| Literature DB >> 35434057 |
Wen Liu1, Bo Yin2, Zong-Hui Liang3, Yang Yu2, Na Lu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors of the digestive system. More than 80% of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma are not diagnosed until late stage and have distant or local metastases. AIM: To investigate the value of computed tomography (CT) perfusion imaging in the evaluation of angiogenesis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis; Evaluation; Imaging; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Perfusion computed tomography; Quantitative assessment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35434057 PMCID: PMC8968604 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i8.2393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Demographic features
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (yr) | 61.5 (46-79) | 48 (28-68) | < 0.001 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 17 (48.6%) | 20 (60.6%) | 0.342 |
| Female | 18 (51.4%) | 13 (39.4%) | |
| rBF | 0.222 ± 0.089 | 1.000 ± 0.023 | < 0.001 |
| rBV | 0.453 ± 0.193 | 0.993 ± 0.076 | < 0.001 |
| rPE | 0.576 ± 0.278 | 1.003 ± 0.008 | < 0.001 |
| rPermeability | 6.000 ± 1.395 | 0.949 ± 0.165 | < 0.001 |
| rTTP | 1.917 ± 0.208 | 1.014 ± 0.039 | < 0.001 |
rBF: Relative blood flow; rBV: Relative blood volume; rPermeability: Relative permeability; rPE: Relative peak enhancement; rTTP: Relative time to peak.
Relative computed tomography perfusion parameters of grade I-II pancreatic adenocarcinoma vs grade III-IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma
|
|
|
|
|
| rBF | 0.266 ± 0.057 | 0.111 ± 0.042 | < 0.001 |
| rBV | 0.546 ± 0.127 | 0.223 ± 0.123 | < 0.001 |
| rPE | 0.586 ± 0.265 | 0.552 ± 0.321 | 0.750 |
| rPermeability | 5.841 ± 1.413 | 6.393 ± 1.336 | 0.297 |
| rTTP | 1.919 ± 0.208 | 1.911 ± 0.218 | 0.915 |
rBF: Relative blood flow; rBV: Relative blood volume; rPermeability: Relative permeability; rPE: Relative peak enhancement; rTTP: Relative time to peak.
Figure 1Representative computed tomography perfusion parameters in the pancreas of a healthy volunteer.
Figure 2Representative computed tomography perfusion parameters of grade II (left) The pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients had a lower density on the maximum-density projection images, as well as lower values of blood flow, blood volume, and permeability, as compared with the adjacent relatively normal pancreatic tissue.
Figure 3Immunohistochemical indicators in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CD34-MVD, CD105-MVD, VEGF, and (α-SMA)-MVD in patients with grade III pancreatic adenocarcinoma (right) were compared with CD34-MVD, CD105-MVD, VEGF, and (α-SMA)-MVD in patients with grade I pancreatic adenocarcinoma (left). Magnification × 400.
Correlation between relative computed tomography perfusion parameters and immunohistochemical indicators in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| VEGF | -0.670 | -0.557 | -0.182 | 0.107 | 0.071 |
| CD105-MVD | -0.489 | -0.549 | -0.002 | 0.016 | 0.030 |
| CD34-MVD | -0.241 | -0.407 | -0.074 | 0.072 | -0.028 |
| AR | -0.497 | -0.412 | 0.049 | -0.046 | 0.020 |
| VMI | 0.603 | 0.499 | -0.119 | -0.043 | 0.150 |
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01. AR: Angiogenesis rate; VMI: Vascular maturity index.
Figure 4Correlation between relative blood flow and relative blood volume and angiogenesis rate. A: Correlation between relative blood flow and angiogenesis rate (AR); B: Correlation between relative blood volume and AR.