Literature DB >> 35415409

The State of Data in Healthcare: Path Towards Standardization.

Keith Feldman1,2, Reid A Johnson1,2, Nitesh V Chawla1,2.   

Abstract

Coupled with the rise of data science and machine learning, the increasing availability of digitized health and wellness data has provided an exciting opportunity for complex analyses of problems throughout the healthcare domain. Whereas many early works focused on a particular aspect of patient care, often drawing on data from a specific clinical or administrative source, it has become clear such a single-source approach is insufficient to capture the complexity of the human condition. Instead, adequately modeling health and wellness problems requires the ability to draw upon data spanning multiple facets of an individual's biology, their care, and the social aspects of their life. Although such an awareness has greatly expanded the breadth of health and wellness data collected, the diverse array of data sources and intended uses often leave researchers and practitioners with a scattered and fragmented view of any particular patient. As a result, there exists a clear need to catalogue and organize the range of healthcare data available for analysis. This work represents an effort at developing such an organization, presenting a patient-centric framework deemed the Healthcare Data Spectrum (HDS). Comprised of six layers, the HDS begins with the innermost micro-level omics and macro-level demographic data that directly characterize a patient, and extends at its outermost to aggregate population-level data derived from attributes of care for each individual patient. For each level of the HDS, this manuscript will examine the specific types of constituent data, provide examples of how the data aid in a broad set of research problems, and identify the primary terminology and standards used to describe the data. © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Big data; Healthcare analytics; Review; Standards

Year:  2018        PMID: 35415409      PMCID: PMC8982788          DOI: 10.1007/s41666-018-0019-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res        ISSN: 2509-498X


  84 in total

1.  The proteomics standards initiative.

Authors:  Sandra Orchard; Henning Hermjakob; Rolf Apweiler
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Overcoming potential pitfalls in the use of Medicare data for epidemiologic research.

Authors:  E S Fisher; J A Baron; D J Malenka; J Barrett; T A Bubolz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Metabolomics Standards Workshop and the development of international standards for reporting metabolomics experimental results.

Authors:  Arthur L Castle; Oliver Fiehn; Rima Kaddurah-Daouk; John C Lindon
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association White Paper.

Authors:  Charles Safran; Meryl Bloomrosen; W Edward Hammond; Steven Labkoff; Suzanne Markel-Fox; Paul C Tang; Don E Detmer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Shattuck lecture--clinical research to clinical practice--lost in translation?

Authors:  Claude Lenfant
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Omics technologies, data and bioinformatics principles.

Authors:  Maria V Schneider; Sandra Orchard
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

8.  Survey and evaluation of approaches to physician performance measurement.

Authors:  A R Barro
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1973-11

9.  Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. Results from the medical outcomes study.

Authors:  S Greenfield; E C Nelson; M Zubkoff; W Manning; W Rogers; R L Kravitz; A Keller; A R Tarlov; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-03-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2015.

Authors:  Kristian A Gray; Bethan Yates; Ruth L Seal; Mathew W Wright; Elspeth A Bruford
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 19.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.