| Literature DB >> 35408883 |
Chendong He1,2, Yunqing Gu1,2, Junjun Zhang1,2, Longbiao Ma1,2, Muhan Yan1,2, Jiegang Mou1,2, Yun Ren3.
Abstract
As a new type of flexible smart material, ionic polymer-metal composite (IPMC) has the advantages of being lightweight and having fast responses, good flexibility, and large deformation ranges. However, IPMC has the disadvantages of a small driving force and short lifespan. Based on this, this paper firstly analyzes the driving mechanism of IPMC. Then, it focuses on the current preparation technology of IPMC from the aspects of electroless plating and mechanical plating. The advantages and disadvantages of various preparation methods are analyzed. Due to the special driving mechanism of IPMC, there is a problem of short non-aqueous working time. Therefore, the modification research of IPMC is reviewed from the aspects of the basement membrane, working medium, and electrode materials. Finally, the current challenges and future development prospects of IPMC are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: IPMC; driving mechanism; modification research; preparation technology; smart materials
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35408883 PMCID: PMC8998928 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Smart material classification.
| Type | Material | Stimulant | Result Impact | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property changes | Thermochromic | Thermal energy | Spectral reflectance | [ |
| Magnetorheological | Magnetic field | Viscosity | [ | |
| Shape memory | Thermal energy | Crystal phase transition | [ | |
| Energy exchanges | Photovoltaic power generation | Radiant energy | Electric current | [ |
| Electroactive polymer | Electric field | Stress | [ | |
| Thermoelectric | Electric current | Temperature difference | [ |
Performance comparison of different types of EAP materials.
| Type | Category | Strain Rate (%) | Stress (MPa) | Response Time | Stiffness (MPa) | Density (g/cm3) | Drive Voltage | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ionic type | IPMC | >20 | 10~30 | ms~s | 70~300 | 1~3 | 1~5 V | [ |
| Conductive polymers | 0.1 | 5 | ms~s | >103 | 1.48 | <10 V | [ | |
| Ionic gel | 40 | - | min | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0 V/mm | [ | |
| Electric field type | Dielectric elastomer | 300 | 0.2 | ms | 0.5 | 1.5 | 144 V/μm | [ |
| Ferroelectric polymer | 2~10 | 45 | ms | 1~103 | 1.78 | 200 V/μm | [ | |
| Electrostrictive elastomer | 1.7 | 65 | ms | 600 | 7.5 | 12 V/μm | [ |
Figure 1Structure diagram of IPMC [23].
Figure 2Schematic diagram of IPMC driving mechanism [34].
Figure 3Traditional preparation process of IPMC [43].
Figure 4Cross-sectional morphology of IPMC prepared by different electroless plating methods. (a) Prepared by impregnation–reduction method [39]. (b) Prepared by reverse electroless plating method [49]. (c) Prepared by co-reduction method [51].
Figure 5Chitosan actuator based on hot pressing method [59]. (a) Schematic diagram of the assembly and bimorph configuration of an actuator. (b) Typical SEM cross-sectional image of a bimorph configured actuator.
Figure 6Cross-sectional morphology of IPMC prepared by different physical plating methods. (a) Prepared by physical vapor deposition method [55]. (b) Prepared by solution casting method [56]. (c) Prepared by hot-pressing method [58]. (d) Prepared by direct assembly method [60].
Comparison of IPMC preparation technology.
| Category | Preparation Method | Advantage | Disadvantage | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electroless plating | Impregnation–reduction method | Forms durable metal electrode layers | Time consuming and costly | [ |
| Reverse electroless plating | More uniform metal particle distribution | The process is complicated | [ | |
| Co-reduction method | Non metallic materials can be used | Time consuming and costly | [ | |
| Mechanical plating | Physical vapor deposition | Time saving and large area preparation | Poor bond fastness | [ |
| Solution casting method | Diversified shapes | Need to be used with other methods | [ | |
| Hot-pressing method | The thickness of the membrane is controllable | Poor flexibility | [ | |
| Direct assembly method | Easy to operate | Poor interface bonding | [ |
Figure 7Surface morphology of IPMC composite electrode observed by SEM. (a) IPMC electrode surface without MWCNTs. (b) IPMC electrode surface with MWCNTs added [65].
Figure 8Nafion and SPEEK membranes in dry and wet state. (a) Tensile modulus and (b) tensile strength [71].
Figure 9Preparation of biocomposite actuators based on mesoporous renewable cellulose/ionic liquids [79].
Figure 10Schematic diagram of IPMC bilayer structures prepared by imidazolium-based ionic liquids with different concentrations. (a) Without Li+ ions. (b) Optimal concentration of Li+ ions (0.1 M). (c) Higher concentrations of Li+ ions (>0.1 M) [48].
Figure 11Electrode morphology of IPMC with different metal types. (a) Dendritic Au electrode. (b) Granular Pd electrode [82]. (c) Layered Pt electrode [83].
Figure 12Preparation of renewable biocompatible nanocomposite soft actuator based on three-dimensional porous electrode [86].
Study on modification of IPMC.
| Modification Aspect | Advantage | Disadvantage | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modification of basement membrane | MWCNTs/IPMC | The surface coating is smooth and uniform, and the rigidity of the basement membrane is enhanced | There are problems with low output force and retraction | [ |
| Blended composite ion exchange membrane | Conducive to ion migration and improve driving performance | Higher cost | [ | |
| Hydrocarbon backbone ion polymer membrane | Good proton conductivity, low cost and environmental protection | Time consuming to prepare polymeric membranes | [ | |
| Modification of the working medium | Organic solvents | Improve the stability of the basement membrane | Slow driving speed | [ |
| Ionic liquid | Improve drive performance and operating life | Higher cost | [ | |
| Modification of electrodes | Rare metals | Good conductivity and stability | Easy to fall off after repeated use | [ |
| Carbon material | High performance, high conductivity | Higher cost | [ | |