| Literature DB >> 35430705 |
Javier Fernández-Torres1,2, Yessica Zamudio-Cuevas1, Nathalie Montaño-Armendariz3, Iván Alejandro Luján-Juárez3, Roberto Sánchez-Sánchez4,5, Karina Martínez-Flores6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an autoimmune disease that affects the enthesis and synovial membrane of the spine, the sacroiliac vertebrae and peripheral joints. Genetic susceptibility to AS is mainly due to the presence of the HLA-B*27 (B27) allele, and endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase-1 (ERAP-1) plays a key role in antigen processing and presentation to HLA class I molecules. Tobacco consumption is one of the main environmental factors involved in the pathogenesis of various diseases, including AS. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the association and the interactive effects of variants of the ERAP1 gene with smoking in modulating the risk of AS. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; B27; ERAP1; Polymorphisms; Smoking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35430705 PMCID: PMC9013272 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07456-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Rep ISSN: 0301-4851 Impact factor: 2.742
Demographic and clinical characteristics of AS patients and healthy controls
| AS patients (New York criteria) | Controls (n = 65) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 46.1 ± 13.5 | 53.9 ± 5.7 | < |
| Gender | |||
| Female (%) | 22 (38.0) | 60 (92.3) | < |
| Male (%) | 36 (62.0) | 5 (7.7) | |
| HLA-B27 (%) | |||
| Negative | 17 (29.3) | 64 (98.5) | < |
| Positive | 41 (70.7) | 1 (1.5) | |
| Age at diagnosis (years) | 36.1 ± 13.9 | NA | |
| BASFI | 4.9 | NA | |
| BASDAI | 3.73 | NA | |
| Smoking (%) | |||
| No | 42 (72.4) | 53 (81.5) | 0.228** |
| Yes | 16 (27.6) | 12 (18.5) |
The variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). *P-values were estimated using t-test, α = 0.05; **P-values were estimated using χ2 test; ***P-values were estimated using Fisher´s exact test, α = 0.05; significant P-values are in bold
AS ankylosing spondylitis; HLA human leukocyte antigen; BASFI bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index; BASDAI bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index; NA not applicable
Analyses of the association of two SNPs with ankylosing spondylitis
| SNP | AS cases | Control | OR* | 95% CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C/C | 20 (34.4) | 23 (35.4) | 1.00 | (Reference) | |
| C/T | 28 (48.3) | 32 (49.2) | 2.09 | (0.13–1.73) | 0.262 |
| T/T | 10 (17.2) | 10 (15.4) | 1.60 | (0.18–2.09) | 0.444 |
| Dominant model | |||||
| C/C | 20 (34.4) | 23 (35.4) | 1.00 | (Reference) | |
| C/T + T/T | 48 (65.5) | 42 (64.6) | 1.31 | (0.63–2.72) | 0.461 |
| Recessive model | |||||
| C/C + C/T | 30 (82.7) | 55 (84.6) | 1.00 | (Reference) | |
| T/T | 10 (17.2) | 10 (15.4) | 1.83 | (0.68–4.89) | 0.223 |
| HWE | 0.836 | ||||
| C/C | 23 (39.6) | 27 (41.5) | 1.00 | (Reference) | |
| C/G | 26 (44.8) | 29 (44.6) | 1.96 | (0.14–1.83) | 0.302 |
| G/G | 9 (15.5) | 9 (13.8) | 2.12 | (0.13–1.70) | 0.254 |
| Dominant model | |||||
| C/C | 23 (39.6) | 27 (41.5) | 1.00 | (Reference) | |
| C/G + G/G | 34 (60.3) | 38 (58.4) | 1.05 | (0.50–2.16) | 0.864 |
| Recessive model | |||||
| C/C + C/G | 49 (84.4) | 56 (86.1) | 1.00 | (Reference) | |
| G/G | 9 (15.5) | 9 (13.8) | 1.14 | (0.42–3.10) | 0.793 |
| HWE | 0.786 |
AS ankylosing spondylitis; ERAP1 endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval; SNP single nucleotide polymorphism; HWE Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
*Adjusted for age and gender
Results of MDR analysis
| Number of the risk factors | Testing balanced accuracy | CVC | P-value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B27 | 0.8381 | 9/10 | 0.0101 |
| 2 | B27, smoke | 0.8458 | 9/10 | 0.0107 |
| 3 | B27, rs30187, rs27044 | 0.8509 | 10/10 | 0.0130 |
| 4 | B27, smoke, rs30187, rs27044 | 0.8513a | 10/10 | 0.0016 |
| 5 | Smoke, rs30187, rs27044 | 0.3983 | 10/10 | 0.0210 |
| 6 | Smoke, rs30187 | 0.4447 | 8/10 | 0.6773 |
| 7 | Smoke | 0.5456 | 7/10 | 0.7032 |
The model with the maximum testing balnced accuracy and maximum CVC was considered as the best model
MDR multifactor dimensionality reduction, CVC cross validation consistency
*P-values were based on 1000 permutations
aThe best interaction model in MDR analysis
Fig. 1Interaction map for ankylosing spondylitis risk. The interaction model describes the percentage of the entropy (information gain) that is explained by each factor or 2-way interaction. Values inside nodes indicate information gain of individual attributes or main effects, whereas values between nodes show information gain of pairwise combinations of attributes or interaction effects. Positive entropy (plotted in red or orange) indicates interaction, which can be interpreted as a synergistic or nonadditive relationship; while negative entropy (plotted in yellow-green or green) indicates independence or additivity (redundancy). (Color figure online)
Fig. 2Conditioned analysis for B27 negative (−) or B27 positive (+). The presence of B27 increases the interactive effects between smoking and ERAP1 polymorphisms