Literature DB >> 35445335

The effect of prolonged laser activation on irrigation fluid temperature: an in vitro experimental study.

Arman Tsaturyan1, Angelis Peteinaris2, Lampros Pantazis2, Ergina Farsari3, Konstantinos Pagonis2, Constantinos Adamou2, Athanasios Vagionis2, Anastasios Natsos2, Evangelos Liatsikos2,4,5, Panagiotis Kallidonis2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of prolonged laser activation on irrigation fluid temperature by varying the power settings flow rate (10-30 ml/min).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experimental study using a 20 ml syringe, 12/14 ureteral access sheath, a dual-lumen catheter and a thermocouple was performed. The laser was fired with 12 W (0.3 J × 40 Hz), 40 W (1 J × 40 Hz), 60 W (1.5 J × 40 Hz) using Quanta Ho 150 W (Quanta System, Samarate, Italy). All trials were performed with fluid outflow rate of 10, 20 and 30 ml/min with the fixed fluid volume at 10 ml.
RESULTS: Continuous laser activation for 10 min with the outflow rate of 10 ml/min using only 12 W resulted to continuous temperature rise to as high as 83 °C. Similar rise of temperatures were observed for 40 W and 60 W with 10 ml/min outflow rate with intermittent laser activation. With 20 and 30 ml/min outflow rates the maximum temperatures for all power settings were below the threshold (< 43 °C). However, the time to reach the same total emitted energy was 60% and 40% shorter 60 W and 40 W, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our study found that continuous laser activation with as less as 12 W using 10 ml/min outflow rate increased the irrigation fluid temperature above the threshold only after 1 min. In the current experimental setup, with the fluid outflow rate of 20 and 30 ml/min safe laser activation with 60 W and 40 W (temperature < 43 °C) can be achieved reaching the same total emitted energy as with 12 W in significantly shorter time period.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dusting; High-power lithotripsy; Holmium YAG laser; In vitro study; Irrigation fluid temperature

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35445335     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04000-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  19 in total

Review 1.  EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Caliceal Fluid Temperature During High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in an In Vivo Porcine Model.

Authors:  Ali H Aldoukhi; Timothy L Hall; Khurshid R Ghani; Adam D Maxwell; Brian MacConaghy; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Simulation of Laser Lithotripsy-Induced Heating in the Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Brian MacConaghy; Jonathan D Harper; Ali H Aldoukhi; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Effect of Laser Settings and Irrigation Rates on Ureteral Temperature During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy, an In Vitro Model.

Authors:  Daniel A Wollin; Evan C Carlos; Westin R Tom; W Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Thermal Response to High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Ali H Aldoukhi; Khurshid R Ghani; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Temperature changes during laser lithotripsy with Ho:YAG laser and novel Tm-fiber laser: a comparative in-vitro study.

Authors:  Mark Taratkin; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Nirmish Singla; Vasily Kozlov; Abdusalam Abdusalamov; Stanislav Ali; Svetlana Gabdullina; Tatyana Alekseeva; Dmitry Enikeev
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy.

Authors:  S A Sapareto; W C Dewey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Review of Dusting vs Fragmentation with Extraction.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Ben Chew; Brian Eisner; Mitchell Humphreys; Bodo Knudsen; Amy Krambeck; Dirk Lange; Michael Lipkin; Nicole L Miller; Manoj Monga; Vernon Pais; Roger L Sur; Ojas Shah
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Biagio Barone; Felice Crocetto; Raffaele Vitale; Dante Di Domenico; Vincenzo Caputo; Francesco Romano; Luigi De Luca; Maida Bada; Ciro Imbimbo; Domenico Prezioso
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.720

10.  Patterns of Laser Activation During Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Effects on Caliceal Fluid Temperature and Thermal Dose.

Authors:  Ali H Aldoukhi; Julie J Dau; Sami E Majdalany; Timothy L Hall; Khurshid R Ghani; John M Hollingsworth; Sapan N Ambani; Casey A Dauw; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.