Literature DB >> 35426886

An Anatomic Analysis of Fibula Flap Mandible Reconstructions: Implications for Endosseous Implant Placement.

Evan B Rosen1, R Kyle Gazdeck1, Debra A Goldman1, Hina Panchal1, Emily Jones1, Jennifer P Nguyen1, Robert J Allen1, Jonas A Nelson1, Joseph M Huryn1, Evan Matros1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Precise planning and evaluation of the fibula bone are necessary if immediate endosseous implant placement is considered. Limited information is available on the anatomical dimensions or density of fibula used in mandibular reconstructions. This study aimed to describe the morphology and dimensions of the fibula used to reconstruct segmental mandibular defects and contrast the findings with the native mandible.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy reconstructed with osteocutaneous fibula flaps and had at least one postoperative computed tomography scan. Fibula cross sectional dimensions and densities were evaluated with three-dimensional software. Radiographic measurements were obtained from the contralateral mandible medial to the first molar for comparison.
RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-seven fibula cross sections from 159 segments were evaluated. Cross-sectional oval, quadrilateral, triangular, and pentagonal shapes differed significantly in proportion (p < 0.001). Thirty-eight percent of segments (95 percent CI, 30 to 46 percent) had differences in cross-section height greater than 1 mm (p < 0.001). Between segments within the same patient, the median height difference was 1.58 mm (range, 0.14 to 6 mm). The superior cortex density was significantly higher for the fibula than the native mandible; however, the medullary space density was significantly lower (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The current study comprises the most comprehensive description of fibula morphology in mandibular reconstructions and highlights the significant variability that exists. The findings provide justification for the added time and cost of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing in centers interested in performing immediate dental implant placement, as the technology provides the necessary precision and accuracy.
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35426886      PMCID: PMC9305724          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   5.169


  12 in total

1.  Clinicoanatomic examination of the fibula: anatomic basis for dental implant placement.

Authors:  M Matsuura; K Ohno; K Michi; K Egawa; R Takiguchi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Topographical anatomy of the fibula and peroneal artery in Koreans.

Authors:  S W Choi; H J Kim; K S Koh; I H Chung; I H Cha
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Comparisons of bone volumes and densities relating to osseointegrated implants in microvascularly reconstructed mandibles: a study of cadaveric radius and fibula bones.

Authors:  B Klesper; J Wahn; J Koebke
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Anatomical considerations of the Thai fibula used as a fibula osteocutaneous free flap in mandibular reconstruction and dental implant placement.

Authors:  Wandee Apinhasmit; Phonkit Sinpitaksakul; Supin Chompoopong
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2012-04

Review 5.  Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmental resection.

Authors:  Christiaan Schrag; Yang-Ming Chang; Chi-Ying Tsai; Fu-Chan Wei
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction.

Authors:  D A Hidalgo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Cephalometric analysis for microvascular head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Edward I Chang; Mark W Clemens; Patrick B Garvey; Roman J Skoracki; Matthew M Hanasono
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Classification of mandibular defects.

Authors:  J B Boyd; P J Gullane; L E Rotstein; D H Brown; J C Irish
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Contemporary reconstruction of the mandible.

Authors:  Mathew Bak; Adam S Jacobson; Daniel Buchbinder; Mark L Urken
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 5.337

10.  Anatomical examination of the fibula: digital imaging study for osseointegrated implant installation.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Ide; Satoru Matsunaga; Jeffrey Harris; Daniel O' Connell; Hadi Seikaly; Johan Wolfaardt
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.