Cláudio Tinoco Mesquita1,2,3, Isabella Caterina Palazzo2,3, Maria Fernanda Rezende3. 1. Radiology Department, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil. 2. Hospital Pró-Cardíaco, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 3. Hospital Vitória e Hospital Samaritano da Barra, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that account
for approximately 0.5% of all newly diagnosed malignancies. The primary sites of NETs
are the gastrointestinal tract (in 65%) and the lungs (in 25%). Nearly one quarter of
all NETs are metastatic at diagnosis(. Most NETs express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in the cell membrane,
which allows the use of radiotracers that bind with high affinity to SSTRs, such
radiotracers being used for diagnosis, staging, prediction of a treatment response and
even as therapeutic agents(. The first radiotracer used in order to
evaluate SSTR expression was 123I-labeled Tyr3-octreotide, which
was developed in 1983(. Because of
the excessive intestinal accumulation of this tracer due to high biliary excretion,
there was a search for a better radiotracer, which resulted in the development of
[(111)In-DTPA(0)]octreotide ( 111In-pentetreotide). In 1993,
Eric Krenning’s team published data related to the use of 111In-pentetreotide
imaging in more than 1,000 patients, demonstrating that the modality has good
sensitivity and specificity(. Trials
of 111In-pentetreotide established the pathway to developing tracers
dedicated to therapy using the same mechanism of cell binding (theranostics), designated
peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), which is now considered an important
option for the treatment of patients with well-differentiated NETs(.Despite the established clinical value of using 111In-pentetreotide as a
radiotracer, it has some shortcomings, including a high radiation burden, less than
optimal spatial resolution (i.e., less ability to detect small lesions), longer image
acquisition time, some accumulation in the intestine/gallbladder, and less
availability(. In an article
published in the previous issue of Radiologia Brasileira, Cavicchioli et al.( compared the use of
68Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1,Tyr3-octreotate (
68Ga-DOTATATE) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with
that of 111In-octreotide scintigraphy in 41 patients with NETs. Images were
compared in a patient-by-patient analysis to identify additional lesions and determine
their impact on clinical management. In 33 patients, both exams were positive, although
68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT revealed more positive sites in one third of the
cases (11 patients). The results were discordant in five patients, in whom
68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was positive and 111In-octreotide
scintigraphy was negative. In five patients, there were changes in clinical management
based on the additional information obtained by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. The
authors concluded that 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is superior to conventional
111In-octreotide scintigraphy for the management of NETs because the
former better discriminates the extent of disease and has greater capacity to change the
treatment strategy.How do the findings of Cavicchioli et al.( relate to data in the literature? Their findings are in good
agreement with the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2016,
in which 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was compared with
111In-DTPA-octreotide imaging and conventional imaging for the evaluation of
pulmonary and gastroenteropancreatic NETs(. Only three of the studies evaluated in that review directly
compared the two radiopharmaceuticals in the same patient, and the results were similar:
for the diagnosis and reassessment of tumors with high SSTR expression,
68Ga-DOTATATE is more sensitive than is 111In-DTPA-octreotide and
should be used if available. Here in Brazil, Etchebehere et al.( compared another single-photon
emission CT (SPECT) tracer with high affinity for SSTRs
(99mTc-HYNIC-octreotide) with 68Ga-DOTATATE and found that the
latter seems to be more sensitive for the detection of well-differentiated NETs,
especially those in bone and those that were previously unknown. Those authors suggested
that SSTR-binding SPECT tracers should be used only when 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT
and magnetic resonance are not available. We strongly agree with this recommendation,
and we can state that 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT should be the functional imaging
modality of choice in the management of patients with NETs. SPECT, preferably SPECT/CT,
should be reserved for cases in which 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is not available.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for NETs currently recommend that
SSTR imaging options should include SSTR-PET/CT or SSTR-PET/MRI, or octreotide SPECT/CT
(only if SSTR-PET/CT is not available)(.Not only is 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT more accurate than octreotide SPECT for NET
localization, it also plays an important role in the selection of NET patients for
treatment. In 2017, a landmark clinical trial demonstrated the benefit of the use of
PRRT in patients with metastatic midgut NETs with SSTR expression(. In that study, progression-free
survival was markedly longer among the patients who received 177Lu-DOTATATE
than among those who received high-dose octreotide. Our personal experience is that
PET/CT is preferred for selecting patients for PRRT because it can identify patients
that have advanced disease not diagnosed by conventional imaging, thus avoiding
unnecessary surgical procedures.In addition, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is a marker of prognosis: increased uptake
of the tracer in a tumor indicates well-differentiated neoplastic cells, which has been
shown to correlate with improved overall survival(. However, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on
PET has an opposite prognostic association: higher FDG uptake in tumors has consistently
been associated with poorer overall survival. A recent meta-analysis showed that, in NET
patients, 18F-FDG PET imaging prior to PRRT administration appears to be a
useful tool to predict tumor response and survival outcomes, negative FDG uptake by the
tumor being associated with longer progression-free and overall survival(. Based on those findings, there are
classifications for clinical use that combine the FDG PET results with those of
68Ga-DOTATATE PET in staging subjects with NET, to provide better support
for clinical management.Novel radiotracers for SSTR imaging are under study. It has been shown that
18F-labeled tracers have better resolution potential than do
68Ga-labeled tracers because of their lower positron energy. Therefore, there
is intense interest in adding a cyclotron-produced tracer to the clinical portfolio; one
of the best candidates is 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide ([ 18F]AlF-OC),
because it shows favorable kinetic and imaging characteristics(. Studies involving head-to-head comparisons to validate [
18F]AlF-OC as a 18F-labeled alternative to
68Ga-DOTATATE in clinical applications of PET are now underway and must be
completed before this tracer can be used in clinical practice. The pathway to the
development of new tracers and the use of PRRT for the management of NETs is a brilliant
example of the importance of the scientific effort. Patients with rare diseases such as
NETs can derive great benefit from well-designed research and teamwork.
Authors: Elin Pauwels; Frederik Cleeren; Térence Tshibangu; Michel Koole; Kim Serdons; Jeroen Dekervel; Eric Van Cutsem; Chris Verslype; Koen Van Laere; Guy Bormans; Christophe M Deroose Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Elba Cristina Sá de Camargo Etchebehere; Allan de Oliveira Santos; Brenda Gumz; Andreia Vicente; Paulo Ghem Hoff; Gustavo Corradi; Wilson André Ichiki; José Geraldo de Almeida Filho; Saulo Cantoni; Edwaldo Eduardo Camargo; Frederico Perego Costa Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Manisha H Shah; Whitney S Goldner; Al B Benson; Emily Bergsland; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Pamela Brock; Jennifer Chan; Satya Das; Paxton V Dickson; Paul Fanta; Thomas Giordano; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Daniel Halperin; Jin He; Anthony Heaney; Martin J Heslin; Fouad Kandeel; Arash Kardan; Sajid A Khan; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Christopher Lieu; Kimberly Miller; Venu G Pillarisetty; Diane Reidy; Sarimar Agosto Salgado; Shagufta Shaheen; Heloisa P Soares; Michael C Soulen; Jonathan R Strosberg; Craig R Sussman; Nikolaos A Trikalinos; Nataliya A Uboha; Namrata Vijayvergia; Terence Wong; Beth Lynn; Cindy Hochstetler Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 11.908