| Literature DB >> 35430800 |
Xiangyang Liu1, Wanming Zhou1, Wenmao Fan1, Aihua Li1, Jungang Pang1, Zefang Chen1, Xiangmei Li1, Xiulian Hu1, Yanmin Zeng1, Liangqiu Tang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) has been taken as a biomarker of inflammation in patients with acute coronary diseases. Regular exercise rehabilitation could attenuate inflammation and promote the rehabilitation of coronary heart disease (CHD). The level of Lp-PLA2 is negatively correlated with 6-min walk test (6-MWT). The exercise prescription of appropriate intensity is the basis of exercise rehabilitation. 6-MWT is associated with maximal oxygen consumption, and can be used to determine the intensity of exercise prescription guiding patients how to do exercise rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to observe the benefit of 6-MWT guided exercise rehabilitation on the level of Lp-PLA2 in patients with CHD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Entities:
Keywords: 6-min walk test; Coronary heart disease; Exercise rehabilitation; Lipoprotein phosphorus esterase A2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35430800 PMCID: PMC9014591 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02430-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.174
Fig. 1Flowchart of the study
Comparison of general information in two groups ± s, N (%)
| Group | Group A | Group B | t/χ2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 49 | 46 | ||
| Age (years) | 59.98 ± 7.69 | 64.11 ± 8.08* | − 2.552 | 0.012 |
| Male (%) | 37 (75.5%) | 34 (73.9%) | 0.032 | 0.858 |
| Hypertention (%) | 28 (57.1%) | 26 (56.5) | 3.901 | 0.272 |
| T2DM (%) | 11 (22.4%) | 6 (13.0%) | 1.429 | 0.232 |
T2DM type-2 diabetes mellitus. Compared between Group A and Group B
*P < 0.05
Comparison of general information between Group A and Group B ± s, M (Q)
| Variable | Group A | Group B | t (U) value | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 49 | 46 | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | At baseline | 24.04 ± 3.12 | 23.66 ± 3.76 | 0.538 | 0.592 |
| After 12 weeks | 24.23 ± 3.01 | 23.76 ± 3.70 | 0.671 | 0.504 | |
| TC (mmol/l) | At baseline | 4.52 ± 1.28 | 4.40 ± 1.02 | 0.483 | 0.630 |
| After 12 weeks | 3.80 ± 0.89 | 3.85 ± 0.84 | − 0.299 | 0.765 | |
| TG (mmol/l) | At baseline | 1.37 ± 0.70 | 1.29 ± 0.54 | 0.598 | 0.551 |
| After 12 weeks | 1.58 ± 1.03 | 1.30 ± 0.71 | 1.508 | 0.135 | |
| Lp (a) (mmol/l)a | At baseline | 16.90 (36.40) | 13.40 (51.56) | 976.000 | 0.780 |
| After 12 weeks | 15.50 (21.90) | 13.94 (32.05) | 1057 | 0.854 | |
| ApoA (g/l) | At baseline | 1.31 ± 0.33 | 1.35 ± 0.26 | − 0.711 | 0.479 |
| After 12 weeks | 1.37 ± 0.29 | 1.41 ± 0.28 | − 0.758 | 0.451 | |
| ApoB (g/l) | At baseline | 0.85 ± 0.23 | 0.86 ± 0.25 | − 0.031 | 0.976 |
| After 12 weeks | 0.70 ± 0.20 | 0.70 ± 0.21 | − 0.030 | 0.976 | |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | At baseline | 1.13 ± 0.29 | 1.17 ± 0.23 | − 0.672 | 0.503 |
| After 12 weeks | 1.20 ± 0.29 | 1.27 ± 0.33 | − 1.11 | 0.270 | |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | At baseline | 2.83 ± 1.09 | 2.75 ± 0.88 | 0.376 | 0.708 |
| After 12 weeks | 2.22 ± 0.69 | 2.08 ± 0.64 | 1.063 | 0.291 | |
| LP-PLA2 (umol/l) | At baseline | 249.58 ± 129.24 | 221.37 ± 148.8 | 0.976 | 0.332 |
| After 12 weeks | 219.13 ± 117.70 | 155.87 ± 93.80* | 2.875 | 0.005 |
aMedian and quartile. M (Q) median (quartile), BMI body mass index, TC total cholesterol, TG three acyl glycerin, ApoA apolipoprotein A, ApoB apolipoprotein B, Lp (a) lipoprotein (a), LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LP-PLA2 Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2. Compared between Group A and Group B
*P < 0.05
Fig. 2Comparison of Lp-PLA2 between Group A and Group B. Lp-PLA2 = Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2. Compared between group A and group B, *P < 0.05 after 12 weeks
The single factor linear regression analysis of the Lp-PLA2 level in group B after 12 weeks
| Independent variable | Constant | β | SE | β′ | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise rehabilitation | 282.383 | − 63.258 | 22.164 | − 0.287 | − 2.854 | 0.005 |
| Age (years) | 149.008 | 0.637 | 1.426 | 0.047 | 0.447 | 0.656 |
| Male (%) | 114.712 | 58.665 | 25.696 | 0.233 | 2.283 | 0.025 |
| Hypertention (%) | 178.358 | 8.006 | 9.118 | 0.092 | 0.878 | 0.382 |
| T2DM (%) | 190.118 | − 8.765 | 29.899 | − 0.031 | − 0.293 | 0.77 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 168.392 | 0.837 | 3.324 | 0.026 | 0.245 | 0.807 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 125.194 | 16.012 | 13.559 | 0.124 | 1.181 | 0.241 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 152.203 | 23.698 | 12.832 | 0.192 | 1.847 | 0.068 |
| Lp (a) (mmol/l) | 176.695 | 0.34 | 0.345 | 0.104 | 0.984 | 0.328 |
| ApoA (g/l) | 237.693 | − 36.466 | 41.367 | − 0.093 | − 0.882 | 0.38 |
| ApoB (g/l) | 148.409 | 54.909 | 57.794 | 0.1 | 0.95 | 0.345 |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 215.76 | − 23.485 | 38.042 | − 0.065 | − 0.617 | 0.539 |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 115.75 | 32.983 | 17.461 | 0.197 | 1.889 | 0.062 |
Lp-PLA2 Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2, T2DM type-2 diabetes mellitus, BMI body mass index, TC total cholesterol, TG three acyl glycerin, ApoA apolipoprotein A, ApoB apolipoprotein B, Lp (a) lipoprotein (a), LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol
The multiple factors regression analysis of the Lp-PLA2 level in group B after 12 weeks
| Independent variable | Constant | β | SE | β′ | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise rehabilitation | 154.327 | 46.321 | 22.493 | − 0.258 | − 2.542 | 0.013 |
| Male (%) | − 57.186 | 26.15 | 0.182 | 1.771 | 0.08 | |
| TG (mmol/l) | 11.61 | 12.996 | 0.094 | 0.893 | 0.374 | |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 20.093 | 17.321 | 0.12 | 1.16 | 0.249 |
Lp-PLA2 Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2, TG three acyl glycerin, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol