Euihwan Do1,2, Jae Whan Park1, Oleksandr Stetsovych3, Pavel Jelinek3, Han Woong Yeom1,2. 1. Center for Artificial Low Dimensional Electronic Systems, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea. 3. Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Cukrovarnicka 10, 18221 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Abstract
An ideal one-dimensional electronic system is formed along atomic chains on Au-decorated vicinal silicon surfaces, but the nature of its low-temperature phases has been puzzling for last two decades. Here, we unambiguously identify the low-temperature structural distortion of this surface using high-resolution atomic force microscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy. The most important structural ingredient of this surface, the step-edge Si chains, are found to be strongly buckled, every third atom down, forming trimer unit cells. This observation is consistent with the recent model of rehybridized dangling bonds and rules out the antiferromagnetic spin ordering proposed earlier. The spectroscopy and electronic structure calculation indicate a charge density wave insulator with a Z3 topology, making it possible to exploit topological phases and excitations. The tunneling current was found to substantially lower the energy barrier between three degenerate CDW states, which induces a dynamically fluctuating CDW at very low temperature.
An ideal one-dimensional electronic system is formed along atomic chains on Au-decorated vicinal silicon surfaces, but the nature of its low-temperature phases has been puzzling for last two decades. Here, we unambiguously identify the low-temperature structural distortion of this surface using high-resolution atomic force microscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy. The most important structural ingredient of this surface, the step-edge Si chains, are found to be strongly buckled, every third atom down, forming trimer unit cells. This observation is consistent with the recent model of rehybridized dangling bonds and rules out the antiferromagnetic spin ordering proposed earlier. The spectroscopy and electronic structure calculation indicate a charge density wave insulator with a Z3 topology, making it possible to exploit topological phases and excitations. The tunneling current was found to substantially lower the energy barrier between three degenerate CDW states, which induces a dynamically fluctuating CDW at very low temperature.
Entities:
Keywords:
atomic force microscopy; atomic wire; charge density wave; density functional theory; scanning tunneling microscopy; topological soliton
One-dimensional (1D)
electronic systems have attracted great research
interest due to their simplicity with exactly solvable models, the
exploded manifestation of many-body interactions, and topological
properties. Non-Fermi liquid behaviors,[1,2] charge/spin
density wave phenomena,[3−5] nontrivial topology,[6] and
topological excitations[7] are among notable
issues discussed actively. While bulk compounds with strongly anisotropic
structures and organic crystals[8] have been
widely investigated materials hosting 1D electronic systems, self-assembled[6,7,9−16] or atom-manipulated[17,18] atomic chain structures on solid
surfaces are in the spotlight recently. As notable examples of self-assembled
atomic chains, charge density wave (CDW) and a new type of solitons
were discussed in indium chain structures on silicon surfaces,[6,7] non-Fermi liquid behaviors[10−12] and quantum spin chains[13−15] in gold-induced chains on silicon surfaces, and Majorana edge modes
in iron chain structures on a lead surface.[16]Among those representative atomic chain systems, Au-induced
atomic
chain structures on stepped Si surfaces have remained puzzling with
intriguing phase transitions of elusive origin.[10−15,19−23] The stepped surface of Si(553) with submonolayer
Au deposited has been known to feature well ordered atomic chain arrays,
which are composed basically of Au atomic rows embedded into the topmost
Si layer and honeycomb Si chains formed along its step edges (Figure a).[13−15,24] The latter provides chains of
Si dangling bonds localized on step edges. These atomic chains were
discovered to exhibit two different symmetry-broken structures at
low temperature; ×2 and ×3 orderings on terrace Au and step-edge
Si chains, respectively (2a0 and 3a0 with a0 = 0.384
nm, the Si lattice constant along steps). Origins of the superstructures
have been controversial for a long time.[13−15,21,22,25−28] The recent electron diffraction study revealed that the ×2
structure along the terrace Au chains has a static structural distortion
without a drastic temperature dependence,[25,27] which is consistently supported by the recent density functional
theory (DFT) calculations.[15] However, the
origin of the temperature-induced ×3 ordering along Si step-edge
chains[21,29] is still unclear with the suggestions of
the electronic/structural instability[15,26,28] and the antiferromagnetic spin ordering on Si dangling
bonds.[13] On the basis of the latter, even
a quantum spin liquid phase was suggested.[14,25] Namely, there exist two lines of models, which are distinctly based
on charge/structural and spin degrees of freedom, respectively. Moreover,
making the investigation of the ground state more challenging, the
apparent structure along Si step-edge chains in scanning tunneling
microscopy (STM) changes into another ×2 ordering below about
60 K.[30,31] The atomic structure of this ordering is
not clear at all but was suggested to be induced by the tunneling
current.[30,32] This means that STM cannot probe the pristine
ground state at low temperature.
