Alicia Rey Planells1, Arturo Espinosa Ferao1. 1. Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Química, Campus de Espinardo, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Abstract
High-quality ring strain energy (RSE) data for 1H-unsaturated (CH)2X parent rings, where X is a group 13-16 element, are reported in addition to the 2H-isomers of the pnictogenirene rings. RSE data are obtained from appropriate homosdesmotic reactions and calculated at the DLPNO-CCSD(T)/def2-TZVPP//B3LYP-D3/def2-TZVP(ecp) level. 1H-Tallirene and 1H-plumbirene have unique donor-acceptor structures between an acetylene π(CC) orbital and an empty p orbital of a metallylene subunit (a Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson description) and therefore cannot be described as proper rings but as pseudocyclic structures. Also, 1H-indirene and 1H-oxirene lack ring critical points and constitute borderline cases of pseudorings. 1H-Unsaturated rings exhibit enhanced RSE compared to their saturated homologues. The mechanism of ring strain relaxation by increasing the s character in the lone pair (LP) of group 15-16 elements is remarkable and increases on descending the groups. Furthermore, RSE is affected by the aromatic character of group 13 rings and certain aromatic or antiaromatic character in group 14 or 15-16 rings, respectively, which tend to vanish on descending the group as shown by NICS(1) values. 2H-Unsaturated rings were found only for group 15 elements (although only 2H-azirine shows a proper cyclic structure) and displayed lower RSE (higher stability) than the corresponding 1H-isomers.
High-quality ring strain energy (RSE) data for 1H-unsaturated (CH)2X parent rings, where X is a group 13-16 element, are reported in addition to the 2H-isomers of the pnictogenirene rings. RSE data are obtained from appropriate homosdesmotic reactions and calculated at the DLPNO-CCSD(T)/def2-TZVPP//B3LYP-D3/def2-TZVP(ecp) level. 1H-Tallirene and 1H-plumbirene have unique donor-acceptor structures between an acetylene π(CC) orbital and an empty p orbital of a metallylene subunit (a Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson description) and therefore cannot be described as proper rings but as pseudocyclic structures. Also, 1H-indirene and 1H-oxirene lack ring critical points and constitute borderline cases of pseudorings. 1H-Unsaturated rings exhibit enhanced RSE compared to their saturated homologues. The mechanism of ring strain relaxation by increasing the s character in the lone pair (LP) of group 15-16 elements is remarkable and increases on descending the groups. Furthermore, RSE is affected by the aromatic character of group 13 rings and certain aromatic or antiaromatic character in group 14 or 15-16 rings, respectively, which tend to vanish on descending the group as shown by NICS(1) values. 2H-Unsaturated rings were found only for group 15 elements (although only 2H-azirine shows a proper cyclic structure) and displayed lower RSE (higher stability) than the corresponding 1H-isomers.
The chemistry of unsaturated
three-membered heterocycles has been
an important field of study for theoreticians and experimentalists
for decades. Their peculiar geometrical characteristics lie in their
inherent high ring strain and the presence of unsaturated bonds and
heteroatoms, which introduce (de)stabilizing factors such as lone
pair repulsion, σ-aromaticity, delocalization, and rehybridization.[1] They are also a source of starting materials
for the synthesis of a wide range of other more complex substances.
For instance, the versatile cyclopropene is used as a reagent in the
well-known Diels–Alder reactions[2] or in its chiral version to produce enantiomerically enriched methylene-
and alkylidenecyclopropane derivatives.[3] Also, 2H-azirine is an important intermediate for
the preparation of acyclic amino compounds[4] and substituted aziridines,[5] among other
important reactions. And dimerization of borirene leads to 1,4-diboracyclohexadiene.[6]In the study of three-membered unsaturated
heterocycles containing
(at least) a group 13–16 heteroatom, the essential concept
of aromaticity (or antiaromaticity in case) in chemistry comes into
play.[7] Numerous studies are reported in
the literature that try to elucidate how this condition affects the
geometrical and electronic aspects of this type of rings. Although
the combination of acetylene and silylene was suggested to be an appropriate
way of describing silacyclopropane (silirane), the stability exhibited
when successfully synthesized by Seyferth in 1972[8] hinted at considering that its unsaturated version, silacyclopropene
(1H-silirene), might also be stable due to some predicted
aromatic character,[9] as a few years later
demonstrated by the synthesis of the tetramethyl-1-silacycloprop-2-ene
derivative by Conlin et al.[10] The heavier
analogues 1H-germirenes were reported to be stable
species,[11] and a high ring strain energy
(RSE) of 44.4 and 47.6 kcal/mol were computed for the parent and 1-bromo-substituted
rings,[12] respectively, whereas a somewhat
lower strain was obtained for the corresponding 1H-silirene (RSE = 40.6 and 42.0 kcal/mol, respectively). On the other
hand, the rather unstable 1H-thiirene was the first
