| Literature DB >> 35444276 |
Martin W Breuss1,2,3, Xiaoxu Yang1,2, Johannes C M Schlachetzki4, Danny Antaki1,2, Addison J Lana4, Xin Xu1,2, Changuk Chung1,2, Guoliang Chai1,2, Valentina Stanley1,2, Qiong Song1,2, Traci F Newmeyer1,2, An Nguyen1,2, Sydney O'Brien4, Marten A Hoeksema4, Beibei Cao1,2, Alexi Nott5,6, Jennifer McEvoy-Venneri1,2, Martina P Pasillas4, Scott T Barton7, Brett R Copeland1,2, Shareef Nahas2, Lucitia Van Der Kraan2, Yan Ding2, Christopher K Glass4,8, Joseph G Gleeson9,10.
Abstract
The structure of the human neocortex underlies species-specific traits and reflects intricate developmental programs. Here we sought to reconstruct processes that occur during early development by sampling adult human tissues. We analysed neocortical clones in a post-mortem human brain through a comprehensive assessment of brain somatic mosaicism, acting as neutral lineage recorders1,2. We combined the sampling of 25 distinct anatomic locations with deep whole-genome sequencing in a neurotypical deceased individual and confirmed results with 5 samples collected from each of three additional donors. We identified 259 bona fide mosaic variants from the index case, then deconvolved distinct geographical, cell-type and clade organizations across the brain and other organs. We found that clones derived after the accumulation of 90-200 progenitors in the cerebral cortex tended to respect the midline axis, well before the anterior-posterior or ventral-dorsal axes, representing a secondary hierarchy following the overall patterning of forebrain and hindbrain domains. Clones across neocortically derived cells were consistent with a dual origin from both dorsal and ventral cellular populations, similar to rodents, whereas the microglia lineage appeared distinct from other resident brain cells. Our data provide a comprehensive analysis of brain somatic mosaicism across the neocortex and demonstrate cellular origins and progenitor distribution patterns within the human brain.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35444276 PMCID: PMC9436791 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04602-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 69.504