| Literature DB >> 35432960 |
Akbar Jokar1, Mohamad Hossyn Azizi2.
Abstract
One of the effective ways for increasing milk intake in a diet is producing flavored milk. In the present study, flavored persimmon milk drinks were formulated and produced. Rheological, sensorial, and physicochemical properties of the drinks were evaluated. Different amounts of persimmon (5, 10, 20, and 30% W/V), gum Arabic (0.1 and 0.2% W/V), and sugar (3 and 5% W/V) were used to produce persimmon milk. All the experiments were done in a completely randomized design (CRD) in three replicates. First, persimmons were mixed thoroughly in a blender then, according to the formulation, whole milk was added to it and mixed again. The obtained mixture was heated up to 50 ᵒC then sugar and the gum were added and mixed completely for 3 min. The drink was pasteurized at 90 ᵒC for 1 min. Sensorial analysis revealed that the most acceptable persimmon milk was related to 0.1% gum Arabic, 5% sugar, and 10% persimmon. Flow behavior of the drinks with 20 and 30% persimmon was Non-Newtonian, while 10% persimmon samples with and without gum showed Newtonian behavior. The drinks with 20 and 30% persimmon were pseudoplastic, and their apparent viscosity increased by increasing shear rates. By applying a proper content of persimmon in milk, we can produce a nutritious flavored milk drink with acceptable taste, stability, and consistency. As this drink has high nutrient contents like phenol, dietary fiber, vitamins, antioxidants, etc., it can help promote health, especially for children.Entities:
Keywords: drink; formulation; persimmon milk; physicochemical; rheology; sensorial properties
Year: 2022 PMID: 35432960 PMCID: PMC9007307 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Comparison of milk and persimmon ingredients
| Protein (%) | Fat (%) | Dry solids (%) | pH | TSS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Persimmon | 2.2 | N.D | 32 | 5.34 | 29 |
| Milk | 3.4 | 3.43 | 12.2 | 6.78 | N.D |
Abbreviations: Nd, Not Determined; TSS, Total Soluble Solids.
Ingredients of persimmon milk drinks
| Persimmon | Whole milk | 5% persimmon | 10% persimmon | 20% persimmon | 30% persimmon | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSS (%) | 29 | 12.2 | 17.98 | 18.68 | 19.93 | 20.98 |
| Protein (%) | 2.2 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.27 | 3.1 | 2.9 |
Nonparametric analysis results from the first‐step sensory evaluation
| Evaluated features | Treatments (Persimmon) | Number | Mean ranks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taste | 10% | 14 | 17.69 |
| 20% | 14 | 26.29 | |
| 30% | 14 | 20.25 | |
| Total | 49 | ||
| Consistency | 10% | 14 | 24.57 |
| 20% | 14 | 21.04 | |
| 30% | 14 | 18.89 | |
| Total | 49 |
Nonparametric analysis results from the second‐step sensory evaluation
| Evaluated features | Treatments (Persimmon) | Numbers | Mean ranks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taste | 5% | 14 | 19.57 |
| 10% | 14 | 40.14 | |
| 20% | 14 | 27.86 | |
| 30% | 14 | 26.43 | |
| Total | 56 | ||
| Color | 5% | 14 | 23.43 |
| 10% | 14 | 34.39 | |
| 20% | 14 | 26.29 | |
| 30% | 14 | 29.89 | |
| Total | 56 | ||
| Consistency | 5% | 14 | 26.86 |
| 10% | 14 | 39.75 | |
| 20% | 14 | 26.68 | |
| 30% | 14 | 20.71 | |
| Total | 56 |
FIGURE 1Mean comparison of taste and consistency scores
FIGURE 2Color change trends in the drinks
FIGURE 3Stability of the drinks in different days of experiments
Apparent viscosity of the drinks with the gum at different shear rates
| Shear Rates (1/S) | Samples (Persimmon Content) | Apparent viscosity (Pa.S) |
|---|---|---|
| 21.3 | 10% | 0.079 ± 0.0003a |
| 20% | 1.605 ± 0.013b | |
| 30% | 4.087 ± 0.031c | |
| 35.6 | 10% | 0.065 ± 0.001a |
| 20% | 1.198 ± 0.013b | |
| 30% | 2.960 ± 0.020c | |
| 71.1 | 10% | 0.064 ± 0.0006a |
| 20% | 0.727 ± 0.008b | |
| 30% | 2.140 ± 0.020c |
Different letters show significant differences (p<.05) in Duncan's comparison test.
Apparent viscosity of the drinks without the gum at different shear rates
| Shear Rates (1/S) | Samples (Persimmon Content) | Apparent viscosity (Pa.S) |
|---|---|---|
| 21.3 | 10% | 0.019 ± 0.0015a |
| 20% | 0.161 ± 0.0010b | |
| 30% | 1.06 ± 0.020c | |
| 35.6 | 10% | 0.018 ± 0.001a |
| 20% | 0.119 ± 0.0006b | |
| 30% | 0.860 ± 0.20c | |
| 71.1 | 10% | 0.021 ± 0.0006a |
| 20% | 0.064 ± 0.0008b | |
| 30% | 0.096 ± 0.020c |
Different letters show significant differences (p<.05) in Duncan's comparison test.
The effects of persimmon contents and gum on flow index, consistency yield stress of the drinks in Herschel–Bulkley model
| Samples (Persimmon Content) | Flow Index (m) | K (pa.sn) | Yield stress (Pa) | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without Gum | 10% | 0.961a ± 0.019 | 0.098a ± 0.012 | 0 | 0.894 ± 0.009 |
| 20% | 0.216b ± 0.010 | 1.152b ± 0.022 | 1.43 ± 0.0.044 | 0.97 ± 0.005 | |
| 30% | 0.218b ± 0.009 | 9.894c ± 0.406 | 7.12 ± 0.617 | 0.986 ± 0.015 | |
| With Gum | 10% | 0.901a ± 0.002 | 0.965a ± 0.009 | 0 | 0.962 ± 0.005 |
| 20% | 0.219b ± 0.009 | 5.332b ± 0.199 | 25.357 ± 0.11 | 0.980 ± 0.012 | |
| 30% | 0.218b ± 0.005 | 21.72c ± 0.775 | 114.906 ± 34.7 | 0.985 ± 0.003 |
Different letters show significant differences (p<.05) in Duncan's comparison test.
R 2: coefficient of determination in Herschel–Bulkley model.
Student's t‐test for evaluating flow index and consistency coefficient means equality test between drinks with and without gum
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| t |
| Sig. (2‐tailed) | ||
| 10% persimmon | K | −98.511 | 4 | 0.000 |
| m | 28.326 | 4 | 0.000 | |
FIGURE 4Effects of persimmon content and gum on consistency coefficient and flow index