Literature DB >> 35439063

Texture-like representation of objects in human visual cortex.

Akshay V Jagadeesh1,2, Justin L Gardner1,2.   

Abstract

The human visual ability to recognize objects and scenes is widely thought to rely on representations in category-selective regions of the visual cortex. These representations could support object vision by specifically representing objects, or, more simply, by representing complex visual features regardless of the particular spatial arrangement needed to constitute real-world objects, that is, by representing visual textures. To discriminate between these hypotheses, we leveraged an image synthesis approach that, unlike previous methods, provides independent control over the complexity and spatial arrangement of visual features. We found that human observers could easily detect a natural object among synthetic images with similar complex features that were spatially scrambled. However, observer models built from BOLD responses from category-selective regions, as well as a model of macaque inferotemporal cortex and Imagenet-trained deep convolutional neural networks, were all unable to identify the real object. This inability was not due to a lack of signal to noise, as all observer models could predict human performance in image categorization tasks. How then might these texture-like representations in category-selective regions support object perception? An image-specific readout from category-selective cortex yielded a representation that was more selective for natural feature arrangement, showing that the information necessary for natural object discrimination is available. Thus, our results suggest that the role of the human category-selective visual cortex is not to explicitly encode objects but rather to provide a basis set of texture-like features that can be infinitely reconfigured to flexibly learn and identify new object categories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BOLD; deep neural networks; object perception; texture representation; ventral visual stream

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35439063      PMCID: PMC9169962          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115302119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  70 in total

1.  The parahippocampal place area: recognition, navigation, or encoding?

Authors:  R Epstein; A Harris; D Stanley; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Scene Perception in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 6.422

3.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Serge O Dumoulin; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Maps of visual space in human occipital cortex are retinotopic, not spatiotopic.

Authors:  Justin L Gardner; Elisha P Merriam; J Anthony Movshon; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Mid-level visual features underlie the high-level categorical organization of the ventral stream.

Authors:  Bria Long; Chen-Ping Yu; Talia Konkle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex.

Authors:  Daniel L K Yamins; Ha Hong; Charles F Cadieu; Ethan A Solomon; Darren Seibert; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Integrative Benchmarking to Advance Neurally Mechanistic Models of Human Intelligence.

Authors:  Martin Schrimpf; Jonas Kubilius; Michael J Lee; N Apurva Ratan Murty; Robert Ajemian; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Metamers of the ventral stream.

Authors:  Jeremy Freeman; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  GLMdenoise: a fast, automated technique for denoising task-based fMRI data.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Ariel Rokem; Jonathan Winawer; Robert F Dougherty; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  When the ventral visual stream is not enough: A deep learning account of medial temporal lobe involvement in perception.

Authors:  Tyler Bonnen; Daniel L K Yamins; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 18.688

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mid-level Feature Differences Support Early Animacy and Object Size Distinctions: Evidence from Electroencephalography Decoding.

Authors:  Ruosi Wang; Daniel Janini; Talia Konkle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.420

2.  Texture-like representation of objects in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Akshay V Jagadeesh; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Perception of an object's global shape is best described by a model of skeletal structure in human infants.

Authors:  Vladislav Ayzenberg; Stella Lourenco
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 8.713

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.