BACKGROUND: The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is cost-effective and well-documented field test for assessing functional exercise capacity and response to medical interventions in diverse patient groups, and predicting cardiorespiratory fitness among healthy people. OBJECTIVE: Assessments of cardiorespiratory fitness in terms of maximal aerobic power (VO2 max) have great potential in public health monitoring to predict future health, early retirement and ability to independent living. This study aimed to develop a prediction model for VO2 max based on 6MWT results among healthy adults. DESIGN: The study comprised of pilot and validation studies. In validation study, seventy-five 19- to 75-year-old adults (39 men, 36 women) were equipped with portable gas analyser and heart rate monitor. Participants performed 6MWT on a 15-m indoor track and maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a treadmill. We evaluated performance of the developed prediction model among 1583 Finnish adults. RESULTS: Participant's mean walking distance was 652 m (SD ± 74). Their mean VO2 max in GXT and O2 uptake at the end of the 6MWT were 34·4 ml kg-1 min-1 (SD ± 7·6) and 27·2 ml kg-1 min-1 (SD ± 6·5), respectively. For men, the best predictors for VO2 max were walking distance, age, BMI, heart rate at the end of 6MWT and height, and for women, walking distance, age and weight. The predictors explained 82% and 79% of men's and women's measured VO2 max with the standard error of estimate of 3·6 ml kg-1 min-1 and 3·5 ml kg-1 min-1 , respectively. CONCLUSION: The 6MWT performed along a 15-m track is a valid field test for predicting VO2 max of healthy adults with accuracy of about 1MET.
BACKGROUND: The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is cost-effective and well-documented field test for assessing functional exercise capacity and response to medical interventions in diverse patient groups, and predicting cardiorespiratory fitness among healthy people. OBJECTIVE: Assessments of cardiorespiratory fitness in terms of maximal aerobic power (VO2 max) have great potential in public health monitoring to predict future health, early retirement and ability to independent living. This study aimed to develop a prediction model for VO2 max based on 6MWT results among healthy adults. DESIGN: The study comprised of pilot and validation studies. In validation study, seventy-five 19- to 75-year-old adults (39 men, 36 women) were equipped with portable gas analyser and heart rate monitor. Participants performed 6MWT on a 15-m indoor track and maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a treadmill. We evaluated performance of the developed prediction model among 1583 Finnish adults. RESULTS:Participant's mean walking distance was 652 m (SD ± 74). Their mean VO2 max in GXT and O2 uptake at the end of the 6MWT were 34·4 ml kg-1 min-1 (SD ± 7·6) and 27·2 ml kg-1 min-1 (SD ± 6·5), respectively. For men, the best predictors for VO2 max were walking distance, age, BMI, heart rate at the end of 6MWT and height, and for women, walking distance, age and weight. The predictors explained 82% and 79% of men's and women's measured VO2 max with the standard error of estimate of 3·6 ml kg-1 min-1 and 3·5 ml kg-1 min-1 , respectively. CONCLUSION: The 6MWT performed along a 15-m track is a valid field test for predicting VO2 max of healthy adults with accuracy of about 1MET.
Authors: Lucía Gil-Herrero; Marina Pollán; Miguel Martín; Sara López-Tarruella; Mónica Castellanos; Soraya Casla-Barrio Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Renske Meijer; Martijn van Hooff; Nicole E Papen-Botterhuis; Charlotte J L Molenaar; Marta Regis; Thomas Timmers; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Hans H C M Savelberg; Goof Schep Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2022-04-05
Authors: P Kolu; J Raitanen; H Sievänen; K Tokola; H Vähä-Ypyä; E Nieminen; T Vasankari Journal: Occup Med (Lond) Date: 2022-10-18 Impact factor: 5.629
Authors: Barry P Boden; Anwar E Ahmed; Kenneth M Fine; Michael J Craven; Patricia A Deuster Journal: Sports Health Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 4.355
Authors: Jonathan J Petrocelli; Alec I McKenzie; Ziad S Mahmassani; Paul T Reidy; Gregory J Stoddard; Annelise M Poss; William L Holland; Scott A Summers; Micah J Drummond Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Susan M Linder; Sara Davidson; Anson Rosenfeldt; John Lee; Mandy Miller Koop; Francois Bethoux; Jay L Alberts Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Fang Liu; Raymond C C Tsang; Alice Y M Jones; Mingchao Zhou; Kaiwen Xue; Miaoling Chen; Yulong Wang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Vivian Z Tan; Meredith Q Lee; Daryl L Wong; Katherin S Huang; Melissa Y Chan; Clement C Yan; Meredith T Yeung Journal: Hong Kong Physiother J Date: 2021-01-13