| Literature DB >> 35417232 |
Feixiang Bao1,2, Lingyan Zhou1,2, Rui Zhou3, Qiaoying Huang4, Junguo Chen4, Sheng Zeng1,2, Yi Wu1,2, Liang Yang1,2, Shufang Qian3, Mengfei Wang1,2, Xueying He1,2, Shan Liang1,2, Juntao Qi1,2, Ge Xiang1,2,5, Qi Long1,2, Jingyi Guo1,2, Zhongfu Ying1,2,5, Yanshuang Zhou1,2, Qiuge Zhao6, Jiwei Zhang7, Di Zhang1,2, Wei Sun1,2, Mi Gao1,2, Hao Wu1,2, Yifan Zhao1,2, Jinfu Nie1,2, Min Li8, Quan Chen9, Jiekai Chen1,2, Xiao Zhang1,2, Guangjin Pan1,2, Hong Zhang3, Mingtao Li4, Mei Tian3, Xingguo Liu1,2,10.
Abstract
Mitochondrial quality control plays an important role in maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis and function. Disruption of mitochondrial quality control degrades brain function. We found that flunarizine (FNZ), a drug whose chronic use causes parkinsonism, led to a parkinsonism-like motor dysfunction in mice. FNZ induced mitochondrial dysfunction and decreased mitochondrial mass specifically in the brain. FNZ decreased mitochondrial content in both neurons and astrocytes, without affecting the number of nigral dopaminergic neurons. In human neural progenitor cells, FNZ also induced mitochondrial depletion. Mechanistically, independent of ATG5- or RAB9-mediated mitophagy, mitochondria were engulfed by lysosomes, followed by a vesicle-associated membrane protein 2- and syntaxin-4-dependent extracellular secretion. A genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen identified genes required for FNZ-induced mitochondrial elimination. These results reveal not only a previously unidentified lysosome-associated exocytosis process of mitochondrial quality control that may participate in the FNZ-induced parkinsonism but also a drug-based method for generating mitochondria-depleted mammal cells.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35417232 PMCID: PMC9007515 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abk2376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1.FNZ induced motor dysfunction and reduced mitochondrial content in vivo.
(A) Experimental design for FNZ and PEG400 treatment in ICR mice. (B to E) Behavior assessment of male mice following FNZ or control PEG400 treatment for 2 weeks. FNZ-treated mice showed defects on the rotarod test (B) (n ≥ 7 mice) and open-field test (C to E) (n ≥ 10 mice). (F) The striatal dopamine concentrations were detected by UPLC assay in mice treated with FNZ for 2 weeks (n ≥ 5 mice). (G to I) PET/CT imaging and biodistribution analysis of 18F-FDG in brains of mice treated with FNZ or PEG400. Representative images from mice before (Baseline) and after treatment are shown, with values for maximum percentage injected dose indicated (G). Quantification of k1 value (H). Waterfall plot of the percentage change in k1, each bar representing an individual mouse (I) (n = 12 mice). (J and K) Western blot analysis of endogenous mitochondrial OMM proteins (TOM20 and VDAC), IMM protein (PHB1), and matrix protein (HSP60) in mouse brain homogenates (J). Quantification of protein levels (K) (n ≥ 4 mice). (B) to (E) and (H) show means ± SEM, and (F) and (K) show means ± SD; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001, in t test.
Fig. 2.Mitochondrial content decreased in dopaminergic neurons and astrocytes of mice treated with FNZ.
(A to F) Immunostaining was used to detect mitochondria (TOM20) in the dopaminergic neurons (TH) of mice treated with FNZ for 2 weeks. Representative images of mitochondria in neurite (A) and cell body (D) are shown. Quantification of relative mitochondrial area in neurites and cell bodies is shown in (B) and (C) (80 cell bodies from four mice) and (E) and (F) (≥60 neurites from four mice), respectively. (G to I) Immunostaining was used to detect mitochondria (TOM20) in the SN GFAP-positive astrocytes. Representative confocal microscopy images are shown in (G), and quantification of relative mitochondrial area in astrocytes is shown in (H) and (I) (60 cells from four mice). Scale bars, 10 μm. All graphs show means ± SD; **P < 0.005 and ***P < 0.001, in t test.
Fig. 3.FNZ induced mitochondrial elimination in vitro.
