| Literature DB >> 35445375 |
Deivis Nicolas Guzman-Tordecilla1, Diego Lucumi2, Maricel Peña3.
Abstract
The prevention of high blood pressure (HBP) is an important public health initiative worldwide, since HBP is the main risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and increases the damage caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We designed, implemented, and evaluated a program to identify effective and sustainable interventions for preventing HBP in a marginalized black population. Our study was conducted in Quibdó, a city in Colombia with the highest poverty rate and located in the Pacific coast, a subregion in Colombia with the highest prevalence of HBP. We followed an intervention mapping framework using a community-based participatory research approach. Focus groups, photovoice, literature reviews, and cross-sectional quantitative surveys were used for data collection. The community chose the time, place, and type of physical activity; led the physical activities; and strengthened their skills in seeking resources in their community to sustain the program. The evaluation was aimed at determining whether the interventions were able to achieve the program's primary aim. We used a before (September 2016) and after (December 2017) design for the evaluation. To decrease the selection bias and allow comparisons between homogeneous groups, we used a propensity score matching technique. The steps required to create a self-sustaining physical activity program were provided in detail. The pre-post test showed a decrease of the HBP (systolic, 13.4% points; p = 0.018; diastolic, 6.5% points; p = 0.002). The program may be an effective and self-sustaining intervention, and it can be replicated by policymakers and implemented in other population groups.Entities:
Keywords: Colombia; Hypertension; Intervention mapping; Physical activity; Prevention; Vulnerable communities
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35445375 PMCID: PMC8800401 DOI: 10.1007/s10935-022-00668-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Prev (2022) ISSN: 2731-5533
Specific objectives, barriers and determinants for the PA program.a
| Specific objectives | Barriers | Determinants |
|---|---|---|
| To identify resources and opportunities for PA | Lack of organization in the community to put strategies in place to identify resources and opportunities to do PA | • Empowerment • Information/knowledge |
| To create collective agreements to facilitate PA | Lack of collective agreements to facilitate PA | • Social norms • Critical thinking |
| To work on logistics in the neighborhood to incentivize PA | Lack of knowledge about the needed logistics to implement a PA program | • Information/knowledge • Empowerment • Environment |
| To involve natural social support networks to advertise and do PA | Lack of knowledge about strategies that would allow social support to incentivize PA | • Social Support |
| To develop and strengthen motor, emotional, cognitive and social skills to do PA | Lack of knowledge and/or lack of abilities to do PA | • Information/knowledge • Behavior ´s capacity (knowledge of the behavior and ability for its execution) |
| To modify beliefs that limit the execution of PA | Wrong beliefs such as PA can only be executed in specific places in the city; they also seemed to believe that they could not lead a PA program as that was a Government duty or that they didn’t have enough resources to lead and execute such programs, among others | • Information/knowledge • Self- efficiency Popular beliefs • Motivation to achieve (To determine subjective norm) |
aOn this matrix we show the specific objective for the program, the barriers to achieve said objectives and the behavior ´s determinants linked to the barriers
Behavior change techniques used in the theoretical-mapped determinants for the PA programa
• Increase skills: problem solving, decision making and goal setting • Practice of relevant skills • Homework • Perform the behavior in several sections • Self-monitoring • Varied tasks, starting with easy tasks • Copy of skills • Feedback • Rewards (encourage self-evaluation) • Persuasive communication • Customized message • Rewards, incentives (encourage self-evaluation) • Organizational development • Create specific goals or targets | • Information with respect • Planning and implementation • Decision making • Contract • Social process of stimulation, pressure and support • Modeling • Organizational development • Environmental change (to define objectives that facilitate behavior) • Social process of motivation, pressure and support • Monitoring • Self-monitoring • Information regarding behaviour and results |
aList of behavior change techniques selected from the taxonomy of Abraham and Michie in 2008 and Michie et al. in 2008 for the theoretical determinants of behavior mapped to the program
Fig. 1Logo of the physical activity program. (Note: A contest was held among community members to select a logo and name for the program. The winning logo and name were selected by external guests and the community’s popular vote in September 2016)
Example of change matrix of PA program for Prevention of high Blood Pressure
| Specific objectives | Barriers | Determinants | Intervention levels | Techniques | Strategies | Components |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To recognize resources and opportunities for the PA workout to take place | Lack of community organization or strategies focused on identification of resources and opportunities to carry out PA | Empowerment | Community | Organizational development To design specific aims | Conformation of a coalition, where to create a team that would be held responsible for the functioning and sustainability of the program (administrative and community promoters) | Community organization |
| Knowledge/Information | Intrapersonal | Information with respect | Discussion of potential resources for the development of the PA program with the community | Educational | ||
| Empowerment | Community | Planning and implementation Decision making Contract | Identification of specific places where the workout could take place Creation of communal savings where those who attended the workout would contribute with a voluntary sum. | Community organization Environmental |
Change on the blood pressure, pre-post evaluation results
| Variable | Coefficient | Standard error |
| CI 95% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic blood pressure | − 0.134 | 5.66 | 0.018 | − 0.2451 − 0.0232 |
| Diastolic blood pressure | − 0.065 | 2.10 | 0.002 | − 0.1068 − 0.0244 |
Note: The covariates of the PSM models were age, sex, body mass index and abdominal circumference. CI: Confidence interval