| Literature DB >> 35425426 |
Weizhen Huang1,2, Lan Lan2, Heng Zhou2, Jiajia Yuan2, Xiuhong Mao2, Qing Hu2, Shen Ji2.
Abstract
Platycodon grandiflorus (Jacq.) A. DC. is widely cultivated across the south and north of China. Its root, Platycodonis radix, is commonly used as a vegetable, functional food, and traditional herbal medicine with various biological benefits. It is critical to fully clarify the chemical composition of Platycodonis radix for the sake of the food industry and traditional herb markets. In this study, a strategy of metabolome and lipidome profiling based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to ion mobility-quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-IM-QTOF-MS) was developed to reveal the overall chemical composition of Platycodonis radix. IN particular, comprehensive lipidome profiling was first performed for Platycodonis radix, in which 170 lipid molecular species including 55.9% glycerophospholipids, 31.2% glycerolipids, and 12.9% sphingolipids were identified. Platycodonis radix from two major production regions in China, Inner Mongolia and Anhui province, were collected and analyzed by the MS based approach combined with multivariate statistical analysis from both the metabolome and lipidome aspects. This study threw focus on the profiling investigations of Platycodonis radix from different growing regions and provided new potential in the lipidome analysis of medicinal food. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35425426 PMCID: PMC8981106 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra08285j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1Multivariate statistical analysis of the metabolites in Platycodonis radix from different geographical origins. (A) PCA score plot, R2X = 0.905 and Q2 = 0.641; (B) OPLS-DA score plot, R2X = 0.653, R2Y = 0.989 and Q2 = 0.954; (C) permutation test of the established OPLS-DA model; (D) S-plot; (E) VIP plot.
Information of 24 potential metabolic markers for Platycodonis radix from different growing regions
| No. | Compound ID | VIP value | Adducts | Formula | Mass error/ppm | MS/MS information | Identify | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.82_1208.5822 | 7.80 | [M − H]− | C57H92O27 | −1.12 | 665.39, 541.18, 469.16, 409.16 | Polygalacin D | Triterpenoid saponins |
| 2 | 10.93_1385.6227 | 7.21 | [M − H]− | C63H102O33 | 0.56 | 843.44, 541.18, 519.33, 469.16, 409.16 | Platycodin D2 | Triterpenoid saponins |
| 3 | 3.26_1314.4321 | 6.53 | [M + HCOO]− | C48H82O41 | −1.47 | 972.32, 827.27, 503.16, 341.11, 179.06 | 1,1,1,1,1,1-Kestooctaose | Saccharides |
| 4 | 22.99_433.2363 | 5.59 | [M − H]− | C21H39O7P | 1.01 | 279.23, 171.01, 152.99, 96.97, 78.96 | LPA 18:2 | Phospholipids |
| 5 | 1.16_666.2214 | 5.53 | [M + HCOO]− | C24H42O21 | −0.82 | 485.15, 341.11, 323.10, 179.06 | Nystose | Saccharides |
| 6 | 2.16_873.2720 | 5.51 | [M + HCOO]− | C30H52O26 | −1.63 | 647.20, 503.16, 485.15, 341.11, 323.10, 179.06 | 1-Fructofuranosylnystose | Saccharides |
| 7 | 3.32_990.3266 | 5.07 | [M + HCOO]− | C36H62O31 | −1.68 | 809.26, 647.20, 485.15, 341.11, 323.10, 179.06 | 1,1,1,1-Kestohexaose | Saccharides |
| 8 | 3.32_1152.3793 | 4.57 | [M + HCOO]− | C42H72O36 | −1.41 | 971.31, 647.20, 342.11, 179.06 | 1,1,1,1,1-Kestoheptaose | Saccharides |
