Adam Meares1,2, Kimihiro Susumu3,4, Divita Mathur1,2, Sang Ho Lee3,4, Olga A Mass5, Jeunghoon Lee5,6, Ryan D Pensack5, Bernard Yurke5,7, William B Knowlton5,7, Joseph S Melinger8, Igor L Medintz1. 1. Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900, U. S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., Virginia 20375, United States. 2. College of Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, United States. 3. Optical Sciences Division Code 5600, U. S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., Virginia 20375, United States. 4. Jacobs Corporation, Hanover, Maryland 21076, United States. 5. Micron School of Materials Science & Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho 83725, United States. 6. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho 83725, United States. 7. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho 83725, United States. 8. Electronics Science and Technology Division Code 6800, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375, United States.
Abstract
Cyanine dyes represent a family of organic fluorophores with widespread utility in biological-based applications ranging from real-time PCR probes to protein labeling. One burgeoning use currently being explored with indodicarbocyanine (Cy5) in particular is that of accessing exciton delocalization in designer DNA dye aggregate structures for potential development of light-harvesting devices and room-temperature quantum computers. Tuning the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of Cy5 dyes in such DNA structures should influence the strength of their excitonic coupling; however, the requisite commercial Cy5 derivatives available for direct incorporation into DNA are nonexistent. Here, we prepare a series of Cy5 derivatives that possess different 5,5'-substituents and detail their incorporation into a set of DNA sequences. In addition to varying dye hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity, the 5,5'-substituents, including hexyloxy, triethyleneglycol monomethyl ether, tert-butyl, and chloro groups were chosen so as to vary the inherent electron-donating/withdrawing character while also tuning their resulting absorption and emission properties. Following the synthesis of parent dyes, one of their pendant alkyl chains was functionalized with a monomethoxytrityl protective group with the remaining hydroxyl-terminated N-propyl linker permitting rapid, same-day phosphoramidite conversion and direct internal DNA incorporation into nascent oligonucleotides with moderate to good yields using a 1 μmole scale automated DNA synthesis. Labeled sequences were cleaved from the controlled pore glass matrix, purified by HPLC, and their photophysical properties were characterized. The DNA-labeled Cy5 derivatives displayed spectroscopic properties that paralleled the parent dyes, with either no change or an increase in fluorescence quantum yield depending upon sequence.
Cyanine dyes represent a family of organic fluorophores with widespread utility in biological-based applications ranging from real-time PCR probes to protein labeling. One burgeoning use currently being explored with indodicarbocyanine (Cy5) in particular is that of accessing exciton delocalization in designer DNA dye aggregate structures for potential development of light-harvesting devices and room-temperature quantum computers. Tuning the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of Cy5 dyes in such DNA structures should influence the strength of their excitonic coupling; however, the requisite commercial Cy5 derivatives available for direct incorporation into DNA are nonexistent. Here, we prepare a series of Cy5 derivatives that possess different 5,5'-substituents and detail their incorporation into a set of DNA sequences. In addition to varying dye hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity, the 5,5'-substituents, including hexyloxy, triethyleneglycol monomethyl ether, tert-butyl, and chloro groups were chosen so as to vary the inherent electron-donating/withdrawing character while also tuning their resulting absorption and emission properties. Following the synthesis of parent dyes, one of their pendant alkyl chains was functionalized with a monomethoxytrityl protective group with the remaining hydroxyl-terminated N-propyl linker permitting rapid, same-day phosphoramidite conversion and direct internal DNA incorporation into nascent oligonucleotides with moderate to good yields using a 1 μmole scale automated DNA synthesis. Labeled sequences were cleaved from the controlled pore glass matrix, purified by HPLC, and their photophysical properties were characterized. The DNA-labeled Cy5 derivatives displayed spectroscopic properties that paralleled the parent dyes, with either no change or an increase in fluorescence quantum yield depending upon sequence.
The family of cyanine
dyes has and continues to see extensive use
as molecular probes and biolabels since several reactive versions
were first developed more than 30 years ago.[1,2] Their
application space has covered a broad range of utility including roles
as multicolor nucleic acid array probes, generalized protein and antibody
labels, real-time PCR probes, within numerous biosensors, and as Förster
resonance energy transfer (FRET) donors (D) and/or acceptors (A).[3−7] Their latter use within FRET configurations has recently been extended
beyond the realm of biosensing to incorporation within designer DNA
assemblies in pursuit of two new research foci, namely, for designer
light-harvesting and energy transfer (ET) systems along with molecular-scale
devices that seek to access and exploit exciton delocalization phenomena.
In terms of ET, various D–A cyanine dyes displaying a range
of absorption and emission maxima have been used to label oligonucleotides
that are then assembled into designer DNA structures allowing them
to function as so-called molecular photonic wires.[8] Within these structures, a variety of parameters can be
iteratively modified and tested either jointly or independently including
that of D/A ratios, D/A spacing, number of ET steps, relative dye
orientation, interactions with other dyes, structural dimensionality
(planar vs 3D), dye density, and so forth.[8−10] Cumulatively,
this provides a powerful system to develop design strategies to optimally
harvest light and then focus it on the nanoscale. To exploit exciton
delocalization, DNA structures such as Holliday junctions allow the
cyanine dyes to strongly interact and provide access to intriguing
optical phenomena such as displaying J- and H-aggregate behavior along
with large Davydov splitting.[11−14] Harnessing such exciton delocalization properties,
especially at room temperature, is of interest for the development
of new types of hyperefficient light harvesters and sensors along
with excitonic devices that exploit coherence for quantum information
processing. Due to its inherently high molecular extinction coefficient
(∼2.5 × 105 M–1·cm–1), indodicarbocyanine (Cy5) is a particularly appealing
dye for the latter application and Cy5 aggregates on DNA scaffolds
have received recent attention in this context.[12−20]Beyond the presence of cyanine dyes, the other common enabling
element among both the systems described above is that of the underlying
DNA architecture, which not only functions to place the dyes in the
correct position, and sequential order if that is required, but also
provides the dyes sufficient (sub)nanometer proximity relative to
each other to engage in efficient excitonic coupling. The inherent
modularity of DNA assembly also allows experimental structures and
the necessary controls to be easily assembled in a parallel side-by-side
format. Indeed, reflecting the power of DNA nanotechnology’s
inherently parallel reaction assembly chemistry, some reports have
assembled hundreds of different targets and control structures in
total to provide necessary data on all potentially contributing ET
processes by making almost every possible combination.[8−10] Several cyanine dye analogues are available through commercial sources
which display reactive functional groups that enable dye incorporation
both during and post DNA synthesis, for example, phosphoramidite and N-hydroxysuccinimidyl ester/maleimide derivatives,
respectively.[21−23] Due to the chemical nature of these functional groups,
longer attachment linkers are also often required, which can allow
significant conformational freedom of individual dyes within DNA constructs.
Excessive freedom of movement can be detrimental to excitonic coupling
applications on DNA scaffolds due to positional uncertainty and lack
of control over orientation and dye-to-dye interactions. To circumvent
this geometrical uncertainty and allow more precise dye placement,
the two-point internal insertion approach is preferred, where, in
essence, the dye molecule physically replaces a nucleoside within
the DNA, see Figure . This type of insertion is, however, chemically dependent on having
access to the requisite phosphoramidite dye derivative(s) for incorporation
during automated DNA synthesis.
Figure 1
Structures of the four substituted Cy5
dye derivatives for phosphoramidite
conversion and insertion in DNA. (A) Structures of the homo-substituted
Cy5-hex, Cy5-Peg, Cy5-tBu, and Cy5-Cl derivative
dyes synthesized in this study. MMTr is the 4-monomethoxytrityl protecting
group. These were prepared in the iodide salt form. (B) General structure
of the Cy5 dye derivatives inserted internally into DNA oligonucleotides
during phosphoramidite synthesis and attached to the DNA at both the
3′ and 5′ ends. The commercial Cy5 dye used for the
same type of DNA labeling has the same structure but is not substituted
(R = H).
