| Literature DB >> 35407089 |
Xiaopu Ren1,2, Mingyang Li1, Wei Wang1, Xiyue Niu1, Qian Xu1, Ruili Zhang1.
Abstract
Tamarix ramosissima has been widely used as barbecue skewers for the good taste and unique flavor it gives to the meat, but the effects of T. ramosissima on heterocyclic amine (HA) formation in roast lamb are unknown. The influence of T. ramosissima extract (TRE) on HA formation, precursors' consumption, and free radicals' generation in roast lamb patties were elucidated by UPLC-MS, HPLC, and electron spin resonance (ESR) analysis, respectively. Six HAs were identified and compared with the control group; the total and polar HAs decreased by 30.51% and 56.92% with TRE addition at 0.30 g/kg. The highest inhibitory effect was found against 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-f]pyridine (PhIP) formation (70.83%) at 0.45 g/kg. The addition of TRE retarded the consumption of HA precursors, resulting in fewer HAs formed. The typical signal intensity of free radicals in roast lamb patties significantly decreased with TRE addition versus the control group (p < 0.05), and the higher the levels of the TRE, the greater the decrease in signal intensity. We propose that the inhibitory effects of TRE on HA formation, especially on polar HAs, were probably achieved by retarding the consumption of precursors and preventing free radicals from being generated in roast lamb patties. These findings provide valuable information concerning TRE's effectiveness in preventing HA formation through both the precursor consumption and free radical scavenging mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Tamarix ramosissima extract (TRE); free radicals; heterocyclic amines (HAs); precursors; roast lamb patties
Year: 2022 PMID: 35407089 PMCID: PMC8998052 DOI: 10.3390/foods11071000
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Inhibition effects of TRE on HAs formation in roast lamb.
| HAs | Control | TRE Levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.15 g/kg | 0.30 g/kg | 0.45 g/kg | |||
| Polar HAs | IQ | 1.86 ± 0.08 a | 0.68 ± 0.04 c | 0.75 ± 0.04 c | 1.01 ± 0.06 b |
| MeIQ | 0.26 ± 0.01 a | 0.14 ± 0.01 b | 0.13 ± 0.01 b | 0.10 ± 0.01 c | |
| PhIP | 0.48 ± 0.04 a | 0.38 ± 0.04 b | 0.24 ± 0.03 c | 0.14 ± 0.02 d | |
| Nonpolar HAs | Harman | 0.87 ± 0.08 c | 1.48 ± 0.28 b | 1.37 ± 0.17 b | 2.42 ± 0.33 a |
| Norharman | 3.22 ± 0.18 ab | 2.88 ± 0.23 bc | 2.34 ± 0.29 c | 3.51 ± 0.42 a | |
| MeAαC | 1.34 ± 0.07 a | 1.23 ± 0.08 b | 0.76 ± 0.04 c | 0.69 ± 0.04 c | |
| Total HAs | 8.03 ± 0.29 a | 6.79 ± 0.26 b | 5.58 ± 0.12 c | 7.87 ± 0.29 a | |
| Inhibition(%) | −15.44 | −30.51 | −1.99 | ||
Note: Means with different superscripts within the same row are significantly different at p < 0.05. Values are represented as means ± standard deviation (SD).
Content of different precursors in roast lamb with different levels of TRE.
