Literature DB >> 25868064

Patients' experiences of technology and care in adult intensive care.

Louise Caroline Stayt1, Kate Seers2, Elizabeth Tutton2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate patients' experiences of technology in an adult intensive care unit.
BACKGROUND: Technology is fundamental to support physical recovery from critical illness in Intensive Care Units. As well as physical corollaries, psychological disturbances are reported in critically ill patients at all stages of their illness and recovery. Nurses play a key role in the physical and psychological care of patients;, however, there is a suggestion in the literature that the presence of technology may dehumanise patient care and distract the nurse from attending to patients psychosocial needs. Little attention has been paid to patients' perceptions of receiving care in a technological environment.
DESIGN: This study was informed by Heideggerian phenomenology.
METHODS: The research took place in 2009-2011 in a university hospital in England. Nineteen participants who had been patients in ICU were interviewed guided by an interview topic prompt list. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Van Manen's framework.
FINDINGS: Participants described technology and care as inseparable and presented their experiences as a unified encounter. The theme 'Getting on with it' described how participants endured technology by 'Being Good' and 'Being Invisible'. 'Getting over it' described why participants endured technology by 'Bowing to Authority' and viewing invasive technologies as a 'Necessary Evil'.
CONCLUSION: Patients experienced technology and care as a series of paradoxical relationships: alienating yet reassuring, uncomfortable yet comforting, impersonal yet personal. By maintaining a close and supportive presence and providing personal comfort and care nurses may minimize the invasive and isolating potential of technology.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult; intensive care; nursing; qualitative research; technology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25868064     DOI: 10.1111/jan.12664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  5 in total

1.  Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative study of patient experience in the UK WOLLF trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tutton; Juul Achten; Sarah E Lamb; Keith Willett; Matthew L Costa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 2.  Interpersonal touch interventions for patients in intensive care: A design-oriented realist review.

Authors:  Sansha J Harris; Elizabeth D E Papathanassoglou; Melanie Gee; Susan M Hampshaw; Lenita Lindgren; Annette Haywood
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2018-10-24

Review 3.  "Humanizing intensive care: A scoping review (HumanIC)".

Authors:  Monica Evelyn Kvande; Sanne Angel; Anne Højager Nielsen
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  Effect of Intensive Psychological Nursing Intervention on HAMD and SF-36 Scores in Patients with Severe Liver Cancer in ICU.

Authors:  Yimin Zhang; Qingyun Lu; Ning Li; Yanxia Lu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Mental well-being of patients from ethnic minority groups during critical care: a qualitative ethnographic study.

Authors:  Rose Lima Van Keer; Reginald Deschepper; Luc Huyghens; Johan Bilsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.