Literature DB >> 35443033

Mapping the Lay of the Land: Using Interactive Network Analytic Tools for Collaboration in Rural Cancer Prevention and Control.

Bobbi J Carothers1, Peg Allen2, Callie Walsh-Bailey2, Dixie Duncan2, Rebeca Vanderburg Pacheco3, Karen R White4, Debra Jeckstadt5, Edward Tsai6, Ross C Brownson2,6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer mortality rates in the United States are higher in rural than urban areas, especially for colorectal cancer. Modifiable cancer risks (e.g., tobacco use, obesity) are more prevalent among U.S. rural than urban residents. Social network analyses are common, yet rural informal collaborative networks for cancer prevention and control and practitioner uses of network findings are less well understood.
METHODS: In five service areas in rural Missouri and Illinois, we conducted a network survey of informal multisector networks among agencies that address cancer risk (N = 152 individuals). The survey asked about contact, collaborative activities, and referrals. We calculated descriptive network statistics and disseminated network visualizations with rural agencies through infographics and interactive Network Navigator platforms. We also collected feedback on uses of network findings from agency staff (N = 14).
RESULTS: Service areas had more connections (average degree) for exchanging information than for more time-intensive collaborative activities of co-developing and sustaining ongoing services and programs, and co-developing and sharing resources. On average, collaborative activities were not dependent on just a few agencies to bridge gaps to hold networks together. Users found the network images and information useful for identifying gaps, planning which relationships to establish or enhance to strengthen certain collaborative activities and cross-referrals, and showing network strengths to current and potential funders.
CONCLUSIONS: Rural informal cancer prevention and control networks in this study are highly connected and largely decentralized. IMPACT: Disseminating network findings help ensure usefulness to rural health and social service practitioners who address cancer risks. ©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35443033      PMCID: PMC9167755          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.090


  35 in total

Review 1.  Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion.

Authors:  F D Butterfoss; R M Goodman; A Wandersman
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  1993-09

2.  Using organizational network analysis to plan cancer screening programs for vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Rebecca Lobb; Bobbi J Carothers; Aisha K Lofters
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Mojtaba Vaismoradi; Hannele Turunen; Terese Bondas
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 1.857

4.  Disparities in colorectal cancer mortality for rural populations in the United States: Does screening matter?

Authors:  Heather Carmichael; Michelle Cowan; Robert McIntyre; Catherine Velopulos
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Obesity and obesity-related behaviors among rural and urban adults in the USA.

Authors:  Tushar Trivedi; Jihong Liu; Janice Probst; Anwar Merchant; Sonya Jhones; Amy Block Martin
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  The mobilizing action toward community health partnership study: multisector partnerships in US counties with improving health metrics.

Authors:  Susan J Zahner; Thomas R Oliver; Kirstin Q Siemering
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Leading Causes of Death in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Areas- United States, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Ernest Moy; Macarena C Garcia; Brigham Bastian; Lauren M Rossen; Deborah D Ingram; Mark Faul; Greta M Massetti; Cheryll C Thomas; Yuling Hong; Paula W Yoon; Michael F Iademarco
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2017-01-13

8.  Development of a national childhood obesogenic environment index in the United States: differences by region and rurality.

Authors:  Andrew T Kaczynski; Jan M Eberth; Ellen W Stowe; Marilyn E Wende; Angela D Liese; Alexander C McLain; Charity B Breneman; Michele J Josey
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Local networks of community and healthcare organisations: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Wendy Kemper-Koebrugge; Jan Koetsenruijter; Anne Rogers; Miranda Laurant; Michel Wensing
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-07-01

10.  Applying Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Implementation of a Multisector Population Health Collaborative That Uses a Bridging Hub Organization.

Authors:  Aaron L Leppin; Janet M Okamoto; Paige W Organick; Anjali D Thota; Francisco J Barrera-Flores; Mark L Wieland; Rozalina G McCoy; Robert P Bonacci; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-11-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Facilitators of Multisector Collaboration for Delivering Cancer Control Interventions in Rural Communities: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Peg Allen; Callie Walsh-Bailey; Jean Hunleth; Bobbi J Carothers; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.354

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.