| Precursors | Raw Lamb | Roast Control | TRE Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.15 g/kg | 0.30 g/kg | 0.45 g/kg | |||
| Asp | 3.26 ± 0.05 a | 1.58 ± 0.12 d | 1.73 ± 0.02 cd | 2.12 ± 0.11 b | 1.86 ± 0.01 c |
| Thr | 61.97 ± 2.22 a | 25.07 ± 1.14 e | 40.27 ± 0.46 b | 29.95 ± 0.76 cd | 33.86 ± 0.21 c |
| Ser | 16.00 ± 1.41 a | 8.65 ± 0.22 c | 10.29 ± 0.34 b | 9.83 ± 0.19 b | 9.73 ± 0.13 b |
| Glu | 26.17 ± 1.97 a | 14.34 ± 0.31 b | 14.65 ± 0.56 b | 14.13 ± 0.13 b | 13.61 ± 0.51 b |
| Gly | 21.11 ± 1.49 a | 14.36 ± 0.00 b | 13.90 ± 0.47 b | 14.32 ± 0.29 b | 14.19 ± 0.37 b |
| Ala | 78.58 ± 2.66 a | 47.72 ± 1.24 d | 52.32 ± 1.19 c | 48.89 ± 1.07 d | 55.95 ± 0.81 b |
| Cys | 1.66 ± 0.37 a | 0.82 ± 0.00 b | 0.75 ± 0.08 b | 0.72 ± 0.00 b | 0.72 ± 0.00 b |
| Val | 15.72 ± 1.07 a | 7.54 ± 0.22 b | 8.04 ± 0.91 b | 7.86 ± 0.10 b | 6.91 ± 0.19 b |
| Met | 14.07 ± 0.99 a | 5.70 ± 0.09 b | 5.70 ± 0.74 b | 5.84 ± 0.03 b | 5.16 ± 0.11 b |
| Ile | 9.85 ± 0.98 a | 5.87 ± 0.03 bc | 5.43 ± 0.16 c | 5.99 ± 0.22 bc | 6.16 ± 0.47 b |
| Leu | 26.48 ± 1.99 a | 12.85 ± 0.07 b | 13.72 ± 0.69 b | 13.03 ± 0.22 b | 11.66 ± 0.34 c |
| Tyr | 11.88 ± 0.29 a | 6.87 ± 0.12 b | 7.30 ± 0.42 b | 7.13 ± 0.46 b | 6.48 ± 0.16 b |
| Phe | 26.13 ± 0.43 a | 8.70 ± 0.23 c | 10.19 ± 1.24 bc | 11.39 ± 0.47 b | 11.87 ± 0.55 b |
| Lys | 19.89 ± 0.38 a | 8.53 ± 0.12 c | 9.04 ± 0.14 b | 9.08 ± 0.07 b | 9.03 ± 0.18 b |
| His | 7.93 ± 0.02 a | 4.15 ± 0.12 d | 4.85 ± 0.41 c | 5.21 ± 0.14 bc | 5.55 ± 0.19 b |
| Arg | 28.04 ± 0.32 a | 11.07 ± 0.24 c | 12.33 ± 0.26 b | 12.46 ± 0.30 b | 12.48 ± 0.34 b |
| Pro | 19.56 ± 1.73 a | 8.63 ± 0.19 b | 9.02 ± 0.02 b | 8.91 ± 0.08 b | 8.78 ± 0.18 b |
| Total free amino acid | 388.32 ± 7.97 a | 192.44 ± 2.55 d | 219.54 ± 3.83 b | 206.85 ± 0.17 c | 214.01 ± 1.03 b |
| Creatine | 11.52 ± 0.62 a | 7.86 ± 0.76 b | 7.45 ± 0.08 bc | 7.27 ± 0.14 c | 7.27 ± 0.26 c |
| Creatinine | 0.08 ± 0.00 c | 0.66 ± 0.09 a | 0.47 ± 0.06 b | 0.51 ± 0.02 b | 0.50 ± 0.04 b |
| Glucose | 1.24 ± 0.07 a | 0.55 ± 0.04 e | 0.72 ± 0.02 c | 0.64 ± 0.03 d | 0.78 ± 0.02 b |
Note: Means with different superscripts within the same row (a–e) are significantly different at p < 0.05. Values are represented as means ± standard deviation (SD).
Figure 1Correlation of HAs and FAAs in roast lamb patties.
Figure 2Correlation of HAs and some precursors and free radical.
Figure 3ESR spectra of roast lamb with the addition of different levels of TRE. Black curve: Control (without TRE); Red curve: 0.15 g/kg TRE; Blue curve: 0.30 g/kg TRE; Green curve: 0.45 g/kg TRE.