Kirsten Wentlandt1, Kayla T Wolofsky2, Andrea Weiss1, Lindsay Hurlburt3, Eddy Fan4, Ebru Kaya2, Erin O'Connor5, Warren Lewin1, Cassandra Graham2, Camilla Zimmermann6, Sarina R Isenberg7. 1. Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Departments of Emergency Medicine and Supportive Care, University Health Network, Divisions of Palliative Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 7. Department of Medicine, Bruyère Research Institute; University of Ottawa; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Palliative care is well suited to support patients hospitalized with COVID-19, but integration into care has been variable and generally poor. AIM: To understand barriers and facilitators of palliative care integration for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Internists, Intensivists and palliative care physicians completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences providing care to patients with COVID-19. Results were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-three physicians (13 specialist palliative care, five intensivists, five general internists) were interviewed; mean ± SD age was 42 ± 11 years and 61% were female. Six thematic categories were described including: patient and family factors, palliative care knowledge, primary provider factors, COVID-19 specific factors, palliative care service factors, and leadership and culture factors. Patient and family factors included patient prognosis, characteristics that implied prognosis (i.e., age, etc.), and goals of care. Palliative care knowledge included confidence in primary palliative care skills, misperception that COVID-19 is not a 'palliative diagnosis', and the need to choose quantity or quality of life in COVID-19 management. Primary provider factors included available time, attitude, and reimbursement. COVID-19 specific factors were COVID-19 as an impetus to act, uncertain illness trajectory, treatments and outcomes, and infection control measures. Palliative care service factors were accessibility, adaptability, and previous successful relationships. Leadership and culture factors included government-mandated support, presence at COVID planning tables, and institutional and unit culture. CONCLUSION: The study findings highlight the need for leadership support for formal integrated models of palliative care for patients with COVID-19, a palliative care role in pandemic planning, and educational initiatives with primary palliative care providers.
BACKGROUND: Palliative care is well suited to support patients hospitalized with COVID-19, but integration into care has been variable and generally poor. AIM: To understand barriers and facilitators of palliative care integration for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Internists, Intensivists and palliative care physicians completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences providing care to patients with COVID-19. Results were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-three physicians (13 specialist palliative care, five intensivists, five general internists) were interviewed; mean ± SD age was 42 ± 11 years and 61% were female. Six thematic categories were described including: patient and family factors, palliative care knowledge, primary provider factors, COVID-19 specific factors, palliative care service factors, and leadership and culture factors. Patient and family factors included patient prognosis, characteristics that implied prognosis (i.e., age, etc.), and goals of care. Palliative care knowledge included confidence in primary palliative care skills, misperception that COVID-19 is not a 'palliative diagnosis', and the need to choose quantity or quality of life in COVID-19 management. Primary provider factors included available time, attitude, and reimbursement. COVID-19 specific factors were COVID-19 as an impetus to act, uncertain illness trajectory, treatments and outcomes, and infection control measures. Palliative care service factors were accessibility, adaptability, and previous successful relationships. Leadership and culture factors included government-mandated support, presence at COVID planning tables, and institutional and unit culture. CONCLUSION: The study findings highlight the need for leadership support for formal integrated models of palliative care for patients with COVID-19, a palliative care role in pandemic planning, and educational initiatives with primary palliative care providers.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Palliative care; access to care; barriers; coronavirus; end of life; facilitators; integration; palliative care understanding; pandemic planning; primary palliative care; referral; specialist palliative care
What is already known about the topic?• Palliative care is well suited to support patients hospitalized with COVID-19, but
integration has been variable and generally poor.What this paper adds• Primary palliative care knowledge, patient and family factors, COVID-19 specific
factors, palliative care service characteristics, as well as institutional
leadership and culture affected palliative care integration in the management of
COVID-19.• Many barriers remain centered on a misunderstanding that palliative care is
relevant only for those as end of life, or those with comfort related goals of
care.• Perceived threats of poor availability to specialized palliative care services, as
well as personal protection equipment and medication shortages were not realized by
participants.Implications for practice, theory or policy• Our research indicates the need for high-level support for formal palliative care
integrated models of care, a palliative care role in pandemic planning as well as
the need for ongoing educational initiatives with primary palliative care providers
to overcome barriers of palliative care integration in COVID-19 care.
