Construction of a Au@MoS2 composite nanosheet biosensor for the ultrasensitive detection of a neurotransmitter and understanding of its mechanism based on DFT calculations.

MoS2 nanosheets can be applied as electrochemical biosensors to selectively and sensitively respond to the surrounding environment and detect various biomolecules due to their large specific surface area and unique physicochemical properties. In this paper, single-layer or few-layer MoS2 nanosheets were prepared by an improved liquid phase stripping method, and then combining the unique material characteristics of MoS2 and the metallic property of Au nanoparticles (AuNPs), Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets were synthesized based on MoS2 nanosheets. Then, the structure and properties of MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets were comprehensively characterized. The results proved that AuNPs were successfully loaded on MoS2 nanosheets. At the same time, on the basis of the successful preparation of Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets, an electrochemical biosensor targeting dopamine was successfully constructed by cyclic voltammetry. The linear detection range was 0.5-350 μM, and the detection limit was 0.2 μM. The high-sensitive electrochemical detection of dopamine has been achieved, which provides a new idea for the application of MoS2-based nanomaterials in the biosensing of neurotransmitters. In addition, density functional theory (DFT) was used to explore the electrochemical performance of Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets. The results show that the adsorption of Au atoms on the MoS2 2D structure improves the conductivity of MoS2 nanosheets, which theoretically supports the possibilities of its application as a platform for the ultrasensitive detection of neurotransmitters or other biomolecules in the field of disease diagnosis. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Introduction

Transition metal disulfides are other important two-dimensional materials besides graphene. Among them, MoS2 as the most typical transition metal disulfide, has received extensive attention due to its ultra-thin structure and special physicochemical properties.[1-3] At present, single-layer or few-layer MoS2 nanosheets, considered as semiconductor analogs of graphene, have been widely used in photochemistry, electrochemistry and long-acting transistor biosensors due to their high specific surface area, conductive photothermal conversion performance and easy functionalization.[4-7] Molybdenum disulfide, combined with fluorescence, electrochemistry, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and field-effect transistor technology, is considered to be a promising sensing platform for chemical/biological molecule detection.[5,7] Molybdenum disulfide nanosheets have been proven to be promising support materials for the modification of noble metal nanoparticles such as gold, silver, platinum, and palladium nanoparticles, and noble metal nanostructures are also considered ideal detection platforms for unlabeled and ultra-sensitive detection.[8,9] Wang et al. constructed a sandwich-type immunosensor for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) using the catalytic activity of MoS2–Au nanocomposites, which could detect carcinoembryonic antigen as low as 0.27 pg ml−1.[10] Su et al. successfully used AuNPs-MoS2 as an electrochemical sensing platform for the detection of chemical/biological molecules including neurotransmitters, H2O2, ATP, thrombin, and protein.[11] Therefore, molybdenum disulfide based nanocomposites are potential biosensing nanomaterials.[12-14]

Neurotransmitter is a small molecule that transmits chemical information between brain cells through the process of nerve transmission, and its abnormal level is closely related to the occurrence of many mental disorders.[15] Dopamine is one of the most important neurotransmitters, whose reduction is directly related to nervous system diseases such as Parkinson's disease,[16,17] thus it is highly desirable to detect dopamine and other neurotransmitters accurately and rapidly in medical diagnosis.[18,19] Current detection of dopamine rely primarily on time-consuming and expensive liquid chromatography and molecular spectroscopy.[20] Compared with electrochemical methods,[21] electrochemical methods are significantly superior to other methods due to their simplicity, convenience, speed, and low cost.[22,23] Therefore, the research on the sensitive electrochemical method for the determination of dopamine is a hot topic at present. The efficient and rapid detection of dopamine has a positive effect on the survival and development of human beings.

