| Literature DB >> 35423842 |
Wei Chen1,2, Wen-Qing Zhu1,2, Jing Qiu1,2.
Abstract
The development of effective methods to promote the osseointegration of dental implants by surface modification is an area of intense research in dental materials science. Exogenous metal ions present in the implant and surface modifications are closely related to the bone metabolism around the implant. In the complex oral microenvironment, the release of metal ions caused by continuous corrosion of dental implants has an unfavorable impact on the surrounding tissue, and then affects osseointegration, leading to bad results such as loosening and falling off in the late stage of the implant. Besides, these ions can even be distributed in distant tissues and organs. Currently, surface modification techniques are being developed that involve different processing technologies including the introduction of exogenous metal ions with different properties onto the surface of implants to improve performance. However, most metal elements have some level of biological toxicity and can only be used within a safe concentration range to exert the optimum biological effects on recipients. In this paper, we review the adverse effects of metal ions on osseointegration and highlight the emerging applications for metal elements in improving the performance of dental implants. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35423842 PMCID: PMC8697588 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra09395e
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1Various corrosions of dental implants cause the release of metal ions. The adhesion of oral microorganisms and the wear between the implant and the bone can cause the corrosion of the implant. The crevice, galvanic and pitting corrosion are also common types of corrosion that caused the release of metal ions.
The localization and concentrations of individual metal ions in the body
| Reference | Implant alloys | Animal model and area of implant insertion | Localization of the metal particles | Method of detection | Concentrations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puskar T. | Co–Cr alloy | Human hip | Peri-implant tissue | Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) | Co: about 150 ng mL−1, Cr: about 1500 ng mL−1 |
| Sampson B. | Co–Cr alloy | Human hip | Plasma and tissues | ICP-MS | Cr: 5–100 μg L−1 |
| Co: 5–300 μg L−1 | |||||
| Rubio J. C. | Co–Cr alloy | Rat femur | Liver, kidneys, spleen, lungs | ICP-MS | Co: kidneys: about 0.5 ng mL−1 |
| Liver: about 0.15 ng mL−1 | |||||
| Lungs: about 0.15 ng mL−1 | |||||
| Spleen: about 0.12 ng mL−1 | |||||
| Cr: kidneys: about 0.5 ng mL−1 | |||||
| Liver: about 0.33 ng mL−1 | |||||
| Lungs: about 0.55 ng mL−1 | |||||
| Spleen: about 0.6 ng mL−1 | |||||
| He X. | Ti dental implants | Human madible | Peri-implant bone tissue | Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) | 7064 ± 1932 μg kg−1-bone weight |
| Wennerberg | Turned implant, blasted implant | New Zealand rabbit tibia | Peri-implant tissue | X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (SRXRF) | Turned implant surface: 20–100 wt. ppm |
| Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) | Blasted implant surface: the highest titanium concentration reached about 100 wt. ppm | ||||
| Weingart D. | Plasma-coated titanium screw implants | Beagle dogs mandible and maxilla | Lymph nodes, visceral organs | Flameless atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS) | Lymph nodes: 0.16–9.0 μg g−1 |
| Visceral organs: 0.01 and 0.21 μg g−1 | |||||
| Schliephake | Titanium, machined | Minipig mandible | Lungs, liver and kidneys | FAAS | Kidneys: 2.92 ± 0.69 ng mg−1 |
| Liver: 11.5 ± 1.35 ng mg−1 | |||||
| Lungs: 135.7 ± 12.42 ng mg−1 | |||||
| Sarmiento-González A. | Ti wire (purity 99.99%) | Rat femur | Liver, kidneys, spleen, lungs, heart | Double focusing inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (DF-ICP-MS) | Liver: 78.1 ± 9.8 ng g−1 dry tissue |
| Kidneys: 210 ± 76 ng g−1 dry tissue | |||||
| Spleen: 632 ± 177 ng g−1 dry tissue | |||||
| Lungs: 578 ± 189 ng g−1 dry tissue | |||||
| Heart: 160 ± 60 ng g−1 dry tissue |
The performances of different surface modification techniques used for the incorporation of metal ions on implant surfaces
| Method | Definition | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrothermal treatment[ | Chemical reactions that take place in a liquid phase at high temperature | Simple; economical, effective; environmentally friendly; uniform thickness of the deposited layer | Some substances are heat-sensitive |
| PIII[ | A material engineering process by which ions are accelerated in an electrical field and impacted onto the surface of a substrate to change the surface chemistry | Suitable for processing implants with complex shapes | Technical complexity; high costs; high dissolution rate |
| Micro-arc oxidation[ | Arc discharge is used to enhance and activate the reaction on the anode, which produces a thick and relatively stable oxide film on the surface of the metal and its alloy | Multi-microporous structure can achieve long-term stable release of metal ions; corrosion-resistant | Technical complexity |
| Electrochemical deposition[ | The metal matrix is immersed in the aqueous solution containing the gold-plated ions, and the direct current is passed through to make the positive ions discharge on the surface of the cathode to obtain the metal film | Low dissolution rate; effective | Low fatigue strength, poor adhesion between coating and implant |
| Sol–gel method[ | The use of metal inorganic salts or metal alcohol salts in water or alcohol solvent hydrolysis or alcoholysis reaction, the formation of the sol through drying dehydration into gel, and then after heat treatment to obtain the product | Uniform layers; the preparation process is easy to control; low processing temperature | Fabrication steps; environmentally unfriendly; debonding of the coating layer |
| Plasma spraying[ | A kind of gas is ionized by non-transfer arc to form a high temperature plasma jet, and the powder is introduced into it, and the jet is accelerated and impinges on the surface of the substrate to form a coating | Effective, lower possibility of coating degradation, | Nonuniform coatings, poor adhesion between coating and implants; high dissolution rate; the preparation temperature is too high to make HA decomposition |
| Magnetron sputtering[ | It uses charged particles to bombard the target surface in vacuum, and the particles are deposited on the surface of the cold metal substrate to form a coating structure | Effective; high purity of layers; ability to coat implants with complex shapes; strong adhesion of films; dense and uniform coatings | Technical complexity; high costs; the subsequent heat treatment is needed to restore the crystalline state of the coating structure, and the high temperature treatment will destroy the HA lattice to some extent |
| Selective laser melting[ | This technique uses metal powder to be completely melted under the heat of a laser beam, then cooled and formed coatings | Good mechanical property; a high degree of processing freedom | The rough surface of titanium implants modified by SLM alone can promote bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, so it is necessary to combine with other means to give the implant antibacterial property |
Fig. 2The adverse effects of the release of excessive titanium ions on implant osseointegration and its underlying mechanism. Titanium ions can significantly interfere with osteogenic differentiation and hinder the mineralization of the cell matrix in osteoblasts. They can also inhibit the development of osteogenic precursor cells into osteoblasts. Titanium ions can also activate the formation of osteoclasts and inflammatory cells to produce inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, CCL-17, CCL12, IL-6 and IL-1β that can also enhance osteoclast differentiation and accelerate bone resorption.