Introduction
During the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there have been calls to
action by international colleagues to support the palliative care needs of patients
with COVID-19.[1-3] Data to date indicate that
almost 349 million people have contracted COVID-19, with over 5.6 million deaths worldwide,
yet palliative care involvement and its integration into the management of
these patients has been variable and poor in many centres.[5-10] It is unclear why some
centres mobilized their palliative care skills and resources more than
others.[1,10,11]Few studies explore the barriers to palliative care in previous epidemics or
pandemics. These studies based out of Africa and Asia outlined shortages in
equipment, medications and trained healthcare workers as well as poor organization
and coordination of services as the main barriers to accessing palliative care
during a pandemic.[7,12] No studies have evaluated the challenges in integrating
palliative care into the care provided to patients with COVID-19.The aim of this prospective qualitative study is to explore the facilitators and
barriers to palliative care integration in the care of patients with COVID-19. We
describe the perceptions and opinions of intensivists and internists who cared for
patients with COVID-19, as well as those of palliative care specialists to help
understand the challenges of integrating palliative care into COVID-19
management.
Methods
The aim of this study is to describe the facilitators and barriers to palliative care
integration in the care of patients with COVID-19.
Study design
We conducted a qualitative study with physicians that worked in hospitals across
Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study design utilized a postpositivist
framework which recognizes that our participants may have multiple perspectives
rather than a unified single perspective of reality.
This study was approved by the University Health Network Research Ethics
Board (ID: 20-5933).
Setting
We recruited physicians in practice during the COVID-19 pandemic from September
2020 to March 2021 (corresponding to the beginning of Canada’s Wave 2 and the
start of Wave 3 of the pandemic). Our study included intensivists (e.g.,
critical care specialists) and internists (e.g., general internal medicine
specialists) who provided care to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and
specialist palliative care physicians who worked in hospitals caring for
patients with COVID-19 but may or may not have provided direct care for these
patients. All participants practiced medicine in Canada.
Population
Inclusion criteria for this study were: English speaking and being either (1) an
intensivist or internist providing care to patients with COVID-19, or (2) a
specialist palliative care physicians working in a hospital environment
supporting the care of patients with COVID-19. Exclusion criteria included:
non-English speaking physicians that did not provide care in hospitals during
the pandemic as well as intensivists and internists that did not provide care to
patients with COVID-19. Eligible participants were approached and consented
virtually.
Recruitment
To recruit participants, we posted study information on a COVID-19 website hosted
by the Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians, and potential
participants were encouraged to contact the research team. We also employed
snowball sampling, wherein current participants identified potential
participants and reached out to them with the research team’s contact
information or asked them if they preferred the research team to contact
them.
Data collection and measures
Participants completed a demographic questionnaire virtually prior to the
semi-structured, open-ended interview. The interview guide (Appendix 1) was developed with insight and guidance from
clinicians and researchers and then pilot tested with a physician meeting the
inclusion criteria. Questions were designed to gather information on the
participants’ practice and the care provided to patients during the COVID-19
pandemic, including their provision of palliative care and the barriers and
facilitators to the integration of palliative care. The interview guide was
amended after each of the first four interviews. Interviews were conducted and
audio recorded by three researchers (KW, AW, and LH) who did not have a close
relationship with the participants, and subsequently de-identified. All
participants were assigned a unique study ID for data collection and analysis,
and recordings were subsequently transcribed verbatim by a 3rd party company. We
determined we had reached a sufficient sample size by ascertaining the point at
which we reached thematic saturation. As we were collecting data, we were coding
transcripts, and we determined we had hit saturation once no new themes were
identified in the new transcripts.We used thematic analysis to describe participant’s understanding of the barriers
and facilitators of palliative care integration for patients with COVID-19.
Palliative care integration refers to the provision of palliative care (such as
symptom management, goals of care discussions, end of life care, etc.) that
occurs along with other focused medical management (i.e. cancer care, infection
treatment, etc.). As palliative care may have been provided by their current
care team, or by consulting specialists, we explored two concepts: integration
of palliative care via primary palliative care provision (i.e., palliative care
provided by attending internists or intensivists) or via specialized palliative
care provision (i.e., referral to and integration of specialist palliative care teams).