(A) Representative microscopy images of mito-GFP–expressing NPCs treated with FNZ for 3 days. (B) Representative images showing MitoTracker Deep Red staining of NPCs with or without FNZ treatment for 3 days. (C) Quantification of relative mtDNA copy number (MT-ND1, MT-ND4, and MT-CO1) in NPCs with or without FNZ treatment for 3 days (n = 5 independent experiments). (D) Immunostaining of mitochondrial OMM protein (TOM20) and IMM protein (MT-CO1) in mito-GFP–expressing NPCs treated with FNZ for 3 days. (E and F) Western blot analysis (E) and quantification (F) of mitochondrial OMM proteins (VDAC and TOM20), IMM proteins (PHB1 and ATP5A), mtDNA-encoded IMM proteins (MT-ATP8 and MT-CO1), and matrix proteins (HSP60 and HSP70) in NPCs with or without FNZ treatment for 3 days (n ≥ 2 independent experiments). (G to I) Oligomycin, FCCP, and antimycin A and rotenone were added sequentially in NPCs treated with or without FNZ for 3 days (G). Mitochondrial ATP production capacity (H) and maximal respiration (I) (n = 2 independent experiments). Scale bars, 10 μm. All graphs show means ± SD; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, and ***P < 0.001, in t test.
Fig. 4.FNZ-induced mitochondrial elimination was independent of canonical or noncanonical mitophagy.
(A and B) Representative images (A) and quantification of the ratio of LC3-positive mitochondria (B) in NPCs expressing mito-DsRed and LC3B-GFP treated with FNZ or rapamycin for 12 hours in the presence or not with BAF (n ≥ 29 cells from three independent experiments). (C and D) Representative images (C) and quantification of cells without mitochondria (D) in mito-GFP–expressing NPCs transduced with ATG5, PINK1, FUNDC1, or control TRC and treated with FNZ for 3 days (n ≥ 3 independent experiments). (E and F) Representative images (E) and quantification of cells without mitochondria (F) in wild-type, ATG5−/−, PARK2−/−, and FUNDC1−/− MEFs transfected with mito-GFP and treated with FNZ for 3 days (n = 3 independent experiments). (G and H) Representative images (G) and quantification of cells without mitochondria (H) in mito-GFP–expressing NPCs transduced with TRC, RAB9, or ULK1 shRNA and treated with FNZ for 3 days (n ≥ 3 independent experiments). (I and J) Representative images (I) and quantification of cells without mitochondria (J) in mito-GFP–expressing NPCs treated with FNZ and 3MA for 3 days (n = 3 independent experiments). Scale bars, 10 μm. All graphs show means ± SD; *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001, in t test.
Fig. 5.Mitochondrial elimination through a lysosome-dependent exocytosis mechanism.
(A) Representative images and quantification of cells without mitochondria in NPCs treated with FNZ and CLQ for 3 days. (B) Representative images and profile analysis (white lines) of mito-DsRed– and LAMP1-GFP–expressing NPCs treated with FNZ for 24 hours. (C) Imaris 3D reconstruction of mitochondria and lysosomes [scale bars, 3 and 1 μm (right)], and quantification of the ratio of lysosomal mitochondria (n = 10 cells from two independent experiments). (D) Representative TEM images of NPCs during FNZ treatment. Arrows indicate the engulfment of mitochondria by lysosomes. (E) Representative images of mito-DsRed–expressing NPCs treated with FNZ for 24 hours and stained with FM1-43FX and LysoTracker. (F) Immunoblot analysis and quantification of MT-ATP8, TOM20, H3, and actin in cell lysates and culture supernatants (n ≥ 2 independent experiments). (G and H) Representative images (G) and quantification of cells without mitochondria (H) in NPCs transduced with indicated shRNA and treated with FNZ for 3 days (n = 4 independent experiments). (I and J) Immunoblot analysis (I) and quantification (J) of TOM20 and actin in cell lysates and culture supernatants of NPCs transduced with indicated shRNA and treated with FNZ for 2 days (n = 2 independent experiments). Scale bars, 10 μm in (A), (B), (E), and (G) and 500 nm in (D). All graphs show means ± SD; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, and ***P < 0.001, in t test (A and C) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (F, H, and J).
Fig. 6.GeCKO screen to identify genes necessary for FNZ-induced mitochondrial elimination.
(A) Schematic of GeCKO screen. (B) Identification of top candidate genes using the RNAi Gene Enrichment Ranking (RIGER) P value analysis. The functional categories of the candidate genes, manually curated, are shown in the bottom panel. (C) Validation of the candidate genes. Quantification of the fraction of cells without mitochondria in NPCs expressing Cas9 and an sgRNA against candidate genes (bottom, n = 3 independent experiments). (D) Identification of genes related to mitochondrial entry into lysosomes. Quantification of the fraction of mitochondria in lysosomes in NPCs expressing mito-GFP, Cas9, and indicated sgRNA treated with FNZ for 1 day and stained with LysoTracker (bottom, n = 30 cells from three independent experiments). (E and F) Immunoblot analysis of TOM20 and actin in cell lysates and culture supernatants in indicated KO NPCs treated with FNZ for 2 days (E). Quantification of protein levels is shown in (F) (n = 2 independent experiments). (G) Graphic scheme of mitochondrial elimination induced by FNZ. Essential genes identified in the GeCKO screen are shown in the table below. Scale bars, 10 μm. All graphs show means ± SD; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, and ***P < 0.001, in one-way ANOVA test.