| Literature DB >> 35408621 |
Ayoub Lafnoune1,2, Su-Yeon Lee3, Jin-Yeong Heo4, Khadija Daoudi1,2, Bouchra Darkaoui1,2, Salma Chakir1, Rachida Cadi2, Khadija Mounaji2, David Shum4, Haeng-Ran Seo3, Naoual Oukkache1.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most dominant primary liver cancer, which can be caused by chronic hepatitis virus infections and other environmental factors. Resection, liver transplantation, and local ablation are only a few of the highly effective and curative procedures presently accessible. However, other complementary treatments can reduce cancer treatment side effects. In this present work, we evaluated the activity of Moroccan scorpion venom Buthus occitanus and its fractions obtained by chromatography gel filtration against HCC cells using a 3D cell culture model. The venom was fractionated by gel filtration chromatography, each fraction and the crude venom was tested on normal hepatocytes (Fa2N-4 cells). Additionally, the fractions and the crude venom were tested on MCTSs (multicellular tumor spheroids), and this latter was generated by cultivate Huh7.5 cancer cell line with WI38 cells, LX2 cells, and human endothelial cells (HUVEC). Our results indicate that Buthus occitanus venom toxin has no cytotoxic effects on normal hepatocytes. Moreover, it is reported that F3 fraction could significantly inhibit the MCTS cells. Other Protein Separation Techniques (High-performance liquid chromatography) are needed in order to identify the most active molecule.Entities:
Keywords: Buthus occitanus; anticancer activity; hepatocellular carcinoma; multicellular tumor spheroids; venom
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35408621 PMCID: PMC9000837 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27072219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Gel filtration chromatography of Buthus occitanus venom on Sephadex G-50.
Figure 2Cytotoxic activity of Buthus occitanus crude venom and gel filtration purified fraction on Fa2N-4 cell line. Each value is expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 2).
Figure 3Anti-cancer activity of Buthus occitanus crude venom and gel filtration purified fraction on the area of the MCTSs. Each value is expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 2). * p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4Anti-cancer activity of Buthus occitanus crude venom and gel filtration purified fraction on the intensity of RFP of the MCTSs. PBS was used as a negative control. Each value is expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 2).
Figure 5MCTSs towards Buthus occitanus crude venom and its fractions (10 μg/mL). Sorafenib (12.5 µM) was used as a positive control and PBS as a negative control. Scale bar = 200 μm.
Mass spectrometry analysis of the F3 fraction of Buthus occitanus venom.
| Protein Name | Molecular Weight (Da) | UniProt ID | Molecular | Homology Degree % | Sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha-insect toxin Lqq3 | 7334.93 ± 0.23 | P01487 | Sodium channel inhibitor activity | 91.3 | VRDAYIAKNY NCVYECFRDS YCNDLCTKNG ASSGYCQWAG KYGNACWCYA LPDNVPIRVP GKCH |
| Alpha-like toxin Bom4 | 7287.96 ± 0.37 | P59354 | Sodium channel inhibitor activity | 97.7 | GRDAYIAQPE NCVYECAKNS YCNDLCTKNG AKSGYCQWLG KYGNACWCED LPDNVPIRIP GKCHF |