| Literature DB >> 35409558 |
Marcio L V Araujo1,2,3, José G V Miranda4, Rodrigo N Vasconcelos5, Elaine C B Cambui6, Raphael S Rosário4, Márcio C F Macedo4, Antonio C Bandeira7, Márcia S P L Souza7, Ana C F N Silva7, Aloisio S Nascimento Filho3,8, Thiago B Murari3,8, Eduardo M F Jorge3,9, Hugo Saba1,3,9.
Abstract
To effectively combat the COVID-19 pandemic, countries with limited resources could only allocate intensive and non-intensive care units to a low number of regions. In this work, we evaluated the actual displacement of infected patients in search of care, aiming to understand how the networks of planned and actual hospitalizations take place. To assess the flow of hospitalizations outside the place of residence, we used the concepts of complex networks. Our findings indicate that the current distribution of health facilities in Bahia, Brazil, is not sufficient to effectively reduce the distances traveled by patients with COVID-19 who require hospitalization. We believe that unnecessary trips to distant hospitals can put both the sick and the healthy involved in the transport process at risk, further delaying the stabilization of the COVID-19 pandemic in each region of the state of Bahia. From the results found, we concluded that, to mitigate this situation, the implementation of health units in countries with limited resources should be based on scientific methods, and international collaborations should be established.Entities:
Keywords: government; hospitalization; pandemics; public policy; transportation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35409558 PMCID: PMC8997845 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19073872
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1A visual comparison between the expected (a) and observed (b) hospitalization networks for COVID-19 patients in Bahia, Brazil. Source: Author.
A numerical overview of the observed hospitalization networks for COVID-19 patients with respect to the nine regions of the state of Bahia.
| Region | Patients That Live in That Region | Patients Imported from Other Regions | Patients Exported to Other Regions |
|---|---|---|---|
| North | 158 (81.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 35 (18.1%) |
| Northeast | 11 (3.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 290 (96.3%) |
| North-Central | 12 (12.9%) | 2 (2.2%) | 79 (84.9%) |
| East-Central | 77 (10.7%) | 70 (9.7%) | 571 (79.5%) |
| East | 1686 (54.9%) | 1369 (44.6%) | 14 (0.5%) |
| West | 62 (67.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 30 (32.6%) |
| Southwest | 263 (54.3%) | 140 (28.9%) | 81 (16.7%) |
| South | 401 (47.3%) | 61 (7.2%) | 385 (45.5%) |
| Extreme-South | 74 (31.8%) | 1 (0.4%) | 158 (67.8%) |
Figure 2A histogram with the frequencies of expected (red) and observed (black) distances traveled by COVID-19 patients. Source: Author.
Figure 3(a) A visualization of the East and East-Central regions. (b) A visualization of the East, East-Central, and North-Central regions. Source: Author.
Figure 4(a) A visualization of the Extreme-South, East, South-West, and South regions. (b) A visualization of the East and South-West regions. Source: Author.
Figure 5(a) A visualization of the East-Central, East, Northeast regions. (b) A visualization of the East and North regions. Source: Author.
Figure 6(a) A visualization of the East, West, South-West regions. (b) A visualization of the East, South-West and South regions. Source: Author.