Electrochemical detection is a convenient and rapid method, and many current detection methods are based on the physicochemical properties, biological properties and immunological properties.[24] Self-assembled nanoparticles modified electrode has attracted much attention because of its high sensitivity and stability.[25-27] As a typical two-dimensional material, MoS2 has great potential for its application in the field of sensing.[28] Yang et al. demonstrated the application prospects of molybdenum disulfide hybrid materials in chemical/biomolecular sensing by culturing molybdenum disulfide flake-like nanostructures on polypyrrole microtubes.[29] Zheng et al. prepared a molybdenum disulfide modified carbon nanotube doped with nitrogen for the detection of hydrogen peroxide and ascorbic acid.[30] In the process of research, researchers realized that there were few active sites in single MoS2 nanosheets, and the higher surface energy and the van der Waals interaction between layers caused serious aggregation of MoS2. In order to improve the performance of the sensor, many researchers use surface modified electrodes for electrochemical detection.[31,32] Among them, the noble metal (such as Au and Ag) is loaded on the molybdenum disulfide nanosheets by the good synergy between the noble metal and the molybdenum disulfide nanosheets.[29] Rees et al. have developed a carbon nanopeptide electrode, which can detect dopamine in the range of 0.1 to 10 μM with a detection limit of 25 nM. Although their work proves that carbon-based nano-electrodes can be used for neurotransmitter detection, the sensitivity of the sensor needs to be further improved.[33] Alexander et al. developed an electrochemical sensor for dopamine detection by planting carbon nanotips on metal wires. Although the results reached the detection limit of 1 μM, the sensitivity was not ideal.[34] Tang et al. improved acupuncture needles with gold nanoparticles on the tip surface, and then electrochemically deposited graphene for dopamine detection. Due to the promotion of graphene and gold nanoparticles, the conductivity and sensitivity of the sensor were improved, but the detection limit was not minimized.[35] Choo et al. developed a 3D porous graphene oxide composite with gold nanoparticles for dopamine detection. The detection limit is 1.28 μM, and the linear response range is from 0.1 μM to 30 μM. However, this method has no significant signal changes in the detection of glucose and anti-bad blood glucose acid.[36] In this paper, in order to achieve the goals of low cost, high sensitivity and more accurate detection limit, the electrochemical biosensor was constructed by modifying Au nanoparticles on MoS2 nanosheets. The comparative experiments were performed using three kinds of electrodes, namely, a glassy carbon electrode (bare GCE), a MoS2 nanosheet-modified glassy carbon electrode (MoS2/GCE) and an Au@MoS2 composite nanosheet-modified glassy carbon electrode (Au@MoS2/GCE). The composite nanosheets has excellent conductivity and electrocatalytic performance due to the synergistic effect of the MoS2 nanosheets and the Au nanoparticles,[37] thereby effectively promoting electron transfer between the redox probe and the electrode surface,[38] and achieves ideal detection performance.

In this work, we have constructed an electrochemical biosensor based on Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets to achieve the specific and high-sensitivity quantitative electrochemical detection of dopamine, as shown in Scheme 1, which includes the preparation of MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 nanosheets as well as the detection of the model neurotransmitter molecules (dopamine). Transmission electron microscope (TEM), ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (UV-Vis), Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR), Raman Spectrometer (Raman), X-ray powder diffractometer (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were used to characterize the Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets, and the results showed that the electrocatalytic performance of electrochemical detection was improved after AuNPs was successfully loaded on MoS2 nanosheets, so that dopamine could be detected more effectively. The MoS2-based biosensing platform can become a promising biomolecular detection method for biomedical applications.

Scheme 1

The manufacturing process of MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 nanosheets and detection of the nanosheets.

Experimental section

Reagents and materials

Na2HPO4 and NaH2PO4 were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Phosphate buffer (PBS, 0.1 M, pH 6.0–8.0) solution was prepared from stock solutions of Na2HPO4 and NaH2PO4. Dopamine (DA), gold (iii) tetrachloride trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O, 99%), sodium cholate, sodium citrate and molybdenum (iv) sulfide powder (<2 μm, 99%), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Aqueous solutions were prepared with ultrapure water from Millipore system (>18 MΩ). All chemicals were directly used without further purification.