Structures of the four substituted Cy5
dye derivatives for phosphoramidite
conversion and insertion in DNA. (A) Structures of the homo-substituted
Cy5-hex, Cy5-Peg, Cy5-tBu, and Cy5-Cl derivative
dyes synthesized in this study. MMTr is the 4-monomethoxytrityl protecting
group. These were prepared in the iodide salt form. (B) General structure
of the Cy5 dye derivatives inserted internally into DNA oligonucleotides
during phosphoramidite synthesis and attached to the DNA at both the
3′ and 5′ ends. The commercial Cy5 dye used for the
same type of DNA labeling has the same structure but is not substituted
(R = H).Recent experimental results in
conjunction with theoretical studies
have strongly suggested that modifying Cy5 to display various types
of substituent groups that alter hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity could
further augment its ability to engage in delocalized excitonic coupling
in the context of DNA scaffolds.[12,24] However, within
the available cyanine dyes, beyond a single unsubstituted Cy5 dye
version, other types of functionalized Cy5 phosphoramidite derivatives
are neither commercially available nor reported. We thus undertook
the synthesis of a series of novel Cy5 analogues, with different substituents
[n-hexyloxy (hex), triethylene glycol monomethylether
(Peg), tert-butyl (tBu), and chloro
(Cl)] at the 5,5′-positions (Figure ). In addition to tuning the hydrophobicity
and potential intermolecular interactions of these dyes with each
other, variation of these substituents potentially enables tuning
of absorption and emission properties, including relative absorption/emission
maxima, Stokes shift, and fluorescence quantum yield (QY).[12,24] The as-synthesized series of substituted Cy5 dyes displaying short
linkers were functionalized with monomethoxytrityl- and phosphoramidite-terminated N-propyl linkers to enable two-point 3′-5′
insertion into nascent oligonucleotides during automated DNA synthesis.
Each of the novel dyes was internally incorporated into several different
DNA sequences (chosen for downstream excitonic coupling studies) and
the basic photophysical properties of each were characterized.
Results
and Discussion
Molecular Design
The design of the
current Cy5 phosphoramidite
derivatives was based on that of the commercially available Cy5 phosphoramidite
designated for incorporation internally within oligonucleotides during
automated DNA synthesis.[25,26] This structure was
of relevance as a parent compound because it features two 3-hydroxypropyl
linkers originating at the indole’s nitrogen atoms. Upon incorporation
into the DNA scaffold, these short linkers limit conformational variability
and can ultimately enforce close proximity of dyes placed opposite
to each other on complementary strands. To have the ability to later
probe and understand the influence of hydrophobicity on dye–dye
interactions in DNA scaffolds, we chose to modify the 5,5′-peripheral
positions of the parent Cy5 with various substituents.[12,24] In contrast to this approach, substituents placed directly on the
polymethine chain may result in either undesired steric repulsion
between dyes when incorporated into arrays or other undesired changes
to relevant photophysical properties.[27] Additionally, the electron-donating or electron-withdrawing character
of substituents placed at the 5,5′-positions enables the tuning
of photophysical properties, such as absorption and emission maxima.[24] Thus, we designed and synthesized a series of
Cy5 derivatives ready for phosphoramidite conversion with different
peripheral substituents including n-hexyloxy (Cy5-hex),
2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethoxy (Cy5-Peg), tert-butyl (Cy5-tBu), and chloro (Cy5-Cl) groups, see Figure . Hexyloxy and Peg
substituents possess similar electron-donating capacities but are
hydrophobic and hydrophilic, respectively. The tert-butyl group is also hydrophobic and an electron-donating group but
to a lesser extent than the hexyloxy, while Cl is a weak acceptor.
Finally, the chloro modification was chosen because it has been previously
shown that chloro-substituted cyanine derivatives are prone to aggregation,[28,29] which could facilitate excitonic interactions within downstream
DNA assemblies.
Dye Synthesis
In-depth detail of
each synthetic step
and the corresponding chromatographic separation, NMR results, and
mass spectral analysis (where available) are provided in the Supporting Information (Sections 1 and 2). The
following represents an abbreviated overview of key steps. The entire
synthetic scheme was initiated from the synthesis of 5-substituted
indole precursors via Fischer indole synthesis.[30−32] For the 5-alkoxyindoles (2-hex and 2-Peg), the synthesis began by preparing 5-methoxyindole (1-OMe) from 4-methoxyphenylhydrazine hydrochloride and 3-methyl-2-butanone
in refluxing ethanol (Scheme A).[31,32] The methoxy group in compound 1-OMe was then hydrolyzed in 48% aqueous hydrobromic acid,
yielding the common precursor 1-OH.[33] Next, 5-hydroxyindole 1-OH was utilized in
Williamson-type ether synthesis, yielding either 5-hexyloxy (2-hex)- or 5-triethyleneglycol monomethyl ether (2-Peg)-substituted indoles from bromohexane and 1-bromo-2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethane
(S1),[34] respectively. In parallel,
5-tert-butylindole (2-tBu) and 5-chloroindole
(2-Cl) were also prepared from their respective 4-substituted
hydrazine hydrochlorides via Fisher indole synthesis
(Scheme B). For compound 2-Cl, sulfuric acid was added to expedite the slow reaction;
otherwise, the HCl inherent to the hydrazine salts was sufficient
to catalyze the reaction. The 5-substituted indoles were N-alkylated to the corresponding [(3-acetoxy)propyl]indolinium iodide
derivatives by heating to 100 °C in neat,[26] freshly prepared 3-iodopropyl acetate S2 (Scheme C),[26,35] providing good to nearly quantitative yields. Next, the series of
indolinium iodide salts were coupled with malonaldehyde dianilide
hydrochloride to form N,N-bis(3-acetoxypropyl)indodicarbocyanine
derivatives (Scheme ). Note that the solvent and base varied depending upon the availability
at the given time,[27,36,37] and yields were comparable nonetheless. Subsequently, the acetoxy
groups were deprotected by either HCl or acetyl chloride in the presence
of methanol to obtain the N,N-bis(3-hydroxypropyl)indodicarbocyanine
series. In the cases of 4-hex and 4-tBu,
purification was carried out prior to hydrolysis, while 4-Peg and 4-Cl were hydrolyzed as crude materials. The final,
stable dyes (monomethoxytrityl-substituted Cy5 derivatives, Scheme A) were then prepared
by the substitution reaction of the terminal hydroxyl group with 4-monomethoxytrityl
chloride (MMTr-Cl). Due to the statistical nature of this substitution,
both mono- and bis-tritylation occur, and the separation of the two
products is nontrivial. We found that sacrificing target yield (32%
and below) using excess Cy5 significantly limited the formation of
the bis-trityl byproduct while also making subsequent purification
much more facile. Furthermore, any unreacted bis-hydroxy cyanine was
simply recovered and reused, as opposed to the bis-trityl byproduct,
which would require additional hydrolysis for its recycling. We note
that the 4,4′-dimethoxytrityl (DMTr, shown in Figure S1) group is more common as the protective group of
primary alcohols when used for DNA synthesis; however, this protective
group is less robust.[38]
Scheme 1
Synthetic Schemes
for Obtaining Cy5 Precursor Indoles and Indolinium
Salts,
(A) Synthesis of 5-alkoxy
indoles;
(B) Synthesis of 5-tert-butyl and 5-chloro indoles; (C) Synthesis
of 5-substituted indolinium iodide salts.
Yields are indicated for each step (italicized bold)
following compound number; corresponding NMR spectra and mass spectra
of all products are shown in the supporting information, in the order
of appearance. Details for preparation of compounds S1 and S2 are
found in the Supporting Information.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of N,N-Bis(3-hydroxypropyl)indodicarbocyanines
Individual
procedures vary slightly
for each cyanine depicted in this scheme; details can be found in
the Supporting Information. Yields indicated
for each step (italicized bold) following compound number. The corresponding
NMR spectra and mass spectra of all products are shown in the Supporting Information in the order of appearance.
Scheme 3
Preparation of Cyanine Dye Derivatives for Internal
Incorporation
into DNA during Automated Synthesis,
(A) Tritylation of the indodicarbocyanine
series; (B) Indodicarbocyanine phosphoramidite conversion/phosphytilation,
product yield was assumed to be quantitative based upon TLC. Following
a quick purification, the product was immediately dissolved in anhydrous
acetonitrile under N2 gas in a reagent bottle and then
installed into the DNA synthesizer.
Yields are indicated for each step (italicized bold)
following compound number; corresponding NMR spectra and mass spectra
of all products are shown in the Supporting Information, in the order of appearance. Details for preparation of compounds
S1 and S2 are found in the Supporting Information.
Synthetic Schemes
for Obtaining Cy5 Precursor Indoles and Indolinium
Salts,
(A) Synthesis of 5-alkoxy
indoles;
(B) Synthesis of 5-tert-butyl and 5-chloro indoles; (C) Synthesis
of 5-substituted indolinium iodide salts.Yields are indicated for each step (italicized bold)
following compound number; corresponding NMR spectra and mass spectra
of all products are shown in the supporting information, in the order
of appearance. Details for preparation of compounds S1 and S2 are
found in the Supporting Information.