| 9 | 10.34_1137.5325 | 4.40 | [M + HCOO]− | C52H84O24 | −0.35 | 681.39, 663.37, 519.33, 501.32, 457.33 | Deapioplatycodin D | Triterpenoid saponins |
| 10 | 4.55_353.0874 | 4.39 | [M − H]− | C16H18O9 | −0.82 | 191.05624, 173.05, 161.02485, 135.04542 | Chlorogenic acid | Organic acids |
| 11 | 15.62_329.2332 | 4.26 | [M − H]− | C18H34O5 | −0.19 | 311.22, 229.14, 211.13, 193.12, 183.14 | Tianshic acid | Organic acids |
| 12 | 22.65_295.2279 | 4.24 | [M − H]− | C18H32O3 | 0.78 | 277.22, 233.23, 205.12, 195.14, 125.10 | Coronaric acid | Organic acids |
| 13 | 11.44_1370.6350 | 4.22 | [M − H]− | C63H102O32 | −1.07 | 827.44, 665.39, 541.18, 503.34, 469.16, 441.34 | Polygalacin D2 | Triterpenoid saponins |
| 14 | 22.81_540.3309 | 4.09 | [M + HCOO]− | C24H50NO7P | 0.98 | 480.31, 255.23, 242.08, 224.07 | LPC 16:0/0:0 | Phospholipids |
| 15 | 22.70_452.2782 | 4.08 | [M − H]− | C21H44NO7P | 1.22 | 255.23312, 214.05, 196.03830 | LPE 16:0/0:0 | Phospholipids |
| 16 | 10.83_1134.5450 | 3.88 | [M + HCOO]− | C54H86O25 | 0.15 | 1091.53, 983.48, 681.39, 663.37, 501.32 | Platycoside C | Triterpenoid saponins |
| 17 | 22.26_564.3309 | 3.81 | [M + HCOO]− | C26H50NO7P | 0.56 | 504.31, 279.23, 242.08, 224.07 | LPC 18:2/0:0 | Phospholipids |
| 18 | 10.20_1253.5800 | 3.77 | [M − H]− | C58H94O29 | 0.01 | 843.44, 825.43, 663.37562; 519.33, 471.31 | Deapioplatycodin D2 | Triterpenoid saponins |
| 19 | 6.70_396.1784 | 3.76 | [M + HCOO]− | C20H28O8 | 0.7 | 305.12, 215.11, 185.10, 159.08, 143.07, 89.04 | Lobetyolin | Polyacetylenes |
| 20 | 22.17_476.2785 | 3.60 | [M − H]− | C23H44NO7P | 1.06 | 279.23, 214.05, 196.03810 | LPE 18:2/0:0 | Phospholipids |
| 21 | 13.37_1222.5611n | 3.37 | [M − H]− | C57H90O28 | −0.43 | 1131.52, 635.38, 541.18, 469.16, 409.13 | 16-Oxo-platycodin D | Triterpenoid saponins |
| 22 | 6.18_558.2313 | 3.32 | [M + HCOO]− | C26H38O13 | 0.08 | 467.18, 323.10, 221.07, 179.06, 161.05 | Lobetyolinin | Polyacetylenes |
| 23 | 11.21_1105.5065 | 3.24 | [M − H]− | C52H82O25 | −0.17 | 995.45, 717.35, 695.37, 633.36, 485.29, 423.29 | Platyconic acid C | Triterpenoid saponins |
| 24 | 7.69_1254.5874 | 3.11 | [M + HCOO]− | C58H94O29 | −0.85 | 843.44, 681.38; 519.33, 471.31, 409.13 | Deapioplatycodin D3 | Triterpenoid saponins |
Identified with authentic standards.
Fig. 2Structural inference of typical metabolic markers in Platycodonis radix from different growing regions.
Fig. 3Heatmap of the cluster analysis based on the abundance of 24 potential metabolic markers.
Fig. 4Distribution of lipid subclasses identified in Platycodonis radix. Number of lipids in each subclass (A). Percentage composition of lipid subclasses identified in Platycodonis radix (B).
Fig. 5Negative ion mode MS/MS spectra of PA 16:0/18:2 at m/z 671.47 (A), PA 16:0/18:2(OH) at m/z 687.46 (B), PC 16:0/18:2 at m/z 802.56 (C), PE 18:0/18:2 at m/z 742.54 (D), LPI 18:2 at m/z 595.29 (E), PMeOH 18:0/18:2 at m/z 713.51 (F); positive ion mode MS/MS spectra of TG 18:2/18:2/18:3 at m/z 894.75 (G) and Cer t18:1/h22:0 at m/z 654.60 (H).
Fig. 6PCA, OPLS-DA and VIP plot of AH and NM samples in negative mode (A–C) and positive mode (D–F). The statistical parameters as follows: (A) R2X = 0.838, Q2 = 0.690; (B) R2X = 0.721, R2Y = 0.980 and Q2 = 0.942; (D) R2X = 0.902, Q2 = 0.751; (E) R2X = 0.626, R2Y = 0.960 and Q2 = 0.929; heatmaps visualizing the intensities of potential chemical markers (G).