Apparatus and measurements

Ultrasonic treatment of molybdenum disulfide samples to obtain dispersed MoS2 nanosheets was used an ultrasonic cell crusher (JY92-IIDN, Ningbo Xinzhi Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China). Morphologies of as-prepared products were performed with a HT-7700 transmission electron microscope (HT-7700, HITACHI, Japan). A UV-Vis spectrophotometer (SPECORD 200 PLUS, Jena, Germany) was used to determine the characteristic absorption peaks of the samples. A spectrometer (Nicolet 6700, Thermo Scientific) was used to obtain the data of Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR). The degree of exfoliation of the nanosheets was determined using a Raman spectrometer (Refence 3000+ iRaman, Gamry Instruments, USA). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of samples were verified by a X-ray electron diffractometer (D8 DISCOVER, Rigaku Corporation). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted by a spectrometer (ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Electron, USA) to investigate the surface elemental states of products. Electrochemical analysis of dopamine was performed on Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets using an electrochemical workstation (DH7000, Jiangsu Donghua Analytical Instruments CO., Ltd., China).

Preparation of MoS2

Layered MoS2 was obtained through sonication-assisted exfoliation of bulk MoS2 crystals in aqueous surfactant solution.[39-41] First, 250 mg of MoS2 powder and 75 mg of sodium cholate were added into a 50 ml aqueous solution, and then the mixed solution was subjected to ultrasonic crushing (ultrasound effective time is 3 h under the condition of 50% power + ultrasound effective time is 2 h under the condition of 70% power) in an ice-water bath to obtain a black-green MoS2 nanosheet dispersion. Subsequently, the resultant dispersion was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 30 min, followed by the separation of the yellow-green supernatant to remove the bulk MoS2. The separated supernatant was centrifuged at 12 000 rpm (30 min) for the isolation of layered MoS2. In order to remove sodium cholate adsorbed on the surface of nanosheet, the layered MoS2 collected was dispersed in ultrapure water with the assistance of sonication. Similarly, the regenerated dispersion was centrifuged at 12 000 rpm for 30 min, followed by the collection of sediments to complete the washing process. The washing process was then repeated a further two times to remove sodium cholatecompletely. Ultimately, the sediments were dispersed in a certain amount of ultrapure water to prepare uniform layered MoS2 dispersion. Furthermore, in order to obtain a high reproducibility for optical absorption detection, the stock solution of layered MoS2 should be used after sonication treatment for 2 min.

Preparation of Au@MoS2 nanocomposite decorated electrode

The method of preparing composite nanosheets by growing AuNPs on the prepared MoS2 nanosheets is a typical self-assembly experiment.[16,42-44] First, 500 μL MoS2 nanosheets dispersion of 1 mg ml−1 was added into a 10 ml glass bottle, and then 1 ml of 24.3 mmol HAuCl4 solution was added into the bottle. The mixture was ultrasonicated for 5 min to form a uniform mixture. Then, 3 ml of sodium citrate solution with a concentration of 34 mmol was added to the above mixture, and the glass bottle was moved to a water bath under the condition of 96 °C with magnetic stirring until a uniformly dispersed black-purple mixed solution was obtained. The mixed solution was centrifuged at 10 000 rpm, and the precipitate was collected and cleaned repeatedly with deionized water several times to remove the excess impurities. Finally, the prepared Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets were dispersed into deionized water for later use. The GCE of 3 mm in diameter was polished mechanically with 0.3 mm and 0.05 mm alumina powders and rinsed with ultrapure water between each polishing step. After this, it was sonicated with absolute ethanol and ultrapure water for about 1 min, respectively. 5 ml of the Au@MoS2 solution was dropped to the surface of the GCE and allowed to dry in the ambient air for about 16 h, which denotes as MoS2/GCE. The electrodeposition method: pulse voltammetry (1.1–0.2 V), scan rate: 100 mV s−1. For comparison, the AuNPs/GCE was prepared under the same condition.