Synthesis of N,N-Bis(3-hydroxypropyl)indodicarbocyanines
Individual
procedures vary slightly
for each cyanine depicted in this scheme; details can be found in
the Supporting Information. Yields indicated
for each step (italicized bold) following compound number. The corresponding
NMR spectra and mass spectra of all products are shown in the Supporting Information in the order of appearance.
Preparation of Cyanine Dye Derivatives for Internal
Incorporation
into DNA during Automated Synthesis,
(A) Tritylation of the indodicarbocyanine
series; (B) Indodicarbocyanine phosphoramidite conversion/phosphytilation,
product yield was assumed to be quantitative based upon TLC. Following
a quick purification, the product was immediately dissolved in anhydrous
acetonitrile under N2 gas in a reagent bottle and then
installed into the DNA synthesizer.Yields are indicated for each step (italicized bold)
following compound number; corresponding NMR spectra and mass spectra
of all products are shown in the Supporting Information, in the order of appearance. Details for preparation of compounds
S1 and S2 are found in the Supporting Information.Thus, the more stable 4-monomethoxytrityl
(MMTr) group was used
to protect the primary alcohol in this work as is also done with commercially
available cyanine phosphoramidites. Importantly, exchanging the DMTr
with the MMTr group does not impact the automated DNA synthesis protocol
and had no apparent effect on overall yields.[39] Finally, the MMTr-protected cyanine derivatives were each coupled
with 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite
to yield indodicarbocyanine phosphoramidites (Scheme B). Once prepared, the Cy5-phosphoramidites
were purified and then immediately dried down. Initial successful
Cy5-phosphoramidite syntheses were confirmed by the presence of 31P NMR resonances in the range of 140–150 ppm;[40] however, we found that thin-layer chromatography
(TLC) provided sufficient confirmation of the product for later trials.
Additionally, we modified the scale of the reactions such that all
phosphoramidite could be consumed by the DNA synthesizer within two
days. Once thoroughly dried, the phosphoramidite samples were reconstituted
in dry acetonitrile and immediately used for DNA synthesis.We attribute our successful DNA synthesis trials to two factors
in preparation of the final phosphoramidites. First, we utilize only
the iodide salts. The iodide salts, as opposed to the more commonly
found commercial Cy5-phosphoramidite chloride salts, have improved
solubility and larger retention factor, making their synthesis easier
to monitor by TLC. Comparatively, the chloride salts required a much
more polar TLC eluent (methanol/dichloromethane as opposed to acetonitrile/dichloromethane),
which additionally undergoes substitution on the phosphoramidite moiety
complicating TLC interpretation. Second, during initial, poor yielding
DNA synthesis trials, we struggled to purify the Cy5-phosphoramidites
in a timely manner prior to placing the samples into the DNA synthesizer.
We found that concentrating the Cy5-phosphoramidite reaction crude,
in an attempt to go directly to column chromatography, results in
significant decomposition of the crude product presumably due to the
presence of acid when the amine was evaporated. This decomposition
was circumvented by washing with saturated sodium bicarbonate. However,
the bicarbonate wash converted the excess 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophoramidite to cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropyl-H-phosphonamidate
(see Figure S2 for structure, characterization data available in Section
3, and NMR spectra available in Supporting Information Figures S48–S50)[41] that unfortunately
coeluted with Cy5-phosphoramidites when attempting column chromatography.
We opted not to reduce the molar equivalents of 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophoramidite, as some
amount is inevitably consumed by moisture in the reaction solvent,
despite our best efforts to dry the solvent over activated 3 Å
molecular sieves.[42] Ultimately, we were
able to remove the impurity through iterative powderization (see General Procedure for Cy5-Phosphoramidite Synthesis), tracking its removal through TLC upon staining with ninhydrin
(impurity shows bright red-orange upon heating the stained TLC). Once
removed, we observed significantly improved yields in our DNA synthesis
trials.
DNA Synthesis, Oligonucleotide Purification, and Overall Yield
For each new Cy5 dye analogue prepared above, five different DNA
oligonucleotide sequences were synthesized with each dye internally
incorporated into the target oligo during automated synthesis. Full
sequences with the dye insertion locations are listed in Table . Our selection of
oligonucleotide sequences for synthesis is motivated by the Holliday
junction (HJ) DNA structure that is widely applied in the field as
a platform for studying dye excitonic coupling and illustrated in Figure S3.[11,13,14,18] Sequences HJA-HJD are programmed
to self-assemble into this tetrameric HJ structure. The fifth strand—HJAcomp—is
designed to be complementary to HJA and assemble to form a linear
duplex DNA for any comparative studies with the HJ structure. Each
sequence was prepared in multiple copies with at least 3 and up to
8 replicates at the 1 μmol scale undertaken.
Table 1
DNA Sequences Synthesized in This
Studya
designation
oligonucleotide sequence (5′-3′)
HJA
ATATAATCGCTCG-X-CATATTATGACTG
HJB
CAGTCATAATATG-X-TGGAATGTGAGTG
HJC
CACTCACATTCCA-X-CTCAACACCACAA
HJD
TTGTGGTGTTGAG-X-CGAGCGATTATAT
HJAcomp
CAGTCATAATATG-X-CGAGCGATTATAT
Note: ATCG are the naturally occurring
nucleotides. X denotes the site of Cy5 analogue incorporation.
Note: ATCG are the naturally occurring
nucleotides. X denotes the site of Cy5 analogue incorporation.DNA synthesis utilized an automated
Applied Biosystems Expedite
8909 DNA Oligo Synthesizer (supplied by Biolytic Lab Performance,
Inc., Fremont, CA) using solid-phase phosphoramidite coupling chemistry
carried out at the 1 μmol scale on controlled-pore glass (CPG)
columns that contained the initial 3′ starting base in the
protected form. Unsubstituted commercial nucleoside phosphoramidites
were coupled at a concentration of 70 mM while the novel Cy5 phosphoramidites
were coupled at a concentration of 80 mM (note that commercial Cy5
phosphoramidites recommend coupling at 70 mM).[43] DNA oligonucleotides were synthesized following the instrument’s
standard coupling protocols, with the exception of the Cy5-phosphoramidite
insertion step.[44] For coupling of the novel
Cy5 analog phosphoramidites (monomer for these purposes), the coupling
time was modified such that three pulses of monomer + activator (Act,
0.25 M 5-ethylthio-1H-tetrazole in anhydrous acetonitrile)
were pushed into the column by flushing 9–10 pulses (optimized
based on the volume of the tubing from the monomer reservoir to the
synthesis column) of acetonitrile wash immediately after. The monomer
+ Act was then allowed to react with the column by flushing seven
pulses of wash over the course of 150 s. Next, the unreacted monomer
+ Act was rapidly flushed out of the column using eight pulses of
wash. The entire process was repeated three times to achieve a total
of nine pulses of monomer + Act per coupling. The end of the coupling
was the same as the standard protocol, which included additional activator
and wash steps. See Supporting Information Section 4 for more information on the standard coupling protocols
utilized.All solutions and reagents used with the system were
purchased
from Glen Research (Sterling, VA) and used in accordance with their
instructions and that of the DNA synthesizer. For incorporation of
naturally occurring nucleotides, we utilized nucleoside phosphoramidites
possessing standard protecting groups (as opposed to ultramild protecting
groups) due to supply-line/chemical ordering delays (protecting group
information and catalogue numbers for each can be found in Supporting Information Section 4, Table S1).
