| Literature DB >> 35433721 |
Shan Lv1, Ling Ling2, Hui Shi3, Xing Chen1, Shu Chen1, Siping Zhu1, Wei Lin1, Rong Lv2, Guoxian Ding1.
Abstract
To explore the correlation between Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and the muscle thickness and quality of local muscle, and to provide a reasonable basis for the application of ultrasound measurement in the frailty assessment. A total of 150 people (age ≥ 65 years, 58 women, 92 men) were included from the First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University. They were divided into Normal group (40 cases), Prefrailty group (69 cases) and Frailty group (41 cases). The thickness and the quality of local muscle were detected by ultrasound. Participants in the prefrailty group had a higher grayscale value of the vastus lateralis muscle, indicating the deterioration of muscle quality. At the frailty stage, the muscle thickness and quality of the vastus lateralis muscle and the anterior tibialis muscle decreased significantly compared with the normal and the prefrailty group. Pearson's correlation analysis also showed FFP was negatively correlated with muscle thickness and quality of the lower limbs. In multiple regression model, FFP was positively associated with gray value (Vastus lateralis muscle:β =0.457, p < 0.001; Anterior tibialis muscle: β = 0.220, p = 0.037) and inversely associated with muscle thickness (Vastus lateralis muscle:β = -0.973, p = 0.031; Anterior tibialis muscle: β = -4.551, p = 0.004) in the frailty stage. Together, FFP was closely related to muscle thickness and quality, especially vastus lateralis muscle. Moreover, Muscle quality has deteriorated in the prefrailty stage, which is earlier than muscle thickness.Entities:
Keywords: Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP); local muscle; muscle quality; muscle thickness (MT); ultrasound
Year: 2022 PMID: 35433721 PMCID: PMC9009442 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.859555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Anthropometrics, depression assessment and Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) of the participants.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (years) | 72.77 ± 6.41 | 75.58 ± 8.32 | 85.38 ± 6.72 |
| Weight (cm) | 67.38 ± 6.74 | 66.27 ± 10.67 | 62.86 ± 12.20 |
| Height (cm) | 164.54 ± 8.26 | 164.71 ± 8.11 | 163.30 ± 7.21 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.85 ± 3.27 | 24.44 ± 3.62 | 23.55 ± 4.33 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.57 ± 1.20 | 6.69 ± 1.56 | 7.22 ± 2.40 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.93 ± 1.51 | 5.78 ± 1.46 | 6.70 ± 2.43 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.43 ± 1.24 | 4.42 ± 1.14 | 4.24 ± 1.13 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.32 ± 0.51 | 1.45 ± 0.69 | 1.32 ± 0.73 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.23 ± 0.25 | 1.16 ± 0.32 | 1.14 ± 0.32 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.57 ± 0.82 | 2.62 ± 0.83 | 2.51 ± 0.74 |
| VD (ng/ml) | 66.54 ± 24.02 | 52.42 ± 25.95 | 48.65 ± 17.85 |
| FT3 (pmol/L) | 4.0.70 ± 1.27 | 4.34 ± 0.82 | 3.76 ± 0.58 |
| FT4 (pmol/L) | 15.97 ± 2.01 | 16.34 ± 2.06 | 16.59 ± 3.18 |
| TSH (mIU/L) | 2.49 ± 1.51 | 2.64 ± 1.42 | 2.88 ± 2.20 |
| Depression | 5.07 ± 6.63 | 6.38 ± 5.99 | 9.17 ± 5.16 |
| MNA | 29.88 ± 3.57 | 28.42 ± 4.39 | 28.33 ± 5.42 |
| FFP | 0 | 1.65 ± 0.48 | 3.62 ± 0.50 |
Variables are expressed as mean ± SD; BMI, body mass index; HAc1%, glycated hemoglobin; TC, cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FT3, triiodothyronine; FT4, thyroxine; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; MNA, Mini Nutritional Assessment; FFP, Fried Frailty Phenotype.
*compared with normal;
#compared with prefrailty.
P < 0.05;
and
P < 0.01;
and
P < 0.001.
Figure 1The thickness and quality of anterior ulnar muscle, vastus lateralis muscle and anterior tibialis muscle were detected by ultrasound. (A–C) The thickness of anterior ulnar muscle, vastus lateralis muscle, and anterior tibialis muscle were detected by ultrasound; (D–F) The gray value of anterior ulnar muscle, vastus lateralis muscle and anterior tibialis muscle were analyzed by QLAB software to detect the muscle quality. Square sampling frame represents Region Of Interest (ROI).