Structural optimization of theoretical calculation

The density grid cutoff value of electrostatic potential is set to 65 Hartree, and the electron temperature in Fermi function is set to 300 K. To ensure the accuracy of calculation, double zeta plus polarization (DZP) basis set is adopted for all atoms involved. Set K point in Brillouin zone to 5 × 5 × 1. In order to avoid the interaction between periodic structures, the model is built in a vacuum layer with more than 15 Å. Until the force acting on each atoms is less than 0.05 Å−1, the structural optimization is completed.

Results and discussion

Characterization of MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets

The morphologies of MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets were characterized by transmission electron microscopy. Fig. 1(a) confirms that the MoS2 nanosheets have a wrinkled nanosheet structure, which indicates the formation of nanosheets of few layers or single layers with uniform size and good dispersibility, and the size of its planar sheet layers is about 150 nm. The as-prepared MoS2 nanosheets have a large specific surface area and can provide a large one-sided space for the loading of AuNPs.

Fig. 1

TEM images of (a) dispersion of MoS2 nanosheets and (b) Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets.

As shown in Fig. 1(b), many AuNPs with a uniform size and an average diameter of 20 nm are loaded on the MoS2 nanosheets, suggesting Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets had been successfully synthesized.[10,38,45] In addition, the growth of AuNPs on MoS2 nanosheets does not damage the lamellar structure of MoS2 nanosheets, but increases the specific surface area of the nanosheets, which provides good support for subsequent applications.

To further monitor the formation of Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets, the UV-vis absorption spectra, FT-IR, Raman spectra and XRD of bulk MoS2, MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets were also investigated.

As shown in Fig. 2(a), there is no obvious characteristic optical absorption peaks appearing in the dispersion of bulk MoS2 within the range of 200–800 nm, while a pair of obvious characteristic absorption peaks appear in the dispersion of MoS2 nanosheets at 610 nm and 677 nm, which can be attributed to the A1 and B1 absorption bands of MoS2, corresponding to two different transition modes of K points in the Brillouin zone in MoS2 nanosheets. While the absorption peaks at 454 nm and 397 nm correspond to direct exciton transitions at M point between higher density in the band structure state region. The above results can preliminarily prove the success of the preparation of MoS2 nanosheets.

Fig. 2

(a)UV-vis absorption spectra of bulk MoS2, MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets; (b) FT-IR specta of bulk MoS2, MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets; (c) Raman spectra of MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets; (d) XRD pattern of bulk MoS2, MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets.

Compared with MoS2 nanosheets, the absorption peaks in the dispersion solution of Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets disappear at 454 nm and 397 nm, while a new strong absorption peak corresponding to the surface plasmon resonance of AuNPs appears at 532 nm, which can prove the successful preparation of Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets.

FT-IR spectrum has been also applied to monitor the formation of Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets. As shown in Fig. 2(b), the bulk MoS2 exhibits strong characteristic absorption peaks at the positions of 3404 cm−1 and 1635 cm−1 corresponding to hydroxyl groups, and another two strong absorption peaks at 469 cm−1 and 600 cm−1 correspond to the vibrations of the Mo–S bond.[46] Compared with bulk MoS2, two positions of 2970 cm−1 and 2926 cm−1 correspond to the stretching vibration of C–H, and the positions of 1604 cm−1, 1377 cm−1 and 1047 cm−1 correspond to the skeletal telescopic vibration of ΣCC aromatic ring, the C–H symmetrical bending vibration of methyl group and the stretching vibration of C–O. The position of 883 cm−1 corresponds to the bending vibration of σC–H. All these can be attributed to the characteristic vibration of the functional group of the surfactant sodium cholate.

In addition, compared with the MoS2 nanosheets, the absorption peak at the position of 1604 cm−1 representing the skeletal telescopic vibration of the σCC aromatic ring disappeared. In addition, two strong new absorption peaks appear at 1589 cm−1 and 1392 cm−1 which correspond to the asymmetric telescopic vibration and the symmetric telescopic vibration of the C–O bond in the carboxylate, respectively. The above changes confirmed the formation of AuNPs on the surface of the MoS2 nanosheets.