Thus, we looked at the barriers to physicians integrating and providing
palliative care themselves, as well as the barriers to involving specialist
teams to do so.
Data analysis
The coding team (KW, KTW, LH and AW) first reviewed over 50% of the transcripts
and then worked collaboratively to compile a list of high-level concepts
inductively using thematic analysis.[15,16] Once the codebook was
finalized, two team members (KW and KTW) consensus coded all 23 transcripts
using Nvivo (Nvivo Qualitatitve Data Analysis and Software Version 12. 2018).
Themes were further reviewed and refined by team members (KW, KTW, AW, LH, SRI
and CZ).
Results
A total of 23 physicians, including 13 specialists in palliative care, five
intensivists, and five internists were interviewed. Two additional clinicians (one
intensivist and one palliative care physician) also agreed to participate but were
unable to find a convenient time to complete an interview. The participant average
age was 42 years (SD 11) and 61% were female (Table 1). Twenty-one participants were
from the province of Ontario, one from Nova Scotia and another from Quebec.
Participants were employed at 18 unique health care institutions. All intensivist
and internist participants indicated that they had cared for patients with COVID-19
on a general medicine unit, on a dedicated COVID-19 ward, or in an intensive care
setting. All palliative care physicians indicated they worked in a hospital setting,
but 7 of these physicians also provided care in the community and/or on a palliative
care unit or hospice. Two palliative care physicians indicated they did not care for
any patients with COVID-19, and another stated they provided care for patients with
COVID-19 only outside their hospital (in a long-term care home). All intensivists
and internists indicated they provided primary palliative care to their patients
both before and during the pandemic and claimed familiarity with their institutional
specialist palliative care team, had referred patients before, and had positive
relationships with these teams.
Table 1.
Participant Demographics.
Demographics
N (%)
Age (years)
Mean (SD)
42 (11)
Median
37
Gender
Female
14 (61)
Male
9 (39)
Practice
Intensivists
5 (22)
Internists
5 (22)
Specialist Palliative Care Physicians
13 (57)
Years since Training Completion (SD)
11 (13)
Number of patients with COVID-19 seen
Mean (SD) Range
Intensivists
29 (14) 15–50
Internists
32 (12) 20–50
Palliative Specialists
10 (13) 0–50
Note: Several participants had mixed practices but were identified by
their primary practice; 2 Internal Medicine participants also acted as
palliative care consultants, and 1 palliative care specialist also
worked as an intensivist.
Participant Demographics.Note: Several participants had mixed practices but were identified by
their primary practice; 2 Internal Medicine participants also acted as
palliative care consultants, and 1 palliative care specialist also
worked as an intensivist.We identified five main thematic categories that outline the barriers and
facilitators to palliative integration: patient and family factors, palliative care
knowledge, primary provider factors, COVID-19 specific factors, palliative care
service factors, and leadership and culture (Table 2).
Table 2.
Main thematic categories.
Patient and family factors: Participants identified
that the need for palliative care integration into patient care
was often based on prognostic factors (such as age, clinical
status) and patient related goals of care. Patients’ families
were also thought to be a facilitator to integration if family
members were open to palliative care, had unmet psychosocial
needs, or required support around care decisions. Families lack
of openness to palliative care integration was considered to be
a barrier.
Palliative care understanding and skills: The idea
that COVID-19 was not a “palliative diagnosis” was identified as
a barrier to integration, whereas the presence of a malignancy
(rather than other non-malignant comorbidities) was seen as a
facilitator. It was felt that patients with COVID-19
specifically needed to choose between quantity (i.e. length of
life) or quality of life (i.e. comfort) goals and palliative
care was likely to prioritize comfort and provide optimal
symptom management but there was an understanding that this may
contribute to clinical deterioration and possibly death. The use
of opioids was also seen as an intervention that may interfere
with a patient’s goal to pursue quantity of life, and was
recognized as a common palliative care intervention to support
refractory dyspnea management, thus participants identified this
as a barrier to palliative care integration and referral.
Finally, a provider’s comfort providing primary palliative care
was seen as a facilitator to palliative care but barrier to
palliative care team integration.
