| Literature DB >> 35408542 |
Fanxin Zeng1,2, Tao Lu1, Jie Wang3, Xuliang Nie3, Wanming Xiong3, Zhongping Yin1,4, Dayong Peng1,3.
Abstract
Coumarin possesses the aromatic group and showed plentiful activities, such as antioxidant, preventing asthma and antisepsis. In addition, coumarin derivatives usually possess good solubility, low cytotoxicity and excellent cell permeability. In our study, we synthesized the compound bridge methylene tacrine (BMT), which has the classical pharmacophore structure of Tacrine (THA). Based on the principle of active substructure splicing, BMT was used as a lead compound and synthesized coumarin-BMT hybrids by introducing coumarin to BMT. In this work, 21 novel hybrids of BMT and coumarin were synthesized and evaluated for their inhibitory activity on AChE. All obtained compounds present preferable inhibition. Compound 8b was the most active compound, with the value of Ki as 49.2 nM, which was higher than Galantamine (GAL) and lower than THA. The result of molecular docking showed that the highest binding free energy was -40.43 kcal/mol for compound 8b, which was an identical trend with the calculated Ki.Entities:
Keywords: acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; bioactivity evaluation; coumarin–BMT hybrids; molecular docking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35408542 PMCID: PMC9000719 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27072142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structure of THA derivatives.
Figure 2Synthesis routes of target product coumarin–BMT hybrid. Reagents and conditions: (a) AlCl3, Toluene, NaOH, 140 °C, reflux. (b) HCl, NaNO2, SnCl2; (c) phenol, NaI, N2, 180 °C, reflux; (d) (CH2O)n, MgCl2, CH3CN, Et3N,95 °C, reflux; (e) CH2(CO2C2H5)2, HAC, EtOH, 95 °C, reflux; (f) EtOH, NaOH, 95 °C, reflux. (g) PyBOP, Et3N, CH2Cl2, r.t.
Inhibitory activity of Coumarin–BMT hybrids and positive controls against AChE.
| Compounds | R1 (Position 6) [a] | R2 (Position 7) [a] |
| Inhibition Ratio (%) [b] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| H | H | 5 | 71.11 ± 0.94 d |
|
| Me | H | 5 | 85.71 ± 1.66 bc |
|
| Br | H | 5 | 50.72 ± 2.98 h |
|
| OCF3 | H | 5 | 47.51 ± 2.65 hi |
|
| OMe | H | 5 | 86.68 ± 2.18 b |
|
| H | OMe | 5 | 81.70 ± 4.82 c |
|
| OMe | OMe | 5 | 84.75 ± 1.27 bc |
|
| H | H | 6 | 66.57 ± 1.09 de |
|
| Me | H | 6 | 86.60 ± 2.13 b |
|
| Br | H | 6 | 57.58 ± 3.30 fg |
|
| OCF3 | H | 6 | 62.92 ± 3.32 e |
|
| OMe | H | 6 | 87.48 ± 0.27 b |
|
| H | OMe | 6 | 62.44 ± 1.63 e |
|
| OMe | OMe | 6 | 62.74 ± 0.27 e |
|
| H | H | 7 | 40.65 ± 4.28 j |
|
| Me | H | 7 | 61.56 ± 4.65 ef |
|
| Br | H | 7 | 44.05 ± 2.74 ij |
|
| OCF3 | H | 7 | 40.35 ± 2.45 j |
|
| OMe | H | 7 | 62.15 ± 3.14 ef |
|
| H | OMe | 7 | 56.11 ± 2.60 g |
|
| OMe | OMe | 7 | 35.49 ± 3.86 k |
|
| – | – | – | 95.75 ± 1.45 a |
|
| – | – | – | 69.23 ± 2.34 d |
Note: [a] The general structure of Coumarin–BMT hybrids is included in Figure 2. [b] Data are normalized as a percentage of control and are expressed as the means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments, and the measurements were carried out in the presence of 2 μM compounds. There are no identical letters on the superscript of the data, showing that they have statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) between the two groups. Any letter being the same on the superscript of the data shows that they have no difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT).
Figure 3Inhibitory activity of coumarin–BMT hybrids. Note: Data are normalized as a percentage of control, and are expressed as the means ± SEM of at least three independent experiments, and the measurements were carried out in the presence of 2 μM compounds. There are no identical letters on the superscript of the data, showing that they have statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) between the two groups. Any letter being the same on the superscript of the data shows that they have no difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT).
Figure 4Kinetic parameters (K) of AChE inhibition by two high-activity Coumarin–BMT hybrids (8b and 8e) and positive control THA and GAL. Lineweaver-Burk reciprocal plots of the AChE initial velocity at substrate concentrations (5 mM and 10 mM) in the presence of (a) THA, (b) GAL, (c) 8b and (d) 8e.
Inhibition constants (K) of the target compounds against human AChE.
| Compounds | R1 [a] | R2 [a] |
| K |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Me | H | 5 | 189.82 |
|
| OMe | H | 5 | 65.13 |
|
| H | OMe | 5 | 118.34 |
|
| OMe | OMe | 5 | 152.61 |
|
| Me | H | 6 | 49.20 |
|
| OMe | H | 6 | 50.81 |
|
| – | – | – | 31.13 |
|
| – | – | – | 61.93 |
Note: [a] The general structure of Coumarin–BMT hybrids is included in Figure 2.
Figure 5The RMSD value of compound 7b and 8b.
Binding energy of AChE with the compounds (kcal/mol).
| Comp. | ΔEele | ΔEVDW | ΔEMM | ΔGsol | ΔGbind | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7b | 19.94 | −67.54 | −47.58 | 10.10 | −37.48 | 189.82 |
| 8b | −4.44 | −63.61 | −68.05 | 27.62 | −40.43 | 49.20 |
Figure 6Binding mode of AchE (white cartoon) with the compounds 7b (A) and 8b (B). The blue dotted lines represent H-bonds. The interaction residues are shown as purple sticks, the compound 7b as a red salmon stick and the compound 8b as a green salmon stick.
Figure 7Crystal structure of complex 5a with 50% thermal ellipsoids. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.