Local muscle thickness and muscle quality in control group, Prefrailty group and Frailty group.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| MT(cm) | 3.44 ± 0.11 | 3.52 ± 0.55 | 3.13 ± 0.39 |
| Grayscale value | 21.05 ± 2.83 | 19.57 ± 4.05 | 22.90 ± 4.43 |
|
| |||
| MT(cm) | 1.55 ± 0.36 | 1.59 ± 0.36 | 1.28 ± 0.32 |
| Grayscale value | 25.11 ± 5.40 | 27.30 ± 3.50 | 30.52 ± 6.37 |
|
| |||
| MT(cm) | 2.62 ± 0.27 | 2.56 ± 0.36 | 2.42 ± 0.38 |
| Grayscale value | 29.53 ± 3.92 | 28.47 ± 5.95 | 31.14 ± 3.58 |
*compared with normal;
compared with prefrailty.
MT, muscle thickness
P < 0.05;
and
P < 0.01.
Figure 2Correlation between FFP and muscle thickness and quality of anterior ulnar muscle, vastus lateralis muscle and anterior tibialis muscle. (A) There was no correlation between fried frailty phenotype (FFP) and the thickness of anterior ulnar muscle (B) FFP was negatively correlated with the thickness of vastus lateralis muscle (C) FFP was negatively correlated with the thickness of anterior tibialis muscle (D) There was no correlation between FFP and the gray value of anterior ulnar muscle (E) FFP was positively correlated with the gray value of vastus lateralis muscle (F) FFP was positively correlated with the gray value of anterior tibialis muscle.
Multivariate logistics regression analysis of the effects of muscle thickness and muscle quality of Anterior ulnar muscle, Vastus lateralis muscle and Anterior Tibialis muscle on FFP.
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age | 0.164 | 5.493 |
| 1.179 (1.027, 1.352) | 0.052 | 1.467 | 0.226 | 1.054 (0.968, 1.146) |
| BMI | 0.032 | 0.056 | 0.814 | 1.033 (0.791, 1.347) | −0.055 | 0.431 | 0.511 | 0.946 (0.802, 1.116) |
| HbA1c | 0.683 | 2.432 | 0.119 | 1.980 (0.839, 4.670) | 0.485 | 2.549 | 0.110 | 1.623 (0.896, 2.943) |
| Glucose | −0.632 | 3.361 | 0.067 | 0.532 (0.271, 1.045) | −0.498 | 3.630 | 0.057 | 0.608 (0.364, 1.014) |
| VD | −0.231 | 4.380 |
| 0.971 (0.929, 1.015) | −0.027 | 1.704 | 0.192 | 0.974 (0.949, 0.998) |
| FT3 | −0.342 | 0.182 |
| 0.711 (0.148, 3.414) | −0.262 | 0.728 | 0.394 | 0.769 (0.421, 1.405) |
| Depression | 0.105 | 1.405 | 0.236 | 1.111 (0.934, 1.321) | 0.066 | 1.435 | 0.231 | 1.068 (0.959, 1.190) |
|
| ||||||||
| MT | 0.716 | 0.240 | 0.624 | 2.046 (0.116, 35.985) | 0.138 | 0.044 | 0.834 | 1.148 (0.316, 4.164) |
| Grayscale value | 0.074 | 0.341 | 0.559 | 1.077 (0.839, 1.383) | −0.068 | 1.017 | 0.313 | 0.934 (0.819, 1.066) |
|
| ||||||||
| MT | −0.973 | 0.296 |
| 0.378 (0.011, 12.555) | 1.348 | 1.872 | 0.171 | 3.851 (558, 26.575) |
| Grayscale value | 0.457 | 15.233 |
| 1.580 (1.256, 1.988) | 0.158 | 5.344 |
| 1.171 (1.024, 1.340) |
|
| ||||||||
| MT | −4.551 | 8.084 |
| 0.011 (0.000, 0.243) | −1.700 | 4.143 | 0.062 | 0.183 (0.036, 0.939) |
| Grayscale value | 0.220 | 4.328 |
| 1.246 (1.013, 1.532) | 0.107 | 3.470 |
| 1.113 (0.994, 1.246) |
Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) as the dependent variable and meaningful variables of univariate analysis as independent variables. Adjustment for age, BMI, HbA1c, Glucose, VD, FT3 and Depression; β standardized coefficient. Bold values are statistically significant (p < 0.05).