As shown in Fig. 2(c), Raman spectra of the MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets were measured. The two Raman characteristic peaks corresponding to the two vibration modes of E12g and A1g are respectively located at 382 cm−1 and 407 cm−1, and the displacement difference between the two characteristic peaks is 25 cm−1, whereby it can be judged that the MoS2 nanosheet is a 2D structure with few layers or a single layer.[47,48] In addition, the offset difference between the characteristic peaks of the samples does not change after in situ growth of AuNPs on the MoS2 nanosheets, indicating that the in situ growth of Au does not damage the layered structure of MoS2. The intensity of the two characteristic peaks in Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets is significantly weaker than those of the two characteristic peaks in MoS2 nanosheets, which is the result of the combination of AuNPs and MoS2.

The crystal structure of bulk MoS2, MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets were characterized by XRD. As shown in Fig. 2(d), the bulk MoS2 powder corresponds to the standard card (JCPDS no. 00-006-0097), and the main peak of MoS2 nanosheets is located at 2θ = 14.4°, which corresponds to the (002) plane and the standard card (JSPDS no. 77-1716). The main peak at 14.4° is significantly weaker than the diffraction peak of bulk MoS2 crystal powder on the (002) plane, indicating that the MoS2 nanosheets prepared by liquid phase stripping have a regular and few-layer layered stacking structure. In addition, three characteristic peaks of Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets at 38.6°, 44.4° and 64.6°, which corresponds to the (111), (200) and (220) crystal planes of AuNPs,[49] respectively, indicating that AuNPs have been successfully modified on MoS2 nanosheets.

Fig. 3 shows the XPS spectra of MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets. All spectral lines were obtained after C 1s calibration with a binding energy of 284.5 eV. It can be seen from Fig. 3 that the main components of the MoS2 nanosheets prepared by us are Mo and S without the interference of other impurities. Moreover, there is no binding energy of MoS2 in the metal phase in the sample. In addition, there is a small peak at 226.7 eV, which can be indexed as S 2 s. The two peaks of Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2 of MoS2 nanosheets are located at 229.5 eV and 232.5 eV,[48] respectively, indicating that the main valence state of Mo element in the nanosheet is +4. The classical peaks of S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 are located at 162.3 eV and 163.5 eV, demonstrating that the main valence state of S element in the nanosheet was −2.

Fig. 3

XPS spectra of MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets. (a) Survey spectra of MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets; (b) high resolution Mo 3d of MoS2 nanosheets; (c) high resolution S 2p of MoS2 nanosheets; (d) high resolution Au 4f of Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets.

In addition, the high-resolution scanning measurement of Au in Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets revealed that the two peaks of Au 4f5/2 and Au 4f7/2 in the composite nanosheets are 83.8 eV and 87.5 eV,[50] respectively. The high-intensity Au 4f peaks confirm that Au precursor has been reduced to AuNPs by sodium citrate and has been successfully modified on the surface of MoS2. The XPS spectra of Mo and S of Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets are shown in the ESI Fig. S1.† Compared with the XPS spectra of Mo and S of MoS2 nanosheets, the positions of the binding energy corresponding to each peak does not change.

Analytical performance of Au@MoS2 modified GCEs

In this work, cyclic voltammetry (CV) was applied to the electrochemical detection of dopamine (DA) using three working electrodes mentioned above as comparators. 150 μM DA was added to 0.1 M PBS solution with pH = 7.0 saturated with N2, and the test was performed in an electrochemical system composed of different electrode materials at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. The CV curves of DA are shown in Fig. 4. It has been found that the MoS2/GCE exhibits a larger CV area at the same scanning speed compared with the bare GCE. However, neither the bare GCE nor the MoS2/GCE exhibits significant current response or oxidation–reduction peaks after the addition of DA. The CV scanning area of Au@MoS2/GCE under the same scanning conditions greatly exceeds those of the bare GCE and MoS2/GCE. Au nanoparticles significantly increase the response signal. Moreover, it can be clearly observed that the electrode shows a pair of redox peaks corresponding to DA located within the voltage window of 0.1–0.2 V in the electrolyte containing DA besides the oxidation–reduction peaks reflecting its own characteristics. It is indicated that the electrode based on Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets has excellent electrocatalytic performance towards DA. In addition, in order to prove that Au@MoS2/GCE can stably detect DA, we carried out 50 cycles in PBS buffer containing 150 μM DA, as shown in Fig. S2.† The positions of oxidation–reduction peaks are basically consistent, which proves that electrochemical detection has good stability.