Figure 1
(a) Topographic STM image (13.6 ×
13.6 nm2 at +0.9
V sample bias) of Si(553)-Au at 50 K and schematics of the rehybridized
model.[15] Si (Au) atoms are represented
by small (large) spheres. High-resolution (b,c) empty- and (d,e) filled-state
STM images (at V = +0.9, + 0.4, −0.4, and
−0.7 V, respectively, with I = 10 pA) for
four unit cells of the ×3 step-edge chain. The scale bar in (b)
corresponds to 1.0 nm. (f) Comparison between 50 K STM (V = +0.9 V and I = 5 pA) and 4.3 K AFM (V = 0 V) images resolving clearly step-edge Si (black arrow) and terrace
Au (yellow) chains.
(a) Topographic STM image (13.6 ×
13.6 nm2 at +0.9
V sample bias) of Si(553)-Au at 50 K and schematics of the rehybridized
model.[15] Si (Au) atoms are represented
by small (large) spheres. High-resolution (b,c) empty- and (d,e) filled-state
STM images (at V = +0.9, + 0.4, −0.4, and
−0.7 V, respectively, with I = 10 pA) for
four unit cells of the ×3 step-edge chain. The scale bar in (b)
corresponds to 1.0 nm. (f) Comparison between 50 K STM (V = +0.9 V and I = 5 pA) and 4.3 K AFM (V = 0 V) images resolving clearly step-edge Si (black arrow) and terrace
Au (yellow) chains.In the present work,
we report an atomic resolution noncontact
(nc) atomic force microscopy (AFM) study on the Si(553)-Au surface
together with simultaneous STM measurements. These combined measurements
provide effective decoupling of the possible excitation source (tunneling
current) and the local structural probe (AFM). The unperturbed step-edge
Si structure at 4.3 K is observed to possess a trimer ground state
with every third atom distorted downward and with an insulating property.
This clearly rules out the spin ordering model[13,14] and supports strongly the charge/structure-modulated model.[15] The present model corresponds to a CDW ground
state with a triple degeneracy or a Z3 topology for the Si step-edge chain,[21,22,33] whose electronic states are unexpectedly decoupled
from those of neighboring Au chains. The tunneling current injection
is found to induce an apparently undistorted structure in AFM but
a buckled dimer structure in STM. This structure is explained by the
fluctuation between three translationally degenerate trimer structures
with their translational barrier reduced substantially by the tunneling
current. The present work thus solves a long-standing puzzle on the
structure of this model 1D electronic system. Beyond that, this work
discloses the topological nature of the present system and introduces
it as a platform for manipulating topological phases and topological
excitations such as Z3 solitons. The combination
of atomic resolution STM and AFM can be widely applied to decouple
not only the electronic modulation from atomic structure but also
the electronic local excitation source for manipulation from the structural
probe.
Results and Discussion
Figure panels
b and e show the well-known empty- and filled-state STM images taken
at 50 K along a step edge of the Si(553)-Au surface, respectively.
The brightest protrusions in the STM images are due to Si step-edge
atoms (Figure f).
At this temperature, the perturbation by the tunneling current[30,31] is not substantial and the step edge exhibits the well-known ×3
superstructure.[13−15] On the other hand, the atomic chains on narrow terraces
show a ×2 superstructure with a much reduced contrast (indicated
by a yellow arrow in Figure f). These results are fully consistent with many previous
STM works.[14,21,29−31,35,36] Note also the strong bias dependence of the STM images (Figure b–e), which
indicates a substantial electronic effect for these images such as
the spin splitting[13,14] or the rehybridization of dangling
bonds.[15]In stark contrast, a Δf image of nc-AFM
can reveal directly the structural distortion, if any, since it sensitively
detects the relative distance between the tip and individual surface
atoms. The corresponding image of Figure f exhibits a strong negative Δf (the dark contrast in the image), which indicates surface
atoms closer to the tip. This image tells immediately that the step
edge is structurally distorted with a significant height difference.
