BACKGROUND: The relationship between breast artery calcification (BAC) noted on mammography and both coronary artery disease and cardiovascular risk remains controversial. Few studies have examined the clinical significance of BAC in asymptomatic women. In the present study we evaluated the relationship between BAC and coronary artery calcium (CAC) as identified by multi-slice CT scanning (MSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive women (n = 98) with BAC noted on routine mammography but without known coronary artery disease (CAD) were assessed for CAD risk factors and had assessment of coronary calcium by MSCT. A control cohort of consecutive women who were BAC(-) (n = 104) underwent an identical assessment. RESULTS: Women who were BAC(+) were older than those who were BAC(-); otherwise, there were no differences between the 2 groups with regard to traditional cardiac risk factors. Significantly more BAC(+) vs. BAC(-) women were found to have high risk CAC scores, defined as CAC > 400 (11.2 % vs. 1.0 %, p = 0.006). However, the rates of CAC scores of 0 were not different between the two groups (50.0 % vs. 54.8 % for BAC(+) and BAC(-) , respectively, p = 0.586). When examined in a multivariate model including the traditional risk factors of diabetes, increasing age, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and family history of CAD, the presence of BAC remained significantly associated with CAC > 400 (OR = 22.6, 95 % CI = 2.1 - 237.1). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of breast artery calcium on screening mammography was a strong independent predictor (odds ratio > 22) of high risk coronary artery calcium scores (defined as CAC > 400). The presence of BAC in those with significant CAD risk factors may warrant further evaluation.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between breast artery calcification (BAC) noted on mammography and both coronary artery disease and cardiovascular risk remains controversial. Few studies have examined the clinical significance of BAC in asymptomatic women. In the present study we evaluated the relationship between BAC and coronary artery calcium (CAC) as identified by multi-slice CT scanning (MSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive women (n = 98) with BAC noted on routine mammography but without known coronary artery disease (CAD) were assessed for CAD risk factors and had assessment of coronary calcium by MSCT. A control cohort of consecutive women who were BAC(-) (n = 104) underwent an identical assessment. RESULTS:Women who were BAC(+) were older than those who were BAC(-); otherwise, there were no differences between the 2 groups with regard to traditional cardiac risk factors. Significantly more BAC(+) vs. BAC(-) women were found to have high risk CAC scores, defined as CAC > 400 (11.2 % vs. 1.0 %, p = 0.006). However, the rates of CAC scores of 0 were not different between the two groups (50.0 % vs. 54.8 % for BAC(+) and BAC(-) , respectively, p = 0.586). When examined in a multivariate model including the traditional risk factors of diabetes, increasing age, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and family history of CAD, the presence of BAC remained significantly associated with CAC > 400 (OR = 22.6, 95 % CI = 2.1 - 237.1). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of breast artery calcium on screening mammography was a strong independent predictor (odds ratio > 22) of high risk coronary artery calcium scores (defined as CAC > 400). The presence of BAC in those with significant CAD risk factors may warrant further evaluation.
Authors: Juan Wang; Huanjun Ding; Fatemeh Azamian Bidgoli; Brian Zhou; Carlos Iribarren; Sabee Molloi; Pierre Baldi Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Morgan Lamberg; Andrea Rossman; Alexandra Bennett; Sabrina Painter; Rachel Goodman; James MacLeod; Ragasnehith Maddula; David Rayan; Krishna Doshi; Alexander Bick; Simone Bailey; Sherry-Ann Brown Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Sing Ching Lee; Michael Phillips; Jamie Bellinge; Jennifer Stone; Elizabeth Wylie; Carl Schultz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 3.240