Primary provider factors: Providers’ time
availability was seen as both a variable facilitator and
barrier. It was thought that if providers had a lot of time they
were more likely to provide primary palliative care, and less
likely to refer, whereas if there was too little time they might
not have time to prepare a referral, or perhaps would be more
likely to refer because they did not have time to provide care
themselves. A provider’s motivation ‘not to give up’ and
remuneration were both identified as specific barriers.
COVID-19 specific: COVID-19 was thought to be an
impetus for change or to act in some centres; facilitating
palliative care integration. The uncertainty surrounding
COVID-19 illness trajectory, treatments and outcomes was
identified as a barrier as participants felt it was unclear when
a patient would benefit from palliative care. A faster speed of
decline was also felt to be a barrier to palliative care
integration. Infection control measures were seen as a barrier
to the integration of additional care providers and palliative
care referral.
Palliative Care Services: Palliative care team
availability and accessibility influenced referral. Participants
noted increased team adaptability and team readiness supported
their integration into institutional COVID structures and
planning with subsequent care integration. Providers’ prior
successful relationships with palliative care services
encouraged ongoing collaboration.
Leadership and Culture: Providers highlighted that
the presence of government or formal institutional mandates
calling for palliative care involvement in long-term care
supported integration within hospitals. Palliative care
leadership engagement and presence in COVID-19 planning led to
stronger integration and involvement. Institutional and unit
culture, including referral practices, were seen as indicative
of palliative care integration and referral during the
management of patients with COVID-19.
Main thematic categories.
Patient and family factors
Participants indicated that certain patient characteristics, prognosis, as well
as patient goals of care influenced the need for palliative care integration
into their management of COVID-19. These descriptors often implied prognosis and
included patient age, number of comorbidities, and clinical status; with older
patients, those with more comorbidities, poorer clinical status and poorer
prognosis more likely to be deemed appropriate for palliative care integration.
Patients with unclear or comfort-related goals were perceived as more likely to
be provided palliative care. Younger patients, those that were previously
healthy, or had goals in line with intensive care were felt to be less likely to
receive palliative care.I’ve involved palliative care in non-palliative patients [with
COVID-19] for symptom management, but because most . . . families
wanted to be quite aggressive with their goals . . .. I wasn’t sure
what palliative care was going to provide me. Intensivist 5
MalePatients’ families were thought to be a facilitator to integration if family
members were interested or open to palliative care, had clinician-identified
unmet psychosocial needs, or required support around care decisions. Family
members not being open to palliative care was seen as a barrier to referral.I explained to the families. . . I’m. . . involving palliative
care and they freaked out because it means that I’m going to stop
aggressively treating their patients . . . when that’s not in
keeping with what they had envisioned. That’s happened a few times
and the family will say why is palliative care. . . becoming
involved when we’re aggressively treating this pneumonia.
Intensivist 5 Male
Palliative care knowledge: understanding and skills
Participants highlighted that in some cases palliative care was still stigmatized
due to an association with end of life, and that this was seen as a barrier to
palliative care integration into COVID-19 care.There’s a lot of cases where we feel that palliative care
involvement would have been useful and it hadn’t been activated
yet. . . because the patient was . . .fairly new or the family or
the primary MRP (most responsible physician) didn’t feel that the
family was yet ready to have conversations with palliative care
because of the assumed stigma. Intensivist 3 FemaleSome participants felt that COVID-19 was not a ‘palliative diagnosis’, purporting
that COVID-19 was an acute illness, unlike a diagnosis of cancer or other
‘advanced serious illnesses’ or ‘chronic palliative illness’, thus questioning
the need for palliative care integration in this patient population.It’s a summation that we generally did not need [palliative
care]. So I didn’t really need it because as I mentioned is that
often palliative care is extremely helpful for us in patients with
complex oncological history with the symptoms that are outside
shortness of breath or patients that they are chronically palliative
care, right those patients that have chronic palliative clinical
illness. . .. This was not a COVID case. It was an acute illness.