Since the height (contrast) of the two (black) atoms are similar to
those of the terrace atoms, we can conclude that every third (blue)
atoms of the step edge has a downward distortion. We also observe
the alternating bright and dark contrast in a ×2 period along
the Au chains within the narrow terraces between Si step edges in
the AFM image (pointed by the yellow arrow), which is consistent with
what is observed in the STM images. Since the Au atomic positions
would be represented by dark contrast, this image indicates a dimerlike
paring of Au atoms. The former is crucial for the debate on the surface
structure since the recent structure models share the double Au row
structure with a ×2 distortion along the terrace but differ substantially
in the structural distortion on the Si step edge.[13−15,24] Namely, the previous calculations and the present
one indicate that the structural distortion of the antiferromagnetic
spin chain model is negligible, in clear contrast to the present AFM
observation even though this model gives a strong electronic modulation
in STM similar to that of the rehybridized model. On the other hand,
the strong step-edge distortion revealed in the nc-AFM image is consistent
with the rehybridized step-edge chain model (Figure f).[13−15] Furthermore, the atomic origin
of the STM protrusions can be disclosed unambiguously by the high-resolution
Δf image of the same structure taken simultaneously
with STM. The strong empty-state protrusion is localized on the down-distorted
Si atom at the step edge and the double protrusions in the filled
state on the undistorted Si atoms. This is fully consistent with the
result of the DFT calculations based on the reconstruction of step-edge
Si atoms within the rehybridization model.[15] This reconstruction, the downward distortion on every third atoms,
splits the sp3 dangling bond into sp2 and p
orbitals in filled and empty states, respectively, which explains
the corresponding STM contrast.[15]The reconstruction of step-edge atoms would be reflected in surface
electronic states. Figure panels a and b show the band structures calculated along
step edges. In the undistorted structure (Figure a), the Au chains have two strongly metallic
bands coming from the double Au rows consistent with the previous
angle-resolved photoemission measurements.[21,23] Note that the spin–orbit coupling is not included here, which
explains small extra splittings observed in these Au 6s bands.[23] The silicon dangling bonds along
step edges also form a metallic band. This is naturally expected from
the partially filled nature of dangling bonds. The Au and Si bands
are hybridized, and the latter receives electrons from the substrate
to be filled over the half filling. As mentioned above, the step-edge
reconstruction splits the Si band into the empty p band just above
the Fermi level and the fully filled sp2 band (blue and
black circles in Figure b, respectively). These states are rather well localized on the distorted
and undistorted Si atoms, respectively. The ×2 distortion on
the Au chains also makes a band gap, but it is located above the Fermi
level around +0.4 eV. Thus, the Au chains keep its metallic property
but the Si chains become insulating with a gap larger than 0.6 eV.
These calculated results explain the main features of the measured
STS (dI/dV) spectra (Figure d). Most importantly, the density
of states for Si chains of the reconstructed surface exhibit a substantial
splitting of the main spectra with the strong localization of the
empty-state feature (+0.50 eV) on the distorted atom (the blue arrow)
and the filled state (−0.16 eV) on the undistorted atoms (the
black arrow). The empty state closer to the Fermi level at +0.2 eV
is due to the electronic state related to Au chains. This state appears
also in the spectra of the Si chain atoms, which seems to indicate
the limited spatial resolution of this particular STS measurement.
The insulating property of the Si chains can be clearly deduced from
the STS measurements in contrast to the Au chains (inset of Figure d and see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information for more
the detailed gap measurements). The major discrepancy between the
calculation and the measurement is the rigid shift of the spectra
by 0.3 eV (Figure c,d), which obviously indicates a less charge transfer from the Si
substrate than calculated. A smaller charge transfer (or a hole doping)
puts the Fermi level of the Si step-edge chain well within its band
gap. Within this situation, namely with the large band gap formation
and the shift of the Fermi level for the Si dangling-bond band, the
insulating property of the Si step-edge chain becomes robust, and
the coupling of the bands of Si and Au chains becomes much less significant.
In our additional calculations, we prove that the mild hole doping
indeed leads to a rigid shift of the Si states and is favorable for
the ×3 CDW formation on the step-edge Si (Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). In contrast, the
electron doping suppresses the ×3 structure, which will be discussed
below.
