| Literature DB >> 35406853 |
Hwa Pyoung Lee1, Dong Seon Kim1, Sang Hee Park2, Chae Yun Shin2, Jin Joo Woo2, Ji Won Kim1, Ren-Bo An3, Changyoung Lee4, Jae Youl Cho1.
Abstract
Skin aging is a natural process influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, and many skin anti-aging strategies have been developed. Plants from the genus Potentilla has been used in Europe and Asia to treat various diseases. Potentilla paradoxa Nutt. has been used as a traditional medicinal herb in China and has recently been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects. Despite the biological and pharmacological potential of Potentilla paradoxa Nutt., its skin anti-aging effects remain unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the free radical scavenging, moisturizing, anti-melanogenic, and wound-healing effects of an ethanol extract of Potentilla paradoxa Nutt. (Pp-EE). Pp-EE was found to contain phenolics and flavonoids and exhibits in vitro antioxidant activities. α-Linolenic acid was found to be a major component of Pp-EE on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pp-EE promoted the expression of hyaluronic acid (HA) synthesis-related enzymes and suppressed the expression of HA degradation-related enzymes in keratinocytes, so it may increase skin hydration. Pp-EE also showed inhibitory effects on the production and secretion of melanin in melanocytes. In a scratch assay, Pp-EE improved skin wound healing. Taken together, Pp-EE has several effects that may delay skin aging, suggesting its potential benefits as a natural ingredient in cosmetic or pharmaceutical products.Entities:
Keywords: Potentilla paradoxa Nutt.; anti-melanogenesis; antioxidant capacity; moisturizing; wound healing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35406853 PMCID: PMC9003520 DOI: 10.3390/plants11070873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Total phenolic and flavonoid content of Pp-EE.
| Extract | TPC 1 | TFC 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Pp-EE | 273.26 ± 2.28 | 102.08 ± 2.95 |
1 Expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalent/g of extract. 2 Expressed as mg of quercetin equivalent/g extract.
Figure 1Antioxidative capacity of Pp-EE. (A,B) The radical scavenging activities of Pp-EE and ascorbic acid were evaluated using the (A) ABTS and (B) DPPH assays. (C,D) The abilities of Pp-EE and Trolox to chelate transition metals were assessed by the (C) FRAP and (D) CUPRAC assays. (E) The cytotoxicity of Pp-EE on HaCaT cells was evaluated using the MTT assay. (F) The intracellular ROS levels in HaCaT cells were detected by fluorescence microscope and flow cytometry. Results (A–E) are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. ## p < 0.01 compared with the positive control group, and * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with the normal group. ABTS: 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, FRAP: ferric reducing antioxidant power, CUPRAC: cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity.
Figure 2The GC-MS chromatogram of Pp-EE. GC-MS was performed as a phytochemical screen.
Phytochemical analysis of ethanol extract of Potentilla paradoxa Nutt. by GC-MS.
| Peak No. | RT 1 | Name of the Compound | Type of the | Peak Area % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.680 | Dimethyl sulfone | Sulfoxide | 1.140 |
| 2 | 5.440 | 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- | Pyrone | 1.333 |
| 3 | 7.569 | 2-Propanamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso- | - | 1.292 |
| 4 | 7.705 | 4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- | Pyrone | 6.864 |
| 5 | 8.687 | Benzofuran, 2,3-dihydro- | Benzofuran | 1.332 |
| 6 | 8.829 | 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural | Alcohol | 10.547 |
| 7 | 9.035 | 1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-acetate | Glyceride | 3.347 |
| 8 | 9.452 | Methyl 4-(methylthio)butyrate | Fatty ester | 2.007 |
| 9 | 9.530 | 2,4-Dihydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furan-3-one | - | 2.249 |
| 10 | 10.092 | 2-Methoxy-4-vinylphenol | Phenol | 2.244 |
| 11 | 11.682 | Benzaldehyde, 3-methoxy- | Benzaldehyde | 8.468 |
| 12 | 13.348 | Methyl-.beta.-D-thiogalactoside | Glucoside | 6.937 |
| 13 | 13.536 | D-erythro-Pentose, 2-deoxy- | Carbohydrate | 2.028 |
| 14 | 16.608 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester | Organic acid | 0.761 |
| 15 | 17.436 | Fatty Acid | 8.383 | |
| 16 | 17.549 | Dibutyl phthalate | Organic acid | 1.411 |
| 17 | 18.926 | Phytol | Diterpenoid | 3.241 |
| 18 | 19.088 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- | Fatty acid | 2.894 |
| 19 | 19.161 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)- | Fatty acid | 20.397 |
| 20 | 19.319 | Octadecanoic acid | Fatty acid | 3.276 |
| 21 | 19.436 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, ethyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)- | Fatty acid | 2.564 |
| 22 | 22.618 | Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | Organic acid | 1.225 |
| 23 | 23.730 | Linolenic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester (Z,Z,Z)- | Glyceride | 1.369 |
| 24 | 23.951 | 1,2,4-Triazol-3-amine, 5-(1,3,5-trimethyl-4-pyrazolyl)amino- | Triazole | 1.352 |
| 25 | 27.161 | Vitamin E | Tocopherol | 1.424 |
| 26 | 29.385 | Hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane | Siloxane | 1.913 |
1 Retention time (min).
Figure 3Effects of Pp-EE on parameters that can affect skin moisture. (A–G) The mRNA levels of HAS-1, HAS-2, HAS-3, Hyal-1, Hyal-2, Hyal-3, and Hyal-4 in Pp-EE-treated HaCaT cells were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. The fold increase represents the ratio of the increased mRNA expression level of Pp-EE-treated groups to the mRNA expression level of the normal group. (H) The total and phosphorylated forms of PI3K, AKT, HAS-2, and HAS-3 were measured using immunoblotting analysis. (I–L) The relative intensities of the immunoblots were determined using ImageJ. All results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with the normal group.