The only exception is acetyl-protected cytidine phosphoramidite (Glen
Research, Sterling, VA., Cat. no. 10-1015-1C), which is suitable for
ultramild deprotection. Typically, one would prefer to use nucleoside
phosphoramidites with ultramild compatible protecting groups, as their
deprotection conditions (methanolic potassium carbonate) minimize
cyanine hydrolysis.[45] Once synthesized,
the crude DNA sequences still attached to the CPG columns were stored
at 4 °C in dry and dark conditions until a sufficient number
of synthetic replicates had been collected (20+) for bulk processing
in parallel. The latter began with ammonolysis (see Ammonolysis of DNA Sequences in the Experimental
Section) which both frees the DNA sequences from the CPG beads
and deprotects the individual nucleobases, but it can also lead to
hydrolysis of the cyanines. The manufacturer suggested concentration
of 30% ammonia[44] resulted in rapid degradation
of all novel cyanine-containing sequences. We carefully screened conditions
to find that optimal yield and near complete deprotection (>95%)
of
nucleobases was attained at 7% NH4OH with 1 week reaction
time, when using Cy5-hex, Cy5-Peg, and Cy5-tBu. In
the case of electron-deficient Cy5-Cl, nearly complete hydrolysis
of Cy5 was observed during the 1 week long exposure time; thus, it
was tuned back to 48 h. This decreased reaction time results in 5–10%
of DNA failing to undergo complete deprotection; however, those species
were separable from the target sequence by HPLC.Upon completion
of the ammonolysis, the crude oligo solution underwent
salt exchange (see Salt Exchange of DNA Sequences in the Experimental Section for the procedure)
using triethylammonium acetate (TEAA) buffer followed by deionized
water and was then concentrated to dryness. Dried crude samples can
be stored long term at −20 °C if necessary at this stage.
We note that this buffer exchange is critical as concentration of
the sequences directly from basic solution leads to nearly complete
decomposition of the cyanines.Desalted oligo solutions were
then analyzed by liquid chromatography–mass
spectrometry (LCMS, see Characterization in the Experimental Section for more details)
to quickly confirm the presence of the target sequence in the crude
product mixture. Samples containing the confirmed dye-labeled DNA
sequences were then pooled and purified by preparatory-scale reverse-phase
HPLC (see Oligonucleotide Purification in Experimental
Section) with a gradient of increasing methanol in 0.1M TEAA
(aq). For Cy5-hex-, Cy5-Peg-, and Cy5-tBu-containing
sequences, LC fractions were concentrated to dryness directly from
the 0.1 M TEAA buffer/methanol solution. In the case of Cy5-Cl-containing
oligonucleotides, individual LC fractions were again subjected to
salt exchange to remove the excess buffer, as the direct concentration
from TEAA solution resulted in nontrivial (10–20%) decomposition.
Dried LC fractions were reconstituted in small volumes of water (Optima
Grade), to keep concentration sufficiently high (25–50 μM)
to visualize and separate low percentage impurities on LCMS. Purified
fractions were combined, concentrated, and then reanalyzed via LCMS for a final purity assessment.The predicted
and observed masses (as m/z, where z is the charge) for each dye-containing
sequence can be found in Supporting Information Table S2, and detailed information on LCMS acquisition can be found
in Supporting Information Section 5. The
primary impurity observed closely follows the target sequence in reverse-phase
chromatography and cannot be fully separated; it was identified in
each case as the target sequence missing the last nucleobase (denoted
as N – 1 sequences). For the Cy5-Cl sequences,
there was also an impurity present (1–2%) in all cases which
precedes the target band during reverse-phase chromatography, and
it was identified as the half target sequence in which the Cy5-Cl
had been hydrolyzed (absorption band is observed centered at approximate
430 nm). We accepted all final materials when they achieved greater
than 90% purity, with an average sample purity of 95%. Overall, the
final yields varied from 4.5 up to 24.3% (Table , based on an expected maximum yield of 1
μmole per CPG column at this synthetic scale). The large deviations
are due in part to the time a particular sequence was synthesized
during a given dye-analogue’s in-use reagent lifetime (e.g.,
synthesis number 10 from a given Cy5-phosphoramidite sample versus
synthesis number 1 will inherently exhibit lower yield due to hydrolysis
of the Cy5-phosphoramidite over time). To understand this lowered
efficiency, we analyzed a portion of Cy5-phosphoramidite solution
1 day post-installation on the DNA synthesizer and noted the appearance
(by TLC, not shown) of two polar spots (low retention factor). 31P NMR analysis of the crude material shows the appearance
of multiple resonances at or below 25 ppm.[40,41] These low Rf spots have been tentatively assigned as
the partially hydrolyzed Cy5-cyanoethylphosphonate and fully hydrolyzed
Cy5-H-phosphonate, according to the general phosphoramidite hydrolysis
pathway described by Krotz[46] and Hargreaves.[47] Another factor contributing to overall yield
was the varying levels of difficulty with purification encountered,
which was found to be both dye- and sequence-dependent.
Table 3
Selected Properties of the Cy5 Analogue-Labeled
DNA Sequencesa
DNA sequence
av. yieldb (%)
λmax abs (nm)
ε260 (M–1.cm–1)
εCy5 (M–1.cm–1)
λmax em (nm)
Stokes shift (ν, cm–1)
ΦF
ΔΦFc (%)
τavg (ns)d
τ1 (ns)/contribution
τ2 (ns)/contribution
Δτe
krad (ns–1)/knr (ns–1)
τradf (ns)
Cy5-hex Series
HJA
10.3
673
260,900
216,000
696
491
0.08
0.14
0.59
0.50/0.87
1.18/0.13
0.40
0.14/1.56
7.35
HJB
7.5
670
272,100
219,800
696
558
0.07
0
0.64
0.47/0.65
0.96/0.35
0.52
0.11/1.45
9.15
HJC
12.0
674
248,700
208,100
696
469
0.09
0.29
0.67
0.54/0.77
1.10/0.23
0.57
0.14/1.38
7.31
HJD
8.9
673
259,100
200,900
696
491
0.07
0
0.57
0.47/0.80
0.96/0.20
0.36
0.12/1.63
8.16
HJAcomp
10.5
671
268,900
216,700
697
556
0.07
0
0.64
0.43/0.52
0.87/0.48
0.50
0.11/1.48
9.00
Cy5-Peg Series
HJA
11.9
673
265,200
214,500
694
450
0.10
0.43
0.83
0.57/0.48
1.08/0.52
0.89
0.12/1.08
8.33
HJB
6.7
670
276,300
213,800
693
495
0.09
0.29
0.72
0.55/0.64
1.03/0.36
0.64
0.13/1.26
8.00
HJC
12.9
670
253,000
209,500
692
475
0.10
0.43
0.67
0.49/0.63
0.98/0.37
0.52
0.15/1.34
6.67
HJD
7.8
674
264,000
221,400
693
407
0.09
0.29
0.79
0.55/0.45
0.99/0.55
0.79
0.11/1.15
8.78
HJAcomp
4.5
671
273,400
219,000
693
473
0.09
0.29
0.64
0.54/0.83
1.13/0.17
0.45
0.14/1.00
7.11
Cy5-tBu Series
HJA
16
659
261,800
261,100
679
447
0.26
0.24
1.44
0.69/0.15
1.57/0.85
0.53
0.18/0.51
5.56
HJB
13.7
656
272,700
250,000
677
473
0.20
0
1.07
0.77/0.56
1.46/0.44
0.14
0.19/0.74
5.26
HJC
24.3
659
249,500
249,300
678
425
0.26
0.24
1.41
0.64/0.18
1.58/0.82
0.50
0.19/0.52
5.26
HJD
17.2
657
260,300
260,000
676
428
0.21
0
1.13
0.67/0.39
1.42/0.61
0.20
0.19/0.69
5.26
HJAcomp
12.3
657
270,000
269,600
678
471
0.21
0
1.11
0.68/0.40
1.39/0.60
0.18
0.19/0/71
5.26
Cy5-Cl Series
HJA
5.0
656
267,568
274,200
674
407
0.35
0.30
1.89
1.89
0.71
0.19/0.34
5.26
HJB
10.2
653
279,236
288,400
672
433
0.27
0
1.78
1.78
0.60
0.15/0.41
6.67
HJC
16.9
654
255,372
269,300
673
432
0.37
0.37
1.98
1.98
0.78
0.19/0.32
5.26
HJD
12.7
654
265,944
271,100
671
387
0.28
0
1.63
0.55/0.12
1.78/0.88
0.47
0.17/0.44
5.88
HJAcomp
10.8
654
275,640
276,000
673
432
0.29
0
1.47
0.84/0.28
1.71/072
0.32
0.20/0.36
5.00
All values determined
in neat water.
As compared
to an expected 1 μmol
maximum.
Percent change
of ΦF compared to the parent dye in MeOH.
Average of τ1 and
τ2, accounting for weighted contributions.
Percent change of τavg relative to the parent dye in MeOH.