Intensivist 2 MaleSeveral participants described how they felt that patients with COVID-19
specifically needed to choose between quantity (i.e., length of life) or quality
of life (i.e., comfort) goals and opting for quantity of life goals was seen as
a barrier to palliative care integration.I guess one of the reasons was on some of the wards the openness
of the treating physician to consult palliative care. . . .for
symptom management because I think they wanted to focus. . . They
didn’t want us to interrupt or interfere with active medical
management or management that would increase quantity of life.
Palliative Care 11 MaleSpecifically, it was felt that patients with moderate or severe COVID-19 will
suffer from discomfort (i.e., dyspnea, cough, etc.) and to survive COVID-19 it
would necessitate living with this discomfort or suffering because management of
this could jeopardize survival. Alternatively, it was felt that palliative care
could prioritize comfort and provide optimal symptom management but there was an
understanding that this may contribute to clinical deterioration and possibly
death.I think one of the main barriers is there’s still the stigma
that palliative care involvement will increase the likelihood that
someone dies. So on a few occasions, they were patients who were
quite symptomatic. But the team perceived them as having a chance of
“pulling through” so I would ask the nurse and I hear that this
individual is having a lot of dyspnea and would it be okay if we
[palliative care] were involved. . . to co-manage their symptoms and
with certain staff the answer, let’s give it another day, it’s I
think that stigma where getting us involved will increase the
likelihood that they will die resulted in unnecessary suffering for
those patients. Palliative Care 3 MaleThe use of opioids was seen as an intervention that may interfere with a
patient’s goal to pursue quantity of life, likely due to its risk of respiratory
depression. As opioids were recognized as a common palliative care intervention
to support refractory dyspnea management, participants identified this as a
barrier to palliative care integration and referral.As far as I know like physiologically there isn’t a lot of
reason why a small dose of opiates would increase the likelihood
that some of them will pass away with COVID. It’s rare that they
have hypercapnia as a predominant symptom. So that’s why I felt very
comfortable. Even when I was on medicine giving small amounts
regularly to patients who were dyspneic with COVID, but I think at
the end of the day, it was an individual decision. . Palliative Care
3 MaleBoth intensivist and internist participants indicated they felt that palliative
care was part of their speciality, and that they had provided primary palliative
care to their patients and were comfortable doing so.I think most of us. . .we think that we can do a lot of the
symptom management and the family support. I say that when we do get
palliative care involved. . ., it’s mostly to help with the family
support component of things because we can be quite stretched and
sometimes the support that the palliative care consultants can offer
can be quite invaluable. . . When . . . it’s just a question of
symptom management. . . I think I have a level of comfort whether or
not I’m all that good at it.. Intensivist 1 MalePalliative care participants also recognized that their internist and intensivist
colleagues had skills in primary palliative care, but both groups questioned
whether the palliative care provided by both groups was equivalent.I think there are some staff who feel like they know how to do
palliative care and so they don’t feel like they need to involve us,
but . . .we would suggest our involvement and maybe there are things
that are missed that they’re not even aware of. Palliative Care 1
FemaleIn terms of integration, a provider’s comfort providing primary palliative care
was seen as a facilitator to palliative care provision but a barrier to
specialist palliative care team involvement.
Primary provider factors: available time, attitude, and reimbursement
Several provider characteristics were highlighted as factors in supporting
palliative care integration. Providers’ time availability was seen as both a
facilitator and barrier; it was thought that if internist and intensivist
providers had more available time, they were more likely to provide their own
palliative care, and less likely to refer.Actually, what we noticed was because there was one staff for
the COVID patients and it’s actually less patients for a staff on
GIM (general internal medicine) to only have like eight or nine
patients with COVID. I think they had the time to have those
conversations independently of us. So I actually wonder if we could
have been involved in more patients but because the GIM staff had
the time because of this new organizational structure we weren’t
always involved in the goals discussions. Palliative Care 1
FemaleIf clinical demands were high clinicians might not have had time to make a
referral, or conversely would be more likely to refer because they didn’t have
time to provide primary palliative care themselves.It wasn’t the forefront of my mind because generally the times
that I had COVID patients they were very sick COVID patients. Got
acutely worse so quickly that you’re calling ICU or you’re calling
the family to say that they’re dying. I didn’t have a situation
where there was a middle ground where there would have even been
time my palliative care colleagues to come support. But if I look
back. . .there were times when it would have been helpful to have
backup support. Internist 2 FemaleA provider’s attitude of ‘not giving up’ or ‘never saying die’ was seen as a
specific barrier.That is the never-say-die attitude of so many of our colleagues.
