| Literature DB >> 35432836 |
Yimin Zhang1, Qingyun Lu1, Ning Li1, Yanxia Lu2.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to explore the effect of intensive psychological nursing intervention on HAMD and SF-36 scores in patients with severe liver cancer in intensive care unit (ICU). 134 critically ill patients with liver cancer in ICU who underwent resection of primary liver cancer from July 2019 to November 2021 were selected. The patients were randomly divided into control group and study group. The patients in the control group received routine nursing. The patients in the study group received intensive psychological nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing. Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), and the MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) scores before and after nursing were compared between the two groups. The satisfaction of the two groups of patients with nursing was counted. The HAMA, HAMD, and SF-36 scores of patients receiving intensive psychological nursing intervention were significantly better than those receiving routine nursing. The nursing satisfaction of patients receiving intensive psychological nursing intervention was significantly higher than that of patients receiving routine nursing. Intensive psychological nursing intervention for patients with severe liver cancer in ICU can significantly reduce HAMD, improve SF-36 score, and patient nursing satisfaction. It is worthy of wide clinical promotion.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35432836 PMCID: PMC9007641 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4452308
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1The trial flowchart.
Comparison of HAMA and HAMD scores before and after intervention.
|
| HAMA | HAMD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | ||
| Control group | 67 | 26.98 ± 1.09 | 16.44 ± 1.15 | 25.13 ± 1.29 | 17.22 ± 1.05 |
| Observation group | 67 | 27.06 ± 1.53 | 10.83 ± 0.98 | 25.79 ± 1.08 | 11.34 ± 1.18 |
|
| 0.349 | 30.390 | 3.211 | 30.470 | |
|
| 0.728 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 | |
Comparison of SF-36 scores between the two groups before and after intervention.
| Social function | Somatic function | Emotional function | Physiological function | Vitality | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before nursing | Control group | 52.64 ± 6.13 | 60.12 ± 5.86 | 54.79 ± 5.68 | 50.67 ± 5.23 | 60.49 ± 6.08 |
| Observation group | 53.74 ± 5.91 | 58.96 ± 5.22 | 56.13 ± 5.46 | 52.14 ± 5.08 | 59.17 ± 5.14 | |
|
| 1.057 | 1.210 | 1.392 | 1.650 | 1.357 | |
|
| 0.292 | 0.229 | 0.166 | 0.101 | 0.177 | |
|
| ||||||
| After nursing | Control group | 64.38 ± 6.59 | 68.94 ± 6.73 | 69.42 ± 6.79 | 70.65 ± 6.38 | 68.19 ± 6.53 |
| Observation group | 74.16 ± 6.85 | 76.99 ± 7.03 | 77.26 ± 6.48 | 78.01 ± 6.94 | 75.82 ± 7.08 | |
|
| 8.422 | 6.771 | 6.837 | 6.391 | 6.484 | |
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Comparison of nursing satisfaction between the two groups.
|
| Very satisfied | Satisfied | Dissatisfied | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 67 | 10 (14.93) | 31 (46.27) | 26 (38.81) |
| Observation group | 67 | 20 (29.85) | 34 (50.75) | 13 (19.40) |
|
| 7.805 | |||
|
| 0.020 |