Comparisons of bone volumes and densities relating to osseointegrated implants in microvascularly reconstructed mandibles: a study of cadaveric radius and fibula bones.

The study was designed to compare the dimensions and densities of two frequently used bone donor sites with regard to placement of endosseous dental implants in microvascularly reconstructed mandibles. A total of 40 radii and of 40 fibulae were investigated. Fifty two percent of the fibulae had adequate bone volume for the positioning of four 10 mm implants, while this figure was 55% for the radii. After using the 'double barrel' technique the placement of four 10 mm implants succeeded in 87% of all the fibulae. Due to the lack of bone length required, this special technique was not possible in the radii investigated. Cortical thickness and density of bone were higher in the radii when compared with the fibulae. In each bone the central and distal parts presented the highest values of cortical thickness and density. Although the radius offers enough substantial bone for implant placement in some cases this cannot be used for clinical purpose, as only hemicortical grafts can be obtained. Otherwise the resulting donor site morbidity would be intolerable. In conclusion, our results support the clinical experience that the fibula is today's 'work horse' donor site for reconstruction of the mandible.