formally antiaromatic (4π electron) heterocycle prepared,[13] which tries to alleviate this destabilization
by lengthening the C–S bonds and shortening the C=C
bond. No less interesting is 1H-oxirene, which has
given rise to considerable controversy as to whether the C2-symmetric structure exists as a local
minimum or a saddle point energy between two degenerated low-symmetry
(C) minima, which greatly
turned out to depend on the computational level used.[14] However, it seems unanimous that its derivative dimethyloxirene
does constitute a high-symmetry (C2) energy minimum.[15] As for the antiaromatic
pnictogens group, the three-membered N- and P-containing unsaturated
rings constitute exciting fields in heterocyclic chemistry. The chemistry
of aziridines and azirines has been a tremendously exploited field
since the review of Padwa and Woolhouse.[16] Two types of azirines can be formed, namely, 1H-azirine and 2H-azirine, both exhibiting unique
reactivity such as the ability to act as either nucleophile or electrophile,[17] as well as the possibility of being used as
precursors to more complex N-containing molecules.[4] Their structures have been well studied recently.[18] A 2H-azirine is the highly
strained key intermediate in the Neber rearrangement that transforms
ketoximes into α-amino-ketones.[19] In contrast, the development of the chemistry of three-membered
P-containing rings was somewhat delayed, starting with Wagner’s
discovery of phosphirane in 1963.[20] A few
years later, 1H-phosphirene and 2H-phosphirene were discovered by Mathey[21] and Regitz,[22] respectively, both fields
growing rapidly to become key building blocks in organophosphorus
chemistry.[23] But it is not all about antiaromaticity:
in 1998, the remarkable stability of 2π-electron aromatic 1H-borirene was reported to be the most stable isomer of
BC2H3, in contrast to its aluminum counterpart,
which highlights the ability of the B atom to form stable rings.[24]In the present work, high-quality benchmark
RSE (ring strain energy)
data are reported for parent (CH)2X rings, where X is a
group 13–16 element (Figure ), with its most characteristic covalency (3, 4, 3,
and 2 for groups 13–16, respectively) completed by bonds with
H, and is designated as 1 (“El” refers to the heavy element of group X). In addition,
a discussion of possible factors affecting the ring strain as well
as (anti)aromaticity in each case is presented. The 2H-isomers 2 were also studied, although only those with
pnictogen atoms were found as stable species.
Figure 1
1H-
(1) and 2H-unsaturated
(2) three-membered heterocycles studied.
1H-
(1) and 2H-unsaturated
(2) three-membered heterocycles studied.
Results and Discussion
1H-Unsaturated Ring Structures, 1
The main geometrical parameters for all computed
(see the Experimental Section) energy minima
of rings 1 (Figure ) were collected (Table ) to obtain an appropriate
description of
their structures.
Table 1
Calculated (B3LYP-D3/def2-TZVPecp)
C=C Bond Distances (Å) and C–X–C Bond Angles
(Degrees, in Parentheses) for Compounds 1
group 13
group
14
group 15
group 16
B 1.346
(54.6)
C 1.287 (50.6)
N 1.269 (49.5)
O 1.269 (48.0)
Al 1.369 (43.3)
Si 1.330 (43.1)
P 1.292 (41.1)
S 1.271 (40.1)
Ga 1.356 (41.8)
Ge 1.319 (40.1)
As 1.287 (37.8)
Se 1.268
(36.8)
In 1.330 (36.1)
Sn 1.320 (36.3)
Sb 1.287
(34.3)
Te 1.267 (33.4)
Tl 1.201 (22.2)
Pb 1.203
(23.7)
Bi 1.280 (32.4)
Po 1.261 (31.5)
The C=C bond distance maintains a general tendency
to decrease
on moving right within the row, probably due to the increasing electronegativity
of the heteroatom, as also observed for the fully saturated counterparts
and tested on simple acyclic X–CH2–CH2–X model species (X = BH2, CH3, NH2, OH).[25] On descending
within the same group, the C=C bond distance decreases regularly,
reaching limiting values (also very acute C–X–C bond
angles) for rings containing heteroatoms with the highest metallic
character Tl and Pb. Thus, 1 (1H-thallirene) and 1 (1H-plumbirene) present a pseudocyclic structure
(designated with the asterisk) according to the Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson
(DCD) model,[26] where the HCCH moiety displays
a high triple-bond (acetylene) character (WBI = 2.936 and 2.868 for 1 and 1, respectively). Hence, these pseudorings are better
described by a dative bonding from a filled π(C≡C) orbital
in an acetylene subunit to an empty p atomic orbital (AO) in the X
(TlH or PbH2) subunit (Figure ). The energies corresponding to this interaction,
obtained from the second-order perturbation theory (SOPT) of the Fock
matrix in the natural bond orbital (NBO) basis, for pseudo-thallirene
and -plumbirene are 6.28 and 22.84 kcal/mol, respectively. Atoms-in-molecules
(AIM) analysis[27] also supports this description
by lacking a ring critical point (RCP) and attributing a single bond
critical point (BCP) between the organic and metallic fragments (see Figures and S1). This different behavior exhibited by 1 and 1 could be attributed to the well-known inert pair
effect, typical for this type of post-transition-metal elements, which
affects the tendency of the pair of the outermost s electrons not
to be shared, making more favorable a structure with DCD-type interaction
between two subunits.
