Literature DB >> 35417038

Limitations and challenges of direct cell reprogramming in vitro and in vivo.

Yi-Xuan Zhang1, Si-Lin Chen1, Yu-Mei Li1, Yun-Wen Zheng1,2,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

Direct reprogramming, whether in vitro or in vivo, has attracted great attention because of its advantages of convenience, short-term conversion, direct targets, no immune rejection, and potential clinical applications. In addition, due to its independence from the pluripotent state, direct programming minimizes some safety concerns associated with the use of human pluripotent stem cells. However, the significant limitations of reprogrammed cells, such as poor proliferative ability, low efficiency, and immature function, need to be addressed before the clinical application potential can be expanded. Here, we review the recent achievements of direct reprogramming in 2D and 3D systems in vitro and in vivo, covering cells derived from the three germ layers from stem/progenitor cells to terminal cells, such as hepatocytes, pancreatic β cells, cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, neurons, and melanocytes. Combining our lab experiences with current work, we summarize the practical and potential issues that need to be solved and the prospects of strategies for addressing the current dilemmas. Through comprehensive analyses, it is concluded that the directions for dealing with efficiency and functionality issues could be the optimization of transcription factors, the upgradation for delivery systems, the regulation of epigenetic factors and pathways, and the improvement of cellular maintenance conditions. Besides, converting cells into the progenitor state firstly and then differentiating them into the desired cell types with chemical compounds may provide an approach to obtaining functional and safe converted cells in batches with a better proliferative ability. With the emergence of more and more direct reprogramming techniques and approaches with both safety and effectiveness, it is bound to bring a new dawn for mechanism research and therapeutic applications for relevant diseases in the future. ©The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY International License.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35417038     DOI: 10.14670/HH-18-458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histol Histopathol        ISSN: 0213-3911            Impact factor:   2.130


  114 in total

Review 1.  Heart development: molecular insights into cardiac specification and early morphogenesis.

Authors:  Thomas Brand
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 2.  Cell fate plug and play: direct reprogramming and induced pluripotency.

Authors:  Stuart M Chambers; Lorenz Studer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Direct Lineage Reprogramming in the CNS.

Authors:  Justine Bajohr; Maryam Faiz
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Reprogramming mouse embryo fibroblasts to functional islets without genetic manipulation.

Authors:  Bhawna Chandravanshi; Ramesh Bhonde
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Optimization of direct fibroblast reprogramming to cardiomyocytes using calcium activity as a functional measure of success.

Authors:  Russell C Addis; Jamie L Ifkovits; Filipa Pinto; Lori D Kellam; Paul Esteso; Stacey Rentschler; Nicolas Christoforou; Jonathan A Epstein; John D Gearhart
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 5.000

6.  In vivo reprogramming of Sox9+ cells in the liver to insulin-secreting ducts.

Authors:  Anannya Banga; Ersin Akinci; Lucas V Greder; James R Dutton; Jonathan M W Slack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  PDGF Facilitates Direct Lineage Reprogramming of Hepatocytes to Functional β-Like Cells Induced by Pdx1 and Ngn3.

Authors:  Fang-Pei Chang; Candy Hsin-Hua Cho; Chia-Rui Shen; Chiao-Yun Chien; Ling-Wen Ting; Hsuan-Shu Lee; Chia-Ning Shen
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Direct reprogramming of murine fibroblasts to hematopoietic progenitor cells.

Authors:  Kiran Batta; Magdalena Florkowska; Valerie Kouskoff; Georges Lacaud
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  The temporal and hierarchical control of transcription factors-induced liver to pancreas transdifferentiation.

Authors:  Dana Berneman-Zeitouni; Kfir Molakandov; Marina Elgart; Eytan Mor; Alessia Fornoni; Miriam Ramírez Domínguez; Julie Kerr-Conte; Michael Ott; Irit Meivar-Levy; Sarah Ferber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reprogramming Human Adult Fibroblasts into GABAergic Interneurons.

Authors:  Andreas Bruzelius; Srisaiyini Kidnapillai; Janelle Drouin-Ouellet; Tom Stoker; Roger A Barker; Daniella Rylander Ottosson
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.