All with good intention and whether it’s their approach to care or
they’re just reluctant to have the important conversations
independent of COVID. Internist 5 MaleParticipants also identified physician remuneration as a barrier to referral as
government billing only allows for one physician to bill for certain provisions
of palliative care per patient.The biggest thing is that everyone here is fee for service. . .
Everyone is making sure that they look after themselves. And so
sometimes people might be hesitant to make referrals or to transfer
out. Palliative Care 12 Male
COVID-19 specific factors: the impetus to act, uncertainty, and infection
control measures
Participants identified several factors specific to COVID-19 that acted as
facilitators or barriers to palliative care. COVID-19 was thought to be an
impetus for change or action, which facilitated palliative care integration and
collaboration.It was certainly COVID that got [collaboration] going. It lit
the fire. Palliative Care 8 FemaleThe uncertainty surrounding COVID-19 treatments, illness trajectory, and outcomes
was identified as a barrier, as participants felt it was unclear when or if a
patient would benefit from palliative care.I think it just shook everyone. I just think the way people were
dying was shocking to everyone, - just how quickly it happened and
how well they looked the day before they died. So I think maybe it
was just such a new thing.. Palliative Care 6 FemaleA more rapid clinical decline, which was noted to occur at times with COVID-19,
was felt to be a barrier to palliative care integration and referral.The trajectory of when they acutely (got) worse.. that happened
so quickly that they would either get immediately intubated or
passed away so quickly that there just wasn’t time. Internist 2
FemaleInfection control measures were also seen as a barrier to palliative care
referral as clinicians tried to limit the number of providers in contact with
patients as well as limit the use of personal protection equipment.I think there was a sense from the MRP of minimizing staff on
and off the unit if they don’t need to be. . . Especially staff that
are supporting the rest of the hospital. We really didn’t get
called. Palliative Care 8 FemaleOf note, none of the participants indicated that they faced any specific
shortages of personal protection equipment.
Palliative care service factors: accessibility, adaptability and successful
relationships
Palliative care team availability and accessibility were seen as influencers of
palliative care team integration and referral practices. If palliative care
teams were perceived as being available to their patients with COVID-19,
participants felt they were more likely to involve them.All of our palliative care doctors are great to work with- they
keep us posted with their plans or their discussions. We work quite
closely together, especially with family meetings. They’re always
available by phone. Internist 4 FemaleAt times, virtual structures were seen as less effective at meeting the needs of
referrers and a barrier to referral.On occasion when I asked palliative care to come to the unit to
help with some of the dynamics there’s been sort of a push back. So
at a certain stage, I just decided that I needed to become more
comfortable with doing a lot of that work myself. . . So I think the
contexts where I would be contacting palliative care would be to
help with supporting families and it just didn’t come up as a
something that seemed to be feasible just given that everybody was
operating remotely. . .. We had less support from the consultative
service that we did prior to COVID because people weren’t coming to
the hospital. Intensivist 1 MaleParticipants noted increased palliative care team adaptability and team readiness
supported their integration into institutional COVID-19 planning and subsequent
care integration, including new clinical models that were developed to better
meet the needs of patients and families with COVID-19.We developed like an embedded model with the general medicine
teams that we’ve continued since the first wave where we actually
attend the medicine rounds daily, which we haven’t done in the past
and it’s our chance to kind of identify patients including COVID
positive patients who would benefit from our involvement. Palliative
Care 3 FemaleProviders’ prior successful relationships with specialist palliative care
services were thought to encourage collaboration. Of note, none of the
participants mentioned any significant palliative care resources as a barrier to
integration (i.e., medication or staffing shortages).