τrad = krad–1. Extinction coefficients
were determined utilizing nearest-neighbor approximation for DNA absorbance
at 260 nm[55−57] while also accounting for Cy5 contribution. Cy5 percent
contribution (0.02–0.04) was based on the ratio of absorbance
at 260 nm and at Cy5 λmax for each of the parent
dyes obtained in methanol. It was assumed that Cy5 percent contribution
at 260 nm is constant between MeOH and H2O. Fluorescence
QY (ΦF) determined against 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin
standard (ΦF = 0.07 in toluene).[54]
Dye Properties
Due to the overall poor solubility of
the parent cyanine dye derivatives in water, we were unable to determine
the octanol–water partition coefficient (log P) by the traditional “shake flask” method.[48−50] In lieu of this approach, we utilized modeling software developed
by Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc. to predict the partition coefficient
and solubility in water (log S0), as shown in Table . As an additional
means of comparison with direct relevance to the final intended utility
of these oligonucleotides, we determined the average concentration
of methanol required to elute the DNA sequences containing the given
dye from the reverse-phase HPLC column (the greater the methanol content
required to elute, the more hydrophobic the dye). The DNA–dye
sequences were utilized for this instead of the free dyes because
they are capable of eluting at lower methanol content, but the hydrophobic
character of the dye still dominates the elution profile. The calculated
log P and log S0 values suggest
that the order of increasing hydrophobicity, according to the functional
group, is as follows: Peg < Cl ≪ tBu ≪
hex. This is in close agreement with the relative “stickiness”
of the DNA–dye sequences toward the C18 stationary
phase. The slightly greater methanol content required to elute Cy5-Peg-containing
sequences relative to Cy5-Cl can be attributed to the amphiphilic
nature of the Peg chains, where the increased number of hydrogen bond-accepting
O atoms favor interaction with the aqueous phase. This tendency is,
however, offset by the increased number of C–H bonds, which
promote interaction with the hydrophobic stationary phase.[51−53]
Table 2
Select Properties of the Novel Indodicarbocyanine
Dyes
dye
log P
log S0
av. % MeOH for DNA-dye elution
λmax abs (nm)
λmax em (nm)
Stokes’ shift (cm–1)
ΦF
τ (ns)
Cy5-hex
5.66
–9.94
51
670
699
619
0.07
0.42
Cy5-Peg
1.58
–7.88
31.5
668
693
540
0.07
0.44
Cy5-tBu
3.43
–8.25
41
654
678
541
0.21
0.94
Cy5-Cl
2.35
–7.94
30.5
648
670
507
0.27
1.11
Cy5a
1.73
–6.25
30.0
Cy5 refers to the unsubstituted
Cy5. For some comparative values of this dye as incorporated into
DNA, see Table S3. Absorption and emission
properties were determined in methanol. QY (ΦF) was
determined against the standard TPP (ΦF = 0.07 in
toluene).[54] Acetate-functionalized cyanines
(4) were utilized for the log S0 and
log P as this more closely matches the cyanine structure
once imbedded within DNA. log P and log S0 were determined using the Molecular Property Calculations on the
Percepta Platform from Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc. (Toronto,
Canada). Average % methanol for DNA–dye elution based on elution
time for each sequence (HJA-D and HJAcomp) containing the indicated
dye.
Cy5 refers to the unsubstituted
Cy5. For some comparative values of this dye as incorporated into
DNA, see Table S3. Absorption and emission
properties were determined in methanol. QY (ΦF) was
determined against the standard TPP (ΦF = 0.07 in
toluene).[54] Acetate-functionalized cyanines
(4) were utilized for the log S0 and
log P as this more closely matches the cyanine structure
once imbedded within DNA. log P and log S0 were determined using the Molecular Property Calculations on the
Percepta Platform from Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc. (Toronto,
Canada). Average % methanol for DNA–dye elution based on elution
time for each sequence (HJA-D and HJAcomp) containing the indicated
dye.Relative absorption
and emission properties of the novel cyanine
dyes are also summarized in Table . We present the data acquired for those possessing
pendant hydroxyl substituents (5), as the diacetoxy cyanines
(4) were not cleanly isolated in all cases. Figure shows the normalized
absorption and emission spectra of the cyanines, respectively, as
acquired in methanol. Here, the wavelength of the maximum absorbance
shifts with respect to the electron-withdrawing/donating character
of the 5,5’-substituents, spanning the window of 648–670
nm. The greater the electron-donating character, the greater the bathochromic
shift, and vice versa. Thus, the order of increasing shift of the
absorbance maxima is Cy5-Cl < Cy5-tBu < Cy5-Peg
≈ Cy5-hex. The emission maxima of this series, spanning 670–699
nm, follows the same order with each Cy5 possessing a moderate Stokes
shift in the range of 507–619 cm–1. The mirror
images between absorption and fluorescence spectra along with moderate
Stokes shifts suggest that the peripheral substituents used in the
present study have only minimal effect on the excited-state structural
relaxation relative to the ground-state conformation for each Cy5
derivative. We also note that the Cy5-Peg and Cy5-hex have broader
absorption spectra than the other two derivatives (Figure A). The fluorescence QY (ΦF) and the excited-state fluorescence lifetimes (τ) of
these dyes follow an inverse trend as a function of the absorption
peak maxima, where the weaker the electron-donating character of the
5,5′-substituents, the larger the ΦF exhibited.
Thus, the largest determined ΦF was 0.27 for Cy5-Cl,
decreasing to 0.21 for Cy5-tBu, and decreasing further
to 0.07 for Cy5-hex and Cy5-Peg. The corresponding τ values
ranged from 0.42 up to 1.11 ns and appeared to predominantly consist
of a single exponential decay. In addition, we determined ΦF for 4-hex and 4-tBu (not shown), and these
were found to be identical to those of Cy5-hex and Cy5-tBu, respectively, indicating that the free hydroxyl substituents
stemming from the indolenine nitrogens did not influence our measurements.
Figure 2
Absorption
and emission spectra for the as-synthesized dye series.
(A) Normalized absorption spectra (in terms of extinction coefficient)
of Cy5-hex (red), Cy5-Peg (blue), Cy5-tBu (pink),
and Cy5-Cl (green) acquired in methanol with concentration approximated
to 4–5 μM (Abs ∼ 1.0 AU). (B) Corresponding normalized
emission spectra for the same sample series acquired in methanol with
concentration approximated to 0.5 μM (Abs < 0.1 AU). For
emission, samples were excited at 600 nm and spectra were collected
from 620 to 850 nm.
Absorption
and emission spectra for the as-synthesized dye series.
(A) Normalized absorption spectra (in terms of extinction coefficient)
of Cy5-hex (red), Cy5-Peg (blue), Cy5-tBu (pink),
and Cy5-Cl (green) acquired in methanol with concentration approximated
to 4–5 μM (Abs ∼ 1.0 AU). (B) Corresponding normalized
emission spectra for the same sample series acquired in methanol with
concentration approximated to 0.5 μM (Abs < 0.1 AU). For
emission, samples were excited at 600 nm and spectra were collected
from 620 to 850 nm.
Photophysical Properties
of the Dye-Labeled Oligonucleotides
Table summarizes the absorption and emission properties
of the 20 novel Cy5-containing DNA sequences in H2O (HPLC).
The corresponding absorption and emission spectra collected from each
of the single-stranded (ss) oligonucleotides are presented in Figure . For comparative
purposes, the properties of unsubstituted Cy5 oligonucleotides (R
= H) are summarized in Supporting Information Section 6, Table S3. From this point on, use of Cy5-hex,
Cy5-Peg, Cy5-tBu or Cy5-Cl refers to the given dye-labeled oligonucleotide. Upon incorporation into DNA, the absorption maxima measured in water
for these Cy5 derivatives are identical or slightly red-shifted (0–3
nm for Cy5-hex, 2–6 nm for Cy5-Peg, 2–5 nm for Cy5-tBu, and 5–8 nm for the Cy5-Cl oligonucleotides),
compared to the parent dyes measured in methanol. The absorption maxima
vary within 1–4 nm on a sequence-to-sequence basis within each
HJ-Cy5 series and there is no discernible trend as to which HJ sequence
produces the greatest bathochromic shift. For example, HJC-Cy5-tBu
is the most red-shifted of its series, while HJC-Cy5-Peg is the most
blue-shifted of its series. The incorporation of the various Cy5 analogues
does not significantly influence the shape of the DNA absorption band
in any case (see Figures S72–S76). Since the DNA and Cy5 analogue absorbance behaved independently,
we determined the molar absorptivity (ε, M–1·cm–1) of the Cy5 analogue in each sequence
based on the calculated absorbance of the DNA at 260 nm. For this,
we used the nearest-neighbor approximation[55−57] and assumed
that the percent contribution of the Cy5 analogue at 260 nm was constant
between the parent Cy5 in methanol and the DNA-incorporated Cy5 analogue
in water. Thus, the ε at 260 nm values found in Table is the sum of the calculated
value and the Cy5 analogue contribution. For Cy5 analogues incorporated
into sequences, the molar absorptivity at the wavelength of maximum
absorbance (εCy5) falls within a narrow window for
each DNA–dye series: 200,900–219,800 (M–1·cm–1) for Cy5-hex sequences, 209,500–221,400
(M–1·cm–1) for Cy5-Peg sequences,
249,300–269,600 (M–1·cm–1) for Cy5-tBu sequences, and 269,300–288,400
(M–1·cm–1) for the Cy5-Cl
sequences. The deviation of εCy5 between sequences,
and also within the same series of a given dye, is likely due to small
differences in microenvironments and their relative purities. The
significantly lower εCy5 (∼20% average decrease)
observed for Cy5-hex and Cy5-Peg is attributed to the increased width
of the collective vibronic absorption bands (A0–0 and A0–1) relative to those of Cy5-tBu and Cy5-Cl. Note that we are unable to determine full-width at
half-maximum (FWHM) as the A0–0 and A0–1 vibronic bands begin to overlap before the A0–0 falls below 50% maximum intensity, but the relative broadness can
nonetheless be seen in Figure A–D.
