| Literature DB >> 35423806 |
Wipaporn Kitisriworaphan1, Thanyarat Chawanpunyawat2, Thanaporn Manyum1, Pongsakorn Chasing2, Supawadee Namuangruk3, Taweesak Sudyoadsuk2, Vinich Promarak2,4.
Abstract
Diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) pigments are essential and have been intensively exploited as building-blocks for the synthesis of organic semiconducting polymers and small molecules; however, DPP derivatives as emissive materials for electroluminescent (EL) devices have rarely been explored. In this work, a series of new DPP derivatives grafted with carbazole dendrons in a non-conjugated fashion using an amide linkage was designed to improve the performance of DPP in EL devices. Three DPP derivatives (G0DPP, G1DPP and G2DPP) bearing di(p-chlorophenyl)-DPP (Pigment Red 254) as the core substituted with a hexyl chain, N-hexyl carbazole and N-hexyl-N'-9,3':6',N''-tercarbazole, respectively, were synthesized to afford improved hole-transporting properties without affecting the photophysical and electronic properties of the DPP core. The synthesized DPP derivatives displayed an intense yellow fluorescence emission peaked at 536 nm with an absolute photoluminescence quantum yield close to unity in solution. The hole-transporting capability of molecules was improved when carbazole dendrons were incorporated, which increased with an increase in the generation of substituent carbazole dendrons in the order of G0DPP < G1DPP < G2DPP. Significantly, the use of G2DPP, showing the highest hole mobility, in an EL device yielded a strong and stable yellow emission peaked at 556 nm (CIE x, y color coordinates of (0.45, 0.53)) with a brightness of 3060 cd m-2, maximum luminous efficiency of 9.24 cd A-1 and a maximum EQE of 3.11%. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35423806 PMCID: PMC8696974 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra00805f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Scheme 1. Synthesis of diketopyrrolopyrrole derivatives (G0DPP–G2DPP).
Fig. 1Frontier-orbital distribution, HOMO and LUMO energy levels of G0DPP–G2DPP simulated using the B3LYP/6-31G(d) basis set.
Fig. 2(a) UV-vis absorption spectra in toluene solution and normalized PL spectra of G0DPP–G2DPP in toluene solution and thin film spin-coated on quartz substrates of G0DPP–G2DPP. Transient PL decay spectra of G0DPP–G2DPP (b) in toluene solution and (c) as neat films. (d) Normalized PL spectra of 3 wt% G0DPP–G2DPP doped in mCP.
Key physical data of the synthesized compounds
| Compd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HOMO/LUMO/ | LUMO | Hole mobility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0DPP | 479 (4.31) | 536/610/557 | 6/4 | 356 | −1.73, −1.2, 1.23, 1.47 | 96/9/67 | 2.33 | −5.69/−3.33/2.36 | 3.34 | 2.00 × 10−6 |
| G1DPP | 298 (4.71), 479 (4.29) | 536/608/557 | 6/4 | 409 | −1.75, −1.19, 1.15, 1.52 | 95/12/71 | 2.34 | −5.51/−3.33/2.18 | 3.16 | 2.56 × 10−6 |
| G2DPP | 298 (5.14), 479 (4.27) | 536/595/553 | 6/13 | 432 | −1.76, −1.18, 1.02, 1.20, 1.50 | 92/20/70 | 2.35 | −5.29/−3.33/1.96 | 2.94 | 3.35 × 10−5 |
Measured in toluene.
Measured as the neat film.
Measured as 3 wt% doped in mCP thin film.
Transient PL decay time.
Analysed by TGA at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under an N2 flow.
Obtained from CV at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1 in CH2Cl2 and n-Bu4NPF6 as the electrolyte.
Absolute PL quantum yield measured by integrating sphere.
Estimated from the optical absorption edge, Egopt = 1240/λonset.
Calculated using HOMO = −(4.44 + Eooxnset); LUMO = −(4.44 + Eorenset); Eeleg = Eooxnset − Eorenset, where Eooxnset is the onset potential of the oxidation and Eorenset is the onset potential of the reduction.
LUMO = HOMO − Egopt.
Obtained from hole-only device (ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Compd/MoO3/Al).
Fig. 3(a) TGA plots of G0DPP–G2DPP analyzed under N2 at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. (b) CV curves of G0DPP–G2DPP measured in CH2Cl2 solution containing 0.1 M Bu4NPF6 at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1. (c) AFM images of G1DPP and G2DPP 3 wt% doped in mCP thin films.
Fig. 5(a) Device structure and energy levels (relative to the vacuum energy level) of the materials used. (b) Normalized EL spectra (inset: photographs of yellow G1DPP and G2DPP-based OLEDs), (c) current density–voltage–luminance (J–V–L) plots, (d) luminance efficiency–current density (CE–J) plots and (e) external quantum efficiency–current density (EQE–J) plots of the fabricated G0DPP–G3DPP-based OLEDs.
Fig. 4Current density–voltage (J–V) plots of the hole-only devices.
Electroluminescent data of the fabricated OLED devicesa
| Device | EML |
|
| FWHM (nm) |
|
| CEmax | EQEmax | CIE ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | G0DPP | 4.2 | 556 | 88 | 3376 | 142 | 4.13 | 1.42 | 0.48, 0.51 |
| II | G1DPP | 4.2 | 556 | 88 | 2034 | 95 | 8.91 | 2.67 | 0.48, 0.51 |
| III | G2DPP | 4.5 | 553 | 84 | 3060 | 117 | 9.24 | 3.11 | 0.45, 0.53 |
ITO/PEDOT:PSS/EML 3 wt% in mCP/TAZ/LiF : Al.
Turn-on voltage at 1 cd m−2.
Maximum luminance.
Current density at maximum luminance.
Maximum luminous efficiency.
Maximum external quantum efficiency.