Literature DB >> 32184132

Spatial transmission of COVID-19 via public and private transportation in China.

Ruizhi Zheng1, Yu Xu1, Weiqing Wang1, Guang Ning2, Yufang Bi3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32184132      PMCID: PMC7118651          DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis        ISSN: 1477-8939            Impact factor:   6.211


× No keyword cloud information.
Wuhan, the capital city of Hubei province with a population of more than 11 million people, is the largest city and the most important traffic hub in Central China. Since December 2019, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hit the Wuhan city [1]. The time of the outbreak coincided with the Chinese Spring Festival, when the largest annual population movement began. Before the lockdown on January 23rd, an estimated 5 million residents left Wuhan [2]. The infected people in incubation period had brought the virus to other cities and person-to-person transmission of the new coronavirus caused the spread of infections across the country. Up until February 9th, there have been 330 cities in addition to Wuhan with reported confirmed COVID-19 cases in mainland China (Fig. 1 A). In the study of Zhao et al., they found significant association between travel by train and spread of COVID-19 infections, but not for travelling by car and flight [3]. In order to evaluate the role of public transportation in the spatial transmission of COVID-19, we searched daily flights, buses, and trains from Wuhan to these cities in January (https://www.ctrip.com). The figure shows destinations and frequencies of these flights (B), buses (C) and trains (D) from Wuhan. We also obtained straight line distances between Wuhan and these cities (https://map.baidu.com) and excluded those ≥1500 km to avoid outlier effects. The daily number and the cumulative number of COVID-19 cases in each city were obtained from the official website (http://health.people.com.cn/GB/26466/431463/431576/index.html) with real-time updates at 12:00 p.m. on each day since January 24th. All the data were logarithmically transformed and the Pearson's correlation analysis was used to examine correlations of daily frequencies of each transportation methods and the distance between Wuhan and other cities, with the daily number and the cumulative number of COVID-19 cases.
Fig. 1

The destinations and frequencies of different public transportation methods from Wuhan and the associations of transportation and distance with the epidemic of COVID-19 in mainland China.

Panel A shows distributions of COVID-19 cases within mainland China. Darker dots indicate larger numbers of COVID-19 cases. Up until February 9th, 118 cities have reported 1–9 cases; 174 cities have reported 10–99 cases; 28 cities have reported 100–499 cases; 5 cities have reported 500–999 cases; and 6 cities have reported ≥1000 cases. Panel B shows flight destinations and frequencies from Wuhan. Panel C shows bus destinations and frequencies from Wuhan. Panel D shows train destinations and frequencies from Wuhan. Higher weights of lines indicate higher frequencies. Panel E shows the correlation coefficients of daily frequencies of each transportation methods from Wuhan and the distance between Wuhan and other cities, with the daily number of COVID-19 cases. Panel F shows the correlation coefficients of daily frequencies of each transportation methods from Wuhan and the distance between Wuhan and other cities, with the cumulative number of COVID-19 cases. (A high resolution version of the image is available: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/cgckdx7ykj/draft?a=10faa741-a27b-49e3-a576-22ebbf313c81).

The destinations and frequencies of different public transportation methods from Wuhan and the associations of transportation and distance with the epidemic of COVID-19 in mainland China. Panel A shows distributions of COVID-19 cases within mainland China. Darker dots indicate larger numbers of COVID-19 cases. Up until February 9th, 118 cities have reported 1–9 cases; 174 cities have reported 10–99 cases; 28 cities have reported 100–499 cases; 5 cities have reported 500–999 cases; and 6 cities have reported ≥1000 cases. Panel B shows flight destinations and frequencies from Wuhan. Panel C shows bus destinations and frequencies from Wuhan. Panel D shows train destinations and frequencies from Wuhan. Higher weights of lines indicate higher frequencies. Panel E shows the correlation coefficients of daily frequencies of each transportation methods from Wuhan and the distance between Wuhan and other cities, with the daily number of COVID-19 cases. Panel F shows the correlation coefficients of daily frequencies of each transportation methods from Wuhan and the distance between Wuhan and other cities, with the cumulative number of COVID-19 cases. (A high resolution version of the image is available: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/cgckdx7ykj/draft?a=10faa741-a27b-49e3-a576-22ebbf313c81). We found a significant and positive association between the frequency of flights, trains, and buses from Wuhan and the daily as well as the cumulative numbers of COVID-19 cases in other cities with progressively increased correlations for trains and buses (all P values < 0.001) (Fig. 1E and F). The distance between Wuhan and other cities was inversely associated with the numbers of COVID-19 cases in that city (all P values < 0.001), and the correlation became increasingly stronger and went stable after February 1st. The mean incubation period was estimated to be 5.2 days [1], therefore real associations appeared after most infected cases out from Wuhan presented typical symptoms and were diagnosed [4]. Our findings indicated that imported cases via public transportation played an important role in the spread of COVID-19. The connectivity and distance between the epicenter and the destination are important determinants of transmission risks. Strong preventive measures should be taken in cities with shorter distances and more frequent public transportation connectivity with epicenter in order to contain the COVID-19 epidemic.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials used in this work were publicly available.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from the (2016YFC1305600, 2017YFC1310700, 2018YFC1311800). Dr. Y. Bi was supported by the “Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leader Program” and Dr. Y. Xu was supported by the “Outstanding Young Talent Program” from Shanghai Municipal Government.

