Literature DB >> 35438148

Perspective: Early-Life Nutrition Research Supported by the US National Institutes of Health from 2018 to 2020.

Matthew J Landry1, Lyndsey D Ruiz2, Kimberlea Gibbs3, Marcela D Radtke2, Jennifer Lerman4, Ashley J Vargas3.   

Abstract

The Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025, included guidelines for pregnancy, lactation, and children from birth to age 24 mo (B-24) to reflect the growing body of evidence about appropriate nutrition during the earliest stages of life. Guidelines were based on a thorough review of the existing scientific evidence by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC). This study's objective was to enumerate early-life (pregnancy, lactation, and B-24) nutrition research needs that are already being addressed by the scientific community and to identify remaining research gaps. The Scientific Report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee was reviewed, and 138 research gaps relevant to early life were identified. Research gaps were consolidated into 13 topic areas. A total of 1632 nutrition- and early-life-focused research projects funded by the NIH between 2018 and 2020 were manually coded using title, abstract, and public health relevance statement available on NIH RePORTER. Projects were coded as affirmative if they addressed a research gap within 1 of the 13 research gap topic areas. Of coded projects, 235 (14.4%) addressed any early-life nutrition research gap. Between fiscal years 2018 to 2020, total costs of projects addressing any gap represented only 15% of total costs for all projects reviewed. Complementary foods, breastfeeding (never vs. ever), and frequency of eating were research gap areas most frequently coded as being addressed by a funded project. Iron supplementation, seafood consumption, and maternal diet food allergens were research gap areas least frequently coded as being potentially addressed by a funded project. This analysis highlights opportunities for changes in the federal government investment in maternal and child nutrition research to support development of effective, evidence-based dietary guidelines for improvement in early-life nutrition practices and overall public health.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth to 24 months; breastfeeding; complementary foods; dietary guidelines; dietary pattern; early-life nutrition; lactation; maternal health; pregnancy; research funding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35438148      PMCID: PMC9526875          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmac044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   11.567


  13 in total

Review 1.  Learning to eat: birth to age 2 y.

Authors:  Leann L Birch; Allison E Doub
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Increasing the Participation of Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Katrina Heyrana; Heather M Byers; Pamela Stratton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Perspective: Are Large, Simple Trials the Solution for Nutrition Research?

Authors:  Ambika Satija; Meir J Stampfer; Eric B Rimm; Walter Willett; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Executive summary: Evaluating the evidence base to support the inclusion of infants and children from birth to 24 mo of age in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans--"the B-24 Project".

Authors:  Daniel J Raiten; Ramkripa Raghavan; Alexandra Porter; Julie E Obbagy; Joanne M Spahn
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Advocacy for Improving Nutrition in the First 1000 Days to Support Childhood Development and Adult Health.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Schwarzenberg; Michael K Georgieff
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Strategies for Successful Recruitment of Pregnant Patients Into Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Sutton; Loren E Cain; Porsha M Vallo; Leanne M Redman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Perspective: USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Methodology: Grading the Strength of Evidence in Nutrition- and Public Health-Related Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Maureen K Spill; Laural K English; Ramkripa Raghavan; Emily Callahan; Darcy Güngör; Brittany Kingshipp; Joanne Spahn; Eve Stoody; Julie Obbagy
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.567

Review 8.  Challenges of infant nutrition research: a commentary.

Authors:  Alan S Ryan; William W Hay
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025: Understanding the Scientific Process, Guidelines, and Key Recommendations.

Authors:  Linda G Snetselaar; Janet M de Jesus; Dana M DeSilva; Eve E Stoody
Journal:  Nutr Today       Date:  2021-11-12

10.  Analysis of Female Enrollment and Participant Sex by Burden of Disease in US Clinical Trials Between 2000 and 2020.

Authors:  Jecca R Steinberg; Brandon E Turner; Brannon T Weeks; Christopher J Magnani; Bonnie O Wong; Fatima Rodriguez; Lynn M Yee; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.