Figure 3
Absorption and emission spectra for the Cy5 dye series
incorporated
into the 5 DNA oligonucleotides. Absorption spectra (expressed according
to extinction coefficient, ε) of the Cy5-hex- (A), Cy5-Peg-
(B), Cy5-tBu- (C), and Cy5-Cl (D)-containing DNA
sequences acquired in water at 4–5 μM. The inset highlights
the range of observed absorption maxima as also indicated in purple.
The corresponding normalized emission spectra (arbitrary units, AU)
for Cy5-hex (E), Cy5-Peg (F), Cy5-tBu (G), and Cy5-Cl
(H) acquired in water at a concentration of 0.4–0.5 μM.
For emission, samples were excited at 600 nm and spectra collected
from 620 to 850 nm. Averaged emission maxima are shown in purple.
Absorption and emission spectra for the Cy5 dye series
incorporated
into the 5 DNA oligonucleotides. Absorption spectra (expressed according
to extinction coefficient, ε) of the Cy5-hex- (A), Cy5-Peg-
(B), Cy5-tBu- (C), and Cy5-Cl (D)-containing DNA
sequences acquired in water at 4–5 μM. The inset highlights
the range of observed absorption maxima as also indicated in purple.
The corresponding normalized emission spectra (arbitrary units, AU)
for Cy5-hex (E), Cy5-Peg (F), Cy5-tBu (G), and Cy5-Cl
(H) acquired in water at a concentration of 0.4–0.5 μM.
For emission, samples were excited at 600 nm and spectra collected
from 620 to 850 nm. Averaged emission maxima are shown in purple.All values determined
in neat water.As compared
to an expected 1 μmol
maximum.Percent change
of ΦF compared to the parent dye in MeOH.Average of τ1 and
τ2, accounting for weighted contributions.Percent change of τavg relative to the parent dye in MeOH.τrad = krad–1. Extinction coefficients
were determined utilizing nearest-neighbor approximation for DNA absorbance
at 260 nm[55−57] while also accounting for Cy5 contribution. Cy5 percent
contribution (0.02–0.04) was based on the ratio of absorbance
at 260 nm and at Cy5 λmax for each of the parent
dyes obtained in methanol. It was assumed that Cy5 percent contribution
at 260 nm is constant between MeOH and H2O. Fluorescence
QY (ΦF) determined against 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin
standard (ΦF = 0.07 in toluene).[54]The emission
maxima observed in the DNA-Cy5 analogue sequences
parallel the trend observed for the unincorporated dyes—the
order of shortest to longest wavelength-emitting dye does not change
and the Stokes’ shifts remain in a similarly moderate range.
As with the absorption maxima, the emission maxima vary slightly on
a per-sequence basis, and the specific sequence with the greatest
bathochromic shift within each series is dye- and sequence-dependent.
As shown in Table , the fluorescence QYs in the HJ Cy5-hex series are the weakest of
all sequences studied, ranging from 0.07–0.09, followed closely
by the HJ Cy5-Peg series (0.09–0.10). The QY values of the
HJ Cy5-tBu series are next in the range of 0.20–0.26
and the largest fluorescence QYs belong to the HJ Cy5-Cl series ranging
from 0.27–0.37. On a per dye basis, these results, as anticipated,
parallel those of the non-DNA-conjugated parent dyes. In all cases,
the fluorescence QYs of DNA-incorporated Cy5s are either unchanged
or slightly enhanced relative to those of the parent dyes. For the
HJ Cy5-Peg series, QY as a whole increases between 29 and 43% (see
ΔΦF values in Table ); for the remaining series, only HJA and
HJC exhibit enhanced emission. For the HJA/C Cy5-hex series, the increase
is 14–29%, for the HJA/C Cy5-tBu, the increase
is 24%, and for the HJA/C Cy5-Cl, an increase of 30–37% is
seen.The average excited-state fluorescence lifetimes (τavg) along with the corresponding radiative and nonradiative
rate constants
for the substituted Cy5-labeled DNA oligonucleotides are collected
and presented in Table . In contrast to the free substituted Cy5 dyes in methanol, the fluorescence
decays of the dyes incorporated into DNA were generally found to be
nonexponential and well fit by a biexponential decay function. This
observation suggests that the substituted Cy5 dyes experience different
local environments and may assume multiple configurations in the excited
state when attached to DNA strands in the aqueous environment. Similar
to the free dyes in methanol, the τavg increases
in the order Cy5-hex < Cy5-Peg < Cy5-tBu <
Cy5-Cl. For each substituted Cy5, the τavg depends
on the particular DNA sequence. The variation in τavg with the DNA sequence is the greatest for the Cy5-tBu and Cy5-Cl series, where the longest and shortest fluorescence
lifetimes differ by as much as 26%. The radiative rate for each substituted
Cy5 DNA oligo is estimated from[58]where ΦF is the fluorescence
QY and results in the trend krad,Cy5-hex ∼ krad,Cy5-Peg < krad,Cy5-Cl ∼ krad,Cy5-. Thus, the red-shifted
Cy5-hex and Cy5-Peg oligonucleotides, which have relatively broad
absorption bands, generally show smaller radiative rates than the
Cy5-Cl- and Cy5-tBu-labeled oligonucleotides. The
radiative rate was also found to be dependent on the DNA sequence
for each substituted Cy5. We note that the radiative rate for cyanine
dyes,[59] and also other dyes,[60] has been observed to depend on the environment
surrounding the dye. The nonradiative rate is determined fromwhere . The results in Table show that knr generally increases in
the order knr,Cy5-Cl < knr,Cy5- < knr,Cy5-Peg < knr,Cy5-hex, and there is variation in knr with the DNA sequence for each substituted
Cy5. As there are a number of possible decay pathways that may contribute
to the substantially larger knr for Cy5-hex
and Cy5-Peg, determining the primary contributor is beyond the scope
of this work.Figure compares
the absorption and emission profiles of all the HJA and HJAcomp sequences
for each dye derivative along with plotting the corresponding spectra
for the unsubstituted Cy5 in the same sequences. As is clearly seen,
all the substituted analogues possess longer wavelength maxima than
the unsubstituted Cy5. This is not surprising behavior as the substituents
do not equally influence the HOMO and LUMO energies in dyes. For electron-withdrawing
groups, the decrease to HOMO energy is less than the decrease to LUMO
energy, and for electron-donating groups, the increase to HOMO is
greater than the increase to LUMO. Cumulatively, in both scenarios,
the HOMO–LUMO gap is shrinking which causes the observed red-shift
to emission.
Figure 4
Absorption and emission spectra for select Cy5 dye series
DNA oligonucleotides.
Normalized absorption spectra of HJA (A) and HJAcomp (B) sequences
incorporating Cy5-hex Cy5-Peg, Cy5-tBu, Cy5-Cl, and
Cy5 dye acquired in water at a concentration of 4–5 μM.
The corresponding normalized emission spectra for HJA (C) and HJAcomp
(D) sequences acquired in water at a concentration of 0.4–0.5
μM. For emission, samples were excited at 600 nm and spectra
were collected from 620 to 850 nm.
Absorption and emission spectra for select Cy5 dye series
DNA oligonucleotides.