Figure 2
Calculated band structures of (a) undistorted and (b) distorted
surfaces along the step-edge direction. The insets show the schematics
of the structure models, respectively. (c) Calculated and (d) measured
local density of states (LDOS) spectra on the step-edge Si chain (blue
and black for distorted and undistorted atoms, respectively) and on
the terrace Au chain (yellow). For the calculated spectra, the energy
is shifted for +0.3 eV for comparison. The dI/dV spectra are normalized conductance (the method described
in ref (34)) and were
measured at 50 K to prevent the unintended current-induced transition.
Curves are vertically offset for comparison (dashed lines indicate
zeros). Five prominent spectral features are specified on the curves
(blue, black, and yellow arrows). Inset: I–V curves recorded from ×3 step-edge Si (blue) and terrace
Au (yellow) chains. In comparison with the calculated LDOS, one has
to consider a roughly parabolic background in the experiment centered
at zero bias.
Calculated band structures of (a) undistorted and (b) distorted
surfaces along the step-edge direction. The insets show the schematics
of the structure models, respectively. (c) Calculated and (d) measured
local density of states (LDOS) spectra on the step-edge Si chain (blue
and black for distorted and undistorted atoms, respectively) and on
the terrace Au chain (yellow). For the calculated spectra, the energy
is shifted for +0.3 eV for comparison. The dI/dV spectra are normalized conductance (the method described
in ref (34)) and were
measured at 50 K to prevent the unintended current-induced transition.
Curves are vertically offset for comparison (dashed lines indicate
zeros). Five prominent spectral features are specified on the curves
(blue, black, and yellow arrows). Inset: I–V curves recorded from ×3 step-edge Si (blue) and terrace
Au (yellow) chains. In comparison with the calculated LDOS, one has
to consider a roughly parabolic background in the experiment centered
at zero bias.The distorted and insulating Si
step-edge chains straightforwardly
indicate a CDW insulator although its mechanism is largely different
from most known CDW systems. The mechanism is not fully consistent
with the Fermi surface nesting of a dispersive band but is much closer
to the Jahn–Teller distortion. However, the present band gap
is not a bonding–antibonding splitting of the Jahn–Teller
effect but an orbital rehybridization or the orbital ordering of p
and sp2 orbitals. Since the distortion has a ×3 periodicity,
there exist three degenerate ground states. This corresponds to a
realization of a Z3 topological insulator,
whose material realization has not been reported to our best knowledge.
Topological excitations or solitons of this system are expected to
have fractional charges of (2/3)e and (4/3)e.[33,37,38] The soliton excitation of the present system
was suggested in an early STM work for local defects[22] and in the recent electron diffraction study for the thermally
induced disordering,[25,26,29] and was identified experimentally very recently.[39] The present structural information provides a solid ground
for the existence of such exotic topological solitons.As mentioned
above, the STM images at lower temperature were reported
to exhibit different superstructures, developing gradually a new ×2
superstructure.[30,31]Figure a shows an empty-state STM image recorded
at 4.3 K where the effect of tunneling current was reported to dominate.
It is apparent that both chains have a 2a0 periodicity with Si step-edge atoms in apparent up-and-down buckling
contrast. However, at the same temperature and position, the nc-AFM
image shows mainly the ×3 superstructure (Figures b,c), which is consistent with the measurements
at 50 K. Thus, we can ensure that the ×2 structure on the step
edge is indeed induced by tunneling current as suggested in the previous
works.[30,31] The effect of the tunneling current can
further be corroborated by the nc-AFM measurement with the tunneling
current on; while the AFM images shown so far are obtained with the
null tip bias (Figure e), we can also obtain the same quality image with the tunneling
current (bias of 0.5 V) (Figure f). Figure panels e–g unambiguously indicate that the trimer
reconstruction on the step edge is completely relieved by the tunneling
current and the current-induced transition was observed to be reversible
(Figure S3). This confirms that the ground-state
reconstruction is based on the ×3 and ×2 superstructures
along the Si step-edge and Au terrace chains, respectively. In fact,
the apparently undistorted structure is observed locally in the AFM
image without the tunneling current in Figure b (dashed rectangle), which is thought to
be due to the presence of local defects.
