Literature DB >> 18394692

Randomized trial of a clinic-based, community-supported, lifestyle intervention to improve physical activity and diet: the North Carolina enhanced WISEWOMAN project.

Thomas C Keyserling1, Carmen D Samuel Hodge, Stephanie B Jilcott, Larry F Johnston, Beverly A Garcia, Ziya Gizlice, Myron D Gross, Carla E Saviñon, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Julie C Will, Rosanne P Farris, Stewart Trost, Alice S Ammerman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a clinic-based behavioral intervention program for low-income mid-life women that emphasizes use of community resources will increase moderate intensity physical activity (PA) and improve dietary intake.
METHODS: Randomized trial conducted from May 2003 to December 2004 at one community health center in Wilmington, NC. A total of 236 women, ages 40-64, were randomized to receive an Enhanced Intervention (EI) or Minimal Intervention (MI). The EI consisted of an intensive phase (6 months) including 2 individual counseling sessions, 3 group sessions, and 3 phone calls from a peer counselor followed by a maintenance phase (6 months) including 1 individual counseling session and 7 monthly peer counselor calls. Both phases included efforts to increase participants' use of community resources that promote positive lifestyle change. The MI consisted of a one-time mailing of pamphlets on diet and PA. Outcomes, measured at 6 and 12 months, included the comparison of moderate intensity PA between study groups as assessed by accelerometer (primary outcome) and questionnaire, and dietary intake assessed by questionnaire and serum carotenoids (6 months only).
RESULTS: For accelerometer outcomes, follow-up was 75% at 6 months and 73% at 12 months. Though moderate intensity PA increased in the EI and decreased in the MI, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (p=0.45; multivariate model, p=0.08); however, moderate intensity PA assessed by questionnaire (92% follow-up at 6 months and 75% at 12 months) was greater in the EI (p=0.01; multivariate model, p=0.001). For dietary outcomes, follow-up was 90% for questionnaire and 92% for serum carotenoids at 6 months and 74% for questionnaire at 12 months. Dietary intake improved more in the EI compared to the MI (questionnaire at 6 and 12 months, p<0.001; serum carotenoid index, p=0.05; multivariate model, p=0.03).
CONCLUSION: The EI did not improve objectively measured PA, but was associated with improved self-reported and objective measures of dietary intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18394692     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  37 in total

1.  The effectiveness of a motivational interviewing primary-care based intervention on physical activity and predictors of change in a disadvantaged community.

Authors:  Sarah Hardcastle; Nicola Blake; Martin S Hagger
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-04-05

2.  Objective light-intensity physical activity associations with rated health in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew P Buman; Eric B Hekler; William L Haskell; Leslie Pruitt; Terry L Conway; Kelli L Cain; James F Sallis; Brian E Saelens; Lawrence D Frank; Abby C King
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Accelerometer use in a physical activity intervention trial.

Authors:  Melissa A Napolitano; Kelley E Borradaile; Beth A Lewis; Jessica A Whiteley; Jaime L Longval; Alfred F Parisi; Anna E Albrecht; Christopher N Sciamanna; John M Jakicic; George D Papandonatos; Bess H Marcus
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Heart Healthy and Ethnically Relevant (HHER) Lifestyle trial for improving diet and physical activity in underserved African American women.

Authors:  Deborah Parra-Medina; Sara Wilcox; Dawn K Wilson; Cheryl L Addy; Gwen Felton; Mary Beth Poston
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  When it comes to lifestyle recommendations, more is sometimes less: a meta-analysis of theoretical assumptions underlying the effectiveness of interventions promoting multiple behavior domain change.

Authors:  Kristina Wilson; Ibrahim Senay; Marta Durantini; Flor Sánchez; Michael Hennessy; Bonnie Spring; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  A Scoping Review of Positive Lifestyle and Wellness Interventions to Inform the Development of a Comprehensive Health Promotion Program: "HealthPro".

Authors:  Stephanie A P Schuette; Evelyn Cordero; Katherine Slosburg; Elizabeth L Addington; David Victorson
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2017-05-05

7.  A Review of Multiple Health Behavior Change Interventions for Primary Prevention.

Authors:  Judith J Prochaska; James O Prochaska
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2011-05

8.  A comparison of live counseling with a web-based lifestyle and medication intervention to reduce coronary heart disease risk: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Thomas C Keyserling; Stacey L Sheridan; Lindy B Draeger; Eric A Finkelstein; Ziya Gizlice; Eliza Kruger; Larry F Johnston; Philip D Sloane; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Kelly R Evenson; Myron D Gross; Katrina E Donahue; Michael P Pignone; Maihan B Vu; Erika A Steinbacher; Bryan J Weiner; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Alice S Ammerman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  A community assessment to inform a multilevel intervention to reduce cardiovascular disease risk and risk disparities in a rural community.

Authors:  Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts; Maihan B Vu; Beverly A Garcia; Jared T McGuirt; Danielle Braxton; Constance E Hengel; Joey V Huff; Thomas C Keyserling; Alice S Ammerman
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun

Review 10.  Community-based cardiovascular health interventions in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benita Walton-Moss; Laura Samuel; Tam H Nguyen; Yvonne Commodore-Mensah; Matthew J Hayat; Sarah L Szanton
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.