Normalized absorption spectra of HJA (A) and HJAcomp (B) sequences
incorporating Cy5-hex Cy5-Peg, Cy5-tBu, Cy5-Cl, and
Cy5 dye acquired in water at a concentration of 4–5 μM.
The corresponding normalized emission spectra for HJA (C) and HJAcomp
(D) sequences acquired in water at a concentration of 0.4–0.5
μM. For emission, samples were excited at 600 nm and spectra
were collected from 620 to 850 nm.Here, we have described the preparation of four different indodicarbocyanine
(Cy5) derivatives that possess different 5,5′-substituents
including hexyloxy, triethylene glycol monomethyl ether, tert-butyl, and chloro groups. These substituents were chosen primarily
to vary the inherent electron-donating/withdrawing—hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity
characteristics of the final dye construct. Studies to confirm these
particular characteristics can become quite complex and still remain
to be performed. However, analysis of the substituted dye solubility
and hydrophobicity, as estimated from modeling and HPLC analysis,
suggest that they are indeed demonstrating the physicochemical properties
that were expected for each derivative. Phosphoramidite derivatives
of each dye were subsequently prepared and then internally incorporated
into a series of DNA oligonucleotides using two-point insertion via automated DNA synthesis. The average yield observed
per 1 μmol CPG cartridge during synthesis ranged from 4.5 up
to nearly 25%. Given that a number of replicate syntheses were carried
out for each oligo, the overall yield of each sequence was in the
hundreds of nanomoles despite the relative lower yield for some on
a per CPG cartridge basis.Overall, we were pleased to find
that even after undergoing conversion
to the final phosphoramidite, exposure to all the highly reactive
automated DNA chemistry reactions/environments, extended purification
protocols with multiple harsh chemical treatments, and multiple HPLC
procedures with subsequent concentration, the dye derivatives mostly
maintained the photophysical properties of the parent dye in terms
of excited-state fluorescence lifetime and QY. Coming back to the
applications posited in the Introduction that
are based on excitonic delocalization,[12−16,18−20] studies examining how each of these Cy5 derivatives is capable of
engaging in excitonic coupling with itself and perhaps the other dyes
in this series are currently underway. These will require assembling
the oligonucleotides into appropriate DNA scaffolds such as direct
dimers and Holliday junction-like structures which the current synthetic
series is meant to specifically facilitate. It is hoped that these
efforts will provide strong insights with respect to designing better
dye derivatives for such purposes along with optimizing the mechanisms
that underpin this promising room-temperature optical phenomena.
Experimental Section
Materials and Methods
Chemical Synthesis
Triphenylphosphine and 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite
(97%) were purchased
from Acros Organics. 4-Methoxyphenylhydrazine hydrochloride (95%),
malonaldehyde dianilide hydrochloride, and triethyleneglycol monomethyl
ether were purchased from TCI America. 3-Methyl-2-butanone (98%) and
3-chloropropyl acetate (98%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar. Cesium
carbonate (99.9%) was purchased from Chem-Impex International. 4-Methoxytriphenylmethyl
chloride (4-monomethoxytrityl chloride, 97%) and 4-chlorophenylhydrazine
hydrochloride (93%) were purchased from Oakwood Chemical. Hydrobromic
acid (HBr, 48%), N-bromosuccinimide (99%), sodium
iodide (NaI, 98%), triethylamine (99.5%), N,N-diisopropylethylamine
(99.5%), and sulfuric acid (H2SO4, reagent grade,
95–98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Bulk chromatography
solvents were purchased from Pharmco/Greenfield Global. All the other
chemicals, including reaction solvents were purchased from Millipore-Sigma
or Fisher Scientific and used as received, except for CH2Cl2, CH3CN, and N,N-diisopropylethylamine,
which were dried over freshly activated 3 Å molecular sieves
(Sigma-Aldrich) before use for phosphoramidite coupling reaction.
For the unsubstituted Cy5 dye, we used commercially available Cy5-H
(R = H) as the standard for comparison of the DNA-Cy5 sequences. Standard
sequences were prepared by automated DNA synthesis in the same manner
using the commercially available Cy5 phosphoramidite 1-[3-(4-monomethoxytrityloxy)propyl]-1′-[3-[(2-cyanoethyl)-(N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidityl)]propyl]-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine
chloride (Glen Research, Sterling VA).
Characterization
1H and 13C NMR
spectra were recorded on a Bruker SpectroSpin or Bruker Ascend 400
MHz spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA). Chemical shifts
for 1H NMR spectra are reported relative to the tetramethylsilane
(TMS) signal in deuterated solvent (TMS, δ = 0.00 ppm). All
J values are reported in hertz. Chemical shifts for 13C
NMR spectra are reported relative to the chloroform-d (TMS, δ = 0.00 ppm) or the residual solvent peak in DMSO-d6 (δ = 2.52 ppm)[61] in the case of 5-tBu. All coupling constants (J) are reported in hertz. Chemical shifts for 13C NMR spectra
are reported relative to the residual solvent signal in chloroform-d (δ = 77.16 ppm) or DMSO-d6 (δ = 39.52 ppm)[61] in the case of 5-tBu. Mass spectral analysis for both small molecules and
DNA oligonucleotides was performed using an ACQUITY UPLC system equipped
with a single quadrupole (SQD2) mass detector (Waters, Inc., Milford,
MA) as described.[62,63] Additionally, purity of the DNA
oligonucleotides was assessed on the ACQUITY UPLC using the photodiode
array detector (PDA eλ Detector) and fluorescence detector (FLR
Detector) modules. All LCMS samples were injected from Fisher brand
optima grade solvents: MeOH/H2O (1/1) for small molecules
and neat H2O for DNA oligonucleotides and then eluted using
an increasing gradient of methanol in aqueous 0.05 M TEAA buffer (pH
7.0). For small molecules, a Waters BEH C18 column (part
no. 186002350) was utilized, and for DNA sequences, a Waters Oligonucleotide
BEH C18 column (part no. 186003949) was utilized. Absorption
spectra were recorded using a Cary 60 UV–vis (Agilent Technologies,
Inc., Santa Clara, CA), and fluorescence spectra were recorded using
a FluoroMax-4 spectrofluorometer (Horiba Scientific, Piscataway, NJ).
Fluorescence QYs were determined against the 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin
(TPP) standard (ΦF = 0.07 in toluene),[52] with common excitation at 600 nm. The TPP standard
was purchased from Frontier Specialty Chemicals (Logan, UT) and then
oxidized with 2,3-dichloro-5,6-cyano-p-benzoquinone
(DDQ) to remove the stated 1–3% chlorin impurity. TPP was cross-referenced
against oxazine 720 perchlorate (Luxottica-Exciton, Lockbourne, OH,
ΦF = 0.63 in MeOH),[64,65] upon excitation
at 580 nm with agreement of ±5%. The obtained fluorescence spectra
were corrected for wavelength-dependent instrumental sensitivity.
Excited-state fluorescence lifetimes were collected using a system
described previously.[66−68]
Synthetic Procedures
Detailed descriptions
for the
synthesis of 5-methoxy-2,3,3-trimethylindolenine (1-OMe), 5-hydroxy-2,3,3-trimethylindolenine (1-OH), 5-n-hexyloxy-2,3,3-trimethylindolenine (2-hex), 5-{2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethoxy}-2,3,3-trimethylindolenine
(2-Peg), 5-tert-butyl-2,3,3-trimethylindolenine
(2-tBu), 5-chloro-2,3,3-trimethylindolenine (2-Cl), 1-[3-(acetoxy)propyl]-5-n-hexyloxy-2,3,3-trimethylindolinium
iodide (3-hex), 1-[3-(acetoxy)propyl]-5-{2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethoxy}-2,3,3-trimethylindolinium
iodide (3-Peg), 1-[3-(acetoxy)propyl]-5-tert-butyl-2,3,3-trimethylindolinium iodide (3-tBu), 5-chloro-1-[3-(acetoxy)propyl]-2,3,3-trimethylindolinium
iodide (3-Cl), 1,1′-bis(3-acetoxypropyl)-5,5′-bis(n-hexyloxy)-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine
iodide (4-hex), 1,1′-bis(3-acetoxypropyl)-5,5′-bis(tert-butyl)-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine
iodide (4-tBu), 1,1′-bis(3-hydroxypropyl)-5,5′-bis(n-hexyloxy)-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine
iodide (5-hex), 1,1′-bis(3-hydroxypropyl)-5,5′-bis{2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethoxy}-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine
iodide (5-Peg), 1,1′-bis(3-hydroxypropyl)-5,5′-bis(tert-butyl)-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethyl-indodicarbocyanine
iodide (5-tBu), 5,5′-dichloro-1,1′-bis(3-hydroxypropyl)-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethyl-indodicarbocyanine
iodide (5-Cl), 1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-1’-[3-(4-monomethoxytrityloxy)propyl]-5,5′-bis(n-hexyloxy)-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethyl-indodicarbocyanine
iodide (Cy5-hex), 1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-1’-[3-(4-monomethoxytrityloxy)propyl]-5,5′-bis{2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethoxy}-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethyl-indodicarbocyanine
iodide (Cy5-Peg), 1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-1’-[3-(4-monomethoxytrityloxy)propyl]-5,5′-bis(tert-butyl)-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethyl-indodicarbocyanine
iodide (Cy5-tBu), and 5,5′-dichloro-1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-1’-[3-(4-monomethoxytrityloxy)propyl]-tetramethyl-indodicarbocyanine
iodide (Cy5-Cl) are provided in Supporting Information Section 2.