Information of 22 differential lipids for Platycodonis radix from different growing regionsa
| No. | Compound ID | VIP value | Adducts | Formula | Mass error/ppm | MS/MS information | Lipid species | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.44_651.5790 | 5.82 | [M + H]+ | C40H77NO5 | 2.20 | 634.58, 616.57, 354.35, 298.27, 280.26, 262.25 | Cer t18:1/h22:1 | Sphingolipids |
| 2 | 12.40_653.5948 | 5.73 | [M + H]+ | C40H79NO5 | −1.02 | 636.59, 618.58, 356.35, 298.27, 280.26, 262.25 | Cer t18:1/h22:0 | Sphingolipids |
| 3 | 8.65_616.5056 | 4.35 | [M + H]+ | C39H68O5 | −1.98 | 599.50, 337.27, 263.22 | DG 18:2/18:2 | Glycerolipids |
| 4 | 13.60_695.6418 | 3.83 | [M + H]+ | C43H85NO5 | −1.20 | 678.64, 660.63, 398.40, 316.28, 298.27, 280.26, 262.25 | Cer t18:1/h25:0 | Sphingolipids |
| 5 | 15.77_884.7815 | 3.80 | [M + NH4]+ | C57H104O6 | −2.30 | 603.53, 339.29, 265.25 | TG 18:1/18:1/18:1 | Glycerolipids |
| 6 | 13.02_667.6104 | 3.75 | [M + H]+ | C41H81NO5 | −1.25 | 650.61, 632.61, 370.37, 298.27, 280.26, 262.25 | Cer t18:1/h23:0 | Sphingolipids |
| 7 | 10.85_618.5210 | 3.26 | [M + H]+ | C39H70O5 | −1.18 | 601.52, 339.29, 337.27 | DG 18:2/18:1 | Glycerolipids |
| 8 | 15.02_878.7323 | 3.18 | [M + NH4]+ | C57H98O6 | −2.16 | 599.50, 337.27, 319.26, 263.24 | TG 18:2/18:2/18:2 | Glycerolipids |
| 9 | 12.35_679.6101 | 3.08 | [M + H]+ | C42H81NO5 | −1.06 | 662.61, 644.60, 382.37, 298.27, 280.26 | Cer t18:1/h24:1 | Sphingolipids |
| 10 | 0.94_433.2360 | 3.41 | [M − H]− | C21H39O7P | −0.64 | 279.23, 171.01, 153.00 | LPA 18:2 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 11 | 1.11_409.2360 | 2.86 | [M − H]− | C19H39O7P | 0.13 | 255.23, 171.01, 153.00 | LPA 16:0 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 12 | 5.04_745.5016 | 2.85 | [M − H]− | C40H75O10P | −1.08 | 507.27, 489.26, 483.27, 465.26, 279.23, 255.23 | PG 16:0/18:2 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 13 | 5.50_738.5071 | 2.56 | [M − H]− | C41H74NO8P | −0.10 | 476.28, 458.27, 277.22, 196.04, 140.01 | PE 18:1/18:3 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 14 | 6.09_861.5484 | 2.41 | [M − H]− | C45H83O13P | −0.90 | 581.31, 577.28, 283.28, 279.23 | PI 18:0/18:2 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 15 | 8.75_742.5383 | 2.37 | [M − H]− | C41H78NO8P | −0.89 | 480.31, 476.28, 462.30, 458.27, 283.26, 279.23 | PE 18:0/18:2 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 16 | 0.84_595.2884 | 2.34 | [M − H]− | C27H49O12P | −0.93 | 415.23, 333.06, 315.05, 279.23, 241.01, 223.00 | LPI 18:2 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 17 | 7.38_778.5595 | 2.27 | [M + HCOO]− | C40H80NO8P | −0.76 | 718.54, 480.31, 462.30, 255.23 | PC 16:0/16:0 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 18 | 1.01_564.3305 | 2.24 | [M + HCOO]− | C26H50NO7P | −0.64 | 504.31, 279.23, 242.08, 224.07 | LPC 18:2/0:0 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 19 | 1.24_452.2782 | 2.22 | [M − H]− | C21H44NO7P | 0.60 | 255.23, 214.05, 196.04, 140.01 | LPE 16:0/0:0 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 20 | 1.18_540.3307 | 2.20 | [M + HCOO]− | C24H50NO7P | 0.22 | 480.31, 255.23, 242.08, 224.07 | LPC 16:0/0:0 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 21 | 13.65_826.6321 | 2.13 | [M − H]− | C47H90NO8P | −0.60 | 564.40, 546.39, 476.31, 458.27, 367.56, 279.23 | PE 24:0/18:2 | Glycerophospholipids |
| 22 | 0.98_571.2884 | 2.11 | [M − H]− | C25H49O12P | −1.37 | 255.23, 241.01, 153.00 | LPI 16:0 | Glycerophospholipids |
Cer: ceramide; DG: diacylglycerol; TG: triacylglycerol; LPA: lysosphosphatidic acid; PG: phosphatidylglycerol; PE: phosphatidylethanolamine; PI: phosphatidylinositol; LPI: lysophosphatidylinositol; PC: phosphatidylcholine; LPC: lysophosphatidylcholine; LPE: lysophosphatidylethanolamine.
Fig. 7Comparation of the total saponins (A), oligosaccharides (B) and the DPPH radical scavenging effect (C) in AH and NM samples. Data are presented as Mean ± SD (n = 12). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ns p > 0.05.