Figure 4Anti-melanogenesis activity of Pp-EE in melanocytes. (A) The cytotoxicity of Pp-EE in B16F10 cells was assessed using the MTT assay. (B,C) The effects of Pp-EE on melanin content and secretion in B16F10 cells were evaluated using the melanin generation assay. (D–G) The mRNA levels of MITF, tyrosinase, TYRP-1, and TYRP-2 were checked in B16F10 cells treated with Pp-EE or arbutin using real-time PCR. The fold increase represents the ratio of the increased mRNA expression level of α-MSH-, Pp-EE-, or arbutin-treated groups to the mRNA expression level of the normal group. (H) The total and phosphorylated forms of PKA and MITF were measured in an immunoblotting analysis. (I,J) The relative intensities of the immunoblots were determined using ImageJ. All the results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. ## p < 0.01 compared with the normal group, and * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Figure 5Pp-EE promotes wound-healing processes in keratinocytes. (A) The wound-healing activity of Pp-EE in HaCaT cells was evaluated using an in vitro scratch assay. (B) The scratch area closed by Pp-EE was determined using ImageJ. (C) Confluent HaCaT cells were scratched several times and then treated with Pp-EE (0, 12.5, and 25 μg/mL) for 12 h. The mRNA expression of K17 was measured by RT-PCR. (D) The relative intensities of K17 mRNA were determined using ImageJ. The fold increase represents the ratio of the increased mRNA expression level of scratched groups to the mRNA expression level of the normal group. (E) Several scratches were created on confluent HaCaT cells, which were then treated with Pp-EE (0, 12.5, and 25 μg/mL) for 12 h. The total and phosphorylated forms of AKT and ERK were measured in an immunoblotting analysis. (F,G) The relative intensities of the immunoblots were determined using ImageJ. All the results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. # p < 0.05 compared with the normal group, and * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with the control group.
Sequences of primers used for PCR.
| PCR Type | Gene Name | Sequence (5′–3′) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RT-PCR | K17 | Forward | CATGCAGGCCTTGGAGATAGA |
| Reverse | CACGCAGTAGCGGTTCTCTGT | ||
| GAPDH | Forward | CACTCACGGCAAATTCAACGGCAC | |
| Reverse | GACTCCACGACATACTCAGCAC | ||
| Real-time PCR | HAS-1 | Forward | TGTATCCTGCATCAGCGGTC |
| Reverse | GCCGGTCATCCCCAAAAGTA | ||
| HAS-2 | Forward | GTGGATGACCTACGAAGCGA | |
| Reverse | TACCCCGGTAGAAGAGCTGG | ||
| HAS-3 | Forward | TTGGCCTCATTCCTGTGTCC | |
| Reverse | CTGGCAATAAGCTGTGTAGGC | ||
| Hyal-1 | Forward | TGTGGACGTGGATGTCAGTG | |
| Reverse | GTAGTAGGGGTAGGTGCCCA | ||
| Hyal-2 | Forward | ATGTGCAGAACTGGGAGAGC | |
| Reverse | GGAAGCAAGTGTCTCGTCCA | ||
| Hyal-3 | Forward | TCTGGGCATCATAGCCAACC | |
| Reverse | AGAGGCCGAGTTGGTTCTTG | ||
| Hyal-4 | Forward | AACTGCATCCAAGGCCAACT | |
| Reverse | CTCAGCAGCTCTGGTCACAT | ||
| MITF | Forward | TCCGTTTCTTCTGCGCTCAT | |
| Reverse | CTGATGGACGATGCCCTCTC | ||
| Tyrosinase | Forward | GTCCACTCACAGGGATAGCAG | |
| Reverse | AGAGTCTCTGTTATGGCCGA | ||
| TYRP-1 | Forward | ATGGAACGGGAGGACAAACC | |
| Reverse | TCCTGACCTGGCCATTGAAC | ||
| TYRP-2 | Forward | CAGTTTCCCCGAGTCTGCAT | |
| Reverse | GTCTAAGGCGCCCAAGAACT | ||
| GAPDH | Forward | GACAGTCAGCCGCATCTTCT | |
| Reverse | GCGCCAATACGACCAAATC | ||
| GAPDH | Forward | TGTGAACGGATTTGGCCGTA | |
| Reverse | ACTGTGCCGTTGAATTTGCC | ||
Figure 6Schematic representation showing the skin moisturizing, whitening, and wound-healing effects and antioxidant capacity of Pp-EE.