| Literature DB >> 35419766 |
Jyoti Chandan1,2, Suruchi Gupta3, Vikash Babu1,2, Deepika Singh1, Ravail Singh4,5,6.
Abstract
Meloidogyne incognita (Root-knot nematode) and Alternaria alternata (fungus) were among the dominant parasites of the medicinal plant Withania somnifera. Despite the fatal nature of their infection, a comprehensive study to explore their evolution and adaptation is lacking. The present study elucidates evolutionary and codon usage bias analysis of W. somnifera (host plant), M. incognita (root-knot nematode) and A. alternata (fungal parasite). The results of the present study revealed a weak codon usage bias prevalent in all the three organisms. Based on the nucleotide analysis, genome of W. somnifera and M. incognita was found to be A-T biased while A. alternata had GC biased genome. We found high similarity of CUB pattern between host and its nematode pathogen as compared to the fungal pathogen. Inclusively, both the evolutionary forces influenced the CUB in host and its associated pathogens. However, neutrality plot indicated the pervasiveness of natural selection on CUB of the host and its pathogens. Correspondence analysis revealed the dominant effect of mutation on CUB of W. somnifera and M. incognita while natural selection was the main force affecting CUB of A. alternata. Taken together the present study would provide some prolific insight into the role of codon usage bias in the adaptability of pathogens to the host's environment for establishing parasitic relationship.Entities:
Keywords: Codon usage bias; Fungus; Host; Nematoda; Parasite; Plant
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35419766 PMCID: PMC9050767 DOI: 10.1007/s10709-022-00154-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genetica ISSN: 0016-6707 Impact factor: 1.633
Nucleotide composition analysis for the coding sequences of the host plant Withania somnifera and the pathogens Meloidogyne incognita and Alternaria alternata
| Nucleotide composition | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| GC% | 40.31470588 | 37.8775625 | 54.1652657 |
| AT% | 59.68529412 | 62.1224375 | 45.8347343 |
| GC1% | 48.52214286 | 47.29825 | 56.22657005 |
| GC2% | 39.45558824 | 38.5460625 | 44.08241546 |
| GC3% | 32.96693277 | 27.787875 | 62.2126087 |
| T3% | 44.72726891 | 50.5935 | 26.51966184 |
| C3% | 19.66911765 | 17.2458125 | 45.57270531 |
| A3% | 38.11516807 | 44.3554375 | 21.49613527 |
| G3% | 20.61340336 | 16.7600625 | 29.9726087 |
| AT3% | 67.03306723 | 72.212125 | 37.7873913 |
| AT2% | 60.54441176 | 61.4539375 | 55.91758454 |
| CAI | 0.186306723 | 0.21084375 | 0.255690821 |
| CBI | − 0.06837395 | − 0.0964625 | 0.114608696 |
| Fop | 0.367945378 | 0.37203125 | 0.487347826 |
| Nc | 49.04970085 | 44.266125 | 50.60208738 |
| L-sym | 310.1008403 | 281.59375 | 589.4347826 |
| L-aa | 323.697479 | 291.475 | 612.7004831 |
| Gravy | 0.114367441 | − 0.325850569 | − 0.309608696 |
| Aromo | 0.114272277 | 0.096412469 | 0.081127952 |
Various codon usage bias indices values of Withania somnifera and the pathogens Meloidogyne incognita and Alternaria alternata
| Species | ENC | CBI | CAI | GRAVY | AROMO | Fop |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40.7434 | − 0.0683 | 0.1863 | 0.1143 | 0.1142 | 0.3679 | |
| 38.3821 | − 0.0964 | 0.2108 | − 0.3258 | 0.0964 | 0.3720 | |
| 46.5971 | 0.1146 | 0.2556 | − 0.3096 | 0.0811 | 0.4873 |
Relative synonymous codon usage bias analysis for the coding sequences of Withania somnifera and the pathogens Meloidogyne incognita and Alternaria alternata (All the preferred codons were highlighted in bold)
