Morgan Lamberg1, Andrea Rossman2, Alexandra Bennett2, Sabrina Painter3, Rachel Goodman1, James MacLeod2, Ragasnehith Maddula2, David Rayan1, Krishna Doshi4, Alexander Bick5, Simone Bailey6, Sherry-Ann Brown7. 1. Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 2. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 3. Department of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA. 5. Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. 6. Preventive Cardiology, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, MN, USA. 7. Cardio-Oncology & Preventive Cardiology Programs, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. shbrown@mcw.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are the first and second most common causes of death within the USA. It is well established that a diagnosis of cancer increases risk and predisposes the patient to CVD, and vice versa. Despite these associations, cancer is not yet incorporated into current CVD risk calculators, necessitating additional CV risk markers for improved stratification in this at-risk population. In this review, we consider the utility of breast arterial calcification (BAC), coronary artery calcification (CAC), clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), and cancer and cancer treatment in CVD risk assessment. RECENT FINDINGS: There is evidence supporting the use of BAC, CAC, CHIP, and cancer and cancer treatment for improved CV risk stratification in patients with cancer and those who are being screened for cancer. BAC has been shown to predict CAC, coronary atherosclerotic plaque on coronary CTA, coronary artery stenosis on coronary angiography, and CVD events and accordingly enhances CVD risk stratification beyond the atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk pooled cohort equation. Additionally, CAC visualized on CT utilized for lung cancer screening, radiation planning, and cancer staging is predictive of coronary artery disease (CAD). Furthermore, CHIP can also be utilized in risk stratification, as the presence of CHIP carries a 40% increase in CV risk independent of traditional CV risk factors. Finally, cancer and many oncologic therapies confer a lifelong increased risk of CVD. We propose an emerging set of tools to be incorporated into the routine continuum of CVD risk assessment in individuals who have been treated for cancer or who are being screened for cancer development. In this review, we discuss BAC, CAC, CHIP, and cancer and cancer treatment as emerging risk markers in cardiovascular health assessment. Their effectiveness in predicting and influencing the burden of CVD will be discussed, along with suggestions on their incorporation into preventive cardio-oncology practice. Future research will focus on short- and long-term CVD outcomes in these populations.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are the first and second most common causes of death within the USA. It is well established that a diagnosis of cancer increases risk and predisposes the patient to CVD, and vice versa. Despite these associations, cancer is not yet incorporated into current CVD risk calculators, necessitating additional CV risk markers for improved stratification in this at-risk population. In this review, we consider the utility of breast arterial calcification (BAC), coronary artery calcification (CAC), clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), and cancer and cancer treatment in CVD risk assessment. RECENT FINDINGS: There is evidence supporting the use of BAC, CAC, CHIP, and cancer and cancer treatment for improved CV risk stratification in patients with cancer and those who are being screened for cancer. BAC has been shown to predict CAC, coronary atherosclerotic plaque on coronary CTA, coronary artery stenosis on coronary angiography, and CVD events and accordingly enhances CVD risk stratification beyond the atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk pooled cohort equation. Additionally, CAC visualized on CT utilized for lung cancer screening, radiation planning, and cancer staging is predictive of coronary artery disease (CAD). Furthermore, CHIP can also be utilized in risk stratification, as the presence of CHIP carries a 40% increase in CV risk independent of traditional CV risk factors. Finally, cancer and many oncologic therapies confer a lifelong increased risk of CVD. We propose an emerging set of tools to be incorporated into the routine continuum of CVD risk assessment in individuals who have been treated for cancer or who are being screened for cancer development. In this review, we discuss BAC, CAC, CHIP, and cancer and cancer treatment as emerging risk markers in cardiovascular health assessment. Their effectiveness in predicting and influencing the burden of CVD will be discussed, along with suggestions on their incorporation into preventive cardio-oncology practice. Future research will focus on short- and long-term CVD outcomes in these populations.
Authors: Kathleen M Sturgeon; Lei Deng; Shirley M Bluethmann; Shouhao Zhou; Daniel M Trifiletti; Changchuan Jiang; Scott P Kelly; Nicholas G Zaorsky Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2019-12-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Laxmi S Mehta; Karol E Watson; Ana Barac; Theresa M Beckie; Vera Bittner; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Susan Dent; Lavanya Kondapalli; Bonnie Ky; Tochukwu Okwuosa; Ileana L Piña; Annabelle Santos Volgman Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Yeonyee E Yoon; Kyoung Min Kim; Jong Soo Han; Si-Hyuck Kang; Eun Ju Chun; Soyeon Ahn; Sun Mi Kim; Sang Il Choi; Bo La Yun; Jung-Won Suh Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-08-15
Authors: Catherine E Handy; Renato Quispe; Xavier Pinto; Michael J Blaha; Roger S Blumenthal; Erin D Michos; Joao A C Lima; Eliseo Guallar; Seungho Ryu; Juhee Cho; James A Kaye; Josep Comin-Colet; Xavier Corbella; Miguel Cainzos-Achirica Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Angela H E M Maas; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Femke Atsma; David Beijerinck; Jan J M Deurenberg; Willem P Th M Mali; Y van der Graaf Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Andrew M Bellinger; Carlos L Arteaga; Thomas Force; Benjamin D Humphreys; George D Demetri; Brian J Druker; Javid J Moslehi Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Martin E Matsumura; Crystal Maksimik; Matthew W Martinez; Michael Weiss; James Newcomb; Kenneth Harris; Michael A Rossi Journal: Vasa Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 1.961