| Literature DB >> 35417083 |
Bohuai Xiao1, Suhang He2, Mingjun Sun1, Jianghao Zhou1, Zhiye Wang1, Yunchuan Li1, Simin Liu3, Werner M Nau2, Shuai Chang1.
Abstract
We introduce a versatile recognition tunneling technique using doubly cucurbit[7]uril-functionalized electrodes to form supramolecular junctions that capture analytes dynamically by host-guest complexation. This results in characteristic changes in their single-molecule conductance. For structurally related drug molecules (camptothecin, sanguinarine, chelerythrine, and berberine) and mixtures thereof, we observed distinct current switching signals related to their intrinsic conductance properties as well as pH-dependent effects which can be traced back to their different states (protonated versus neutral). The conductance variation of a single molecule with pH shows a sigmoidal distribution, allowing us to extract a pKa value for reversible protonation, which is consistent with the reported macroscopic results. The new electronic method allows the characterization of unmodified drug molecules and showcases the transfer of dynamic supramolecular chemistry principles to single molecules.Entities:
Keywords: Host-Guest Complexes; Molecular Conductance; Molecular Electronics; Molecular Recognition; Single Molecule Spectroscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35417083 PMCID: PMC9324061 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202203830
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 16.823
Scheme 1Top: pH‐dependent interconversion between the active lactone (left and middle) and the inactive carboxylate (right) states of camptothecin (CPT). Middle: Chemical structure of berberine (BE) and of the cationic forms of sanguinarine (SA) and chelerythrine (CHE). Bottom: Chemical structure of cucurbit[7]uril (CB7).
Figure 1Recognition tunneling measurements. a) Schematic diagram of single‐molecule electronic recognition of CPT with CB7 (see Scheme 1) as a reader molecule attached to both electrodes. b) Typical current‐time traces recorded in water at pH 2 with CPT present at the electrode gap (G B=20 pS). The lower panel shows the zoomed‐in plot of the circled region in the upper plot. c) The conductance distribution for molecular CB7‐CB7 junctions with (red) and without CPT (green) measured at G B=50 pS (upper plot). The lower plot shows the statistical event frequency of the corresponding two conductance states recorded at different concentrations of CPT. d) Logarithmic display of the scatter plots of G versus G B for molecular CB7‐CB7 junctions with (orange) and without CPT (green). The inset shows the conductance histogram of a CB7‐CPTH+‐CB7 junction at G B=20 pS.
Figure 2a) Gaussian fittings to the conductance profiles obtained at different pH values show a reduced peak amplitude and a shifted peak position with increasing pH. b) The conductance distribution of the CB7‐CPT‐CB7 junctions at different pH; error bars are full widths at half maximum of the conductance peaks. c) DFT‐D3 optimized structures of the isolated supramolecular junctions (2 : 1 complexes) between neutral CPT (left) or protonated CPT (right) and CB7. d) Calculated transmission functions for the neutral CB7‐CPT‐CB7 (blue line) and protonated CB7‐CPTH+‐CB7 junction (red line).
Figure 3a) Time‐series recognition tunneling measurement of a single CPT molecule first captured in a supramolecular junction and subsequently released upon addition of cations. Typical time‐series traces are displayed at the bottom. The black line shows the current response of the system in acidic water (pH 2, G B=20 pS), the red line shows the temporal evolution of conductance upon addition of CPT (0.5 mM), corresponding to the formation of a CB7‐CPTH+‐CB7 junction, and the blue line shows the continuous reversal of the effect upon addition of Na+ ions (1 M NaCl), which displaces CPT from the junction. Shown in the middle is a plot of occurrence frequency versus time for switching spikes arising from the CB7‐CPTH+‐CB7 junction. b) Conductance distributions for different drug molecules (CPT, BE, SA, and CHE) in acidic (pH 2), neutral (pH 8 for CPT and pH 7 for the rest), and basic (pH 12) solutions; note that only BE afforded a detectable conductance in basic condition. c) Conductance distribution of the recognition tunneling measurement in a mixture of CPT and SA (both 0.5 mM) at pH 7. Two distinctive peaks are generated and the peak values are consistent with the results of the single‐molecule conductance of CPT and SA measured separately (Figure 3b). The inset displays a typical current‐time trace showing distinctive current spikes. d) Conductance histograms of the recognition tunneling events measured in a mixture of CPT and BE (both 0.5 mM) at pH 7 and 12. Two distinctive peaks are shown at pH 7, while only one peak, with the peak value corresponding to BE, is shown at pH 12.