| Amino Acid | Synonymous codon | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ala | GCU | 1.106 | ||
| GCC | 0.698 | 0.575 | ||
| GCA | 1.212 | 1.317 | 0.837 | |
| GCG | 0.331 | 0.296 | 0.704 | |
| Cys | UGU | 0.560 | ||
| UGC | 0.608 | 0.587 | ||
| Asp | GAU | 0.763 | ||
| GAC | 0.492 | 0.525 | ||
| Glu | GAA | 0.670 | ||
| GAG | 0.611 | 0.520 | ||
| Phe | UUU | 0.505 | ||
| UUC | 0.666 | 0.623 | ||
| Gly | GGU | 1.251 | 1.023 | 1.088 |
| GGC | 0.511 | 0.688 | ||
| GGA | 1.003 | |||
| GGG | 0.700 | 0.451 | 0.354 | |
| His | CAU | 0.355 | ||
| CAC | 0.532 | 0.506 | ||
| Ile | AUU | 0.937 | ||
| AUC | 0.635 | 0.470 | ||
| AUA | 0.849 | 0.612 | 0.384 | |
| Lys | AAA | 0.475 | ||
| AAG | 0.638 | 0.329 | ||
| Leu | UUA | 0.258 | ||
| UUG | 1.252 | 1.444 | 0.783 | |
| CUU | 1.412 | 1.504 | 1.217 | |
| CUC | 0.480 | 0.465 | ||
| CUA | 0.687 | 0.424 | 0.503 | |
| CUG | 0.464 | 0.205 | 1.307 | |
| Met | AUG | 1.000 | 0.988 | 1.000 |
| Asn | AAU | 0.518 | ||
| AAC | 0.569 | 0.498 | ||
| Pro | CCU | 1.407 | 1.026 | |
| CCC | 0.713 | 0.443 | ||
| CCA | 1.278 | 0.967 | ||
| CCG | 0.493 | 0.325 | 0.753 | |
| Gln | CAA | 0.741 | ||
| CAG | 0.606 | 0.389 | ||
| Arg | CGU | 1.438 | 1.500 | 1.121 |
| CGC | 0.463 | 0.567 | ||
| CGA | 1.229 | 1.341 | 0.966 | |
| CGG | 0.406 | 0.228 | 0.554 | |
| AGA | 0.600 | |||
| AGG | 0.762 | 0.385 | 0.761 | |
| Ser | UCU | 1.039 | ||
| UCC | 0.949 | 0.572 | 1.225 | |
| UCA | 1.255 | 1.483 | 0.867 | |
| UCG | 0.441 | 0.438 | 1.045 | |
| AGU | 1.139 | 1.071 | 0.571 | |
| AGC | 0.499 | 0.613 | ||
| Thr | ACU | 0.905 | ||
| ACC | 0.806 | 0.547 | ||
| ACA | 1.239 | 1.501 | 0.901 | |
| ACG | 0.397 | 0.304 | 0.673 | |
| Val | GUU | 1.012 | ||
| GUG | 0.486 | 0.521 | ||
| GUA | 1.283 | 0.717 | 0.572 | |
| GUC | 0.685 | 0.545 | 0.664 | |
| Trp | UGG | 0.929 | 0.725 | 0.981 |
| UAG | 0.731 | 0.394 | 1.130 | |
| UGA | 0.693 | 0.619 | 0.638 | |
| Tyr | UAU | 0.526 | ||
| UAC | 0.491 | 0.459 |
Fig. 1ENC-GC3 plot depicting the relationship between the effective number of codons (ENC) values and GC content at the third synonymous codon position (GC3) for host plant W. somnifera (A) and pathogens M. incognita (B) and A. alternata (C)
Fig. 2Parity Rule 2 (PR2)-bias plot between [A 3 / (A 3 + T 3) and G 3 / (G 3 + C 3)] of W. somnifera (A) and pathogens M. incognita (B) and A. alternata (C)
Fig. 3GC3s was plotted against GC12s. Neutrality plot for the coding sequences of the W. somnifera (A) and pathogens M. incognita (B) and A. alternata (C)
Correlation analysis between GC12 and GC3 values of the plant Withania somnifera and the pathogens Meloidogyne incognita and Alternaria alternata
| GC12 | GC3 |
|---|---|
| r = 0.058, p = 0.372 | |
| r = 0.115, p = 0.147 | |
| r = 0.114, p = 0.102 |
Fig. 4Correspondence analysis based on RSCU score of the coding sequences of W. somnifera (A) and pathogens M. incognita (B) and A. alternata (C). Black coloured data points represent GC– ending codons and brown coloured data points represent AT– ending codons in all the selected organisms
Correlation analysis between ENC and several other CUB indices of the plant Withania somnifera and the pathogens Meloidogyne incognita and Alternaria alternata
| Nc | GC1 | GC2 | GC3 | GC12 | AT3 | T3 | A3 | CAI | Fop |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r = 0.373, p = 0.000 | r = 0.085, p = 0.190 | r = 0.421, p = 0.000 | r = 0.339, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.421, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.111, p = 0.087 | r = − 0.172, p = 0.008 | r = 0.257, p = 0.000 | r = 0.240, p = 0.000 | |