Figure 2
Sketched representation of DCD interaction (a) and computed
(B3LYP/def2-TZVPPecp)
structure with BCP (small green spheres), nuclear nonattractive critical
points (NNACP, small pink spheres), and bond paths (b) for pseudo-plumbirene
(1).
Sketched representation of DCD interaction (a) and computed
(B3LYP/def2-TZVPPecp)
structure with BCP (small green spheres), nuclear nonattractive critical
points (NNACP, small pink spheres), and bond paths (b) for pseudo-plumbirene
(1).1H-Indirene (1) represents a borderline case as it does not show a typical
DCD structure due to the double C–C bond character (Table ) (WBI = 2.028; natural
localized molecular orbitals NLMO-BO = 2.007), but it can be categorized
as a pseudocycle as it lacks RCP, only displaying one BCP at the shorter
C–In bond (2.063 Å) and being the other slightly elongated
(2.210 Å) (see the Supporting Information).On the other hand, for the controversial oxirene 1 geometry (vide supra),
it was found that at the MP2(FU)/6-31G(d) level or using GGA functionals
(BLYP, BP91, PBE, HCTH, HCTH147, and HCTH407), with various double-
and triple-ζ quality basis sets with a variety of extra polarization
functions, the C2-symmetric 1 constitutes a transition state
(TS) between two degenerate low-symmetry (C) minima, whereas at the HF/6-31G(d) level, C2-1 is a true minimum; for hybrid functionals (B3LYP,
B3P91, PBE0, B97, B97-1, and B3P86), a disparity of results was obtained.[28] We have obtained similar results with the PBEh-3c[29] functional to those with HF calculations. At
the working level of theory used for optimizations throughout the
current study (see the Computational Details section), oxirene 1 has a C symmetry distorted structure with long (C1–O 1.673 Å) and short (C2–O 1.376 Å)
bonds, interconverting through a very low-lying C2-symmetric TS (ΔΔEZPE‡ = 0.28 kcal/mol). The
weak and long C1–O bond is due to the fact that
it is formed involving two almost pure p AO at carbon (94.3% p) and
oxygen (96.6% p), as shown in the highest occupied molecular orbital
(HOMO) – 1 isosurface, with HOMO and lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital (LUMO) displaying π*(C–O) and π*(C–C)
character, respectively (Figure ). However, oxirene lacks a ring critical point (RCP)
therefore being categorized as a pseudocyclic structure.
Figure 3
Computed (B3LYP-D3/def2-TZVP)
Kohn–Sham isosurfaces (0.07
au) for (a) HOMO – 1, (b) HOMO, and (c) LUMO of pseudo-oxirene
(1).
Computed (B3LYP-D3/def2-TZVP)
Kohn–Sham isosurfaces (0.07
au) for (a) HOMO – 1, (b) HOMO, and (c) LUMO of pseudo-oxirene
(1).
Ring Strain Energy Values and Related Parameters for Compounds 1
Ring strain is one of the most remarkable aspects
of small rings as it is closely linked to chemical reactivity and
has been found to affect properties such as the stereochemical stability
of σ3λ3-pnictogen ring atoms.[30] It frames the driving force for a ring to be
transformed into open-chain products.[31] RSEs were calculated using homodesmotic reactions (reaction class
4 or “RC4”), which constitute the penultimate type in
a hierarchy of increasingly accurate processes, due to the conservation
of larger fragments, according to a recent classification and redefinition
of reaction types used in thermochemistry.[32] Good estimates for RSE concerning saturated[25,31,33] and unsaturated[12,34] three-membered heterocycles were obtained according to this type
of thermochemical reaction schemes. The highest ranked hyperhomodesmotic
reactions (reaction class 5 or “RC5”) were skipped because
they have been shown to give rise to very similar RSE data to RC4,[25] but being somewhat problematic in some cases
by introducing undesired noncompensated interactions due to the presence
of longer chains. Therefore, the RSE for unsaturated three-membered
(CH)2X heterocycles with group 13–16 heteroelements 1 was calculated using the RC4 scheme
(Scheme ) and obtained
as the average of the opposite energy (including the zero-point energy
correction) for the three bond cleavage reactions corresponding to
the three endocyclic bond-breaking reactions (one C=C and two
C–X bonds) (Table ). Although in principle, the Z-isomer of
the homodesmotic C–X bond cleavage product should be the most
suitable diastereomer according to its similarity with the endocyclic
C=C bond, it introduces undesirable long-distance steric clashes,
and hence only the E-isomer was used. The introduction
of a C=C double bond in a small 3MR is expected to drastically
increase the ring strain owing to the higher energy that should be
required to compress an acyclic C=C–El bond angle from ca. 120° to the ca. 60° expected
in the three-membered cyclic species, compared to the shorter bond
angle compression required in a saturated C–C–E moiety.