Fig. 4

CV curves of bare GCE, MoS2/GCE and Au@MoS2/GCE in PBS containing 150 μM DA.

The electrochemical response of DA on Au@MoS2/GCE is attributed to the fact that AuNPs deposited on MoS2 nanosheets provide good electrical conductivity for the material as a whole,[44] increase the active area of the electrodes, and provide pore channels for the conduction of electrons to promote the transmission of electrons, thus improving the current intensity. The electrochemical process of DA is shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The electrochemical reaction process of DA.

To further investigate the analytical performation of the Au@MoS2 modified/GCEs, the effect of different concentrations on the detection of DA by Au@MoS2/GCE at the same scanning speed was also explored, and the linear curves of cyclic voltammetry are shown in Fig. 6(a). From the continuously increasing shape of the CV curves, it can be clearly seen that the current signal increases with the increase of DA concentration, which further illustrates the sensitivity of the Au@MoS2/GCE to DA. Moreover, along with the increase of DA concentration, the oxidation peak current increases and the reduction peak current decreases more obviously.

Fig. 6

(a) CV curves of Au@MoS2/GCE in different concentrations of DA; (b) plots of oxidation peaks currents and reduction peaks currents vs. concentration of DA.

In order to more accurately reflect the electrocatalytic performance of Au@MoS2/GCE for DA, the data were processed to obtain the relationship between the oxidation peaks current and the reduction peaks current and the concentration of DA as shown in Fig. 6(b). It could be seen that the current values of oxidation peaks and reduction peaks in the CV curves have a good linear relationship with DA concentration. The linear range of DA were 0.5–350 μM. After simulation analysis, the anode regression equation corresponding to oxidation peaks of DA was obtained as i (μA) = 10.74917 + 0.05779C (μM), where R2 = 0.99717; the regression equation corresponding to the reduction peaks of DA was i (μA) = −12.39725 − 0.01917C (μM), where R2 = 0.99422, indicating that the reliability of the regression equations was worthy of recognition. In addition, the detection limit of the electrode for DA was calculated to be as low as 0.2 μM. Compared with other reported electrochemical biosensors for dopamine detection (Table 1), although the detection limit of the biosensor in this work is not as low as that in ref. 39, 40, 48 and 49, it has the widest detection range compared with all the reference documents in Table 1, and the highest detection range can reach 350 μM. In general, the biosensor of this work yields a relatively wider detection range or a relative lower detection limit. Therefore, we can conclude that the good analytical performance is attributed to the integration of the AuNPs with excellent conductivity and electrocatalytic activity and the MoS2 nanosheets with high surface area.

Comparison of the response characteristics of different modified electrodes for detection of DA

Electrode material	Linear range/μM	Detection minimum/μM	References
MWCNT/GONR	0.15–12.15	0.08	51
AuNPs-MoS2	0.05–30	0.05	52
MoS2/RGO	1.5–100	0.94	53
Graphene/PEI/AuNPs	2–48	0.2	54
PEDOT/Pd composite	0.5–1	0.5	55
Graphene	4–100	2.64	56
GNS-CNTs/MoS2	0.1–100	0.05	42
AuNPs@MoS2	0.1–100	0.08	43
Au@MoS2	0.5–350	0.2	This work

Electrochemical behaviors of the MoS2/GCE and Au@MoS2/GCE

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was an effective method for probing the features of surface modified electrodes, the energy Nyquist diagram of MoS2/GCE and Au@MoS2/GCE was obtained by impedance analysis. Each impedance curve consists of a semicircle in the high frequency region and a linear part in the low frequency region. The slope of the straight line in the low frequency region represents WuBurg impedance and shows the diffusion rate of ions. The radius of curvature of the semicircular arc represents the reaction resistance Rct, which has a great relationship with the effective contact area of the electrode material and the electrolyte.