| r = 0.122, p = 0.124 | r = − 0.146, p = 0.066 | r = 0.429, p = 0.000 | r = 0.023, p = 0.777 | r = − 0.429, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.269, p = 0.001 | r = − 0.258, p = 0.001 | r = 0.027, p = 0.730 | r = 0.041, p = 0.606 | |
| r = − 0.022, p = 0.754 | r = 0.076, p = 0.274 | r =− 0.725, p = 0.000 | r = 0.055, p = 0.434 | r = 0.725 p = 0.000 | r = 0.448, p = 0.000 | r = 0.727, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.743, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.710, p = 0.000 |
Correlation analysis between CAI and several other CUB indices of the plant Withania somnifera and the pathogens Meloidogyne incognita and Alternaria alternata
| CAI | GC1 | GC2 | GC3 | AT3 | T3 | A3 | Nc | GC12 | Fop |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r = 0.336, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.105, p = 0.105 | r = 0.406, r = 0.000 | r = − 0.406, r = 0.000 | r = 0.152, p = 0.019 | r = − 0.485, p = 0.000 | r = 0.257, p = 0.000 | r = 0.236, p = 0.000 | r = 0.752, p = 0.000 | |
r = 0.273, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.146, p = 0.066 | r = 0.458, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.458, p = 0.000 | r = 0.188, p = 0.017 | r = − 0.491, p = 0.000 | r = 0.027, p = 0.730 | r = 0.133, p = 0.093 | r = 0.863, p = 0.000 | |
| r = 0.051, p = 0.463 | r = − 0.042, p = 0.544 | r = 0.632, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.632, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.239, p = 0.001 | r = − 0.790, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.743, p = 0.000 | r = 0.021, p = 0.768 | r = 0.884, p = 0.000 |
Correlation analysis between GRAVY and several other CUB indices of the plant Withania somnifera and the pathogens Meloidogyne incognita and Alternaria alternata
| GRAVY | GC% | GC3% | CAI | ENC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r = − 0.252, p = 0.000 | r = − 0.220, p = 0.001 | r = − 0.005, p = 0.935 | r = 0.617, p = 0.000 | |
| r = − 0.117, p = 0.141 | r = − 0.177, p = 0.025 | r = − 0.224, p = 0.004 | r = − 0.337, p = 0.000 | |
| r = − 0.075, p = 0.282 | r = − 0.163, p = 0.019 | r = − 0.062, p = 0.371 | r = − 0.033, p = 0.641 |
Correlation analysis between AROMO and several other CUB indices of the plant Withania somnifera and the pathogens Meloidogyne incognita and Alternaria alternata
| AROMO | GC% | GC3% | CAI | ENC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
r = − 0.246, p = 0.000 | r = 0.137, p = 0.034 | r = 0.005, p = 0.943 | r = 0.254, p = 0.000 | |
r = − 0.264, p = 0.001 | r = − 0.176, p = 0.026 | r = − 0.114, p = 0.151 | r = − 0.184, p = 0.020 | |
r = − 0.140, p = 0.044 | r = 0.012, p = 0.862 | r = 0.116, p = 0.096 | r = − 0.038, p = 0.586 |
Codon context analysis of top 20 codon pairs in Withania somnifera and the pathogens Meloidogyne incognita and Alternaria alternata (All the codon pairs comprised of preferred codons were highlighted in red colored font)
| AAA-AAA | UUU-UUU | AAG-AAG |
| GAA-GAA | UUA-UUU | GAG-AAG |
| AUU-GAU | UUA-AUU | GAC-GAG |
| AAG-AAA | UUU-UUA | GUC-AAG |
| AUU-GAA | GAA-GAA | GAG-GAG |
| AUU-UUU | UAU-UUU | AUC-AAG |
| AAA-GAA | UUA-UUA | AAG-GAC |
| UUU-GAU | AUU-UUU | UUC-AAG |
| AUU-GCU | UUU-AUU | GAG-AUC |
| AAU-GAU | CAA-CAA | GGC-AAG |
| GAU-AUU | AAU-UUU | GAA-GAG |
| CUU-CUU | AAU-UUA | CUC-GAC |
| UAU-GAA | UUA-AAU | GAC-GAC |
| GAA-GAU | GAA-AUU | GAC-AAG |
| GAA-AAA | UUU-UAU | AAC-AAC |
| AAA-UAU | AUU-UUA | UUC-UUC |
| AAA-GAU | AAA-AAU | UUC-GAC |
| CAA-GAA | UUU-GAU | GCC-AUG |
| UUA-UUU | AAA-UAU | GAC-AUC |
| GGA-AAA | GAU-GAA | CUC-AAG |
Fig. 5Comparison of amino acid usage between the pathogens (M. incognita and A. alternata) and host W. somnifera