This is long time known since the first report of RSE for cyclopropene
(53.2 kcal/mol)[35]a in 1976,
compared to that of cyclopropane (27.9 kcal/mol).[25]
Scheme 1
Homodesmotic (RC4) Ring-Opening Reactions Used for
the Estimation
of RSE for 1
Table 2
RC4-Derived Calculated (DLPNO-CCSD(T)/def2TZVPPecp)
RSE Values (kcal/mol) for Compounds 1 and 2
1El
2Pn
group
13
group 14
group 15
group 16
group 15
B 31.15 (68.8[36]c)
C 53.97 (53.2,[35]a 55.0,[35]b 55.5,[35]c 54.1,[35]d 55.7,[35]e 54.1,[35]f 54.1,[35]g 56.0[37])
N 71.02 (77.3[37])
Ob 76.10 [71.31]a (74.9,[35]f 82.4[37])
N 41.19
(43.9,[37] 41.9[38])
Al 42.09
Si 41.94 (45.5,[35]b 34.5,[35]cc 49.0[39])
P 38.03 (39.0[37])
S 51.51
Pb 32.57 [31.38]a (34.3[37])
Ga 45.46
Ge 46.62 (44.4[12])
As 35.89
Se 45.25
Asb 32.73 [32.95]a
Inb 46.22 [46.29]a
Sn 45.01
Sb 30.95
Te 38.15
Sbb 30.91 [29.71]a
Bi 26.92
Po 33.17
Bib 28.12 [28.11]a
Values calculated
at the CASSCF(n,6)/MRACPF/def2-SVPD level are presented
in square brackets
(see the Supporting Information for the
specific number of active orbitals used, n).
Pseudocyclic structures.
See text.
Values calculated
at the CASSCF(n,6)/MRACPF/def2-SVPD level are presented
in square brackets
(see the Supporting Information for the
specific number of active orbitals used, n).Pseudocyclic structures.See text.Data collected in Table are in reasonable agreement with previously
reported RSE
data that were obtained using different computational levels and,
in most cases, lower-quality thermochemical equations (e.g., isodesmic reactions). Worth is mentioning the erroneously reported
value of 34.5 kcal/mol for the RSE of 1, which was referenced to a publication where this was not
mentioned.[35]c On the other hand,
the extremely high RSE value reported for the 1H-borirene 1 ring is based on the wrong assumption
that an increase from the saturated counterpart borirane (reported
RSE = 43.7 kcal/mol) could be estimated from the RSE difference (ΔRSE = 24.8 kcal/mol) between cyclopropene (1) and cyclopropane.[36]For those (pseudo)rings with a diagnostic T1, a parameter
widely
used to evaluate the multi- or single-reference character, close to
0.02 (no ring or pseudo-ring exceeds this value). the multireference
RSE value has been calculated by selecting the appropriate number
of n electrons and m active orbitals
(Table S3) to analyze possible differences
between the two methods. The lowest values of single-reference contribution
are shown for 1H-unsaturated 1 (76.2%) and 1 (80.6%) both with the highest diagnostic value T1 (0.02), although
the RSE values for the two methods are quite similar for 1 (despite having considerable multireference
character). The pseudo-ring 1 has a marked multireference character (of almost 20%), and this
is reflected in a difference of about 5 kcal/mol between the two calculation
methods.As described in the previous section, the pseudocyclic
oxirene
ring 1 lacks an RCP and exhibits
an extremely high RSE value (that should be taken with caution), paralleling
the high exothermicity of its low barrier (ΔEZPE‡ = 3.63 kcal/mol) isomerization
to ketene (ΔEZPE = −77.57
kcal/mol; reported: −80.02 kcal/mol[40]). Despite the similar high RSE value of 1H-azirine, 1, its proper cyclic structure is
supported by the existence of BCPs for every endocyclic bond (see Table S1), as well as an RCP (Figure ) with a high value of Lagrange
kinetic energy density per electron G(r)/ρ(r) (see Table S1), which have been shown to correlate with RSE.[41] Moreover, calculation of the relaxed force constant,[42] a numerically stable and fully transferable
parameter related to the stiffness of bond lengths or bond angles,
reveals that the C–C–El bond angle of pseudocyclic 1 (k0 = 0.124 mdyn·Å) is below one-tenth of that for 1 (k0 = 1.572
mdyn·Å), which also points to an inherent difference between
pseudocyclic and cyclic characters, respectively.
