| Literature DB >> 35441506 |
Maryam El Hajam1,2,3, Noureddine Idrissi Kandri2, Abdelaziz Zerouale1, Xiaoju Wang3,4, Jan Gustafsson3, Luyao Wang3, Ermei Mäkilä5, Leena Hupa6, Chunlin Xu3.
Abstract
This work presents a new approach for more effective valorization of sawmill wastes (Beech and Cedar sawdusts), which were used as new sources for the extraction of lignin-containing and lignin-free cellulose II nanocrystals (L-CNCs and CNCs). It was shown that the properties of the extracted nanocrystals depend on the nature of the used sawdust (softwood or hardwood sawdusts). L-CNCs and CNCs derived from Beech fibers were long and thin and also had a higher crystallinity, compared with those obtained from Cedar fibers. Thanks to their interesting characteristics and their high crystallinity, these nanocrystals have been used without changing their surfaces as template cores for nanostructured hollow silica-free-surfactant synthesis for photocatalysis to degrade methylene blue (MB) dye. The synthesis was performed with a simple and efficient sol-gel method using tetraethyl orthosilicate as the silica precursor followed by calcination at 650 °C. The obtained materials were denoted as B/L-CNC/nanoSiO2, B/CNC/nanoSiO2, C/L-CNC/nanoSiO2, and C/CNC/nanoSiO2, when the used L-CNC and CNC cores are from Beech and Cedar, respectively. By comprehensive analysis, it was demonstrated that the nanostructured silica were quite uniform and had a similar morphology as the templates. Also, the pore sizes were closely related to the dimensions of L-CNC and CNC templates, with high specific surface areas. The photocatalytic degradation of MB dye was about 94, 98, 74, and 81% for B/L-CNC/nanoSiO2, B/CNC/nanoSiO2, C/L-CNC/nanoSiO2, and C/CNC/nanoSiO2, respectively. This study provides a simple route to extract L-CNCs and CNCs as organic templates to prepare nanostructured silica. The different silica structures showed excellent photodegradation of MB.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose nanocrystals; hardwood; nanostructured porous silica; photocatalysis; sawdust; softwood
Year: 2022 PMID: 35441506 PMCID: PMC9073848 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c02550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ISSN: 1944-8244 Impact factor: 10.383
Figure 1TEM of L-CNCs and CNCs.
Crystallinity Index, Crystallites Sizes, Zeta Potential, Lignin Content, and Elemental Analysis
| Cedar | Beech | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sawdust | raw | cooked | bleached | L-CNC | CNC | raw | cooked | bleached | L-CNC | CNC |
| CrI (%) | 41.24 | 71.49 | 73.99 | 62.07 | 65.86 | 40.83 | 71.37 | 76.14 | 75.59 | 79.47 |
| 3.09 | 3.76 | 3.95 | 2.32 | 3.25 | 2.94 | 4.19 | 5.40 | 5.68 | 5.91 | |
| zeta potential (mV) | –18.9 | –39.6 | –21.7 | –45.9 | ||||||
| Kappa number | 237 | 41.8 | 2.4 | 35.9 | 1.4 | 161.5 | 27.5 | 1.5 | 23.5 | 1 |
| lignin (%) | 35.53 | 6.26 | 0.3 | 5.38 | 0.21 | 24.21 | 4.12 | 0.225 | 3.52 | 0.15 |
| nitrogen (% w/w) | 0.29 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| carbon (% w/w) | 49.3 | 41.7 | 41.6 | 42.8 | 42.4 | 45.0 | 41.2 | 41.3 | 41.9 | 41.9 |
| hydrogen (% w/w) | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| sulphur (% w/w) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.82 |
Figure 2FTIR spectra and XRD diffractograms of L-CNCs and CNCs extracted from Cedar and Beech sawdusts.
Figure 3TG and DTA curves of L-CNCs and CNCs extracted from Cedar (A) and Beech (B).
Figure 4SEM and TEM micrographs of the different silica nanocomposites.
Figure 5FTIR spectra of silica-coated L-CNCs and CNCs before and after calcination.
Figure 6X-ray diffractograms of silica-coated L-CNCs and CNCs before and after calcination.
Specific Surface Area and Total Pore Volume of Porous SiO2 Materials
| sample | specific surface area (m2/g) | pore volume (cm3/g) |
|---|---|---|
| C/L-CNC/nanoSiO2 | 348 ± 3 | 1.98 ± 0.3 |
| C/CNC/nanoSiO2 | 392 ± 9 | 1.71 ± 0.03 |
| B/L-CNC/nanoSiO2 | 953 ± 20 | 1.17 ± 0.12 |
| B/CNC/NanoSiO2 | 1107 ± 24 | 1.15 ± 0.07 |
Figure 7TG and DTA curves of silica-coated L-CNCs and CNCs extracted from Cedar (A) and Beech (B) and hollow silica nanocomposites.
Figure 8Effect of the initial concentration of MB (a) and amount of the catalyst (b) on the degradation percentage of MB.
Figure 9Effect of pH (c) and contact time (d) on the degradation percentage of MB, as well as the kinetics of MB degradation (e).
Figure 10Photodegradation mechanism of MB by nanostructured silica.