| Literature DB >> 35419325 |
Ruotong Li1, Liping Tian1, Qing Gao1, Yuanfang Guo1, Gaijie Li1, Yulin Li1, Meng Sun1, Yan Yan1, Qing Li1, Wenying Nie1, Hui Zou1.
Abstract
Objective: Lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) are becoming increasingly important in newborn screening, and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is widely used in newborn screening for LSDs through measurement of enzymatic activities in dried blood spots (DBSs). Overall, the determination of the cutoff value is important in such screening, and different laboratories have different methods of determining this value; most do not use a fixed cutoff value but rather calculate the corresponding batch cutoff value based on each batch of experimental data. In this study, we used MS/MS to screen for LSDs and sought to find an appropriate method to establish the cutoff value for LSD screening.Entities:
Keywords: cut-off value; diagnose; lysosomal storage disorders; newborn screening; tandem (hybrid) mass spectrometry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35419325 PMCID: PMC8995975 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.814461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
The rate of screening positive, review positive, and confirmed disorders in LSD newborn screening (due to lack of reagents, not all the initial screening positives on July 22 and July 27, 2020, were followed up).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positives in initial screening | 12 | 1 | 71 | 5 | 34 | 279 | 402 |
| Positives in second original DBS review | 1 | 1 | 47 | 4 | 21 | 180 | 254 |
| Suspected cases | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 |
The type of gene sequence variation in nine suspected cases was “uncertain significance” but with a persistent decrease in enzyme activity as well as signs.
Genetic site information and enzyme activity in the screening experiment in confirmed cases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fabry | GLA | c.1019G > C | 0.3 (2.54) |
| 2 | Fabry | GLA | c.1286–7del | 2.12 (2.74) |
| 3 | Fabry | GLA | c.454T > C | 0.48 (2.56) |
| 4 | Pompe | GAA | c.859-2A > T c.2065G > A | 0.42 (1,73) |
| 5 | Pompe | GAA | c.752C > T c.761C > T | 0.61 (1.92) |
| 6 | Pompe | GAA | c.752–761delins c.1757C > T | 0.4 (1.72) |
| 7 | Krabbe | GALC | c.1901T > C c.2041G > A | 0.33 (0.93) |
| 8 | Krabbe | GALC | c.1901T > C c.1901T > C | 0.52 (0.92) |
| 9 | Krabbe | GALC | c.1901T > C c.1901T > C | 0.45 (0.87) |
| 10 | Krabbe | GALC | c.1204G > A c.1535G > T | 0.21 (0.7) |
| 11 | Krabbe | GALC | c.1901T > C c.1671–14G > A | 0.35 (0.61) |
In the “screening result” column, the parentheses are cutoff values for the batch of experiments.
Figure 1Summary of the cutoff value for 38,945 screening samples. (A) In this chart, the abscissa is the date of the experiment, and the ordinate is the cutoff value of six lysosomal enzymes. The orange, gray, yellow, blue, green, and navy blue lines represent ABG, ASM, GALC, IDUA, GLA, and GAA, respectively. The overall trend of the six lysosomal enzymes was first an increase and then a decrease followed by another increase, finally showing a downward trend. Among them, the increasing trends of ABG and GLA were obvious though the changes in ASM, IDUA, GAA, and GALC were not significant. (B) In this chart, the abscissa is six lysosomal enzymes, and the ordinate is the average monthly cutoff value. Differently colored bars represent different months. For all six lysosomal enzymes, the average cutoff values were the lowest in July and highest in November, December, January, or February.