Figure 3
Topographic (a) STM and
(b) AFM images (5.6 × 5.6 nm2) of Si(553)-Au at 4.3
K. The images are taken at +1.0 (STM, with I = 10
pA) and 0 (AFM) sample biases. The black arrow indicates
the uphill direction of the steps. Comparison of STM (yellow) and
AFM (black) line profiles taken across the (c) Si step-edge wire (white
rectangle) and (d) static adsorbate impurity[29] (solid red). Bias-dependent AFM images measured at (e) 0 and (f)
+0.5 V sample biases. (g) Δf line profiles
taken across the Si step-edge chain at 0 (black) and +0.5 V (red),
which exhibit two different surface states of trimer and monomer,
respectively. The down-distorted (undistorted) atom of the trimer
structure is represented by blue (black) sphere.
Topographic (a) STM and
(b) AFM images (5.6 × 5.6 nm2) of Si(553)-Au at 4.3
K. The images are taken at +1.0 (STM, with I = 10
pA) and 0 (AFM) sample biases. The black arrow indicates
the uphill direction of the steps. Comparison of STM (yellow) and
AFM (black) line profiles taken across the (c) Si step-edge wire (white
rectangle) and (d) static adsorbate impurity[29] (solid red). Bias-dependent AFM images measured at (e) 0 and (f)
+0.5 V sample biases. (g) Δf line profiles
taken across the Si step-edge chain at 0 (black) and +0.5 V (red),
which exhibit two different surface states of trimer and monomer,
respectively. The down-distorted (undistorted) atom of the trimer
structure is represented by blue (black) sphere.The origin of this additional structure with a weak buckling in
the STM image can be explained by the electron doping effect within
our theoretical calculations. The transient electron doping by tunneling
current was already proposed to explain the tunneling-induced structure
within the antiferromagnetic spin chain model.[30,31] This model suggested that a 2a0-periodic
antiferromagnetic spin ordering is favored over the 3a0 one when the system is doped. This model, however, cannot
explain the much reduced STM contrast in the ×2 superstructure
as compared with that of ×3, since the ×2 and ×3 antiferromagnetic
orderings of spins produce the same amount of exchange splitting and
electronic modulation. In Figure , the structural and electronic properties of the surface
were examined for various electron doping levels by using the present
rehybridized model.[15] The additional electron
doping enhances the Au–Au bond length to form a stronger ×2
distortion of the Au chain (Figure a), which is consistent with the previous theoretical
study.[40] In stark contrast, the doping
relieves the distortion of Si step-edge atoms to suppress the ×3
CDW order, especially after the saturation of the Au dimerization
around 0.8e doping. This indicates that doped electrons fill the metallic
Au bands (Figures b and 4c) at the initial stage and, at a higher
doping level, accumulate on the unoccupied part of the distorted Si
bands to destabilize the distorted structure (Figure c,d). As a result, the energy gain of the
×3 CDW structure is significantly reduced together with the transition
energy barrier between three translationally degenerate ×3 structures
(Figure b). Since
three degenerate ground states compete each other with a small energy
barrier of 13 meV, at a finite temperature, the doped system would
exhibit a dynamic fluctuation between them. The averaged STM image
over three degenerate states matches excellently with the weakly buckled
×2 structure observed by STM at low temperature (Figure g). The weak buckling is the
effect of the strong Au dimerization, which affects the translational
potential energy between the degenerate states (see the Supporting Information Figure S4).
Figure 4
Electron doping
effect on a CDW ground state of the Si(553)-Au
surface. (a) Structural distortions of the Si step-edge chain (blue)
and the Au terrace chain (yellow) as a function of electron doping.
Inset: solid and dashed rectangles indicate the distorted Si atoms
placed close to the long and the short Au–Au bonds, respectively.
(b) Translational energy barriers between the degenerate ground states
for different electron doping levels. Inset: initial and final states
for a diffusion process. (c,d) Isosurface of total charge difference
(Δρ). (c) Δρ = ρCDW –
ρ×1 (7 × 10–3 e Å–3) for the undoped surface (ρ0.0).
(d) Δρ = ρ1.0 – ρ0.0 (2 × 10–3 e Å–3).
Red (blue) color indicates positive (negative) charges. Simulated
STM images (V = +1.0 V and z = 2
Å) for (e) undoped and (f) doped (1.0e) ×6 supercells. Magenta
lines indicate z profiles along the step-edge chain.