As shown in Fig. 7, the slope of the straight part of Au@MoS2/GCE is relatively higher and the radius of curvature is smaller, which indicates that the resistance of electron transfer becomes smaller when AuNPs are modified on the surface of MoS2 nanosheets. Moreover, the result also indicates that Au@MoS2/GCE significantly improved the electrochemical performance of the electrodes.[49]

Fig. 7

Nyquist plots of MoS2 GCE and Au@MoS2/GCE.

Theoretical calculation of MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets

In order to in-depth explore the improvement of Au-adsorption on the electrochemical performance of MoS2, the electronic properties of monolayer MoS2 nanosheet before and after Au-adsorption were studied by using the density functional theory (DFT) calculation. For convenience of description, they were expressed as MoS2 and Au@MoS2, respectively. The density of states, electronic differential density as well as the electronic band structure were explored,[57] as shown in Fig. 8. Fig. 8(a) and (b) show the electronic band structures of MoS2 and Au@MoS2. The band gap of MoS2 is calculated to be 1.76 eV, which is consistent with previous research,[58] demonstrating the semiconducting characteristic of the monolayer MoS2 nanosheet.[59] Moreover, its VBM and CBM are both located at K point of hexagonal Brillouin zone, which means that it is a direct band gap semiconductor. But it converts into metallic after adsorbing of Au atoms on the surface of MoS2 nanosheet, because there is a conduct band crosses the Fermi level, indicating that the conductivity of the system is significantly improved. Fig. 8(c) and (d) show the density of states of MoS2 and Au@MoS2 respectively, which is consistent with the above electronic band structure results that the monolayer MoS2 is a semiconductor, because there is an energy gap of 1.76 eV appears at the Fermi level while the Au@MoS2 is a conductor because an obvious DOS peak is observed near the Fermi level. Based on these results, we can conclude that the adsorbed Au atoms play an important role on the contribution of the electrons of the system near the Fermi level. Furthermore, Fig. 8(e) and (f) show the differential electron density diagrams of MoS2 and Au@MoS2, from which we can see that the adsorbed Au atoms contribute to the system electrons to a certain extent.

Fig. 8

(a) Band structure of MoS2 nanosheet; (b) band structure of Au@MoS2 composite nanosheet; (c) density of states of MoS2 nanosheet; (d) density of states of Au@MoS2 nanosheet; electronic differential density of (e) MoS2 and (f) Au@MoS2 nanosheets. G, M and K correspond to the (0, 0, 0), (0, 1/2, 0) and (1/3, 1/3, 0) k-points respectively, in the Brillouin zone. The horizontal dashed line marks the Fermi level (the zero of the energy axis in these plots).

Conclusions

In this work, MoS2 nanosheets were obtained successfully by liquid-phase separation using an ultrasonic crusher, and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets were successfully prepared in the means of in situ growth of AuNPs. Through the characterizations of the XRD diffraction patterns, infrared spectra, ultraviolet-visible spectra, XPS energy spectra, Raman spectra and TEM it was confirmed that the MoS2 nanosheets were in a single layer or a few layers' structure, and the Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets were successfully verified. Furthermore, the electrochemical biosensor with a high-sensitivity for the quantitative electrochemical detection of DA was constructed using the synthesized Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets. The linear detection range was 0.5–350 μm and the detection limit was 0.2 μM, which provides a good foundation for its application in disease diatonics. At the same time, the DFT calculations were the electronic structures of the MoS2 nanosheets and Au@MoS2 composite nanosheets. The results showed that after AuNPs were loaded on the MoS2 nanosheets, the conductivity was significantly improved and the electrochemical performance of the MoS2 nanosheets was improved. This work laid a good foundation for the specific and high sensitivity detection of neurotransmitters.

Conflicts of interest

There are no competing interests to declare.