Literature DB >> 35414730

Ga-DOTA PET/CT: the first-line functional imaging modality in the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Cláudio Tinoco Mesquita1,2,3, Isabella Caterina Palazzo2,3, Maria Fernanda Rezende3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35414730      PMCID: PMC8993178          DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2022.55.2e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Bras        ISSN: 0100-3984


× No keyword cloud information.
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that account for approximately 0.5% of all newly diagnosed malignancies. The primary sites of NETs are the gastrointestinal tract (in 65%) and the lungs (in 25%). Nearly one quarter of all NETs are metastatic at diagnosis(. Most NETs express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in the cell membrane, which allows the use of radiotracers that bind with high affinity to SSTRs, such radiotracers being used for diagnosis, staging, prediction of a treatment response and even as therapeutic agents(. The first radiotracer used in order to evaluate SSTR expression was 123I-labeled Tyr3-octreotide, which was developed in 1983(. Because of the excessive intestinal accumulation of this tracer due to high biliary excretion, there was a search for a better radiotracer, which resulted in the development of [(111)In-DTPA(0)]octreotide ( 111In-pentetreotide). In 1993, Eric Krenning’s team published data related to the use of 111In-pentetreotide imaging in more than 1,000 patients, demonstrating that the modality has good sensitivity and specificity(. Trials of 111In-pentetreotide established the pathway to developing tracers dedicated to therapy using the same mechanism of cell binding (theranostics), designated peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), which is now considered an important option for the treatment of patients with well-differentiated NETs(. Despite the established clinical value of using 111In-pentetreotide as a radiotracer, it has some shortcomings, including a high radiation burden, less than optimal spatial resolution (i.e., less ability to detect small lesions), longer image acquisition time, some accumulation in the intestine/gallbladder, and less availability(. In an article published in the previous issue of Radiologia Brasileira, Cavicchioli et al.( compared the use of 68Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1,Tyr3-octreotate ( 68Ga-DOTATATE) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with that of 111In-octreotide scintigraphy in 41 patients with NETs. Images were compared in a patient-by-patient analysis to identify additional lesions and determine their impact on clinical management. In 33 patients, both exams were positive, although 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT revealed more positive sites in one third of the cases (11 patients). The results were discordant in five patients, in whom 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was positive and 111In-octreotide scintigraphy was negative. In five patients, there were changes in clinical management based on the additional information obtained by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. The authors concluded that 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is superior to conventional 111In-octreotide scintigraphy for the management of NETs because the former better discriminates the extent of disease and has greater capacity to change the treatment strategy. How do the findings of Cavicchioli et al.( relate to data in the literature? Their findings are in good agreement with the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2016, in which 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was compared with 111In-DTPA-octreotide imaging and conventional imaging for the evaluation of pulmonary and gastroenteropancreatic NETs(. Only three of the studies evaluated in that review directly compared the two radiopharmaceuticals in the same patient, and the results were similar: for the diagnosis and reassessment of tumors with high SSTR expression, 68Ga-DOTATATE is more sensitive than is 111In-DTPA-octreotide and should be used if available. Here in Brazil, Etchebehere et al.( compared another single-photon emission CT (SPECT) tracer with high affinity for SSTRs (99mTc-HYNIC-octreotide) with 68Ga-DOTATATE and found that the latter seems to be more sensitive for the detection of well-differentiated NETs, especially those in bone and those that were previously unknown. Those authors suggested that SSTR-binding SPECT tracers should be used only when 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and magnetic resonance are not available. We strongly agree with this recommendation, and we can state that 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT should be the functional imaging modality of choice in the management of patients with NETs. SPECT, preferably SPECT/CT, should be reserved for cases in which 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is not available. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for NETs currently recommend that SSTR imaging options should include SSTR-PET/CT or SSTR-PET/MRI, or octreotide SPECT/CT (only if SSTR-PET/CT is not available)(. Not only is 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT more accurate than octreotide SPECT for NET localization, it also plays an important role in the selection of NET patients for treatment. In 2017, a landmark clinical trial demonstrated the benefit of the use of PRRT in patients with metastatic midgut NETs with SSTR expression(. In that study, progression-free survival was markedly longer among the patients who received 177Lu-DOTATATE than among those who received high-dose octreotide. Our personal experience is that PET/CT is preferred for selecting patients for PRRT because it can identify patients that have advanced disease not diagnosed by conventional imaging, thus avoiding unnecessary surgical procedures. In addition, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is a marker of prognosis: increased uptake of the tracer in a tumor indicates well-differentiated neoplastic cells, which has been shown to correlate with improved overall survival(. However, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on PET has an opposite prognostic association: higher FDG uptake in tumors has consistently been associated with poorer overall survival. A recent meta-analysis showed that, in NET patients, 18F-FDG PET imaging prior to PRRT administration appears to be a useful tool to predict tumor response and survival outcomes, negative FDG uptake by the tumor being associated with longer progression-free and overall survival(. Based on those findings, there are classifications for clinical use that combine the FDG PET results with those of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET in staging subjects with NET, to provide better support for clinical management. Novel radiotracers for SSTR imaging are under study. It has been shown that 18F-labeled tracers have better resolution potential than do 68Ga-labeled tracers because of their lower positron energy. Therefore, there is intense interest in adding a cyclotron-produced tracer to the clinical portfolio; one of the best candidates is 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide ([ 18F]AlF-OC), because it shows favorable kinetic and imaging characteristics(. Studies involving head-to-head comparisons to validate [ 18F]AlF-OC as a 18F-labeled alternative to 68Ga-DOTATATE in clinical applications of PET are now underway and must be completed before this tracer can be used in clinical practice. The pathway to the development of new tracers and the use of PRRT for the management of NETs is a brilliant example of the importance of the scientific effort. Patients with rare diseases such as NETs can derive great benefit from well-designed research and teamwork.
  15 in total