Figure 4
Computed (B3LYP/def2-TZVPP)
BCP (small green spheres), RCP (small
red sphere), and bond paths for (a) 1 and (b) 1.
Computed (B3LYP/def2-TZVPP)
BCP (small green spheres), RCP (small
red sphere), and bond paths for (a) 1 and (b) 1.Unsaturated rings with heteroatoms belonging to groups 15
and 16
experience the lone pair (LP) s character-enhancing effect on the
RSE (Figure ),[43] in line with the observed behavior of the already
reported homologous saturated rings.[25] This
increase of the LP s character causes the increase in p character
for the AOs used by heteroatom “El” in the endocyclic
C–El bonds, resulting in an sp-type hybridization with n > 3 (i.e., beyond 75%p). As the s character of the LP AO increases on descending
the group, the RSE for the corresponding heterocycle 1 decreases (Figure ). The alternative plot of RSE against the
p character of the AO used by the heteroatom “El” for
its endocyclic C–El bonds, %p(El)C–El, shows
a slightly worse correlation for groups 15 and 16 (R2 = 0.8692 and 0.9826, respectively) (see Figure S4), while for groups 13 and 14, the expected
almost constant p character (around 72 and 81%, respectively) is observed
due to the absence of LPs.
Figure 5
Plot of RSE vs s character
(%) of AO used by pnictogen
and chalcogen heteroatoms “El” lone pairs (LPs) in 1.
Plot of RSE vs s character
(%) of AO used by pnictogen
and chalcogen heteroatoms “El” lone pairs (LPs) in 1.Also, the relaxed force constants k0 computed for C–El bonds in heterocycles
with heaviest group
13–16 elements 1 parallels
the behavior of RSE, as k0C–El decreases (bond elasticity increases) with the increase of %p(El)C–El (Figure S2). The lighter
elements (except C) fall out of the correlation, exhibiting unexpectedly
low (for N and O) or high (for B) k0C–El values. For groups 13 and 14, the C–El bond
stiffness is higher than for groups 15 and 16, and its decrease on
moving down the group is much more pronounced. In the case of 1 and 1, both %p(El)C–El and k0C–EI are averaged values for the two different
C–El bonds in the pseudo-ring. Furthermore, due to the orthogonality
of p AOs, an increase of p character should move the electron density
of the σ(C–El) bond out of the hypothetical C–El
straight bond line. Indeed, bond bending from NHO (natural hybrid
orbital) directionality analysis shows a remarkable correlation between
the deviation angle and the %p(El)C–El, only for
group 15 and 16 elements (Figure S3). The
angular deviation increases on moving down the group, being more pronounced
(higher slope) for chalcogens than for pnictogens. This is indeed
the opposite trend observed for RSE versus %p(El)C–El (Figure S4), which suggests
the easiness of bond bending as a mechanism for relieving the ring
strain. For groups 13 and 14, the %p(El)C–El values
vary within a small range (ca. 70–74 and 79–82%,
respectively) and, again, the angular deviation increases on descending
the group (except for pseudocyclic 1).However, despite the strain-relieving effect of the
LP s character
in group 15–16 unsaturated heterocycles 1, the high RSE values displayed compared to
their saturated counterparts (which represent the least strained rings
within the series), and especially for 1 and 1 (also for 1 and 1), are due to their intrinsic antiaromatic character or the
geometric deformation to partially mitigate this electronic destabilization.
In fact, the observed elongation of the endocyclic C–El bonds
(Table S1) compared to analogous C–El
bonds in acyclic species (taking the homodesmotic ring-opening products
as a reference; see Table S2) is more pronounced
for 1 (9.7%) and 1 (11.6% in average) and decreases significantly
from the third period onwards (1 0.9%; 1 1.2%; 1 1.0; 1 1.4%; 1 5.8; 1 5.3; 1 4.6%; 1 4.6%), in accordance
with the decreased antiaromaticity.Although (anti)aromaticity
is not an observable, several parameters
have been described trying to quantify it from the geometrical, energetic,
and magnetic perspectives.[44] One of the
most widely used parameters is the nucleus-independent chemical shift
(NICS)[45] which allows the aromatic character
to be quantified so that the more negative the NICS value, the higher
the aromatic character. As isotropic NICS values calculated at the
ring centroid are strongly influenced by the σ-contributions,[46] NICS(1) (computed at 1 Å above and below
the ring centroid) are usually employed.[47] The NICS(1) values for 1 were
calculated at the standard B3LYP/6311+G(d,p) level[47] for elements of the second to fourth rows and using the
def2-TZVPP basis set for elements of the fifth and sixth rows. At
first sight, a clear correlation between NICS(1) and RSE is observed
(Figure ), with almost
linear character for elements having (groups 15–16) or not
having LPs (groups 13–14), if 1 and 1 are excluded.