General Procedure for Cy5-Phosphoramidite
Synthesis
In preparation for the reaction, an oven-dried
round-bottom flask
was charged with one MMTr-Cy5 iodide derivative (5, 0.16
mmol) and then coevaporated with dry CH3CN (3 times), dried
under vacuum for 2–8 h, and then either stored under nitrogen
overnight or used immediately. At the time of reaction, the precharged
vessel was flushed/filled with dry nitrogen, then dissolved in dried
CH2Cl2 (3.2 mL), and treated with dried N,N-diisopropylethylamine (170 μL, 0.96 mmol). Then,
2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite
(110 μL, 0.48 mmol) was transferred from the glovebox directly
to the reaction solution. The reaction mixture was vigorously stirred
at room temperature in the dark for 30 min under N2. The
reaction completion was assessed by TLC [CH2Cl2/CH3CN, (2:1) or (3:1) depending on Cy5 analogue]. Note
that in all cases, the retention factor (Rf) of Cy5-phosphoramidite was slightly larger than that of the hydroxyl-functionalized
Cy5, thus cospotting the reaction crude against the starting material
is invaluable. Once determination is complete, the solution was washed
with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution (2 times). The organic
layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated.
The crude product was then dried under vacuum for 30 min to ensure
that all volatiles are removed before proceeding. The crude product
was then dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 (∼1
mL), and dry hexane (2–3 mL) was added to the solution. The
solvent was then slowly stripped on a rotary evaporator until the
majority of the product precipitated; then, the yellow-green-colored
supernatant was discarded. This procedure was repeated until the undesired
H-phosphonate byproduct is no longer visible on TLC (bright red-orange
following staining with ninhydrin and heating), and the supernatant
was the blue color of Cy5. The product was then coevaporated with
dry CH3CN (3 times) and dried under vacuum for 30 min.
Following this, the product was immediately used for DNA synthesis
by resolubilizing to a concentration of 80 mM in anhydrous CH3CN (2 mL), transferring directly to a reagent bottle, attaching
that bottle to the DNA synthesizer, priming the bottle lines, and
starting the synthesis. See Supporting Information Section 4 for more information on the automated DNA synthesis coupling
protocols.
Ammonolysis of DNA Sequences
Following
DNA synthesis,
the contents of a CPG-bound DNA column are emptied into a clean 20
mL scintillation vial. The residual CPG beads in the column were then
flushed with 3 mL of water, into the scintillation vial. Next, 1 mL
of 28% NH4OH (aq) was added to the vial, resulting in a
final concentration of approximately 7% NH4OH (aq). The
contents of the scintillation vial were then shaken, in darkness for
48 h (for Cy5-Cl-containing sequences) or 1 week (for all other Cy5-containing
sequences).
Salt Exchange of DNA Sequences
Salt
exchange was performed
on each DNA sequence following the ammonolysis step. To begin, a Glen-Pak
DNA Purification Cartridge (Glen Research, Sterling, VA, catalogue
no. 60–5200) was wetted with 5 mL of neat MeCN (HPLC grade)
and then flushed with 5 mL of 0.2 M TEAA (in 18 Ω water). The
DNA–dye sequence (constituted in ammonia solution) was then
passed through the Glen-Pak column via a 10 mL syringe 3–5
times. If blue color remains in the ammonia solution after several
passes, the solution was retained and set aside. The Glen-Pak was
then flushed/washed with 5 mL of 0.2 M TEAA followed by 5 mL of 18Ω
water. The Glen-Pak was next purged of residual water by plunging
air until no droplets were observed. DNA–dye sequences were
then collected into an Eppendorf tube by eluting from Glen-Pak with
∼1 mL of MeCN/water (80/20). If the original ammonia solution
retained color and was set aside, the Glen-Pak was reconstituted by
flushing with 5 mL of 0.2 M TEAA, and the loading/washing/eluting
process was repeated. The second eluent of DNA–dye solution
was combined with the first and then concentrated to dryness on a
Speed-Vac SPD 1030 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
Oligonucleotide Purification
Purification
was performed
on a preparatory LC system composed of the following Waters, Inc.
(Milford, MA) components: 2707 Autosampler, 2545 Quaternary Gradient
Module, 2998 Photodiode Array Detector, and Fraction Collector III.
Individual oligonucleotides were injected from HPLC grade water (500
μL automated injection) onto an XBridge OST C18 OBD 19 ×
50 mm column (part no. 186008962, Waters, Inc., Milford, MA) and eluted
with a gradient of increasing methanol in 0.1M TEAA (aq.). Individual
oligonucleotides required two, half sample injections to reach adequate
purity (i.e. the bulk sample was dissolved in 1 mL of water, and purified
by two trials, each using a 500 μL injection). Elution gradients
reflect those developed to characterize the individual sequences,
gradients can be found in Supporting Information, Section 5. Oligonucleotides containing Cy5-hex, Cy5-Peg or Cy5-tBu
were concentrated to dryness on a Speed-Vac SPD 1030 (Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Waltham, MA) immediately following elution. Oligonucleotides
containing Cy5-Cl were desalted following the above procedure, as
direct concentration from 0.1 M TEAA resulted in partial (10−20%)
decomposition. Following concentration, all fractions were assessed
for purity by LCMS (see Characterization, above), combined where appropriate,
then assessed again by LCMS to determine final purity. Oligonucleotides
were deemed acceptable when purity exceeded 90%. Final samples were
again concentrated down then stored at −20 °C in the dark.
Authors: Achim H Krotz; Claus Rentel; Dennis Gorman; Phil Olsen; Hans J Gaus; James V McArdle; Anthony N Scozzari Journal: Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 1.381
Authors: Amit Kumar Mandal; Masahiko Taniguchi; James R Diers; Dariusz M Niedzwiedzki; Christine Kirmaier; Jonathan S Lindsey; David F Bocian; Dewey Holten Journal: J Phys Chem A Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 2.781
Authors: Eric A Owens; Hoon Hyun; Tyler L Dost; Jeong Heon Lee; GwangLi Park; Dang Huan Pham; Min Ho Park; Hak Soo Choi; Maged Henary Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Carl W Brown; Susan Buckhout-White; Sebastián A Díaz; Joseph S Melinger; Mario G Ancona; Ellen R Goldman; Igor L Medintz Journal: ACS Sens Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 7.711
Authors: Joyce C Breger; Kimihiro Susumu; Guillermo Lasarte-Aragonés; Sebastián A Díaz; Jesper Brask; Igor L Medintz Journal: ACS Sens Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 7.711
Authors: Jonathan S Huff; Sebastián A Díaz; Matthew S Barclay; Azhad U Chowdhury; Matthew Chiriboga; Gregory A Ellis; Divita Mathur; Lance K Patten; Simon K Roy; Aaron Sup; Austin Biaggne; Brian S Rolczynski; Paul D Cunningham; Lan Li; Jeunghoon Lee; Paul H Davis; Bernard Yurke; William B Knowlton; Igor L Medintz; Daniel B Turner; Joseph S Melinger; Ryan D Pensack Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Austin Biaggne; Lawrence Spear; German Barcenas; Maia Ketteridge; Young C Kim; Joseph S Melinger; William B Knowlton; Bernard Yurke; Lan Li Journal: Molecules Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 4.927
Authors: Shibani Basu; Keitel Cervantes-Salguero; Bernard Yurke; William B Knowlton; Jeunghoon Lee; Olga A Mass Journal: Molecules Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 4.927