Literature DB >> 29905092

Caliceal Fluid Temperature During High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in an In Vivo Porcine Model.

Ali H Aldoukhi1, Timothy L Hall2, Khurshid R Ghani1, Adam D Maxwell3, Brian MacConaghy4, William W Roberts1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With increasing use of high-power laser settings for lithotripsy, the potential exists to induce thermal tissue damage. In vitro studies have demonstrated that temperature elevation sufficient to cause thermal tissue damage can occur with certain laser and irrigation settings. The objective of this pilot study was to measure caliceal fluid temperature during high-power laser lithotripsy in an in vivo porcine model.
METHODS: Four female pigs (30-35 kg) were placed under general anesthesia and positioned supine. Retrograde ureteroscopy with entry into upper or middle calices was performed. Thermocouples were placed into the calix by open exposure and puncture of the kidney or retrograde alongside the ureteroscope. A 242 μm laser fiber was positioned in the center of the calix and activated (0.5 J, 80 Hz, 40 W) for 60 seconds with high, medium, or no irrigation delivered in each trial. Finite element simulations of laser-induced heating in a renal calix were also performed.
RESULTS: Peak temperatures of 84.8°C, 63.9°C, and 43.6°C were recorded for no, medium, and high irrigation, respectively. Mean time to reach threshold of thermal injury (t43 of 120 minutes) was 12.7 and 17.8 seconds for no and medium irrigation. Thermal damage thresholds were not reached in high-irrigation trials. Numerical simulations revealed similar results with peak spatial average fluid temperatures of >100°C, 58.5°C, and 37.5°C during 60 seconds of laser activation for 0.1, 15, and 40 mL/minute irrigation, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: High-power holmium laser settings (40 W) can induce potentially injurious temperatures in the porcine in vivo model, particularly with slower irrigation rates. Characterization of thermal dose across a broader range of laser parameter settings is underway to map out the thermal safety envelope.

Entities:  

Keywords:  holmium laser; in vivo; lithotripsy; temperature; ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29905092      PMCID: PMC6096348          DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  13 in total

1.  Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths.

Authors:  Jamil Rehman; Manoj Monga; Jaime Landman; David I Lee; Tamer Felfela; Marius C Conradie; Rajamahanty Srinivas; Chandru P Sundaram; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm.

Authors:  H H PENNES
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1948-08       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Percutaneous radiofrequency tissue ablation: does perfusion-mediated tissue cooling limit coagulation necrosis?

Authors:  S N Goldberg; P F Hahn; K K Tanabe; P R Mueller; W Schima; C A Athanasoulis; C C Compton; L Solbiati; G S Gazelle
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Influence of saline on temperature profile of laser lithotripsy activation.

Authors:  Wilson R Molina; Igor N Silva; Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; Diedra Gustafson; David Sehrt; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Effect of Laser Settings and Irrigation Rates on Ureteral Temperature During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy, an In Vitro Model.

Authors:  Daniel A Wollin; Evan C Carlos; Westin R Tom; W Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy.

Authors:  S A Sapareto; W C Dewey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Contemporary Practice Patterns of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treating Renal Stones: Results of a Worldwide Survey.

Authors:  Casey A Dauw; Laika Simeon; Abdulrahman F Alruwaily; Francesco Sanguedolce; John M Hollingsworth; William W Roberts; Gary J Faerber; J Stuart Wolf; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation.

Authors:  Brian K Auge; Paul K Pietrow; Costas D Lallas; Ganesh V Raj; Robert W Santa-Cruz; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Temperature Changes Inside the Kidney: What Happens During Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet Laser Usage?

Authors:  Salvatore Butticè; Tarik Emre Sener; Silvia Proietti; Laurian Dragos; Tzevat Tefik; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 10.  Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the New Stone Age: Dust or Bust?

Authors:  Ali H Aldoukhi; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-09-29
View more
  26 in total

1.  Thermal effects of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in an ex vivo porcine kidney model.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Ralf Petzold; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Philippe-Fabian Müller; Martin Schoenthaler; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser induced lithotripsy: in-vitro investigations on fragmentation, dusting, propulsion and fluorescence.

Authors:  Maximilian Eisel; Stephan Ströbl; Thomas Pongratz; Frank Strittmatter; Ronald Sroka
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Simulation of Laser Lithotripsy-Induced Heating in the Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Brian MacConaghy; Jonathan D Harper; Ali H Aldoukhi; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Temperature profiles of calyceal irrigation fluids during flexible ureteroscopic Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jingfei Teng; Yi Wang; Zhuomin Jia; Yawei Guan; Weiwei Fei; Xing Ai
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  [Role of pressure and temperature in ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy : Pressure and temperature changes during stone treatment].

Authors:  F Strittmatter; M J Bader
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  The effect of prolonged laser activation on irrigation fluid temperature: an in vitro experimental study.

Authors:  Arman Tsaturyan; Angelis Peteinaris; Lampros Pantazis; Ergina Farsari; Konstantinos Pagonis; Constantinos Adamou; Athanasios Vagionis; Anastasios Natsos; Evangelos Liatsikos; Panagiotis Kallidonis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  How do we assess the efficacy of Ho:YAG low-power laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper tract urinary stones? Introducing the Joules/mm3 and laser activity concepts.

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Felipe Pauchard; Antonio Rebello Horta Gorgen; Frédéric Panthier; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  A simulated model for fluid and tissue heating during pediatric laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jonathan S Ellison; Brian MacConaghy; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Vincent De Coninck; Steeve Doizi; Michel Daudon; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs high power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG).

Authors:  Wilson R Molina; Raphael V Carrera; Ben H Chew; Bodo E Knudsen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.