As expected, the most antiaromatic rings are those with the lightest
group 15–16 elements (nitrogen and oxygen) due to the most
efficient overlap of the heteroelements LP with the π(C=C)
orbital. Hence, antiaromaticity considerably decreases on moving down
in groups 15 and 16 and varying almost linearly with RSE. As foreseeable, 1 is the most aromatic ring of all
herein described,[48] therefore showing the
most negative NICS(1) value and entailing a remarkable decrease in
RSE (Figure ). Again,
on descending group 13, the heavier congeners of Al, Ga, and In use
an empty p AO with increasing principal quantum number, which decreases
the efficiency of the overlap with the C=C π-system,
hence decreasing the aromaticity of the corresponding unsaturated
heterocycles 1 and increasing
their RSE.
Figure 6
Plot of RSE vs computed (B3LYP/6311+G(d,p) or
def2-TZVPP) NICS(1) (ppm) for compounds 1. Excluding 1 and 1 from the linear correlation.
Plot of RSE vs computed (B3LYP/6311+G(d,p) or
def2-TZVPP) NICS(1) (ppm) for compounds 1. Excluding 1 and 1 from the linear correlation.As for group 14, it is worth mentioning the remarkable aromatic
character, according to its highly negative NICS(1) value, observed
for the 1 ring (Figure ), which has been explained
in terms of using empty low-lying 3d orbitals of silicon playing a similar role to the positive vacancy
(2p) in the C atom of cyclopropenyl cation.[10] It should also be ascertained that the proposed[10] DCD-type structure for the 1H-silirene ring 1, although
suggested by the HOMO isosurface (Figure S5), must be ruled out, not only on the basis of its geometric features
(Table ) but also
supported by the atoms-in-molecules (AIM) analysis,[27] showing three BCPs for the three endocyclic bonds and an
RCP (Figure ), and
not a single BCP between the hypothetical acetylene and silylene moieties,
as is would be expected for a DCD-type structure. The aforementioned
stabilization by d-orbital participation is supported by the NBO analysis,
indicating ESOPT = 3.88 kcal/mol associated
with an electron transfer from a filled π(C=C) to an
almost empty Si orbital with almost pure (95.9%) d-character. This SOPT energy in 1 (1.24 kcal/mol, 90.7% d-character) and 1 rings (1.10 kcal/mol, 69.5% d-character) decrease due to participation of 4d and 5d
orbitals, respectively, with increasing energy gap, whereas 1 lacks d orbitals, which justifies
its nonaromatic character. However, the origin of the diatropic ring
current (aromaticity) accounting for the observed highly negative
NICS(1) value for 1 can mostly
arise from an energetically more important sacrificial hyperconjugation
effect between the π(C=C) and the two σ*(Si–H)
molecular orbitals, each amounting to ESOPT = 10.64 kcal/mol. The energy of the analogous double SOPT interaction
decreases for the 1 and 1 rings (8.24 and 5.22 kcal/mol
respectively), in line with their lower aromaticity. Similarly, for
groups 15 and 16, whereas 1 and 1 lack d-orbitals, a small yet significant
electron transfer is observed for 1 and 1 from π(C=C)
to empty d-orbitals (82.3 and 60.4% d-character,
respectively), the SOPT interaction amounting to 5.89 and 5.74 kcal/mol,
respectively. This suggests a certain (small) aromatic component,
which has an effect on a decrease of RSE and a more negative NICS(1)
resulting from a small diatropic current. This effect decreases (lower ESOPT) for heavier elements due to the increased
energy gap between the donor π(C=C) orbital and the acceptor
El-centered empty AO with increasingly lower d-character.[49] The reason for the increase in the aromaticity-related
NICS(1) descriptor as one moves down in groups 15 and 16 is not trivial
but could be tentatively explained on the basis of the increasing
size of the heavier atoms, whose inner-shell electrons could give
rise to heteroatom-centered diatropic currents that could interfere
in the overall NICS(1) value. The use of NICS(2) values (computed
2 Å away from the ring centroid) did not provide a clearer picture,
and the same trends were observed when plotted against RSE (see Figure S6), with good linear correlations within
groups and all rings displaying lower negative values than benzene.[47] For group 15 rings, a decrease of sacrificial
hyperconjugation of the π electron density with the σ*(El–H)
molecular orbital on descending the group could also explain the decrease
in aromaticity (ESOPT = 8.54, 6.40, 4.61,
and 3.59 kcal/mol for 1, 1, 1, and 1, respectively).
