| Literature DB >> 23849043 |
Naoual Oukkache1, Fatima Chgoury, Mekki Lalaoui, Alejandro Alagón Cano, Noreddine Ghalim.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study compared two methods used successfully in a large-scale program for the collection of scorpion venoms, namely the milking of adult scorpions via manual and electrical stimulation.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23849043 PMCID: PMC3707106 DOI: 10.1186/1678-9199-19-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis ISSN: 1678-9180
Figure 1Methods of scorpion venom milking: (A) manual and (B) electrical method.
Figure 2Electrophoretic profile of venoms on polyacrylamide gel in the presence of SDS in reducing conditions. Lane 1: molecular mass markers, lane 2: Amm manual method (MM) (10 μg), lane 3: Amm MM (20 μg), lane 4: Amm electric method (EM) (10 μg), lane 5: Amm EM (20 μg), lane 6: Bot MM (10 μg), lane 7: Bot MM (20 μg), lane 8: Bot EM (10 μg), lane 9: Bot EM (20 μg).
Comparison of median lethal dose (LD) of venom obtained manually and those obtained electrically
| | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | ||
| Intravenous (μg venom/mouse) | 12.5 | 32.6 |
Figure 3Western blot analysis of scorpion venoms by 12.5% SDS/PAGE. Molecular size standards (MWM) are indicated in the left (in kDa) with the corresponding venom lanes from left to right as follows: hm: hemolymph of scorpion; Amm: Androctonus mauretanicus mauretanicus venom collected by manual method, Bot: Buthus occitanus tunetanus venom collected by manual method, Bot’: Buthus occitanus tunetanus venom collected by electrical method and Amm’: Androctonus mauretanicus mauretanicus venom collected by electrical method.