(g) Comparison between the STM image at 4.3 K (top) and the simulated
one (V = +1.0 V and z = 4 Å)
averaged for all three degenerate ground states (bottom).
Electron doping
effect on a CDW ground state of the Si(553)-Au
surface. (a) Structural distortions of the Si step-edge chain (blue)
and the Au terrace chain (yellow) as a function of electron doping.
Inset: solid and dashed rectangles indicate the distorted Si atoms
placed close to the long and the short Au–Au bonds, respectively.
(b) Translational energy barriers between the degenerate ground states
for different electron doping levels. Inset: initial and final states
for a diffusion process. (c,d) Isosurface of total charge difference
(Δρ). (c) Δρ = ρCDW –
ρ×1 (7 × 10–3 e Å–3) for the undoped surface (ρ0.0).
(d) Δρ = ρ1.0 – ρ0.0 (2 × 10–3 e Å–3).
Red (blue) color indicates positive (negative) charges. Simulated
STM images (V = +1.0 V and z = 2
Å) for (e) undoped and (f) doped (1.0e) ×6 supercells. Magenta
lines indicate z profiles along the step-edge chain.
(g) Comparison between the STM image at 4.3 K (top) and the simulated
one (V = +1.0 V and z = 4 Å)
averaged for all three degenerate ground states (bottom).
Conclusions
The atomic and electronic structures of the
Si(553)-Au chain system
are investigated by atomic resolution nc-AFM together with simultaneous
STM/STS measurements. These measurements unambiguously reveal the
strong trimer structural distortion and a substantial band gap along
the step-edge Si chains at low temperature, which corresponds to a
CDW ground state and a Z3 topological
insulator. The transient electron doping by the tunneling current
is shown to reduce the stability of the CDW phase to induce a dynamically
fluctuating CDW state at very low temperature. Further studies on
topological properties and topological excitations in this system
are thus highly promising. In particular, the exploitation of the Z3 topological solitons in the present system
would provide opportunity for the topologically protected multilevel
information processing. The combination of atomic resolution STM and
AFM is shown to be useful to decouple the electronic local excitation
source for manipulation from the structural probe.
Methods
Atomically resolved imaging and spectroscopy
of the Si(553)-Au
surface were performed by simultaneous high-resolution nc-AFM and
STM measurements under ultrahigh vacuum at two different temperatures
of 4.3 and 50 K using a commercial low-temperature microscope (SPECS
GmbH) with force–current detection capabilities. A tungsten
tip mounted on a tuning fork was used for both AFM and STM measurements.
AFM images were obtained by measuring the frequency shift (Δf) of the tuning fork at constant height mode. For scanning
tunneling spectroscopy (STS) measurements, current–voltage
(I–V) curves were recorded
with the lock-in technique using a modulation amplitude of 10 mV.
The clean Si(553) surface was prepared by repeated flash heating to
1520 K. Gold was evaporated onto the clean Si(553) surface held at
923 K. At a Au coverage of around 0.5 monolayer, well-ordered Si(553)-Au
surfaces were reproducibly fabricated.[29,36] DFT calculations
were performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package[41] within the generalized-gradient approximation
(GGA) using the revised Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBEsol)
functional.[42] The Si(553)-Au surface is
modeled within periodic supercells with six bulklike Si layers and
a vacuum spacing of about 12.8 Å. The bottom of the slab was
passivated by H atoms. We used a plane-wave basis with an energy cutoff
of 312 eV and 5 × 2 × 1 k-point mesh. All atoms but the
bottom two Si layers were relaxed until the residual force components
were within 0.03 eV/Å.
Authors: J N Crain; A Kirakosian; K N Altmann; C Bromberger; S C Erwin; J L McChesney; J-L Lin; F J Himpsel Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2003-05-02 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Stevan Nadj-Perge; Ilya K Drozdov; Jian Li; Hua Chen; Sangjun Jeon; Jungpil Seo; Allan H MacDonald; B Andrei Bernevig; Ali Yazdani Journal: Science Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: J Schlappa; K Wohlfeld; K J Zhou; M Mourigal; M W Haverkort; V N Strocov; L Hozoi; C Monney; S Nishimoto; S Singh; A Revcolevschi; J-S Caux; L Patthey; H M Rønnow; J van den Brink; T Schmitt Journal: Nature Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 49.962