Figure 7
Computed
(B3LYP/def2-TZVPP) BCP (small green spheres), RCP (small
red sphere), and bond paths for 1.
Computed
(B3LYP/def2-TZVPP) BCP (small green spheres), RCP (small
red sphere), and bond paths for 1.Nevertheless, as a consequence
of the very high energy of the d-orbitals
from the third row onward, the above-described effect of aromatic
components could be negligible in this type of rings[50] and, instead, other substituent-depending hyperconjugation
effects may come into play.RSE may also be related to the strength
of endocyclic bonds. Among
bond-strength-related parameters, the widely used Wiberg bond index
(WBI)[51] as well as the bond order provided
by the Natural Localized Molecular Orbitals (NLMO)[52] analysis (NLMO-BO), less prone to overestimate the covalent
character of the bond,[53] were computed
for all 1 heterocycles. The
representation of the RSE versus both WBI (Figure ) and NLMO-BO (see Figure S7) of the C=C bond show that for
groups 14–16, as the ring strain decreases when moving down
the group, the C=C bond order increases, but without reaching
a value close to a genuine triple-bond character as in the case of
DCD-type pseudorings (WBI/NLMO-BO = 2.934/2.943 and 2.867/2.902 for 1 and 1, respectively). For 1, the WBI for the C=C bond (2.028) is clearly overestimated
compared to the NLMO-BO (1.885), the latter falling out of the linear
correlation of its group (Figure S7) probably
because of its pseudocyclic character. 1H-Silirene 1 is also markedly outside the linear
correlation of group 14 (for both WBI and NLMO-BO), most likely due
to its exceptional aromaticity with respect to the rest of the tetrel-based
unsaturated rings, leading to a decrease in the RSE but without greatly
affecting the strength of the C=C moiety. The most aromatic
ring, 1H-borirene (1), shows the lowest C=C bond orders (WBI = 1.720; NLMO-BO
= 1.873) owing to the effective conjugation of the vacant p orbital
in B to the C=C bond, drastically suppressed in the less aromatic
and more strained 1 and 1 rings (Figure ).
Figure 8
Plot of RSE vs WBIC=C for compounds 1, excluding 1, 1, and 1 from the linear correlation.
Plot of RSE vs WBIC=C for compounds 1, excluding 1, 1, and 1 from the linear correlation.In all, despite the expected large difference in
RSE between 1H-unsaturated 3MRs and their saturated
analogues, this turned
out to be true only for 1. For
the heaviest group 14 elements, this difference becomes less pronounced
because of the aromatic stabilization of the unsaturated rings. By
contrast, the aromatic stabilization of group 13 unsaturated rings
results in a somewhat lower RSE than their saturated counterparts.
In the case of group 15 and 16 heterocycles, the RSE of the unsaturated
rings is much higher than that of their saturated counterparts due
to the additional antiaromaticity destabilization effect.
2H-Unsaturated Three-Membered Rings 2
2H-Unsaturated three-membered heterocycles
(2) were only found as energy
minima for the elements of group 15 (2). The RSE data for these pnictogen-containing rings (Table ) were calculated
using the same type of homodesmotic reaction scheme as for the previously
described rings (Scheme ).
Scheme 2
Homodesmotic (RC4) Ring-Opening Reactions Used for the Estimation
of RSE for 2
However, only the 2H-azirine ring, 2, contains three BCPs corresponding
to the
three endocyclic bonds and a proper RCP (Figure a), while neither BCPs for the single C–El
bond nor RCP were found for the rest of rings with heavier pnictogens.
Taking 2 as a case in point,
the lack of RCP and BCP(P–C) can be observed (Figure b); furthermore, 2 features a very elongated single C–P
bond (1.906 Å) in comparison to the C–P single bond of
the 1H-phosphirene 1 isomer (1.840 Å) or to that in phosphirane (1.876 Å).[25] Consequently, except 2H-azirine
(2), all heavier 2H-pnictogenirenes 2 must be
considered pseudocyclic structures and their computed RSE used with
caution. The analysis of the multireference RSE data calculated for
these pseudorings (Table ) shows that there is no significant difference with the single-reference
(sr) data, even for 2 (84.3%
sr) and 2 (86.5% sr) with
a multireference contribution of about 15%.[54]
Figure 9
Computed
(B3LYP/def2-TZVPP) BCP (small orange spheres) and bond
paths for (a) 2 and (b) 2.
