| Literature DB >> 35406936 |
Imane Tagnaout1, Hannou Zerkani1, Nadia Hadi1, Bouchra El Moumen1, Fadoua El Makhoukhi1,2, Mohamed Bouhrim1, Rashad Al-Salahi3, Fahd A Nasr4, Hamza Mechchate5, Touriya Zair1.
Abstract
Thymus capitatus and Thymus broussonnetii are two Moroccan endemic medicinal plants used traditionally by the local population. The present study aims to investigate their essential oil chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities. The chemical composition of the essential oils was determined using the GC-MS analysis, the antioxidant activity assessed using DPPH and FRAP methods while the antimicrobial activity was evaluated against nine bacteria species tested (Enterococcus faecalis, Serratia fonticola, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella oxytoca, sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae, sensitive Escherichia coli, resistant Escherichia coli, resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterobacter aerogenes). The major identified compounds of T. capitatus essential oil where carvacrol (75%) and p-cymene (10.58%) while carvacrol (60.79%), thymol (12.9%), p-cymene (6.21%) and γ-terpinene (4.47%) are the main compounds in T. broussonnetii essential oil. The bioactivity of the essential oils of the two species of thyme was explained by their richness in oxygenated monoterpenes known for their great effectiveness with an IC50 of 3.48 ± 0.05 and 4.88 ± 0.04 μL/mL and EC50 of 0.12 ± 0.01 and 0.20 ± 0.02 μL/mL in the DPPH and FRAP assays, respectively, with an important antibacterial activity. These results encourage the use of these plants as a source of natural antioxidants, and antibacterial additives, to protect food from oxidative damage and to eliminate bacteria that are responsible for nosocomial infections.Entities:
Keywords: Thymus broussonetii; Thymus capitatus; antibacterial activity; antioxidant; chemical composition
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406936 PMCID: PMC9003487 DOI: 10.3390/plants11070954
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1GC-MS chromatogram of T. capitatus (1) and T.broussonetii (2) EOs.
Chemical composition of T. capitatus and T. broussonetii EOs.
| N° | Compounds | IK |
|
| Formula | M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | α-Thujene | 930 | - | 0.38 | C10H16 | 136 |
| 2 | α-pinene | 939 | 0.54 | 0.54 | C10H16 | 136 |
| 3 | Camphene | 954 | 0.14 | - | C10H16 | 136 |
| 4 | Octen-3-ol | 979 | 0.49 | 0.71 | C8H16 O | 128 |
| 5 | 979 | - | 0.09 | C10H16 | 136 | |
| 6 | Myrcene | 990 | 0.88 | 0.97 | C10H16 | 136 |
| 7 | α-Phellandrene | 1002 | - | 0.15 | C10H16 | 136 |
| 8 | 1004 | 0.25 | - | C10H16 | 136 | |
| 9 | δ-3-Carene | 1011 | 0.09 | - | C10H16 | 136 |
| 10 | α–Terpinene | 1017 | 0.36 | - | C10H16 | 136 |
| 11 | 1026 | 10.58 | 6.21 | C10H14 | 134 | |
| 12 | Limonene | 1029 | 0.39 | 0.31 | C10H16 | 136 |
| 13 | 1029 | - | 0.19 | C10H16 | 136 | |
| 14 | γ–Terpinene | 1059 | 0.53 | 4.47 | C10H16 | 136 |
| 15 | (Z)-Sabinene hydrate | 1070 | - | 0.33 | C10H18 | 138 |
| 16 | 1085 | 0.11 | - | C10H12 | 132 | |
| 17 | Terpinolene | 1088 | - | 1.2 | C10H16 | 136 |
| 18 | Linalool | 1096 | 2.29 | 0.14 | C10H18O | 154 |
| 19 | (E)-Sabinene hydrate | 1098 | - | 0.16 | C10H18O2 | 170 |
| 20 | Terpinen-4-ol | 1177 | 0.20 | 0.74 | C10H18O | 154 |
| 21 | Borneol | 1169 | - | 0.25 | C10H18O | 154 |
| 23 | α-terpineol | 1188 | - | 0.09 | C10H18O | 154 |
| 24 | Carvacrol, methyl ether | 1244 | - | 0.2 | C11H16O | 164 |
| 25 | Thymol | 1290 | 0.18 | 12.9 | C10H14O | 150 |
| 26 | Carvacrol | 1299 | 75 | 60.79 | C10H14O | 150 |
| 27 | Terpinylisobutyrate | 1473 | 0.14 | - | C14H24O2 | 224 |
| 28 | Piperitenone | 1343 | 0.06 | - | C10H14O | 150 |
| 29 | Eugenol | 1359 | 0.15 | - | C10H12O2 | 164 |
| 30 | Trans-sobrerol | 1374 | 0.1 | - | C10H18O2 | 170 |
| 31 | ( | 1419 | 1.61 | 4.15 | C15H24 | 204 |
| 32 | Aromadendrene | 1441 | - | 0.90 | C15H24 | 204 |
| 33 | α-Humulene | 1454 | - | 0.13 | C15H24 | 204 |
| 34 | 9-epi-(e)-caryophyllene | 1466 | - | 0.19 | C15H24 | 204 |
| 35 | Muurolene<γ-> | 1479 | - | 0.19 | C15H24 | 204 |
| 36 | Viridiflorene | 1496 | - | 0.76 | C15H24 | 204 |
| 37 | 1505 | 0.79 | 0.47 | C15H24 | 204 | |
| 38 | δ-Cadinene | 1523 | - | 0.34 | C15H24 | 204 |
| 39 | ( | 1524 | 0.28 | - | C15H24 | 204 |
| 40 | Thymohydroquinone | 1555 | 0.69 | - | C10H14O2 | 166 |
| 41 | Epoxy caryophyllene | 1583 | 1.50 | 0.16 | C15H24O | 220 |
| 42 | Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dien-5α-ol | 1640 | 0.10 | - | C15H24O | 220 |
| 43 | Selina-3,11-dien-6-α-ol | 1644 | 0.25 | - | C15H24O | 220 |
| 44 | Germacra-4(15),5,10(14)-trien-1α-ol | 1686 | 0.22 | - | C15H24O | 220 |
| 45 | Geranyl benzoate | 1959 | 0.56 | - | C17H22O2 | 258 |
| 46 | 2237 | - | 0.23 | C21H32O | 300 | |
| Percentage of monoterpenes hydrocarbons | 13.87 | 14.84 | ||||
| Percentage of oxygenated monoterpenes | 79.3 | 75.98 | ||||
| Percentage of sesquiterpenes hydrocarbons | 2.68 | 7.13 | ||||
| Percentage of oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 2.63 | 0.39 | ||||
| Total identified (%) | 98.48 | 98.34 | ||||
Figure 2Distribution of the main chemical families of T. capitatus and T. broussonetii EOs.
