| Literature DB >> 35406992 |
José M Miranda1, Marcos Trigo2, Jorge Barros-Velázquez1, Santiago P Aubourg2.
Abstract
This study analyzed the antimicrobial effect of aqueous extracts of flour obtained from red alga (Gelidium sp.) both in vitro, against most common food pathogenic and spoilage bacteria, and in a food model system during the chilled storage of Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus). Results of in vitro assays allowed the conclusion that the aqueous flour extracts have antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Klebsiella pneumoniae) and proteobacteria (Vibrio alginolyticus), and against Gram-positive bacteria such as Bacillus cereus and B. subtilis. In the food model study, different concentrations of the flour extract were present in the icing medium, microbial and chemical analyses being carried out in fish muscle at different storage times. An inhibitory effect (p < 0.05) on microbial growth (aerobes, psychrotrophs, Enterobacteriaceae, and proteolytic and lipolytic bacteria) and on chemical quality indices (pH, total volatile amines, and trimethylamine) was concluded. This effect was more pronounced when the flour extract concentration in the ice increased and at advanced storage times. This study provides a first approach to the beneficial use of flour of the alga Gelidium as a new preserving strategy for chilled fish.Entities:
Keywords: Gelidium sp.; antimicrobial activity; aqueous extract; chilled storage; flour; in vitro assay; mackerel; quality enhancement
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406992 PMCID: PMC8997398 DOI: 10.3390/foods11070904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Pathogenic and spoilage bacteria selected for the microbial inhibition assay.
Antimicrobial activity of Gelidium flour extract on pathogenic and spoilage bacteria.
| Diameter of Inhibition Zone (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume of Alga Extract | |||
| Bacterial Species | 10 µL | 20 µL | 25 µL |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | |
| ND * | ND | ND | |
| ND | ND | ND | |
| ND | 13 | 14 | |
| 10 | 12 | 13 | |
| ND | 11 | 14 | |
| ND | ND | 11 | |
| ND | ND | 13 | |
| ND | 11 | 12 | |
| ND | ND | 11 | |
| ND | 11 | 13 | |
| ND | ND | 11 | |
| ND | 11 | 13 | |
* ND: not detected.
Minimum inhibitory concentration of Gelidium flour extract on selected bacteria.
| Bacterial Species | Breakpoint * |
|---|---|
| 12.5 mg·mL−1 | |
| 50 mg·mL−1 | |
| 3.125 mg·mL−1 | |
| 0.625 mg·mL−1 | |
| 25 mg·mL−1 | |
| 50 mg·mL−1 | |
| 25 mg·mL−1 | |
| 50 mg·mL−1 | |
| 50 mg·mL−1 |
* Lowest concentration exhibiting antimicrobial activity.
Figure 1Aerobic mesophiles (log CFU·g−1 muscle) in chilled mackerel subjected to different icing conditions. Mean values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are expressed by bars. Mean values accompanied by different lowercase letters (a, b) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of icing conditions; mean values accompanied by different capital letters (A–C) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of storage time. Icing conditions: CT (control; ice prepared without alga flour extract); AFE-1, AFE-2, and AFE-3 correspond to low, medium, and high concentrations of alga flour extracts, respectively.
Microbial development (log CFU·g−1 muscle) * in chilled mackerel subjected to different icing conditions **.
| Microbial Group | Icing Condition | Chilling Time (Days) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 | 11 | ||
| Psychrotrophs | CT | 2.99 A (0.53) | 3.89 aB (0.15) | 7.65 bC (0.28) |
| AFE-1 | 3.53 aA (0.66) | 7.65 bB (0.37) | ||
| AFE-2 | 3.58 aA (0.48) | 6.29 aB (0.04) | ||
| AFE-3 | 3.80 aB (0.21) | 6.36 aC (0.07) | ||
|
| CT | 1.00 A (0.00) | 1.10 aA (0.17) | 3.30 bB (0.30) |
| AFE-1 | 1.10 aA (0.17) | 2.51 abB (0.57) | ||
| AFE-2 | 1.10 aA (0.17) | 3.11 bB (0.64) | ||
| AFE-3 | 1.20 aA (0.35) | 2.19 aB (0.61) | ||
| Lipolytics | CT | 2.00 A (0.00) | 3.47 bB (0.16) | 5.65 aC (0.30) |
| AFE-1 | 2.75 aB (0.12) | 5.34 aC (0.44) | ||
| AFE-2 | 2.40 aA (0.46) | 5.28 aB (0.43) | ||
| AFE-3 | 2.79 aB (0.31) | 5.50 aC (0.61) | ||
* Mean values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated in brackets. Mean values followed by different lowercase letters (a, b) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of icing condition; mean values followed by different capital letters (A–C) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of storage time. ** Icing conditions (CT, AFE-1, AFE-2, and AFE-3) as expressed in Figure 1.
Figure 2Proteolytic bacteria (log CFU·g−1 muscle) in chilled mackerel subjected to different icing conditions. Mean values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are expressed by bars. Mean values accompanied by different lowercase letters (a, b) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of icing conditions; mean values accompanied by different capital letters (A–C) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of storage time. Icing conditions (CT, AFE-1, AFE-2, and AFE-3) as expressed in Figure 1.
Evolution of chemical parameters * related to microbial development in chilled mackerel subjected to different icing conditions **.
| Chemical Parameter | Icing Condition | Chilling Time (Days) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 | 11 | ||
| pH | CT | 5.70 A (0.02) | 5.89 aB (0.09) | 6.14 bC (0.05) |
| AFE-1 | 5.80 aA (0.08) | 5.99 aB (0.06) | ||
| AFE-2 | 5.91 aAB (0.17) | 6.04 abB (0.12) | ||
| AFE-3 | 5.97 aB (0.11) | 6.04 abB (0.14) | ||
| Total volatile base-nitrogen (TVB-N; mg·kg−1 muscle) | CT | 257.15 A (5.14) | 257.10 aA (23. 50) | 315.77 bB (5.62) |
| AFE-1 | 260.66 aA (6.31) | 311.23 bC (4.52) | ||
| AFE-2 | 260.60 aA (6.77) | 300.21 abB (21.60) | ||
| AFE-3 | 269.18 aAB (19.01) | 283.48 aB (14.28) | ||
| Trimethylamine-nitrogen (TMA-N; mg·kg−1 muscle) | CT | 0.55 A (0.13) | 3.43 bB (0.71) | 23.33 bC (0.43) |
| AFE-1 | 1.67 aB (0.48) | 13.61 aC (1.73) | ||
| AFE-2 | 1.41 aB (0.43) | 12.95 aC (4.13) | ||
| AFE-3 | 1.83 aB (0.58) | 11.59 aC (3.85) | ||
* Mean values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated in brackets. Mean values followed by different lowercase letters (a, b) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of storage temperature; mean values followed by different capital letters (A–C) denote significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of storage time. ** Icing conditions (CT, AFE-1, AFE-2, and AFE-3) as expressed in Figure 1.