| Literature DB >> 35423394 |
Danica Z Zmejkoski1, Zoran M Marković1, Nemanja M Zdravković2, Dijana D Trišić3, Milica D Budimir1, Sanja B Kuzman1, Natalia O Kozyrovska4, Iryna V Orlovska4, Nikol Bugárová5, Đorđe Ž Petrović1, Mária Kováčová5, Angela Kleinová5, Zdeno Špitalský5, Vladimir B Pavlović6, Biljana M Todorović Marković1.
Abstract
Therapy of bacterial urinary tract infections (UTIs) and catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) is still a great challenge because of the resistance of bacteria to nowadays used antibiotics and encrustation of catheters. Bacterial cellulose (BC) as a biocompatible material with a high porosity allows incorporation of different materials in its three dimensional network structure. In this work a low molecular weight chitosan (Chi) polymer is incorporated in BC with different concentrations. Different characterization techniques are used to investigate structural and optical properties of these composites. Radical scavenging activity test shows moderate antioxidant activity of these biocompatible composites whereas in vitro release test shows that 13.3% of chitosan is released after 72 h. Antibacterial testing of BC-Chi composites conducted on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria causing UTIs and CAUTIs (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae) and encrustation (Proteus mirabilis) show bactericidal effect. The morphology analysis of bacteria after the application of BC-Chi shows that they are flattened with a rough surface, with a tendency to agglomerate and with decreased length and width. All obtained results show that BC-Chi composites might be considered as potential biomedical agents in treatment of UTIs and CAUTIs and as a urinary catheter coating in encrustation prevention. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35423394 PMCID: PMC8695209 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra10782d
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1Control BC (left) and BC–Chi composite (right).
Fig. 2Top view atomic force microscopy images of: (a) control BC; (b) BC–Chi0.2 composite and (c) BC–Chi2 composite and scanning electron microscopy images of: (d) control BC; (e) BC–Chi0.2 composite and (f) BC–Chi2 composite.
Fig. 3(a) XPS survey spectra of BC (black curve) and BC–Chi2 (red curve); (b) Raman spectra of BC (black curve) and BC–Chi2 (red curve) samples. The excitation laser was 785 nm. (c) FTIR spectra of BC (black curve), Chi powder (blue curve), BC–Chi0.2 (green curve), BC–Chi2 (red curve) samples. All spectra are displaced for clarity. (d) XRD patterns of Chi powder (blue curve), BC (black curve), BC–Chi0.2 (green curve) and BC–Chi2 (red curve).
Elements detected in BC and BC–Chi2 samples by XPS method
| Control BC | Binding energy (eV) | Atomic (%) | BC–Chi2 | Binding energy (eV) | Atomic (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O 1s | 533.0 | 36.8 | O 1s | 532.4 | 29.4 |
| C 1s | 286.8 | 59.5 | C 1s | 286–0 | 62.5 |
| N 1s | 400.2 | 3.7 | N 1s | 399.4 | 8.1 |
The position and full width at half maximum (FWHM) values of control BC, BC–Chi0.2 and BC–Chi2 composite samples
| 2 | FWHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Chi powder | 10.1 | 2.89 |
| 19.8 | 4.75 | |
| 40.6 | 7.38 | |
| Control BC | 14.2 | 1.74 |
| 16.7 | 0.92 | |
| 22.5 | 2.17 | |
| BC–Chi0.2 | 14.2 | 1.67 |
| 16.7 | 1.03 | |
| 22.5 | 2.27 | |
| BC–Chi2 | 14.2 | 1.62 |
| 16.7 | 0.79 | |
| 22.5 | 2.68 |
Fig. 4(a) Release profile of Chi from the BC–Chi composites; (b) Chi release data fitted to Korsmeyer–Peppas mathematical kinetic model.
Fig. 5Antioxidant activity of BC–Chi composites – DPPH scavenging assay. Radical scavenging activity (RSA; in percent) of composites (BC–Chi0.2 and BC–Chi2) and control (BC) samples. One-way ANOVA revealed statistical differences between groups, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. The difference between control and BC–Chi composites are presented with red asterisks and the differences between BC–Chi composites with black asterisks.
Fig. 6Mitochondrial activity 24 h after direct cell seeding on BC, BC–Chi0.2, and BC–Chi2 samples. One-way ANOVA revealed no statistical differences between groups, p < 0.05.
Antibacterial activity of control BC, BC–Chi0.2 and BC–Chi2 samples on bacteria reference strains S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis, P. aeruginosa, E.faecalis and Str. agalactiae – group B Streptococcus β haemolytica
| Bacteria | BC–Chi | Control BC | Genta, ng μL−1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2% | 2% | |||
| MIC/MBC | MIC/MBC | MIC/MBC | MIC/MBC | |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | −/− | 0.156/0.156 |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | −/− | 0.313/0.625 |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | −/− | 5/5 |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | −/− | 0.625/0.625 |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | −/− | 0.625/0.625 |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | −/− | 5/10 |
|
| +/+ | +/+ | −/− | 2.5/5 |
“+” the effect was observed; “−” the effect was not observed.
MIC – minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC – minimum bactericidal concentration.
Fig. 7Top view AFM images of P. mirabilis and P. aeruginosa before (a and c) and after (b and d) the application of BC–Chi2 composite.