Leadership and culture factors
Providers highlighted the role of leadership and culture in facilitating
palliative care integration. Many participants identified that the government
had mandated their acute care hospitals to support regional long-term care homes
that were facing COVID-19 outbreaks. Although these mandates were not specific
to palliative care nor did they outline a call for palliative integration, some
institutions interpreted these mandates as a need for palliative involvement in
the planning and provision of this support.(The hospital) was called in the first wave to support long term
care homes in the region. . . A lot of our rehab docs, geriatricians
they went into every long-term care in the region. Palliative care
was sent in to help with that aspect. Palliative Care 8
FemalePalliative care leadership engagement and presence at COVID-19 planning tables
was felt to lead to stronger integration and involvement.I think it was sort of coming in both directions, we were
reaching out and we were being invited. They invited us to sit at
tables- our own sort of (regional health) community set up weekly
meetings. . . There was a palliative care presence on both of those
and the infectious disease outreach had a palliative care physician
as well. Palliative Care 5 MaleParticipants highlighted that institutional and unit culture, including referral
practices, were seen as indicative of palliative care integration and referral
of patients with COVID-19. Several participants revealed it was less common for
palliative care teams to care for patients in the intensive care unit outside of
particular circumstances, and that certain physician groups (i.e.,
cardiologists) were less likely to refer or integrate palliative care when
managing COVID-19 wards.I think the culture of cardiology at our hospital is one that is
not conducive to palliative care. Whereas it seems like the general
culture for respirology and Internal Medicine, they are much more
likely to give us a call. . . That was reflected on the COVID ward
as well. . . I think depending on which ward it was, each ward was
managed by different physicians. The ward managed by the
cardiologist team like any time we came there, we felt like we were
bothering them. . . The team that was managed by infectious disease
were very receptive, the team managed by the respirologist were also
very receptive and as well as the internists were receptive.
Palliative Care 11 Male
Discussion
Main findings
We conducted a prospective qualitative study to explore physicians’ perceived
facilitators and barriers to the integration of palliative care into COVID-19
management. Participants described six main thematic categories: patient and
family factors, palliative care knowledge, primary provider factors, COVID-19
specific factors, palliative care service factors, and institutional leadership
and culture.
What this study adds
Although several studies have outlined the planning and implementation of
palliative care initiatives for current and past pandemics,[7,12] to our
knowledge this is the first study to explore the factors influencing the
integration of palliative care into the management of patients with COVID-19 and
their families. Previous studies have explored barriers to integrating
palliative care into care for general medical populations,[17,18] as well
as for those with cancer,
advanced heart disease,[20-22] chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD)[23-25] and dementia.
The most prevalent barriers concern education, including lack of
knowledge concerning what palliative care is (and what it is not), clarity
around referral processes, and lack of primary palliative care skills.[17-19,21,22,24-26] In our study, all
internist and intensivist participants indicated they had a good understanding
of palliative care, were familiar with their institutional specialist palliative
care teams, and provided primary palliative care to their own patients when
applicable. Many Palliative care participants also recognized their colleagues’
comfort and confidence in provision of primary palliative care while managing
patients with COVID-19.This confidence of primary providers in their palliative care knowledge and
skills was at odds with participants identifying that patient characteristics
such as age and clinical status (used as prognostic indicators), as well as
overarching goals of care, were being used to determine palliative care
integration and referral. Some internist and intensivist participants also
indicated that COVID-19 was not considered a ‘palliative diagnosis’, and that
palliative care was more appropriate for patients with cancer than patients with
COVID-19 or those with other non-malignant diseases. Despite their acknowledged
role as a palliative care providers, there was a disconnect with understanding
that palliative care is relevant to all patients facing a life-limiting disease,
is not prognosis-dependent, is based on patient need, and can be provided
alongside life-sustaining treatments. It seemed that their definition of
palliative care was equivalent to the provision of comfort or end of life care,
rather than a more holistic perspective on the definition of palliative care.
