Literature DB >> 27780664

Vascular enhancement pattern of mass in computed tomography may predict chemo-responsiveness in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Shin Il Kim1, Jun Young Shin1, Jin-Seok Park1, Seok Jeong2, Yong Sun Jeon3, Moon Han Choi4, Hyun Jong Choi4, Jong Ho Moon4, Jae Chul Hwang5, Min Jae Yang5, Byoung Moo Yoo5, Jin Hong Kim5, Hyun Woo Lee6, Chang-Il Kwon7, Don Haeng Lee8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chemo-responsiveness in pancreatic cancer is known to be dependent on fibrosis and vascularity. The purpose of this study was to assess vascular enhancement in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with or without liver metastasis in computed tomography (CT) and to analyze the correlation between enhancement patterns and chemo-responsiveness.
METHODS: Patients were assigned to either a responder group (partial response or stable disease) or a non-responder group (progressive disease) according to chemo-responsiveness assessed by CT before and after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Hounsefield unit (HU) was measured in pancreatic mass and the largest metastatic liver mass using region of interest (ROI). HU differences (ΔHU) between arterial and pre-contrast phase were calculated.
RESULTS: Of the 101 study subjects, 78(77.2%) were assigned to the pancreas responder group {mean ΔHU (±SD), 36.7(±21.6)} and 23(22.8%) to the pancreas non-responder group {mean ΔHU (±SD), 20.6(±9.9)} (p = 0.001 for ΔHUs). Of the 46 study subjects with liver metastasis, 25(54.3%) were assigned to the liver metastasis responder group {mean ΔHU (±SD), 36.9(±21.0} and 21(45.7%) to the liver metastasis non-responder group {mean ΔHU (±SD), 17.1 (±24.0)}, (p = 0.005 for ΔHUs).
CONCLUSION: CT determined mass vascular enhancement patterns may predict chemoresponse in advanced pancreatic cancer.
Copyright © 2016 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Contrast-enhanced CT; Desmoplastic reaction; Pancreatic cancer; Vascularity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27780664     DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreatology        ISSN: 1424-3903            Impact factor:   3.996


  5 in total

1.  Bile duct angulation and tumor vascularity are useful radiographic features for differentiating pancreatic head cancer and intrapancreatic bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Atsushi Kohga; Yusuke Yamamoto; Teiichi Sugiura; Yukiyasu Okamura; Takaaki Ito; Ryo Ashida; Takeshi Aramaki; Keiko Sasaki; Katsuhiko Uesaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Multi-Phase, Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography-Based Radiomic Prognostic Marker of Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Woo Shin; Jaewon Park; Jong-Chan Lee; Jaihwan Kim; Young Hoon Kim; Jin-Hyeok Hwang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Novel Diagnostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  John C Chang; Madappa Kundranda
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Effect of Sarcopenia on Postoperative Mortality in Osteoporotic Hip Fracture Patients.

Authors:  You Keun Kim; Seung Rim Yi; Ye Hyun Lee; Jieun Kwon; Seok In Jang; Sang Hoon Park
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2018-11-30

5.  Computed tomography perfusion imaging evaluation of angiogenesis in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wen Liu; Bo Yin; Zong-Hui Liang; Yang Yu; Na Lu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 1.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.