Disclaimer

The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data interpretation, or writing of the report. Drs R. Zheng, Y. Xu, Y. Bi, W. Wang, and G. Ning had full access to all the data in the study. The corresponding authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Author's contributors

Drs R. Zheng, Y. Xu, Y. Bi, W. Wang and G. Ning designed the study. Dr. R. Zheng independently collected and analyzed the data. Drs Y. Xu, Y. Bi contributed to the interpretation of the data. Drs R. Zheng, Y. Xu, and Y. Bi drafted the manuscript. Drs W. Wang and G. Ning revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work and approved the final version of the paper.

Declaration of competing interest

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.
  2 in total

1.  The association between domestic train transportation and novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak in China from 2019 to 2020: A data-driven correlational report.

Authors:  Shi Zhao; Zian Zhuang; Jinjun Ran; Jiaer Lin; Guangpu Yang; Lin Yang; Daihai He
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 6.211

2.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

  2 in total
  50 in total

1.  Urban mobility patterns and the spatial distribution of infections in Santiago de Chile.

Authors:  Felipe Bedoya-Maya; Agustina Calatayud; Francisca Giraldez; Santiago Sánchez González
Journal:  Transp Res Part A Policy Pract       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 6.615

2.  Respiratory pandemics, urban planning and design: A multidisciplinary rapid review of the literature.

Authors:  Patrick Harris; Ben Harris-Roxas; Jason Prior; Nicky Morrison; Erica McIntyre; Jane Frawley; Jon Adams; Whitney Bevan; Fiona Haigh; Evan Freeman; Myna Hua; Jennie Pry; Soumya Mazumdar; Ben Cave; Francesca Viliani; Benjamin Kwan
Journal:  Cities       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  Rethinking Lockdown Policies in the Pre-Vaccine Era of COVID-19: A Configurational Perspective.

Authors:  Ziang Zhang; Chao Liu; Robin Nunkoo; Vivek A Sunnassee; Xiaoyan Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  A Comparison of Infection Venues of COVID-19 Case Clusters in Northeast China.

Authors:  Pengcheng Zhao; Nan Zhang; Yuguo Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Retrospective detection of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients with influenza-like illness.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Yu; Dong Wei; Yongyan Chen; Donghua Zhang; Xinxin Zhang
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.163

6.  Spatial risk assessment of an emerging pandemic under data scarcity: A case of COVID-19 in Eswatini.

Authors:  Wisdom M Dlamini; Sabelo N Dlamini; Sizwe D Mabaso; Sabelo P Simelane
Journal:  Appl Geogr       Date:  2020-10-26

7.  Implication of repatriating migrant workers on COVID-19 spread and transportation requirements.

Authors:  Avijit Maji; Tushar Choudhari; M B Sushma
Journal:  Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect       Date:  2020-08-03

8.  Anesthesiologists' and Intensive Care Providers' Exposure to COVID-19 Infection in a New York City Academic Center: A Prospective Cohort Study Assessing Symptoms and COVID-19 Antibody Testing.

Authors:  Miguel Morcuende; Jean Guglielminotti; Ruth Landau
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  The scientific literature on Coronaviruses, COVID-19 and its associated safety-related research dimensions: A scientometric analysis and scoping review.

Authors:  Milad Haghani; Michiel C J Bliemer; Floris Goerlandt; Jie Li
Journal:  Saf Sci       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.392

10.  Distribution of the environmental and socioeconomic risk factors on COVID-19 death rate across continental USA: a spatial nonlinear analysis.

Authors:  Yaowen Luo; Jianguo Yan; Stephen McClure
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.