Computed
(B3LYP/def2-TZVPP) BCP (small orange spheres) and bond
paths for (a) 2 and (b) 2.Recently, we have reported on the C=N bond-containing three-membered
ring oxazirine.[34a] The latter could be
considered either as oxa-analogue (replacement of −CH2– by −O−) of 2H-azirine (2), compared to which exhibits a
somewhat enhanced RSE (44.28 kcal/mol), or as aza-analogue (replacement
of =CH– by =N−) of pseudo-1H-oxirene (1), displaying similar
pseudocyclic structure due to the absence of RCP as a consequence
of the elongated N–O bond (with no BCP).It is worth
mentioning the higher stability of the 2H-pnictogenirene
rings 2 compared
to the corresponding 1H-isomers 1, as can be inferred from the variation in RSE
(Table ). This difference
is very pronounced for the N-containing rings (ΔΔEZPE = 29.83 kcal/mol), mainly due to the antiaromatic
character of 1. For heavier
pnictogens, this difference becomes less noticeable (ΔΔEZPE = 5.46, 3.16, 0.04, and −1.20 kcal/mol
for P, As, Sb, and Bi, respectively), probably due to the decrease
of the antiaromatic character.
Experimental
Section
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were
performed with
the ORCA program.[55] All geometry optimizations
were run in redundant internal coordinates in the gas phase, with
tight convergence criteria, and using the B3LYP[56] functional together with Ahlrichs segmented def2-TZVP basis
set[57] and the 2010 Grimme’s semiempirical
atom-pairwise London dispersion correction (DFT-D3).[58] From these geometries, all electronic data were obtained
through single-point calculations (SP) using the same quality basis
set but including additional polarization, def2-TZVPP.[59] Energy values were corrected for the zero-point
vibrational term at the optimization level and obtained by the newly
developed DLPNO method[60] for the “coupled-cluster”
level with single, double, and triple perturbatively introduced excitations
(CCSD(T)).[61] It is worth mentioning that
the RI-JK speeding up approximation for Coulomb and Hartree–Fock
(HF) exchange (in HF step for post-HF calculations) gave rise to anomalous
results for fifth-row elements even when using appropriate auxiliary
basis sets.[25] Therefore, this approach
was skipped for all high-level RSE calculations. T1-Diagnostic values
close to 0.02 prompted us to use dynamic correlation on top of the
CASSCF(n,m) method[62] employing a (6,6) active space for 1 and 1, whereas
(8,6) for 2, 2 and 2, with the multireference average coupled-pair functional (MRACPF)[63] approach and the def2-SVPD basis set.[64] Analysis of the hybridization in the AO used
for the endocyclic bonds was performed with the NBO method.[65] Properties derived from the topological analysis
of the electronic density were obtained with the Multiwfn program,[66] whereas Figures b, 4, 7, and 9 were plotted with AIMall.[67]Figure was drawn with Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD).[68]
Conclusions
Accurate high-level
(DLPNO-CCSD(T)/def2TZVPP//B3LYP-D3/def2TZVP)
values were provided for the ring strain energy (RSE) in unsaturated
three-membered rings containing only one 13–16 group element.
A thorough exploration of the structural and electronic features of
the 1H-unsaturated rings 1 resulted in the classification of those with the
most metallic elements, 1 and 1, as pseudocyclic structures because
of their typical Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson-type bonding
lacking a ring critical point (RCP), 1H-indirene
(1) constituting a borderline
case. At the working level of theory, the controversial C2-symmetric 1H-oxirene, 1, is a transition state (TS) between
two low-symmetry (C) degenerate minima
(1) with pseudocyclic character.
Among the 2H-unsaturated three-membered rings, 2, only found as a minimum for the
pnictogen elements and presenting low RSE compared to the 1 isomers, just 2H-azirine
(2) presents a proper ring structure
(i.e., featuring an RCP).RSE in groups 15
and 16 containing 1H-unsaturated
rings 1 is very much affected
by the strain relaxation effect of the increased s character of one
LP orbital of pnictogens and chalcogens, as already described for
their saturated counterparts. The existence of an empty orbital in
group 13 rings gives them the possibility of presenting a significant
aromatic character, especially in the case of borirene 1. The existence of empty d orbitals in 1H-tetrelirenes, allows their use to acquire some aromaticity,
especially in the case of 1H-silirene 1, while moving down in the group the energy
of these d orbitals increases, hence decreasing this aromatic contribution.
On the other hand, the high antiaromaticity of 1 and 1, partially alleviated by geometric distortion, results in enhanced
RSE. For the heavier group 15 and 16 elements, the antiaromaticity
considerably decreases on descending the group, which together with
the increase in heteroatom size and aromatic and/or hyperconjugative
contributions result in a remarkable RSE decrease.