1.  [18F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET imaging: biodistribution, dosimetry and first comparison with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in neuroendocrine tumour patients.

Authors:  Elin Pauwels; Frederik Cleeren; Térence Tshibangu; Michel Koole; Kim Serdons; Jeroen Dekervel; Eric Van Cutsem; Chris Verslype; Koen Van Laere; Guy Bormans; Christophe M Deroose
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Standardized uptake values of (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET: a promising prognostic tool in neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Davide Campana; Valentina Ambrosini; Raffaele Pezzilli; Stefano Fanti; Antonio Maria Morselli Labate; Donatella Santini; Claudio Ceccarelli; Francesca Nori; Roberto Franchi; Roberto Corinaldesi; Paola Tomassetti
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Clinical History of the Theranostic Radionuclide Approach to Neuroendocrine Tumors and Other Types of Cancer: Historical Review Based on an Interview of Eric P. Krenning by Rachel Levine.

Authors:  Rachel Levine; Eric P Krenning
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, 99mTc-HYNIC-octreotide SPECT/CT, and whole-body MR imaging in detection of neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Elba Cristina Sá de Camargo Etchebehere; Allan de Oliveira Santos; Brenda Gumz; Andreia Vicente; Paulo Ghem Hoff; Gustavo Corradi; Wilson André Ichiki; José Geraldo de Almeida Filho; Saulo Cantoni; Edwaldo Eduardo Camargo; Frederico Perego Costa
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Quantitative 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Parameters for the Prediction of Therapy Response in Patients with Progressive Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE.

Authors:  Claudia Ortega; Rebecca K S Wong; Josh Schaefferkoetter; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Sten Myrehaug; Rosalyn Juergens; David Laidley; Reut Anconina; Amy Liu; Ur Metser
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Nothing But NET: A Review of Neuroendocrine Tumors and Carcinomas.

Authors:  Bryan Oronsky; Patrick C Ma; Daniel Morgensztern; Corey A Carter
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 7.  Clinical Utility of 18F-FDG PET in Neuroendocrine Tumors Prior to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emmanouil Alevroudis; Maria-Eleni Spei; Sofia N Chatziioannou; Marina Tsoli; Göran Wallin; Gregory Kaltsas; Kosmas Daskalakis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT versus 111In-octreotide scintigraphy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marcelo Cavicchioli; Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt; Eduardo Nóbrega Pereira Lima
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb

9.  Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Manisha H Shah; Whitney S Goldner; Al B Benson; Emily Bergsland; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Pamela Brock; Jennifer Chan; Satya Das; Paxton V Dickson; Paul Fanta; Thomas Giordano; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Daniel Halperin; Jin He; Anthony Heaney; Martin J Heslin; Fouad Kandeel; Arash Kardan; Sajid A Khan; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Christopher Lieu; Kimberly Miller; Venu G Pillarisetty; Diane Reidy; Sarimar Agosto Salgado; Shagufta Shaheen; Heloisa P Soares; Michael C Soulen; Jonathan R Strosberg; Craig R Sussman; Nikolaos A Trikalinos; Nataliya A Uboha; Namrata Vijayvergia; Terence Wong; Beth Lynn; Cindy Hochstetler
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  Diagnostic fficiency of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT as ompared to 99mTc-Octreotide SPECT/CT andonventional orphologic odalities in euroendocrine umors.

Authors:  Babak Fallahi; Reyhaneh Manafi-Farid; Mohammad Eftekhari; Armaghan Fard-Esfahani; Alireza Emami-Ardekani; Parham Geramifar; Mehdi Akhlaghi; Amir Pejman Hashemi Taheri; Davood Beiki
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2019
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.