Thus, although provider’s comfort in providing primary palliative care acted as
a facilitator to palliative care integration for some patients at end of life or
with comfort-focused goals, it may have also acted as a barrier for others not
as close to death or with more medically-focused goals.Palliative care participants identified a misperception of the need to choose
between supporting length of life versus quality of life in the management of
patients with COVID-19. Due to the nature of severe COVID-19, including the risk
of respiratory failure,[9,27] clinicians felt that to optimize treatment for refractory
dyspnea with opioids could negatively impact survival. These concerns and fears
over the use of opioids for dyspnea have been outlined previously in patient
populations with respiratory disease,[28-30] despite evidence that
management of refractory dyspnea with opioids is safe and effective in
alleviating discomfort from refractory dyspnea.[31-33]Several other COVID-19 specific barriers were described in our study. COVID-19
was seen as a new illness with evolving treatment regimes, unknown trajectory,
and unclear outcomes. Intensivist and internist participants expressed concerns
about the uncertainty in predicting when a patient would be at risk of death
which was also complicated by the rapid clinical decline sometimes witnessed by
our participants and documented in the literature.[34,35] In previous studies
concerning other non-malignant disease states such as heart failure, COPD, and
dementia, an unpredictable disease trajectory similarly acted as a barrier to
palliative care integration.[20-26] Palliative care resource
flexibility and collaboration have been outlined as facilitators to referral in COPD
and dementia populations
comparable to our findings of the facilitator ‘team readiness and
adaptability’ of palliative services to manage patients with COVID-19.In preparation for and during COVID-19 surges, many institutions prepared for a
possible influx of patients and recognized the need to better integrate
palliative care.[36-38]
Participants indicated that the drive to prepare for COVID-19 resulted in
integration not seen previously. Similar to earlier research,
participants also thought this was reinforced when several provincial
governments instituted a mandate for acute care hospitals to assist the
long-term care sector due to extensive COVID-19 outbreaks.
However, the influence of these factors was variable as local
institutional leadership was left to determine the need for palliative care
involvement in initiatives to support patients.Outside of the new palliative clinical structures, participants highlighted the
importance of unit culture in determining palliative care penetrance. Intensive
care unit and COVID-19 wards were felt by some participants to have decreased
receptiveness to palliative care team involvement. Institutional, unit or
practice-based cultural factors have been highlighted previously as barriers to
palliative care integration.
Non-oncologic specialists (i.e., cardiology, respirology, etc.) have been
identified as being less knowledgeable than oncologists about palliative care
and more likely to associate it with end of life, and to believe services are
better suited to patients with cancer and lack expertise in managing their
patients’ palliative care needs.[20,40,41]
Limitations
Our study has limitations. Although this study included participants from several
provinces, generalizability may be limited because providers came from a single
country that may have different COVID-19 rates than other countries, with many
participants practising in large, academic medical centres that had
comprehensive palliative care programs. Participants therefore likely had
pre-existing attitudes and preferences towards referral patterns to specialist
palliative care teams, including comfort in defining when and how to provide
primary palliative care. There also may be a potential response bias as those
familiar with palliative care may be more likely to participate.
Conclusions
This study highlights that improving the integration of palliative care during the
COVID-19 pandemic will require interventions at multiple levels, including for
patients, families, primary care providers, palliative care consultants, and
institutional leadership. To better facilitate palliative care integration into the
care for patients and families facing COVID-19, palliative teams need to be
accessible and adaptable. Leaders in the field will need to ensure their presence at
pandemic planning tables that establish clinical models to meet the needs of people
experiencing COVID-19. Despite efforts to educate health care providers that
palliative care is not just for patients at end of life, many barriers to palliative
integration in COVID-19 care continue to relate to this misconception. As the
capacity of primary palliative providers improves during and beyond the pandemic,
the principles of palliative care should be upheld so that patients and families
reap the benefits of this care regardless of diagnosis, complexity, prognosis or
goals of care.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pmj-10.1177_02692163221087162 for Identifying
barriers and facilitators to palliative care integration in the management of
hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A qualitative study by Kirsten Wentlandt,
Kayla T. Wolofsky, Andrea Weiss, Lindsay Hurlburt, Eddy Fan, Ebru Kaya, Erin
O’Connor, Warren Lewin, Cassandra Graham, Camilla Zimmermann and Sarina R.
Isenberg in Palliative Medicine
Authors: Graeme M Rocker; A Catherine Simpson; Robert Horton; Tasnim Sinuff; Jillian Demmons; Paul Hernandez; Darcy Marciniuk Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2013-01-24
Authors: Santiago Lopez; Gene Decastro; Katlynn M Van Ogtrop; Sindee Weiss-Domis; Samuel R Anandan; Christopher J Magalee; Regina Roofeh; Tara A Liberman Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 2.500