| Literature DB >> 35424692 |
Weiye Yang1,2,3, Quanhong Ou1,2,3, Chenyan Li1,2,3, Mingming Cheng1,2,3, Weijun Li1,2,3, Yingkai Liu1,2,3.
Abstract
TiO2 flower like nanomaterials (FLNMs) are fabricated via a hydrothermal method and Ag nanoparticles (NPs) are deposited via electron beam evaporation. Several biological pigments (CV, R6G and RhB) are selected as target molecules to investigate their surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) property. The results demonstrate ultrasensitivity and high reproducibility. They reveal that the limit of detection (LOD) is 4.17 × 10-16 M and the enhancement factor (EF) is 2.87 × 1010 for CV, and the LOD is 5.01 × 10-16 M and 7.94 × 10-14 M for R6G and RhB, respectively. To assess the reproducibility on TiO2/Ag FLNMs SERS substrates, they are tested with 1.0 × 10-13 M of CV, 1.0 × 10-13 M of R6G and 1.0 × 10-11 M of RhB, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSD) are less than 12.93%, 13.52% and 11.74% for CV, R6G and RhB, respectively. In addition, we carry out melamine detection and the LOD is up to 7.41 × 10-10 M, which is over 1000 times lower than the severest standards in the world. Therefore, the obtained TiO2 FLNMs have potential application in detecting illegal food additives. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35424692 PMCID: PMC8982166 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra08128d
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1SEM images of the samples. (a and b) TiO2 FLNMs at low and high magnifications, respectively; (c and d) TiO2/Ag FLNMs at low and high magnifications, respectively. (e and f) Particle size distribution histograms of TiO2 FLNMs and Ag NPs, respectively.
Fig. 2TEM and HRTEM images of TiO2/Ag FLNMs. (a) TEM images; (b) HRTEM of TiO2; (c) HRTEM of Ag NP.
Fig. 3XRD pattern of TiO2 FLNMs and TiO2/Ag FLNMs.
Fig. 4XPS analyzation of TiO2/Ag FLNMs. (a) Survey scan; (b) Ti 2p; (c) O 1 s; (d) Ag 3d.
Fig. 5Raman spectra of CV with various concentrations on TiO2 FLNMs, Ag NPs, TiO2/Ag FLNMs, respectively, (a) TiO2 FLNMs; (b) the linear fit of the peak at 1621 cm−1versus CV concentrations with TiO2 FLNMs; (c) Ag NPs; (d) the linear fit of the peak at 1621 cm−1versus CV concentrations with Ag NPs; (e) TiO2/Ag FLNMs; (f) the linear fit of the peak at 1621 cm−1versus CV concentrations with TiO2/Ag FLNMs.
Fig. 6(a) 3D Raman spectra of 10−13 M CV molecules at 30 randomly spots on the TiO2/Ag FLNMs; (b–d) RSDs values of the selected peaks at 915, 1179, and 1621 cm−1, respectively.
Fig. 7(a) SERS signals with different concentrations of the melamine on the TiO2/Ag FLNMs substrates; (b) the linear fit of the peak at 690 cm−1versus melamine concentrations on the TiO2/Ag FLNMs.
LOD comparison of melamine on different substrates
| SERS substrate | LOD (M) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| Ag NPs sandwich | 10−9 |
|
| Bowl-like Au/Ag alloy | 10−9 |
|
| Ag–Au hollow nanocubes | 10−8 |
|
| Ag–Au microfluidic chip | 10−8 |
|
| Ag–Au NDs | 5.0 × 10−8 |
|
| Hydrogel micropellet | 10−8 |
|
| TiO2 FLNMs | 7.41 × 10−10 | This work |
Fig. 8(a) 3D Raman spectra of 10−7 M melamine molecules at 30 random spots on the TiO2/Ag FLNMs; (b and c) RSDs of the selected peaks at 690 and 984 cm−1, respectively.