Figure 3IC50 and EC50 of T. capitatus and T. broussonetii EOs and of BHA standard measured by DPPH (1) and FRAP (2) methods. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. The experiment was performed in a minimum of three replicates. *** p < 0.001 compared to the samples (1); *** p < 0.001 compared to the control BHA (2).
Figure 4Total antioxidant capacity (Abs. at 695 nm) of T. capitatus and T. broussonetii essential oils; with the regression curve of ascorbic acid. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. The experiment was performed in a minimum of three replicates.
Antibacterial activities of T. capitatus and T. broussonetii EOs and of antibiotics (FOX30, TIM85, PRL100) using the disk diffusion method (mm).
| Strains |
|
| Antibiotics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOX30 | TIM85 | PRL100 | |||
|
| 23.6 ± 0.85 abc | 20.85 ± 0.75 abc | 0 | 0 | 9 ± 0.00 |
|
| 9.3 ± 0.35 abc | 8.55 ± 0.2 abc | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 49.8 ± 0.28 abc | 45.35 ± 0.65 abc | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 22.6 ± 0.57 c | 20.7 ± 1.20 c | 21 ± 0.00 | 15 ± 0.00 | 10.5 ± 0.00 |
|
| 49.9 ± 0.14 abc | 48.05 ± 0.95 abc | 0 | 0 | 11 ± 0.00 |
| 19.95 ± 0.07 bc | 14.15 ± 0.15 bc | 12 ± 0.00 | 0 ± 0.00 | 0 | |
| 45.2 ± 1.13 abc | 45.6 ± 0.4 abc | 22 ± 0.00 | 9 ± 0.00 | 0 | |
| 15.5 ± 0.7 abc | 14.65 ± 0.35 abc | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 28.7 ± 0.42 bc | 28.9 ± 0.3 bc | 20 ± 0.00 | 14 ± 0.00 | 10 ± 0.00 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. The experiment was performed in a minimum of three replicates. Significance level of at least p < 0.05 compared to FOX30 (a), TIM85 (b), PRL100 (c).
Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) and the MBC/MIC report values (mg/mL) of T. capitatus and T. broussonetii EOs.
| Strains | Essential Oils | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| MIC | MBC | MBC/MIC | MIC | MBC | MBC/MIC | |
|
| 4 ± 0.000 | 80 ± 0.00 | 20 ± 0.003 | 8 ± 0.002 | 8 ± 0.003 | 2 ± 0.000 |
|
| 16 ± 0.005 | 32 ± 0.009 | 1 ± 0.001 | 32 ± 0.001 | 32 ± 0.00 | 1 ± 0.004 |
|
| 4 ± 0.001 | 8 ± 0.001 | 2 ± 0.006 | 4 ± 0.001 | 4 ± 0.001 | 1 ± 0.001 |
| 2 ± 0.005 | 4 ± 0.00 | 2 ± 0.00 | 2 ± 0.001 | 4 ± 0.002 | 2 ± 0.001 | |
| 8 ± 0.002 | 32 ± 0.004 | 4 ± 0.001 | 16 ± 0.003 | 32 ± 0.007 | 1 ± 0.001 | |
|
| 4 ± 0.003 | 8 ± 0.001 | 1 ± 0.002 | 4 ± 0.001 | 8 ± 0.002 | 1 ± 0.000 |
|
| 4 ± 0.006 | 8 ± 0.003 | 1 ± 0.006 | 4 ± 0.007 | 8 ± 0.001 | 1 ± 0.000 |
| 2 ± 0.00 | 4 ± 0.004 | 10 ± 0.001 | 2 ± 0.005 | 4 ± 0.008 | 1 ± 0.000 | |
|
| 4 ± 0.002 | 4 ± 0.00 | 20 ± 0.002 | 4 ± 0.008 | 8 ± 0.002 | 2 ± 0.003 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. The experiment was performed in a minimum of three replicates.
Figure 5Morphological profile of T. capitatus (Left) and T. broussonetii (Right).