Literature DB >> 25168627

68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, 99mTc-HYNIC-octreotide SPECT/CT, and whole-body MR imaging in detection of neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective trial.

Elba Cristina Sá de Camargo Etchebehere1, Allan de Oliveira Santos1, Brenda Gumz2, Andreia Vicente1, Paulo Ghem Hoff2, Gustavo Corradi3, Wilson André Ichiki1, José Geraldo de Almeida Filho1, Saulo Cantoni3, Edwaldo Eduardo Camargo4, Frederico Perego Costa2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: There are different metabolic imaging methods, various tracers, and emerging anatomic modalities to stage neuroendocrine tumor (NET). We aimed to compare NET lesion detectability among (99m)Tc-hydrazinonicotinamide (HYNIC)-octreotide (somatostatin receptor scintigraphy [SSRS]) SPECT/CT, (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, and whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging (WB DWI).
METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients (34-77 y old; mean, 54.3 ± 10.4 y old; 10 men and 9 women) underwent SSRS SPECT/CT, (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, and WB DWI. Images were acquired with a maximum interval of 3 mo between them and were analyzed with masking by separate teams. Planar whole-body imaging and SPECT/CT were performed from thorax to pelvis using a double-head 16-slice SPECT/CT scanner 4 h after injection of 111-185 MBq of (99m)Tc-HYNIC-octreotide. (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was performed from head to feet using a 16-slice PET/CT scanner 45 min after injection of 185 MBq of tracer. WB DWI was performed in the coronal plane using a 1.5-T scanner and a body coil. The standard method of reference for evaluation of image performance was undertaken: consensus among investigators at the end of the study, clinical and imaging follow-up, and biopsy of suggestive lesions.
RESULTS: McNemar testing was applied to evaluate the detectability of lesions using (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in comparison to SSRS SPECT/CT and WB DWI: a significant difference in detectability was noted for pancreas (P = 0.0455 and P = 0.0455, respectively), gastrointestinal tract (P = 0.0455 and P = 0.0455), and bones (P = 0.0082 and P = 0.0082). Two unknown primary lesions were identified solely by (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, SSRS SPECT/CT, and WB DWI demonstrated, respectively, sensitivities of 0.96, 0.60, and 0.72; specificities of 0.97, 0.99, and 1.00; positive predictive values of 0.94, 0.96, and 1.00; negative predictive values of 0.98, 0.83, and 0.88; and accuracies of 0.97, 0.86, and 0.91.
CONCLUSION: (68)Ga PET/CT seems to be more sensitive for detection of well-differentiated NET lesions, especially for bone and unknown primary lesions. NET can be staged with (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. WB DWI is an efficient new method with high accuracy and without ionizing radiation exposure. SSRS SPECT/CT should be used only when (68)Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and WB DWI are not available.
© 2014 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT; 99mTc-HYNIC-octreotide SPECT/CT; MRI; PET/CT; SPECT/CT; neuroendocrine tumor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25168627     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.144543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  33 in total

1.  Endocrine radionuclide scintigraphy with fusion single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Ka-Kit Wong; Arpit Gandhi; Benjamin L Viglianti; Lorraine M Fig; Domenico Rubello; Milton D Gross
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28

2.  Radioguided surgery with 68Ga-DOTATATE for patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Valentina Ambrosini; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Prospective Study of 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Detecting Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Unknown Primary Sites.

Authors:  Samira M Sadowski; Vladimir Neychev; Corina Millo; Joanna Shih; Naris Nilubol; Peter Herscovitch; Karel Pacak; Stephen J Marx; Electron Kebebew
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Prognostication and response assessment in liver and pancreatic tumors: The new imaging.

Authors:  Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Gino Puntel; Silvia Ortolani; Sara Cingarlini; Andrea Ruzzenente; Alfredo Guglielmi; Giampaolo Tortora; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Tetsuhide Ito; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.512

6.  Can MDCT or EUS features predict the histopathological grading scheme of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms?

Authors:  Hui Zhu; Lang Ying; Wei Tang; Xiujiang Yang; Bo Sun
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  Nuclear imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with unknown primary: why, when and how?

Authors:  Prasanna Santhanam; Sangeeta Chandramahanti; Alexander Kroiss; Run Yu; Philippe Ruszniewski; Rakesh Kumar; David Taïeb
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted and conventional imaging for the follow-up of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Maximilien Minon; Clothilde Soriano; David Morland; Thomas Walter; Côme Lepage; Antoine Tabarin; Mathilde Deblock; Pascal Rousset; Coralie Barbe; Christine Hoeffel; Guillaume Cadiot
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  M Falconi; B Eriksson; G Kaltsas; D K Bartsch; J Capdevila; M Caplin; B Kos-Kudla; D Kwekkeboom; G Rindi; G Klöppel; N Reed; R Kianmanesh; R T Jensen
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.914

Review 10.  68Ga-DOTATATE Compared with 111In-DTPA-Octreotide and Conventional Imaging for Pulmonary and Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stephen A Deppen; Jeffrey Blume; Adam J Bobbey; Chirayu Shah; Michael M Graham; Patricia Lee; Dominique Delbeke; Ronald C Walker
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.